Dear Amrit,

Thank you for a short but very clear essay that explains your position towards the Big Bang.

I know that you are able to write books about the subject, and also I agree with you.

You read my latest article in "Conscious Exploration & Research", in this essay I am still more clearly trying to explain "intellectual try-outs" like the BB.

Good luck in the contest.

Thank you for taking the time and making comment on it.

best rgards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3411

5 days later

Dear Amrit ji,

You caught a wonderful point in Bigbang ...."To reach the size of today's observed and mapped universe, according to the Big Bang model, the universe should expand since its beginning with the speed of 1,02тИЩ109??тИ'1 . The velocity of light is 3тИЩ108??тИ'1?. To reach today radius universe should expand with the velocity v which should be 3,34 times bigger than light speed."

There are 100 more well publicized problems of this theory, like Dark matter, Dark energy, blue shifted Galaxies, Blackholes....... etc..... This 101th.

Then how Bigbang is surviving?

Just only because of UNLiMITED FUNDs availability. Scientists, Authors and researchers were not given freedom. I dont know why?....

I am also a against Bigbang person,

I just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the " real open thinking" is supported. Have a look at my essay please.

"A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory's Philosophy"

=snp.gupta

Dear Gupta,

BB cosmology is not "scientific theory", this is a silly idea. It is not falsifiable, it is not bijective, this is a fairy tale.

I work that in 2020 BB cosmology will become a history of physics.

Nothing in this model works, incredible how still they teach it at universities.

If we will get the support of FQXI than the BB cosmology abolishing process could start. But I hardly believe in their support. At the end of this essay story, they will ignore us and give awards to other researchers. They do not dare to contradict BB cosmology. Today in science you have to follow the mainstream, otherwise, you are out of the game. The game of money and success.Attachment #1: 5_-_A_THREE-DIMENSIONAL_NON-LOCAL_QUANTUM_VACUUM_AS_THE_ORIGIN_OF_PHOTONS.pdf

a month later
14 days later
5 days later

Dear Amrit,

I have read your essay and comments with great interest. Excellent intellectual attack on the philosophically naive hypothesis of the "big bang".

You write

"What we can measure for sure exists. In order to build the most accurate computable picture of the universe I propose in this essay a bijectivity principle: in the modelling of the universe we will use only what is measurable. We will use only obtained data. "

I would also add: an understanding of the model of the Universe (for all people on Earth) and its heuristic. First of all, understanding of its ontological structure and, as a consequence, the nature of fundamental constants, the structure of space, the nature of time, information, consciousness.

Did you sign this An Open Letter ?

Where can I read the ontological justification (basification) for your model of the Universe?

With kind regards,

Vladimir

Dear Amrit.short but very potent essay.rated you highly.i too think that we may be losing out a lot by ignoring how it all came to be here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525.i think the most popular cosmology theory may be way off Mark.kindly take your time to review.any feedback appreciated.Thanks .All the best

Dear Mark. FQXi is good. We can publish our science here. But remember we will nevdr get any reward. FQXI will always give awaeds to established prof of physics who are lost in their mind. They are talking nonsense. They are not able to make any progress. This is it. Send me your work on my mail. sorli.amrit@gmail.com

Excellent! The main thing for me is that you are against the "big bang" hypothesis. The highest score. But I believe that an ontological justification (basification) is still necessary. Time is a phenomenon and we need to look for a basic noumenon. Plus a hundred-year problem with the "foundations of mathematics", but means with knowledge in general. The crisis of understanding "takes by the throat" not only fundamental science, but also global society.

If you have time, look also at my dialectic-ontological ideas .

With kind regards,

Vladimir

13 days later

Dear Sorli,

excellent essay. BB is an artificial model that cannot happen in nature. I have another model of emergence of Universe. The Universe can also occur without BB. Emergence of Universe from nothing is disclosed in:

Big Bang without Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0037

Before Big Bang. http://viXra.org/abs/1901.0141.

More over, this explains the absence of antimatter in the Universe: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330986087_Hypothesis_of_Tetraverse.

Best regards

Ilgaitis