Dear Naga Parameswara Gupta,

Guidelines for theory and modeling is warranted, especially elimination of bias and agenda-based research and modeling. Visiting your website, I find your theory of interest but requiring more study. It takes courage to openly oppose a prevailing theory such as the Big Bang. It is good to keep an open mind, even about your own pursuits. That is true science. Hopefully, you will get a chance to read my essay.

Jim Hoover

    Thank you Professor Michael Dalton,

    Thanks for reading my essay. And science is very useful, it has a knife sharper on both the sides, It can create havoc and destruction to humanity. We saw and seeing many examples of it. But we want to use it's other edge, to help the world to progress with its cutting edge technology. All of us want science should progress, humanity should progress......

    I am also hoping that there will be some more debate on my essay. Why to postpone it to some later date? You can shoot your questions no problems.... Please come out with your questions asap....

    Best

    =snp

    Dear James Lee Hoover,

    Thank you for your interest in my essay. How to get a copy of your SF novel "Extraordinary Visitors"?

    I just developed this Dynamic Universe Model under the guidance of Her. Nothing is my own except my own mistakes. So NO courage is required. Only accuracy and experimental results dependency is required. I am not opposing any theory. They got their own results and funding, why should I oppose? It is just my LUCK, it is bad, nothing else.

    You are correct , openness is required in true science

    I will read your essay ASAP and meet you there again

    Best Regards

    =snp

    Hi Satyavarapu...

    In that my essay explicitly request my readers' assessment of my application of Absolute Intelligence, as modeled therein, to a logic evaluation criteria for my essay, your thoughtful review of my essay is greatly appreciated,

    By your assessment of my essay as "very logical", I am encouraged in my application of UQS mechanix to establishing verifiable communication with Absolute Intelligence... but I am notoriously incorrigible.

    I have now read your essay, and as a discussion of principles for reality models, it is highly relevant.

    However, a conclusion predicated on principle must adhere to principle, and be consistent with all other such conclusions.

    Your conclusion that there is a "force behind expansion of universe" has historically triggered the "something from nothing" rejection of the model... i.e. "Creation" implies a Logic Singularity.

    Time-Space Energy as Cause's feeling of now, is indicative of a Logic Singularity... i.e. a feeling requires no Space, and now requires no Time.

    REF Graphic Illustration: Cause Energy Pulsed Emergence as Space-Time Energy http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

    To facilitate an Origin Logic singularity in a Space-Time Energy Reality model, UQS implements additional criteria:

    - The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.

    What is the CAD environment geometry of the Dynamic Universe Model (DUM)?

    ... the structural geometry encapsulating a point source emergence IS a spatial singularity for directionally unbiased distribution of Space-Time Energy

    ... a Cartesian and/or Radian geometry does not facilitate a point source pulsed emergence of spatially defined minimum/indivisible Quanta of Energy (QE) without introducing perturbation in all subsequent analysis... i.e. the math becomes" uncomputable".

    - A theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall differentiate Quantum Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE).

    What minimum icon/sprite of spatially defined Energy (QE), experiences a Space-Time differential, in an emergence SIM within the DUM CAD geometry environment?

    ... if the CAD geometry quantization does not establish a structurally uniform spatial occupancy for Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy to emerge as Space-Time Energy in a Space-Time Energy Reality, one can not differentiate a minimum Quantum of Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE)

    ... observations of Phenomenal Energy (PHE)... i.e. observed event of a QE's experience of a Space-Time differential... and subsequent analysis/quantification is inherently perturbative

    I agree that enhanced computer computational skills can resolve perceptual limitations, and In that jayanti V S Murty wrote on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 07:10 GMT... that you are "developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology", it is highly predictable that you "will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field".

    Does the DUM CAD/SIM app utilize a cross platform 3D graphic engine... e.g. OpenGL?

    Thanks again for justifying my obsession to verify a connection with the Cosmic Consciousness Computer (CCC://)... and yes a flip a coin was utilized as the only logic evaluate criteria for each of the above statements.

    Sue Lingo

    UQS Author/Logician

    www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

      Dear Sue Lingo,

      Thank you for your interest on my essay and Dynamic Universe Model.........

      You are confused, Probably I could not explain the whole of Dynamic Universe Model in two pages. There are No singularities in this model.....

      I will answer all your observations, points by point........... First of all the important confusion you got is.........However, a conclusion predicated on principle must adhere to principle, and be consistent with all other such conclusions.

      Your conclusion that there is a "force behind expansion of universe" has historically triggered the "something from nothing" rejection of the model... i.e. "Creation" implies a Logic Singularity.................

      There are blue shifted galaxies and red shifted galaxies in the universe. Universe is rotating..I will give an example.....

      Assume a children's giant wheel in a amusement park, you are looking at it in its plane of rotation. Some buckets come near to you and some will go away. Those which are coming near are Blueshifted and going away are red shifted.

      Now assume many giant wheels each rotating about its own axis and these wheels are rotating rotating Dynamically in different planes about each other. You are in a bucket in a wheel. then you see the some buckets come near and some go away in all directions. so if you observe only those buckets which are going away you will see expanding , only those coming near to you you will see contracting universe.

      And the force behind expansion is UGF, the UNIVERSAL gravitation force , that is the force acting on each body at that position at that time. this force is not constant

      You can Download all papers and books for free from my blog...........

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

      And the Universe Model proposed...........

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/2018/

      I will continue....

      Best Regards

      -snp

      Dear Sue Lingo,

      Your words............Time-Space Energy as Cause's feeling of now, is indicative of a Logic Singularity... i.e. a feeling requires no Space, and now requires no Time.

      REF Graphic Illustration: Cause Energy Pulsed Emergence as Space-Time Energy http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

      To facilitate an Origin Logic singularity in a Space-Time Energy Reality model, UQS implements additional criteria:.............

      In Dynamic Universe model, there are no Logical Singularities, Undefined point errors, No zero / zero errors, No divide by zero errors...... I checked them thoroughly......

      Best

      =snp

      I request you please study Dynamic Universe Model

      Dear Sue Lingo,

      Your words.................REF Graphic Illustration: Cause Energy Pulsed Emergence as Space-Time Energy http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

      To facilitate an Origin Logic singularity in a Space-Time Energy Reality model, UQS implements additional criteria:...................

      Not applicable to Dynamic Universe model

      .................. Your words.................... - The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.................

      In Dynamic Universe Model, Space is space, time is time, NO SPACE-TIME CONTINUUM

      BEST

      =SNP

      Satyavarapu Gupta re-uploaded the file Gupta_Vak_Essay_FQXi_2020_f.pdf for the essay entitled "A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory's Philosophy" on 2020-04-20 05:04:37 UTC.

        Dear Sue Lingo,

        Your words...............

        - The emission and subsequent distribution mechanix of a postulated/theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall comply to the CAD geometry environment upon which the theory is established.

        What is the CAD environment geometry of the Dynamic Universe Model (DUM)?

        ... the structural geometry encapsulating a point source emergence IS a spatial singularity for directionally unbiased distribution of Space-Time Energy

        ... a Cartesian and/or Radian geometry does not facilitate a point source pulsed emergence of spatially defined minimum/indivisible Quanta of Energy (QE) without introducing perturbation in all subsequent analysis... i.e. the math becomes" uncomputable".

        - A theorized Space-Time Energy Reality model, shall differentiate Quantum Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE).

        What minimum icon/sprite of spatially defined Energy (QE), experiences a Space-Time differential, in an emergence SIM within the DUM CAD geometry environment?

        ... if the CAD geometry quantization does not establish a structurally uniform spatial occupancy for Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy to emerge as Space-Time Energy in a Space-Time Energy Reality, one can not differentiate a minimum Quantum of Energy (QE) from Phenomenal Energy (PHE)

        ... observations of Phenomenal Energy (PHE)... i.e. observed event of a QE's experience of a Space-Time differential... and subsequent analysis/quantification is inherently perturbative....................

        Not Applicable to Dynamic Universe Model !!!!

        Best

        =snp

        Dear Sue lingo,

        Your words..............I agree that enhanced computer computational skills can resolve perceptual limitations, and In that jayanti V S Murty wrote on Mar. 3, 2020 @ 07:10 GMT... that you are "developing a software for solving the problems of cosmology", it is highly predictable that you "will emerge as one of the leading stalwarts in the field"..................

        It was his understanding, The software developed in EXCEL, other wise one can just do those calculations with a simple calculator.

        ONLY some of the problems were solved using that SITA software, others were solved using the Dynamic Universe Model principles........

        ............Your words.............Does the DUM CAD/SIM app utilize a cross platform 3D graphic engine... e.g. OpenGL?...................

        NO Sir,

        Whole SITA equations were developed at that time.........

        You can download the software book for free from my webpage (AMAZON sell this book @ Rs 15000)

        http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/p/books-published.html

        Book2. Dynamic Universe Model: SITA singularity free software ---2011 March --- VDM n Germany, March- 2011, ISBN 978-3-639-33501-9,

        .................... your words...............

        Thanks again for justifying my obsession to verify a connection with the Cosmic Consciousness Computer (CCC://)... and yes a flip a coin was utilized as the only logic evaluate criteria for each of the above statements ..............................

        Thank for your interest in this Dynamic Universe Model..

        Thank you once again....

        Best

        =snp

        Dear Dr. Gupta,

        Thank you very much for your comments on my essay.

        I think you wrote a very interesting essay and it must be guidance for every scientific paper.

        I realize that you are also against BB-model and you have described it as a fairy tale. I agree with you and I wonder why the followers of the universe concordance model insist on BB-model, when only 5% of the visible matter in the universe is well known. Wait the universe to unveils all its secrets and then develop whatever theory you like. I think your model of the dynamic Universe is a reasonable way to proceed for the time being. I realize also that it is hard to go against the prevail theory of the Big-Bang theory. As I mentioned in my essay, it is absurd to believe that the whole structure of a universe or multiverse or whatever it is, started 13.6 billion years ago, which is only a moment in the time scale of the universe.

        I wish you all the best, and accordingly give a rating.

        Best regards

        Basileios Grispos

          Dear Dr BASILEIOS GRISPOS

          Thank you Very much for your comments and kindness. I saw, You also wrote an wonderful essay, gave my comments there on that thread. And accordingly I reciprocated the ratings to the bset.

          Best wishes

          =snp

          Dear Satyavarapu,

          Thanks for checking mine out and your kind comments. My rating is your 16th. Someone is rating with 1s and 2s w/o comments. That is why I mention the number of ratings.

          Jim HOover

            I share the same sentiment...

            "A theory in pure Mathematics and a theory in Physics have different requirements and outcomes. A pure Mathematical theory may not have any physical basis and out-comes also may not have any physical significances.

            By to get to a common consensus about changing it will be a long up hill battle

              Dear James Lee Hoover

              Thank you for your help and giving me good rating

              Best

              =snp

              I am fighting this battle for the LAST 40 years without a single back patting. But i know I am fighting for truth. Hence no problems!!

              My essay is a reflection of my experiance, Why dont you join me???

              Best

              =snp

              Dear SNP Gupta!

              I read your beautiful essay. I agree and support your statements in general. But in detail there are some nebulosity for me. For example;

              What is "truth" in your interpretation?

              Best regards

              Ilgaitis

                Author Ilgaitis Prusis replied on Apr. 26, 2020 @ 09:42 GMT

                Dear SNP Gupta! I read your essay. It is very good. It touches on important and profound issues in science. I agree with basic statements.

                According to Dinamic Universe Model I also believe that the Universe is dynamic, everything is moving. However, some concepts in your theory are not clear for me.

                How do you interpret Time?

                What is Space in your theory?

                Best regards

                Ilgaitis

                Dear Dr Ilgaitis Prusis

                This is for reply of your post on Apr. 26, 2020 @ 09:42 GMT

                .................your words..................I read your essay. It is very good. It touches on important and profound issues in science. I agree with basic statements.

                According to Dinamic Universe Model I also believe that the Universe is dynamic, everything is moving. However, some concepts in your theory are not clear for me.

                How do you interpret Time?

                What is Space in your theory?.......................

                Thank you for reading my essay and for your nice complements!

                Time is the elapsed period between two events, say two Sun rises or two oscillations of a pendulum. It moves forwards only in Dynamic Universe Model, no backwards

                Space is 3D linear axis with x,y,z cartisian coordinates in both positive and negative directions. No fixed reference (0,0,0)point is necessay

                Please feel free to ask any further questions

                Best

                =snp