Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta, I really like your model of the dynamic Universe, but why don't you like my neocartesian generalization of modern physics? After all, when Copernicus noticed that the Earth revolves around the Sun, he lost sight of the fact that with it all the circumsolar space (ether) revolves around him. Electromagnetic waves are also oscillations of space (ether), which we do not see, but feel in the form of heat or light. Descartes has ether as matter! I hope that the neocartesian generalization of modern physics will find understanding in India.

I invite you to discuss my essay, in which I show the successes of the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, based on the identity of space and matter of Descartes: "The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich 禄

聽聽聽聽聽聽At the very beginning of the essay, I repeat twice the idea that rectilinear motion, in essence, is a motion around a circle of infinitely large radius and, if this radius is reduced, then in infinitesimal laws of motion according to the theory of relativity will go over to the laws of quantum mechanics. Next come mathematical formulas that only spoil my essay, but without them in any way. I will be pleased if you catch their main meaning and bless me for the further generalization of modern physics. I give high ratings to those who visit my page and leave her comment on it regarding the neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics, even if they did not agree.

Sincerely, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich.

    Respected Professor Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

    Thank you for presenting a wonderful essay here!

    You did not explain the various abbreviations used in your equations. Any way I could get the concept, no problem. Lorentz transformation does not lead your theory into Blackhole singularity i suppose.

    your words....... According to Descartes, in the world there is nothing but vortices, and these swirls of space create our world, thanks to which we exist..... are well written!!

    René Descartes found that he himself must be real (exist), because he felt that he was thinking; and if he was thinking, then he must be real. This is because if he were not real, then how would he have this feeling that he was thinking. He shortened this view, saying in Latin, "Cogito ergo sum," meaning "I think, therefore I am."

    Please read my essay and give your comments also. I hope we will go into collaboration in near future... By the way I rated your essay the best...

    Best reagrds

    =snp

    • [deleted]

    • Post #54

    Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta, many thanks for your comment on my essay. I try not to think about black holes, but they make themselves felt as positive charges in the center of vortices (particles). Some researchers argue that based on the recognized parameters of the universe, it turns out that we live in a black hole. I add that this black hole is crushed into small pieces that are located in the centers of everything that rotates. From this the whole world and we ourselves are so active.

    It's easy to read your essay, all the "NOs" are collected in one table, I carefully looked through them and found that they do not contradict the neocartesian generalization of modern physics. Further development of cosmology is possible only on the basis of your dynamic model of the Universe with the addition of the fact that nature does not tolerate emptiness, i.e. it must be filled with matter that creates space, and there are no dark matter, dark energy, big bang, multiverses, etc.

    I wish you all the best, and accordingly give a rating.

    Sincerely, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich.

    Dear Prof Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

    Thank you for your nice response .

    I did not understand why you want so many trillions of infinities (BHs)in every centers of rotations..... I want to know your points of view

    Best

    =snp

    6 days later

    Dear Satyavarapu Thanks for your update on the " Dynamic Universe Model". In my essay, I introduced a new model for the creation of the universe. Once the universe is created it operates analogously to your description in the "Dynamic Universe Model" with its Energy Matter cycling and multigenerational solar systems, galaxies, etc.. A major difference is that it does have black holes and dark matter as components of the circulating processing. My essay also introduces a new lower "fundamental" level of creation. These fundamentals scale up to become the math, processing and measurements of the visible universe and its major components. These fundamentals are a progression from an all chaotic changing to a sequenced, ordered changing to an overall unchanging - every component is changing eternally cycling result. It converts chaos to the order of the universe. These scaled up fundamentals produce what we measure in the universe. My hope is that you will see if these ideas can be added to your work to get a more complete theory. I would appreciate your comments. John D. Crowell

      Respected Dr. John David Crowell,

      Thank you for your wonderful words on my essay. Thank you for your nice introduction to your essay. And I will give suitable comments there.

      You are correct, probably we should go for collaboration in some new paper....

      I will discuss with you on your essay

      Thank you

      Best

      =snp

      Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

      Thank you for directed me to your essay, and for your feedback to mine.

      I read your essay with interest, because it shows great optimism and expectations about the possibilities of science. I liked the list of undesirable qualities. I think with A1-A5 most will agree in theory, even though in practice people make mistakes. I expect that many people in quantum mechanics would disagree with A6, since they think it's necessary to use complex numbers in quantum mechanics. You said well that this hides the meaning of the result. I started writing a paper some time ago, which I interrupted, but I plan to go back to it, where I show that there are no imaginary numbers in quantum theory, but it stands for something that hase geometric and physical meaning. It's not a reinterpretation, it is the correct interpretation which was overlooked from the beginning. So, although many of my colleagues think that "i" is an essential difference between quantum and classical, I have a different opinion, and I agree with your A6. I also liked your desirables in section B. Section C seems too hard for me to understand, so I have no comments about it, except that I wish you success to go through the right channels with your dynamics. And success with this contest!

      Cheers,

      Cristi

        Dear Prof Cristi,

        Thank you for your well analyzing comments on my essay.

        Basically i wrote point 6 , with a view that the results of the solution to the equations used should be tangible ones, If there is a meaningless result, or if the result is not understood by any person or even to the person who developed those set of equations, then what is the USE?

        Then how some body will do the experimental verification? Without any experimental verification how the theory will help to the progress of humanity or science? Is it sheer madness? Is it not a wastage well educated manpower? Is it only for earning a a degree? So NO Experimental verification required, is that so? Just going on developing on something, with a thinking that may be correct, but going nowhare.........

        I suddenly remembered OLD 'Two of Us'... Boney M. song

        Two of us riding nowhere

        Spending someones

        Hard earned pay

        You and me Sunday driving

        Not arriving on our way back home

        We're on our way home

        We're on our way home

        We're going home ....................

        Are we really going home?

        This is happening in science in general, not only quantum physics, but in Cosmology also. Complex equation resulting to results with infinities,and searching for infinities.....

        I also started thinking of working on quantum physics with straight forward equations already. Hope you will help me on some concepts....

        Thank you for giving me piece of mind!

        Best Regards

        =snp

        Dear Mr Gupta,

        I think you should be commended for setting out a set of principles to guide theory. I suspect there will be much debate about some of them. But debate advances science.

        I wish you success in promoting your ideas.

          Dear Naga Parameswara Gupta,

          Guidelines for theory and modeling is warranted, especially elimination of bias and agenda-based research and modeling. Visiting your website, I find your theory of interest but requiring more study. It takes courage to openly oppose a prevailing theory such as the Big Bang. It is good to keep an open mind, even about your own pursuits. That is true science. Hopefully, you will get a chance to read my essay.

          Jim Hoover

            Thank you Professor Michael Dalton,

            Thanks for reading my essay. And science is very useful, it has a knife sharper on both the sides, It can create havoc and destruction to humanity. We saw and seeing many examples of it. But we want to use it's other edge, to help the world to progress with its cutting edge technology. All of us want science should progress, humanity should progress......

            I am also hoping that there will be some more debate on my essay. Why to postpone it to some later date? You can shoot your questions no problems.... Please come out with your questions asap....

            Best

            =snp

            Dear James Lee Hoover,

            Thank you for your interest in my essay. How to get a copy of your SF novel "Extraordinary Visitors"?

            I just developed this Dynamic Universe Model under the guidance of Her. Nothing is my own except my own mistakes. So NO courage is required. Only accuracy and experimental results dependency is required. I am not opposing any theory. They got their own results and funding, why should I oppose? It is just my LUCK, it is bad, nothing else.

            You are correct , openness is required in true science

            I will read your essay ASAP and meet you there again

            Best Regards

            =snp

            Hi Satyavarapu...

            In that my essay explicitly request my readers' assessment of my application of Absolute Intelligence, as modeled therein, to a logic evaluation criteria for my essay, your thoughtful review of my essay is greatly appreciated,

            By your assessment of my essay as "very logical", I am encouraged in my application of UQS mechanix to establishing verifiable communication with Absolute Intelligence... but I am notoriously incorrigible.

            I have now read your essay, and as a discussion of principles for reality models, it is highly relevant.

            However, a conclusion predicated on principle must adhere to principle, and be consistent with all other such conclusions.

            Your conclusion that there is a "force behind expansion of universe" has historically triggered the "something from nothing" rejection of the model... i.e. "Creation" implies a Logic Singularity.

            Time-Space Energy as Cause's feeling of now, is indicative of a Logic Singularity... i.e. a feeling requires no Space, and now requires no Time.

            REF Graphic Illustration: Cause Energy Pulsed Emergence as Space-Time Energy http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

            To facilitate an Origin Logic singularity in a Space-Time Energy Reality model, UQS implements additional criteria:

            - The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.

            What is the CAD environment geometry of the Dynamic Universe Model (DUM)?

            ... the structural geometry encapsulating a point source emergence IS a spatial singularity for directionally unbiased distribution of Space-Time Energy

            ... a Cartesian and/or Radian geometry does not facilitate a point source pulsed emergence of spatially defined minimum/indivisible Quanta of Energy (QE) without introducing perturbation in all subsequent analysis... i.e. the math becomes" uncomputable".

            - A theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall differentiate Quantum Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE).

            What minimum icon/sprite of spatially defined Energy (QE), experiences a Space-Time differential, in an emergence SIM within the DUM CAD geometry environment?

            ... if the CAD geometry quantization does not establish a structurally uniform spatial occupancy for Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy to emerge as Space-Time Energy in a Space-Time Energy Reality, one can not differentiate a minimum Quantum of Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE)

            ... observations of Phenomenal Energy (PHE)... i.e. observed event of a QE's experience of a Space-Time differential... and subsequent analysis/quantification is inherently perturbative

            I agree that enhanced computer computational skills can resolve perceptual limitations, and In that jayanti V S Murty wrote on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 07:10 GMT... that you are "developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology", it is highly predictable that you "will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field".

            Does the DUM CAD/SIM app utilize a cross platform 3D graphic engine... e.g. OpenGL?

            Thanks again for justifying my obsession to verify a connection with the Cosmic Consciousness Computer (CCC://)... and yes a flip a coin was utilized as the only logic evaluate criteria for each of the above statements.

            Sue Lingo

            UQS Author/Logician

            www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

              Dear Sue Lingo,

              Thank you for your interest on my essay and Dynamic Universe Model.........

              You are confused, Probably I could not explain the whole of Dynamic Universe Model in two pages. There are No singularities in this model.....

              I will answer all your observations, points by point........... First of all the important confusion you got is.........However, a conclusion predicated on principle must adhere to principle, and be consistent with all other such conclusions.

              Your conclusion that there is a "force behind expansion of universe" has historically triggered the "something from nothing" rejection of the model... i.e. "Creation" implies a Logic Singularity.................

              There are blue shifted galaxies and red shifted galaxies in the universe. Universe is rotating..I will give an example.....

              Assume a children's giant wheel in a amusement park, you are looking at it in its plane of rotation. Some buckets come near to you and some will go away. Those which are coming near are Blueshifted and going away are red shifted.

              Now assume many giant wheels each rotating about its own axis and these wheels are rotating rotating Dynamically in different planes about each other. You are in a bucket in a wheel. then you see the some buckets come near and some go away in all directions. so if you observe only those buckets which are going away you will see expanding , only those coming near to you you will see contracting universe.

              And the force behind expansion is UGF, the UNIVERSAL gravitation force , that is the force acting on each body at that position at that time. this force is not constant

              You can Download all papers and books for free from my blog...........

              http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

              And the Universe Model proposed...........

              http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/

              I will continue....

              Best Regards

              -snp

              Dear Sue Lingo,

              Your words............Time-Space Energy as Cause's feeling of now, is indicative of a Logic Singularity... i.e. a feeling requires no Space, and now requires no Time.

              REF Graphic Illustration: Cause Energy Pulsed Emergence as Space-Time Energy http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

              To facilitate an Origin Logic singularity in a Space-Time Energy Reality model, UQS implements additional criteria:.............

              In Dynamic Universe model, there are no Logical Singularities, Undefined point errors, No zero / zero errors, No divide by zero errors...... I checked them thoroughly......

              Best

              =snp

              I request you please study Dynamic Universe Model

              Dear Sue Lingo,

              Your words.................REF Graphic Illustration: Cause Energy Pulsed Emergence as Space-Time Energy http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

              To facilitate an Origin Logic singularity in a Space-Time Energy Reality model, UQS implements additional criteria:...................

              Not applicable to Dynamic Universe model

              .................. Your words.................... - The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.................

              In Dynamic Universe Model, Space is space, time is time, NO SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM

              BEST

              =SNP

              Satyavarapu Gupta re-uploaded the file Gupta_Vak_Essay_FQXi_2020_f.pdf for the essay entitled "A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory's Philosophy" on 2020-04-20 05:04:37 UTC.

                Dear Sue Lingo,

                Your words...............

                - The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.

                What is the CAD environment geometry of the Dynamic Universe Model (DUM)?

                ... the structural geometry encapsulating a point source emergence IS a spatial singularity for directionally unbiased distribution of Space-Time Energy

                ... a Cartesian and/or Radian geometry does not facilitate a point source pulsed emergence of spatially defined minimum/indivisible Quanta of Energy (QE) without introducing perturbation in all subsequent analysis... i.e. the math becomes" uncomputable".

                - A theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall differentiate Quantum Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE).

                What minimum icon/sprite of spatially defined Energy (QE), experiences a Space-Time differential, in an emergence SIM within the DUM CAD geometry environment?

                ... if the CAD geometry quantization does not establish a structurally uniform spatial occupancy for Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy to emerge as Space-Time Energy in a Space-Time Energy Reality, one can not differentiate a minimum Quantum of Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE)

                ... observations of Phenomenal Energy (PHE)... i.e. observed event of a QE's experience of a Space-Time differential... and subsequent analysis/quantification is inherently perturbative....................

                Not Applicable to Dynamic Universe Model !!!!

                Best

                =snp

                Dear Sue lingo,

                Your words..............I agree that enhanced computer computational skills can resolve perceptual limitations, and In that jayanti V S Murty wrote on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 07:10 GMT... that you are "developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology", it is highly predictable that you "will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field"..................

                It was his understanding, The software developed in EXCEL, other wise one can just do those calculations with a simple calculator.

                ONLY some of the problems were solved using that SITA software, others were solved using the Dynamic Universe Model principles........

                ............Your words.............Does the DUM CAD/SIM app utilize a cross platform 3D graphic engine... e.g. OpenGL?...................

                NO Sir,

                Whole SITA equations were developed at that time.........

                You can download the software book for free from my webpage (AMAZON sell this book @ Rs 15000)

                http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/p/books-published.html

                Book2. Dynamic Universe Model: SITA singularity free software ---2011 March --- VDM n Germany, March- 2011, ISBN 978-3-639-33501-9,

                .................... your words...............

                Thanks again for justifying my obsession to verify a connection with the Cosmic Consciousness Computer (CCC://)... and yes a flip a coin was utilized as the only logic evaluate criteria for each of the above statements ..............................

                Thank for your interest in this Dynamic Universe Model..

                Thank you once again....

                Best

                =snp