Metadynamics by Christine Cordula Dantas

Hello Dr Dantas,

Very relevant general analysis and innovative extrapolation. I liked your metadynamics like a conceptual space of physical attributes that are self-referential, and symmetries related to these attributes lead to laws.

I see so many convergences with the topological spaces, euclidian spaces,and lie Groups and derivatives more the 3D spheres if they are the foundamental mathematical and physical objects of course but I cannot affirm. The points of geometrodynamics or the strings can maybe be conjectured if you analyse deeper the goentrizations and topologies more the rankings of fields and matters. The maths and this metadynamics seem relevant for our physics if they are well harmonised with our pure determinism. Very relevant essay, one of my favorites, you are innovative and it is essential, I wish you all the best in this Contest.

Best Regards

Christine I enjoyed your essay and I enjoyed your thinking process. I have a "recent discovery" that you may want to use to adjust your hypothesis. This "discovery" is introduced in my essay--Clarification of Physics---. What it introduces is a new Successful Self Creation theory and a new "lowest level of creation". In reading your essay I was struck by how this lowest level is your ...associated layer of physical reality which is not mathematically expressible.--and the -- (yet to be uncovered) extension of logical systems". However, in my essay appendix, I show that this level is mathematically expressible. It is the lowest level that initially associates physical reality and mathematics. This association carries through its scale up to become the mathematical/universe that I discovered. This lowest level is also the lowest level that "associates" math, physics, the rest of science, philosophy - logic and reason, and religion.

This discovery refutes many of your conclusions. However, the inclusion of this discovery in your excellent thinking about meta- correlations should lead to results that "mirrow ? this is a new term for me" the actual creation of the mathematical-physical universe. It can also be extended to the other disciplines -philosophy etc. I hope you read my essay and comment. If you have any questions, put them in your comments or e mail me. John Crowell

Christine I recently revised (added to) my initial essay. So be sure to read and comment on the current essay. John

hi christian. nice work. like your philosophical work.youve slotted something on the human brain.great art piece.you have my high ratei did something on anthropocentric bias here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3525 please read/rate.all the best in the contest.

Dear Christine,

It was a pleasure to read your essay, it is innovative and with brilliant ideas. I like your idea of metadynamics, and I think it has an important foundational and philosophical potential. I particularly liked this:

We can prove the impossibility of proving something!.

Your

Proposition. We cannot deduce all the physical laws from the initial conditions of the Universe.

and your remark that

this "physical incompleteness" is not just the reflection of a mathematical incompleteness for describing a physical law, but the realization of physical laws that cannot be described mathematically

are thought provoking. I've seen several attempts to get out of the box of mathematics or the physical law itself, but they usually are very vague, while I think yours is by far more concrete and of better potential, by the combination of ergodic theory with no-go results like Gödel's. Although I hope we are not limited to know the physical laws, on the other hand I am a bit mysterian, so this wouldn't mind me that much :-)

Thank you for the great reading, and success with the contest!

Cheers,

Cristi