Dear snp Gupta:
Excellent work!
We should explore the possibility of developing some collaborations. You are an excellent theorecian. I am an experiemntalist. Given your background, you may look into Ch. 11 of my book, "Nature of light Photon by Non-Interaction of waves", Taylor and Francis, 2014.
Essentially, I agree with you. However, I have elaborated my approch to the issues more expicitly here.
C.1. Sub heading: "No space time continuum"
I believe, I agree with you. See section 2.3.2.b of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge", in the current competition:
https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3565
We must recognize that all our measurements are being carried out in the 3D space, albeit at different instants, while the universe is evolving through its "running time". The apparatus always remains in 3D. Nature is executing all its interaction processes in its 3D. Therefore, the theories must also remain confined to 3D.
Further, the key physical parameter of all of our time-recording instruments is its characteristic frequency of oscillation. This is the key physical parameter we really can control and measure. We mathematically invert the physical frequency to a "period". Then keep counting more and more numbers of periods to develop a sense of "running time". Running time is an excellent practical concept for smooth running of the human society. However, significant importance of the concept of "running time" in human society does not make it a physical property of nature.
We know how to "dilate" or "contract" the physical frequency parameter of most oscillator (periodic motion). However, humans do not have the capacity to "dilate" or "contract" the running time.
C.2. "The concept should come out of the depth of truth."
I would re-phrase it as: We all should be HONEST and HUMBLE that we will be wondering around to develop a perfect model for the workings behind the ontological (real) universe for centuries, perhaps, millennia to come. This is the key objective of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge".
We must keep iterating our models of the universe again and again, from the very bottom, every time we see we have become stagnant in gathering new useful information out of nature to assure our continued evolution through our indefinite number of progenies. The beginning of the 20th century was one of those times. Now, the 21st century is one of those times again.
We all are seeking the truth, from Gautama Buddha to Albert Einstein. Nobody got the ultimate truth. Human neural networks, I believe, at the current stage of our development, are incapable of modeling the vast universe, as a single theory to define a truth, which could be sought after.
The universe is a deeply interconnected. Nobody knows "the depth of the truth". We all are seeking the truth. All information we collect are through localized apparatuses are designed to collect information about a very tiny segment of the universe with innumerable approximations. We may have to learn to design apparatus that can measure multiple parameters of multiple objects under the influence of multiple forces and start to appreciate that the entire universe is deeply interconnected and extremely complex.
My papers can be downloaded from:
http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/
In reality, we have started destroying our good knowledge by fictitious new mathematical knowledge. Cosmological Redshift is definitely NOT a Doppler Effect. If the universe is really expanding, we should explore some other physical processes, suggested in my paper below. Download my paper:
#2013.5 "Tribute to H. John Caulfield - Hijacking the 'Holographic Principle' by cosmologists".
Sincerely,
Chandra.