Dear Sue Lingo,

Your words...............

- The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.

What is the CAD environment geometry of the Dynamic Universe Model (DUM)?

... the structural geometry encapsulating a point source emergence IS a spatial singularity for directionally unbiased distribution of Space-Time Energy

... a Cartesian and/or Radian geometry does not facilitate a point source pulsed emergence of spatially defined minimum/indivisible Quanta of Energy (QE) without introducing perturbation in all subsequent analysis... i.e. the math becomes" uncomputable".

- A theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall differentiate Quantum Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE).

What minimum icon/sprite of spatially defined Energy (QE), experiences a Space-Time differential, in an emergence SIM within the DUM CAD geometry environment?

... if the CAD geometry quantization does not establish a structurally uniform spatial occupancy for Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy to emerge as Space-Time Energy in a Space-Time Energy Reality, one can not differentiate a minimum Quantum of Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE)

... observations of Phenomenal Energy (PHE)... i.e. observed event of a QE's experience of a Space-Time differential... and subsequent analysis/quantification is inherently perturbative....................

Not Applicable to Dynamic Universe Model !!!!

Best

=snp

Dear Sue lingo,

Your words..............I agree that enhanced computer computational skills can resolve perceptual limitations, and In that jayanti V S Murty wrote on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 07:10 GMT... that you are "developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology", it is highly predictable that you "will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field"..................

It was his understanding, The software developed in EXCEL, other wise one can just do those calculations with a simple calculator.

ONLY some of the problems were solved using that SITA software, others were solved using the Dynamic Universe Model principles........

............Your words.............Does the DUM CAD/SIM app utilize a cross platform 3D graphic engine... e.g. OpenGL?...................

NO Sir,

Whole SITA equations were developed at that time.........

You can download the software book for free from my webpage (AMAZON sell this book @ Rs 15000)

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/p/books-published.html

Book2. Dynamic Universe Model: SITA singularity free software ---2011 March --- VDM n Germany, March- 2011, ISBN 978-3-639-33501-9,

.................... your words...............

Thanks again for justifying my obsession to verify a connection with the Cosmic Consciousness Computer (CCC://)... and yes a flip a coin was utilized as the only logic evaluate criteria for each of the above statements ..............................

Thank for your interest in this Dynamic Universe Model..

Thank you once again....

Best

=snp

Dear Dr. Gupta,

Thank you very much for your comments on my essay.

I think you wrote a very interesting essay and it must be guidance for every scientific paper.

I realize that you are also against BB-model and you have described it as a fairy tale. I agree with you and I wonder why the followers of the universe concordance model insist on BB-model, when only 5% of the visible matter in the universe is well known. Wait the universe to unveils all its secrets and then develop whatever theory you like. I think your model of the dynamic Universe is a reasonable way to proceed for the time being. I realize also that it is hard to go against the prevail theory of the Big-Bang theory. As I mentioned in my essay, it is absurd to believe that the whole structure of a universe or multiverse or whatever it is, started 13.6 billion years ago, which is only a moment in the time scale of the universe.

I wish you all the best, and accordingly give a rating.

Best regards

Basileios Grispos

    Dear Dr BASILEIOS GRISPOS

    Thank you Very much for your comments and kindness. I saw, You also wrote an wonderful essay, gave my comments there on that thread. And accordingly I reciprocated the ratings to the bset.

    Best wishes

    =snp

    Dear Satyavarapu,

    Thanks for checking mine out and your kind comments. My rating is your 16th. Someone is rating with 1s and 2s w/o comments. That is why I mention the number of ratings.

    Jim HOover

      I share the same sentiment...

      "A theory in pure Mathematics and a theory in Physics have different requirements and outcomes. A pure Mathematical theory may not have any physical basis and out-comes also may not have any physical significances.

      By to get to a common consensus about changing it will be a long up hill battle

        Dear James Lee Hoover

        Thank you for your help and giving me good rating

        Best

        =snp

        I am fighting this battle for the LAST 40 years without a single back patting. But i know I am fighting for truth. Hence no problems!!

        My essay is a reflection of my experiance, Why dont you join me???

        Best

        =snp

        Dear SNP Gupta!

        I read your beautiful essay. I agree and support your statements in general. But in detail there are some nebulosity for me. For example;

        What is "truth" in your interpretation?

        Best regards

        Ilgaitis

          Author Ilgaitis Prusis replied on Apr. 26, 2020 @ 09:42 GMT

          Dear SNP Gupta! I read your essay. It is very good. It touches on important and profound issues in science. I agree with basic statements.

          According to Dinamic Universe Model I also believe that the Universe is dynamic, everything is moving. However, some concepts in your theory are not clear for me.

          How do you interpret Time?

          What is Space in your theory?

          Best regards

          Ilgaitis

          Dear Dr Ilgaitis Prusis

          This is for reply of your post on Apr. 26, 2020 @ 09:42 GMT

          .................your words..................I read your essay. It is very good. It touches on important and profound issues in science. I agree with basic statements.

          According to Dinamic Universe Model I also believe that the Universe is dynamic, everything is moving. However, some concepts in your theory are not clear for me.

          How do you interpret Time?

          What is Space in your theory?.......................

          Thank you for reading my essay and for your nice complements!

          Time is the elapsed period between two events, say two Sun rises or two oscillations of a pendulum. It moves forwards only in Dynamic Universe Model, no backwards

          Space is 3D linear axis with x,y,z cartisian coordinates in both positive and negative directions. No fixed reference (0,0,0)point is necessay

          Please feel free to ask any further questions

          Best

          =snp

            Dear Dr Ilgaitis Prusis

            Your another question is "What is truth?"

            Truth is a verifiable fact or experimental result or astronomical observation by anyone with the same initial conditions.

            Thank you for all your interest on Dynamic Universe Model.You can Download all papers and books for free from my blog...........

            http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

            And the Universe Model proposed...........

            http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/

            I will continue....

            Best Regards

            -snp

            Dear Gupta,

            Thank you for commenting in my thread. I agree with your general statments, however, I cannot comment on your cosmological theory since I don't know enough about its theories, although my system generally agrees with yours. Thanks.

              Dear adel sadeq

              Thank you for reading my essay, I posted on your essay Please check

              Best

              =snp

              Hello Gupta. seen and gone through your beautiful work... trying to break the ice..Wonderful. keep up. all the best. regards

                Dear snp Gupta:

                Excellent work!

                We should explore the possibility of developing some collaborations. You are an excellent theorecian. I am an experiemntalist. Given your background, you may look into Ch. 11 of my book, "Nature of light Photon by Non-Interaction of waves", Taylor and Francis, 2014.

                Essentially, I agree with you. However, I have elaborated my approch to the issues more expicitly here.

                C.1. Sub heading: "No space time continuum"

                I believe, I agree with you. See section 2.3.2.b of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge", in the current competition:

                https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3565

                We must recognize that all our measurements are being carried out in the 3D space, albeit at different instants, while the universe is evolving through its "running time". The apparatus always remains in 3D. Nature is executing all its interaction processes in its 3D. Therefore, the theories must also remain confined to 3D.

                Further, the key physical parameter of all of our time-recording instruments is its characteristic frequency of oscillation. This is the key physical parameter we really can control and measure. We mathematically invert the physical frequency to a "period". Then keep counting more and more numbers of periods to develop a sense of "running time". Running time is an excellent practical concept for smooth running of the human society. However, significant importance of the concept of "running time" in human society does not make it a physical property of nature.

                We know how to "dilate" or "contract" the physical frequency parameter of most oscillator (periodic motion). However, humans do not have the capacity to "dilate" or "contract" the running time.

                C.2. "The concept should come out of the depth of truth."

                I would re-phrase it as: We all should be HONEST and HUMBLE that we will be wondering around to develop a perfect model for the workings behind the ontological (real) universe for centuries, perhaps, millennia to come. This is the key objective of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge".

                We must keep iterating our models of the universe again and again, from the very bottom, every time we see we have become stagnant in gathering new useful information out of nature to assure our continued evolution through our indefinite number of progenies. The beginning of the 20th century was one of those times. Now, the 21st century is one of those times again.

                We all are seeking the truth, from Gautama Buddha to Albert Einstein. Nobody got the ultimate truth. Human neural networks, I believe, at the current stage of our development, are incapable of modeling the vast universe, as a single theory to define a truth, which could be sought after.

                The universe is a deeply interconnected. Nobody knows "the depth of the truth". We all are seeking the truth. All information we collect are through localized apparatuses are designed to collect information about a very tiny segment of the universe with innumerable approximations. We may have to learn to design apparatus that can measure multiple parameters of multiple objects under the influence of multiple forces and start to appreciate that the entire universe is deeply interconnected and extremely complex.

                My papers can be downloaded from:

                http://www.natureoflight.org/CP/

                In reality, we have started destroying our good knowledge by fictitious new mathematical knowledge. Cosmological Redshift is definitely NOT a Doppler Effect. If the universe is really expanding, we should explore some other physical processes, suggested in my paper below. Download my paper:

                #2013.5 "Tribute to H. John Caulfield - Hijacking the 'Holographic Principle' by cosmologists".

                Sincerely,

                Chandra.

                  Dear Michael Muteru

                  Thank you for reading my essay. You also wrote very nice essay. I am giving you the best rating,Best wishes to your essay. I hope you will try to rate my essay too

                  Best

                  =snp.gupta

                  Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,

                  I am making the reply to your post into convenient small parts to increase readability.

                  1.

                  your words...............Excellent work!.......................

                  Thank you for liking my essay please!

                  .................. your words...............We should explore the possibility of developing some collaborations. You are an excellent theorecian. I am an experiemntalist. Given your background,................

                  Thank you sir, we will do that definitely ....

                  Your words........ you may look into Ch. 11 of my book, "Nature of light Photon by Non-Interaction of waves", Taylor and Francis, 2014....................

                  How to get that book , can you please send that chapter, so that I can read it............

                  your words............... Essentially, I agree with you. However, I have elaborated my approch to the issues more expicitly here......................

                  Thank you.............

                  your words...............

                  C.1. Sub heading: "No space time continuum"

                  I believe, I agree with you. See section 2.3.2.b of my essay, "Complete Information Retrieval: A Fundamental Challenge", in the current competition:

                  https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3565 ......................

                  You said excellently in your essay ............ The running time is not a physical parameter of any natural object. Creating the concept of the running time is a remarkable invention by human species. Our modern society will come almost to a halt, not completely though. The Covid-19 pandemic has demonstrated that! Our universe is full of harmonic oscillations and motions, from atoms to our planetary system. We invert the frequency of well-designed oscillator to define a period......... They are exactly correct

                  I will continue...

                  Best Regards

                  =snp

                  Respected Professor Chandrasekhar Roychoudhuri,

                  2.

                  Your words.......................... We must recognize that all our measurements are being carried out in the 3D space, albeit at different instants, while the universe is evolving through its "running time". The apparatus always remains in 3D. Nature is executing all its interaction processes in its 3D. Therefore, the theories must also remain confined to 3D. .....................

                  Dynamic Universe Model is working on that 3D Cartesian coordinates , time is separate

                  your words........................ Further, the key physical parameter of all of our time-recording instruments is its characteristic frequency of oscillation. This is the key physical parameter we really can control and measure. We mathematically invert the physical frequency to a "period". Then keep counting more and more numbers of periods to develop a sense of "running time". Running time is an excellent practical concept for smooth running of the human society. However, significant importance of the concept of "running time" in human society does not make it a physical property of nature.......................

                  In our Dynamic Universe Model time is measured in in periods or parts of periods. Additionally, Time cannot go backwords and moves forward only. Time going backwords happen in science fiction ! ................

                  Your words....................... We know how to "dilate" or "contract" the physical frequency parameter of most oscillator (periodic motion). However, humans do not have the capacity to "dilate" or "contract" the running time.................

                  Exactly correct, Probably Gods have that power.....:) ...

                  I will continue.............

                  Best

                  =snp