Dear Dr Ilgaitis Prusis
Your another question is "What is truth?"
Truth is a verifiable fact or experimental result or astronomical observation by anyone with the same initial conditions.
Thank you for all your interest on Dynamic Universe Model.You can Download all papers and books for free from my blog...........
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/
And the Universe Model proposed...........
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/
I will continue....
Best Regards
-snp
Dear Gupta,
Thank you for commenting in my thread. I agree with your general statments, however, I cannot comment on your cosmological theory since I don't know enough about its theories, although my system generally agrees with yours. Thanks.
Dear adel sadeq
Thank you for reading my essay, I posted on your essay Please check
Best
=snp
Hello Gupta. seen and gone through your beautiful work... trying to break the ice..Wonderful. keep up. all the best. regards
Dear snp Gupta:
Excellent work!
We should explore the possibility of developing some collaborations. You are an excellent theorecian. I am an experiemntalist. Given your background, you may look into Ch. 11 of my book, "Nature of light Photon by Non-Interaction of waves", Taylor and Francis, 2014.
Essentially, I agree with you. However, I have elaborated my approch to the issues more expicitly here.
C.1. Sub heading: "No space time continuum"
I believe, I agree with you. See section 2.3.2.b of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge", in the current competition:
https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3565
We must recognize that all our measurements are being carried out in the 3D space, albeit at different instants, while the universe is evolving through its "running time". The apparatus always remains in 3D. Nature is executing all its interaction processes in its 3D. Therefore, the theories must also remain confined to 3D.
Further, the key physical parameter of all of our time-recording instruments is its characteristic frequency of oscillation. This is the key physical parameter we really can control and measure. We mathematically invert the physical frequency to a "period". Then keep counting more and more numbers of periods to develop a sense of "running time". Running time is an excellent practical concept for smooth running of the human society. However, significant importance of the concept of "running time" in human society does not make it a physical property of nature.
We know how to "dilate" or "contract" the physical frequency parameter of most oscillator (periodic motion). However, humans do not have the capacity to "dilate" or "contract" the running time.
C.2. "The concept should come out of the depth of truth."
I would re-phrase it as: We all should be HONEST and HUMBLE that we will be wondering around to develop a perfect model for the workings behind the ontological (real) universe for centuries, perhaps, millennia to come. This is the key objective of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge".
We must keep iterating our models of the universe again and again, from the very bottom, every time we see we have become stagnant in gathering new useful information out of nature to assure our continued evolution through our indefinite number of progenies. The beginning of the 20th century was one of those times. Now, the 21st century is one of those times again.
We all are seeking the truth, from Gautama Buddha to Albert Einstein. Nobody got the ultimate truth. Human neural networks, I believe, at the current stage of our development, are incapable of modeling the vast universe, as a single theory to define a truth, which could be sought after.
The universe is a deeply interconnected. Nobody knows "the depth of the truth". We all are seeking the truth. All information we collect are through localized apparatuses are designed to collect information about a very tiny segment of the universe with innumerable approximations. We may have to learn to design apparatus that can measure multiple parameters of multiple objects under the influence of multiple forces and start to appreciate that the entire universe is deeply interconnected and extremely complex.
My papers can be downloaded from:
http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/
In reality, we have started destroying our good knowledge by fictitious new mathematical knowledge. Cosmological Redshift is definitely NOT a Doppler Effect. If the universe is really expanding, we should explore some other physical processes, suggested in my paper below. Download my paper:
#2013.5 "Tribute to H. John Caulfield - Hijacking the 'Holographic Principle' by cosmologists".
Sincerely,
Chandra.
Dear Michael Muteru
Thank you for reading my essay. You also wrote very nice essay. I am giving you the best rating,Best wishes to your essay. I hope you will try to rate my essay too
Best
=snp.gupta
Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,
I am making the reply to your post into convenient small parts to increase readability.
1.
your words...............Excellent work!.......................
Thank you for liking my essay please!
.................. your words...............We should explore the possibility of developing some collaborations. You are an excellent theorecian. I am an experiemntalist. Given your background,................
Thank you sir, we will do that definitely ....
Your words........ you may look into Ch. 11 of my book, "Nature of light Photon by Non-Interaction of waves", Taylor and Francis, 2014....................
How to get that book , can you please send that chapter, so that I can read it............
your words............... Essentially, I agree with you. However, I have elaborated my approch to the issues more expicitly here......................
Thank you.............
your words...............
C.1. Sub heading: "No space time continuum"
I believe, I agree with you. See section 2.3.2.b of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge", in the current competition:
https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3565 ......................
You said excellently in your essay ............ The running time is not a physical parameter of any natural object. Creating the concept of the running time is a remarkable invention by human species. Our modern society will come almost to a halt, not completely though. The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated that! Our universe is full of harmonic oscillations and motions, from atoms to our planetary system. We invert the frequency of well-designed oscillator to define a period......... They are exactly correct
I will continue...
Best Regards
=snp
Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,
2.
Your words.......................... We must recognize that all our measurements are being carried out in the 3D space, albeit at different instants, while the universe is evolving through its "running time". The apparatus always remains in 3D. Nature is executing all its interaction processes in its 3D. Therefore, the theories must also remain confined to 3D. .....................
Dynamic Universe Model is working on that 3D Cartesian coordinates , time is separate
your words........................ Further, the key physical parameter of all of our time-recording instruments is its characteristic frequency of oscillation. This is the key physical parameter we really can control and measure. We mathematically invert the physical frequency to a "period". Then keep counting more and more numbers of periods to develop a sense of "running time". Running time is an excellent practical concept for smooth running of the human society. However, significant importance of the concept of "running time" in human society does not make it a physical property of nature.......................
In our Dynamic Universe Model time is measured in in periods or parts of periods. Additionally, Time cannot go backwords and moves forward only. Time going backwords happen in science fiction ! ................
Your words....................... We know how to "dilate" or "contract" the physical frequency parameter of most oscillator (periodic motion). However, humans do not have the capacity to "dilate" or "contract" the running time.................
Exactly correct, Probably Gods have that power.....:) ...
I will continue.............
Best
=snp
Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,
3.
Your words.........................
C.2. "The concept should come out of the depth of truth."
I would re-phrase it as: We all should be HONEST and HUMBLE that we will be wondering around to develop a perfect model for the workings behind the ontological (real) universe for centuries, perhaps, millennia to come. This is the key objective of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge".................
You have nicely re-phrased it, thank you!
Yes I understood that wonderful concept in your essay, best wishes to your work...........
Your words.................
We must keep iterating our models of the universe again and again, from the very bottom, every time we see we have become stagnant in gathering new useful information out of nature to assure our continued evolution through our indefinite number of progenies. The beginning of the 20th century was one of those times. Now, the 21st century is one of those times again..............
Yes we have to revamp the models and renovate them, It is very important aspect of life. Yes lets hope that the 21 century to be better one. IF not, I will quote your words ....... Our modern society will come almost to a halt, not completely though. The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated that!
I will continue....
Best
=snp
Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,
4.
Your words............. We all are seeking the truth, from Gautama Buddha to Albert Einstein. Nobody got the ultimate truth. Human neural networks, I believe, at the current stage of our development, are incapable of modeling the vast universe, as a single theory to define a truth, which could be sought after. ...........
Correct, it is most probably a search in vain! Instead of wasting our well educated manpower and financial resources, we should reallocate them to better result yielding ways.
Your words.............The universe is a deeply interconnected. Nobody knows "the depth of the truth". We all are seeking the truth. All information we collect are through localized apparatuses are designed to collect information about a very tiny segment of the universe with innumerable approximations. We may have to learn to design apparatus that can measure multiple parameters of multiple objects under the influence of multiple forces and start to appreciate that the entire universe is deeply interconnected and extremely complex....................
Wonderful concept sir!!! We have to divert our thing to develop into such ways. We should collaborate on this concept I remember Noble laurate Ravindra Nath Tagore poem, "Geetanjali"...
Where the mind is without fear,
Where the knowledge is held high........
Your words.............
My papers can be downloaded from:
http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/
In reality, we have started destroying our good knowledge by fictitious new mathematical knowledge. Cosmological Redshift is definitely NOT a Doppler Effect. If the universe is really expanding, we should explore some other physical processes, suggested in my paper below. Download my paper:
#2013.5 "Tribute to H. John Caulfield - Hijacking the 'Holographic Principle' by cosmologists".
.....................
Thank you for your web pages, I will do..
I request you to please go through my recent papers
1. Cosmic Ray origins
2. Model of Universe as described by Dynamic Universe Model...
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/
For the other papers
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com
Best Regards
Sincerely,
=snp
Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,
In your previous post dated 30 April above you said We should explore the possibility of developing some collaborations.
I replied Yes, the SUBJECT can be LIGHT,your pet Subject! , I can learn some things new
I hope that will be ok for you
Best Regards
=snp
I liked your fresh approach of throwing out all the present theories and speculations in C1 and replacing them with foundational principles in C.2. Some of which you state are very good but one could expand or refine the list you provided, which opens up possibilities to establish scientific principles.
The theme of the essay is more of a lead into your webpages which makes it weak in content. However, I do appreciate the opportunity given, to further explore your end solutions and results.
You did not rate my essay, but I will give yours an above-average rating in addition to a favourable comment regarding your fresh approach of deciding predictability.
Gilbert
Dear Professor Gilbert Leon Joseph Beaudry,
Thank you for reading my essay and for well thought comments.
I was working on this Dynamic Universe Model for the last forty years under the guidance given by Maa VAK. Almost all papers are important, all results are important, many predictions came true. I dont know which result to elaborate, For example...
-Explains Formation of Astronomical Jets and their high Velocities at Galaxy centers..... The particles traveling parallel to plane of Galaxy suddenly they turn perpendicular at Galaxy center !
-Predicts Frequency shift in electro-magnetic radiation near huge gravitating masses .... this is in addition to bending of light as predicted by Einstein !!
-Galaxy Disk formation: Densemass Equations ..... There is no requirement of Blackholes!!
-Explains gravity disturbances like Pioneer anomaly,.... Until now we considered a single body (eg. Earth) gravitation on another (apple) only.This SITA approach solves the Gravitational catapult !
-Non-collapsing large scale mass structures .... They dont fall a single lump mass dueto gravitation !
-Offers Singularity free solutions ...... No Bigbang, No blackholes !!
-Solving Missing mass in Galaxies, and finds reason for Galaxy circular velocity curves.... ... NO MISSING MASS if you calculate using SITA approach !
-Blue shifted and red shifted Galaxies co-existence, in an Accelerating Expanding Universe...... 30% are blue shifted Galaxies !
-Explains the large voids and non-uniform matter densities.... UNIFORM density is not observed
-Withstands 105 times the Normal Jeans swindle test.... other N-body problems fail at at 1% of any position disturbance
-Explains VLBI variations.... Other wise very difficult
- Explains energy to mass conversion....... Energy --->Frequency upshifting --> mass
-Explains Cosmic-rays formation with the same SITA approach, origins of Cosmic Rays expalined
- Proposed an UNIVERSE model with full cycle of Energy (from Sun)--- to Mass( neutrinos to Hydrogen- to formation of various elements) ---- to formation of Stars and Sun ---- to Energy again---- NO BIGBANG --- No Blackholes etc...
I can not just explain 40 years of research done in just 9 page essay, I just gave main points.... I am sorry ....
I just rated your essay now much better than above average, now your is rating is 5.3. Best wishes to your essay
Please contact me " snp.gupta@gmail.com "
Warm regards
=snp
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,
Thank you so much for bringing me to your essay from my essay. In your essay, there are too many abstract statements to be connected among them. At least for me, to understand your claim, the concrete examples are needed. Do you have it?
Best wishes,
Yutaka
Dear SNP Gupta,
"Let all men meet and think as with one mind. lET ALL HEARTS UNITE IN LOVE.Let the God be common.May all live in happiness with a common purpose."
I have considered your qualities of theory:
A. Undesirable qualities of any theory
v Dogmatisms, Superstitions must be avoided
v Theory must be developed without any type of fear
v Theory has not been bounded up by narrow academic walls
v Don't force or manipulate results
v Don't make the mathematics too complex with thousands of multiple possible solutions
X Avoid imaginary numbers and imaginary dimensions / axes.... and so, avoid unimaginable results.
B. Desirable, important and required qualities of new theory
v Human accrued knowledge should be free to all
v Concept should come out from the depth of truth
v Authors / Scientists thinking should go towards Perfection
v Logic should be simple
v Theory's predictions should be verifiable experimentally, by anyone and anywhere with the same conditions
v Computations / computer programs should be simple
v Ontological realism of senses produced information
v New theory should lead us forward into ever-widening thought and action experiments
v Let the new theory lead us into that heaven of freedom of thinking
where v=tick (agree) and X= cross(disagree)
So you see I must explain my point of disagreement. Imaginery numbers (or as I know them as complex numbers are an important tool in mathemathics and physics, as they allow us to track some dependent variables such as phase in a simple way. They can be extended to quaternions, octonions, etc where multiple variables are tracked. Maxwell formed his theory of electromagnetism using about 20 quaternion eequations, which were later simplified by Heaviside to the four equations we use today. Quaternions which are non commutative are especially good for rotations in 3D space, something that is important in particle physics. Although Einstein used tensors, quaternions are making a comeback as they can be programmed on computers, and are used a lot in computer graphics.
May the hidden Vak be revealed.
Regards
Lockie Cresswell
Whoever wishes,
May he sit in meditation
With eyes closed
To verify if the Universe be true or false.
I, in the meanwhile
Shall sit with insatiate eyes
To see the Universe
While the light lasts.
- Rabindranath Tagore
Dear Professor Yutaka Shikano
Thank you for reading my essay and for well thought comments.
I will supplement any doubts / questions, no problems...
I was working on this Dynamic Universe Model for the last forty years under the guidance given by Maa VAK (She is Hindu Goddess Saraswathi for wisdom and education). Almost all papers are important, all results are important, many predictions came true. I dont know which result to elaborate, For example...
-Explains Formation of Astronomical Jets and their high Velocities at Galaxy centers..... The particles traveling parallel to plane of Galaxy suddenly they turn perpendicular at Galaxy center !
-Predicts Frequency shift in electro-magnetic radiation near huge gravitating masses .... this is in addition to bending of light as predicted by Einstein !!
-Galaxy Disk formation: Densemass Equations ..... There is no requirement of Blackholes!!
-Explains gravity disturbances like Pioneer anomaly,.... Until now we considered a single body (eg. Earth) gravitation on another (apple) only.This SITA approach solves the Gravitational catapult !
-Non-collapsing large scale mass structures .... They dont fall a single lump mass dueto gravitation !
-Offers Singularity free solutions ...... No Bigbang, No blackholes !!
-Solving Missing mass in Galaxies, and finds reason for Galaxy circular velocity curves.... ... NO MISSING MASS if you calculate using SITA approach !
-Blue shifted and red shifted Galaxies co-existence, in an Accelerating Expanding Universe...... 30% are blue shifted Galaxies !
-Explains the large voids and non-uniform matter densities.... UNIFORM density is not observed
-Withstands 105 times the Normal Jeans swindle test.... other N-body problems fail at at 1% of any position disturbance
-Explains VLBI variations.... Other wise very difficult
- Explains energy to mass conversion....... Energy --->Frequency upshifting --> mass
-Explains Cosmic-rays formation with the same SITA approach, origins of Cosmic Rays expalined
- Proposed an UNIVERSE model with full cycle of Energy (from Sun)--- to Mass( neutrinos to Hydrogen- to formation of various elements) ---- to formation of Stars and Sun ---- to Energy again---- NO BIGBANG --- No Blackholes etc...
I can not just explain 40 years of research done in just 9 page essay, I just gave main points.... I am sorry ....
I just rated your essay now much better than above average, now your is rating is 5.3. Best wishes to your essay
Please contact me " snp.gupta@gmail.com "
Warm regards
=snp
Dear Dr Lachlan Cresswell....
Thank you for reading my essay very critically, thank you for accepting my essay to 99%, for me it was a difficult task wonderfully achieved!!!
Now lets come to the point you did not agree.... lets have live discussion....
These Imaginery numbers or complex numbers; quaternions, octonions, etc used for multiple variables are tracked.............. Quaternions which are non commutative are especially good for rotations in 3D space, something that is important in particle physics. Although Einstein used tensors, quaternions are making a comeback as they can be programmed on computers, and are used a lot in computer graphics........
I also accept no problems...... ......
But assume a situation where a third order or any higher order differential equation is used in one or more dimensions while formation, can you get a real solution???
Also assume a situation where some value represented in an imaginary axis perpendicular to time axis, what will be the physical meaning of that point?
Assuming mathematics and giving solutions is ok, what will be the physical meaning ...
40 years I was working on Dynamic Universe model and used tensors with simple equations but not differential equations. Otherwise the real solutions we will get will have singularities.
May the hidden Vak be revealed..........!!!!
Best Regards
=snp
Dear Dr
I suddenly remembered OLD 'Two of Us'... Boney M. song
Two of us riding nowhere
Spending someones
Hard earned pay
You and me Sunday driving
Not arriving on our way back home
We're on our way home
We're on our way home
We're going home ....................
Are we really going home?
Best
=snp
(This is the same post to my answer for your comment of my essay.)
Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,
Thank you so much for sharing your experience and voting my essay as well. Let me give my opinion on this essay contest. In this essay contest, the goals are
-- Encourage and support rigorous, innovative, and influential thinking about foundational questions in physics and cosmology;
-- Identify and reward top thinkers in foundational questions; and,
-- Provide an arena for discussion and exchange of ideas regarding foundational questions.
I think that our essays and comments are pursued to these goals.
Best wishes,
Yutaka
