Dear Terry

5.

...........................Your words .................................

And an addendum: I was serious in my comment above about century-old simplicity still being predictive of where physics must head in the future. For example, the recent HAWC Collaboration data seems to imply that special relativity is never violated. So why not make this into a fundamental hypothesis? That is, what would be the full implications to physics and mathematics of hypothesizing that at their deepest roots both are based not on Euclidean spaces, but on Minkowski spaces? ......................

Dynamic Universe Model uses Euclidean spaces and Galilean Transformations, but not Minkowski spaces. Here in this model, space is space and time is time. No inter-dependencies between axes. All are linear and mutually exclusive....

This simple system solved all these problems. This system was thought formed frame work in the beginning of 1980 or so

...........................Your words...................

That may sound easy, or even "of course" like what we are already doing, but I assure you it is not. For survival purposes our brains are hardwired to think in terms of Euclidean spaces, and those are at best narrow, local-only, and unavoidably approximate subsets of the Minkowski spaces of special relativity.

Well said!

Best Regards

=snp

Dear Terry,

6.

...........................Your words...................

For example, the recent HAWC Collaboration data seems to imply that special relativity is never violated.

..................................

In the post above number 5, I just forgot to mention about Special Relativity.

In some of the simulation of Dynamic Universe Model, I found that light goes faster than 300000 km / sec some times. That was in line some experimental results....

...........................Your words...................

Taking Poincare symmetries as a starting point would require us to abandon the primacy of Euclidean spaces. But to take the idea to its logical limit, this would need to apply not just to physics, but to the mathematics we use to describe physics. That is because the Euclidean concepts that we toss about so freely and without thought in mathematical fields and such are necessary approximations created by the hard-wiring of our brains to take advantage of the narrow, low-energy environment in which we must think quickly to survive. So just how radical might such a transformation be?

.................... I don't know, Dynamic Universe Model, uses Euclidean spaces, only those experts who used Poincare symmetries can say about that.

Best

=snp

Dear Terry

7.

...........................Your words...................

One impact is much of the mathematics of physics would suddenly and necessarily become part of a much broader context, since any Euclidean space -- even those implied by simple arrays of numbers in a computer -- would be newly understood as local-only approximates of some much larger Minkowski space, one that only looks Euclidean to our small-scale, limited-range, biologically enforced perceptions. If you play with such ideas seriously for a while, you will discover they are a bit mind-bending. Minkowski himself glimpsed this a century ago in his famous talk on the merger of space and time into a single entity. Yet even Minkowski struggled with the idea a bit, as seen in the infinities that creep into his discussion of how to define Euclidean space as a limit Minkowski space.

..................................

I dont think so, There is no evidence that larger scales are non Euclidean.

There is no harm in using Euclidean spaces in large scale.

Why space time continuum is required at all???

Best

=snp

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

Glad to read your work again.

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

    Hello SNP!

    I think you make a lot of good points in your essay! At the end, you state "Any new theory with such principles should do good to humanity in any other branch of science." Do you think this could extend to animals and other biological groups of creatures as well? I mean, not things like harmful pathogenic bacteria, but in terms of creatures like orangutans and lemurs? Or do you think that if we truly cared about the well-being of humanity, then these creatures would automatically be taken care of because they are a part of our environment? Curious to know how your ideas extend to other parts of biology!

    Cheers!

    Alyssa

      Dear Vladimir,

      Cpasiba vam balshoya, glya vas post , ya zabil Rusci yazik, ya bil va kiev glya 6 myasas in 1982.... I am sorry for many mistakes.

      Being a mechanical engineer, you wrote such a wonderful essay, my congratulations

      Thank you for picturesque essay, easily understandable. I gave the best ratings just now for your wonderful essay,I saw you have developed wonderful applications even....Please check you mail, we will be corresponding on quantum mechanics. See my blog for further details of my papers please....

      ' http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/ '

      Best

      =snp

      Dear Dr.Alyssa Adams,

      Thank you for appreciating my essay with kind words. These principles are applicable any theory in any branch of Science, truthfulness will be recognized now are some time later. We should be honest that's all.

      I did not understand your question, If the ants have their own social customs ,I cant understand their language!!

      For human observable species including ants, we can apply these methodology without any problem. I will help you with the formation of a new theory, if you are forming one. Should be kind to other humans as well as other creatures. Then environment will be taken cared off automatically.

      I gave the best rating as i promised. Thank you for your post on my essay. We will communicate further with Email for bio problems, please check mail....

      Best wishes to your essay

      =snp

      Dear Satyavarapu,

      Your essay stands out as dealing with the background philosophy of science, procedure and human action, even before we talk about "what the universe is like." This is a very important interdisciplinary purpose and attempt to provide ground rules for trying to carry out what the Contest questions (not just this one) are asking us to think about. I agree with many of your prescriptions, however: we can't readily avoid complex numbers in physics and our theories. They seem necessary to make quantum mechanics workable and elegant (to the extent that it is, before measurement issues muddy things.) Your sort of plea for simplicity is being heard more and more as many people tire of trying to get insights or useful predictions out of string theory (altho some surprising connections to quantum effects have been claimed.) Cheers.

      Also: readers might want to take at look at my own essay, addressing the issue of the strong correlations of entanglement and how mechanistic-style models of quantum physics aren't enough to explain them.

        Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

        I agree with you, the simplest answer is usually the correct answer and integrity is important in all pursuits. I also agree with you that new theories should stimulate and inspire thought. But why no black holes, why no worm holes? Why no big bang, why no repulsion between distant bodies?

        cc walters

        Dear Neil Bates,

        Thank you for really critically studying my essay. I am working on this Dynamic Universe Model for the Last 40 years. Its many predictions came true and it solved many unsolved problems in Cosmology and astrophysics. It was my experience what i wrote in my essay. Though may be Undecidability, Uncomputability, and Unpredictability are related to quantum physics, but these qualities are frequently seen in other parts of Physics also like Cosmology and Computer sciences.

        This essay and Dynamic Universe Model does not go into quantum Physics.

        Usage of Imaginary numbers practically gave many times confusing results, non achievable or realizable view points and difficult to digest statements.

        How will you represent an imaginary axes perpendicular to time axis????

        And a question for you, can you please tell me how these imaginary numbers are useful in quantum physics....???

        Best

        =snp

        Dear nancy walters,

        I am replying here to both of your observations. Your nice words ..............I agree with you in that a predictable universe is safer. I do look at weather reports often. I'm very grateful to know if it will rain tomorrow, or to know if an astroid is heading our way, or to know if a tsunami is heading our way. Predictability is valued

        ....................... I think the predictability depends on how well you take all the factors of nature or Physics and depends on how well you model the situation, mathematics is used for describing physics, but not the other way round.....

        Your nice words......................

        However my point is that it is not absolute. Predictability is based on probability. A 40% chance of rain tomorrow tells you the odds are it will not rain. But it could. Our universe is predictable to a point. But it's that point that keeps it from being predictable, computable and decided. There is always an unknown factor that can disrupt the system.

        ................... That is not correct. Newtonian Physics, Cosmology or Engineering does not depend on Probability, Quantum Physics works on probability. I dont know exactly about equations and physical factors used for making weather reports. it is entirely different science. .....

        Your nice Observation here.................. I agree with you, the simplest answer is usually the correct answer and integrity is important in all pursuits. I also agree with you that new theories should stimulate and inspire thought.

        ................. Thank you for agreeing!

        Your nice words here...................

        But why no black holes, why no worm holes? Why no big bang,

        .............. Because these are having infinities. Physics CAN not have any infinity, because it is physically existing.

        Your nice words here...................

        why no repulsion between distant bodies?

        ................... It is not required here in Dynamic Universe Model. In Newtonian Static universe all bodies will collapse into a lump due to gravitation. But Dynamic Universe model proves that when a set of bodies are allowed on SELF gravitation they will start rotating about each other and don't collapse. Probably in some Universe Models like Bigbang model it is required to assume that distant Galaxies move away from each other. Bigbang model ignores existence of Blue shifted Galaxies

        Lets discuss any further of your observations...

        Best regards

        =snp

        This is regarding Dynamic Universe Model, so I copied this podst here

        Author Malcolm Riddoch replied on May. 20, 2020 @ 03:35 GMT

        Hi snp,

        and yes no fear, I rated your essay on May 12!

        As for your Dynamic Universe Model, well there's a lot of fundamental concepts there! For me, starting from my fundamental concept of fundamental conceptual indeterminacy I can only say that I agree with 'dynamis' as a fundamental concept and all that it implies.

        Dynamis as pure potentiality from which constantly emerges actuality/enargeia with entelecheia as its organizing principle is, again for me, at the centre of the ever-changing essence of an observer dependent universe.

        What comes to presence and what leaves, in its becoming and constant dissolution, what is / what it gives comes from nowhere and nowhere does it go, thus time and its spatiality and all things are in flux/dynamis.

        Which is to say the wave function of the universe is pure potentiality from which this humble sub-system is constantly evolving in a reflection of that potentiality as the actuality of its observable universe. And I think it's that dynamic moment of actualisation--the observer's 'phenomenal experience'--that is the crux of this entelecheiac matter!

        Wheeler saw the general picture decades ago, but the mathematical formalists are still largely stuck in their early modern classical delusions. I'm interested in how we might construct a semantic bridge between that old classical world and the quantum world picture that is slowly forming on the horizon of our collective understanding. And so your own stirring of that pot here on FQXi is also very much to the point!

        Dear Prof. Malcolm Riddoch

        Your words.......................

        and yes no fear, I rated your essay on May 12!..................

        Thank you , What ever it may be, It is your frank opinion on my essay.

        your words..........................

        As for your Dynamic Universe Model, well there's a lot of fundamental concepts there! For me, starting from my fundamental concept of fundamental conceptual indeterminacy I can only say that I agree with 'dynamis' as a fundamental concept and all that it implies............................

        Wonderful sir, thank you..............

        Your words............................

        Dynamis as pure potentiality from which constantly emerges actuality/enargeia with entelecheia as its organizing principle ..................

        Here entelecheia is UGF, the Universal Gravitational force which is the vectorial resultant gravitational forces acting on any mass by all the bodies in the universe. This UGF is is not a constant forces, but varies with time and position of mass in space. This is the cause of the movement of the mass under consideration.

        Your words............................

        is, again for me, at the centre of the ever-changing essence of an observer dependent universe.............

        The view of the Universe changes dynamically due to movement of masses caused by gravitation,and gravitation is the main force that causes all these movements.

        Our Universe is not observer dependent , but it is observer independent. For every person the macro cosmological universe looks same.

        I will continue....

        Best

        =snp

          Dear Prof. Malcolm Riddoch

          You wrote a thought Provoking reply, wonderful....!!!

          2.

          Your words.......................

          What comes to presence and what leaves, in its becoming and constant dissolution, what is / what it gives comes from nowhere and nowhere does it go, thus time and its spatiality and all things are in flux/dynamis...............

          Wow wonderful definition, This Universe is always Dynamically moving. This Dynamism Is the center point of all the processes, correctly said...........

          Your words.....................

          Which is to say the wave function of the universe is pure potentiality from which this humble sub-system is constantly evolving in a reflection of that potentiality as the actuality of its observable universe. .....................

          You mean the view is different after the after the boundaries of observable Universe according to your words ' this humble sub-system is constantly evolving in a reflection of that potentiality as the actuality of its observable universe '?????????.

          So if you use a bigger telescope, the diameter of the Observable Universe Increases, and you will see a different view ??????????????????

          Your words....................

          And I think it's that dynamic moment of actualisation--the observer's 'phenomenal experience'--that is the crux of this entelecheiac matter!

          ...................

          So for one observer the Astrophysical view of the sky is different to another observer.... you mean to say? I dont think sky looks different to different people.

          your words........................

          Wheeler saw the general picture decades ago, but the mathematical formalists are still largely stuck in their early modern classical delusions. I'm interested in how we might construct a semantic bridge between that old classical world and the quantum world picture that is slowly forming on the horizon of our collective understanding. And so your own stirring of that pot here on FQXi is also very much to the point!

          .....................

          Dynamic Universe Model takes and solves this Astronomical Universe as an N-Body Problem solution. I dont know much about quantum mechanics....

          questions are.........

          1. Will this quantum mechanics be solved as another N-body problem solution

          .....???

          2. What are the fundamental forces acting between particles? Gravitation? Electrical Charges? Magnetic forces? Forces due to s,p,d,f levels???

          3. Or it is combination of of these????

          4. Will these forces be same in solids, liquids, Gasses or in eather or Vacuum....

          Can you pleas tell me?

          Best

          =snp

          25 days later

          Dear Professor Paul N Butler,

          Thank you for your fast and very much detailed reply.

          I got some work or other, so I move out once in every 3 or 4 days. I am retired 7 years back, my wife is house wife. Some bank work or leaking pipes, carpenter work etc.... Here in India there was a good control earlier, but now nothing. Cases are rising alarmingly high. I take a bath after coming back. Here in India people are moving freely without bothering for Corona, cases are going up...... We cannot eliminate going for Vegetables, Fruits etc.,

          Every day I am going out for Yoga, Physical exercises and Breathing exercises (Pranhayama). Started at morning 5.30 am to 7.00 am. People said pranayama increases immunity and breath holding capacity. We do 6 types. 1. Anuloma viloma, 2. Bhramary 3. Ujjayi 4. Kapal Bhathi 5. OAM 6. Bhrastrika etc. for about 45 min every day. These are taught by Baba Ramdev of Pathanjali Yoga. You can search internet. You can practice by seeing Videos in internet at home, you can ask me questions.

          ============= Your words================

          All fields are channeled flows of field particles, which are composed of simple linear motions that travel at or below the speed of light. The gravity field is a large-scale field that holds large scale objects together.

          ===============OK===============

          Molecules are more affected by the atomic external fields of the atoms that make up the molecule. When the outer electron shell of the atoms in the molecule are not filled with the maximum number of electrons, they can share electrons in their outer shells to more evenly balance out attractions between the electrons by the atom's external fields, which attract the electrons of the outer shell of the other atoms in the molecule.

          ================ Chemical Bonding is it not?=============

          The outer high-density field spheres of the atoms in the molecule are joined together to form single high-density field spheres around the atoms sharing electrons in the atom down to and including the spheres that the outer electrons are nested between. This creates a field structure that allows the outer electrons to travel around the atoms with shared electrons. This field flow joining also holds the atoms together in the molecule and at that size scale it is much stronger than the gravity field, which is a much larger and more diffuse field structure.

          ================ Also Chemical Bonding is it not?=============

          The Van der Waals forces are mainly due to the alignment of the internal fields of the particles in the atoms in the molecules that causes attractions between the molecules when they are aligned. Since the internal field inputs and outputs of the matter particles in the atoms are continually changing their three dimensional composite directions as they follow the energy photon that is contained within each of the particles as it travels around the particle's enclosed path, the attraction is much weaker than might be expected because the attraction is only the average of the affects of all of the particles involved as the field's inputs/ outputs go into and out of alignment with each other.

          ================ Thank you for your nice explanation!! Is that, VanDerval Field direction changes???=============

          It is possible to align the field flows of the particles in atoms and molecules, etc. to create very strong field effects, but man is not ready for that yet. There are other field flows that are generated by the molecule's external field spheres that can create a stronger more consistent attraction between molecules.

          ========= What are these field, why they are strong??? Are these Gravitational? ======

          That is about all I can go into about that at this time. Fields come in all size scales. You can clearly see this in that the field flows of the outputs and inputs of some galaxies can be seen as the spiral arms of the galaxies. Unlike the three-dimensional balanced field flow patterns of matter particles, the field flows in those galaxies are primarily two-dimensional because they are caused by the two-dimensional rotation of the matter in the galaxy around the center of the galaxy.

          I hope that helps you.

          ================= wonderful , Thank you, I missed your mail Id , Can you please send me again? I want to send you my new paper on NANBIOTECHNOLOGY

          Best Regards,

          Sincerely

          =snp

          snp.gupta@gmail.com