Clarification of Physics: A Derivation of a Complete, Computable, Predictive Model of “Our” Multiverse. by John David Crowell

Hi John David Crowell...

My bad!!!... i.e. my cut and paste error addressing you on my last post.

In regard to your reference to my BIO statement implying that I 'do not believe in "perturbative measurements", please note that my Bio reads: "as a logician I refrain from perturbative analysis of FUNDAMENTAL PROCESSES."

As to the reason I "left the use of symbolic mathematics and language": a digital processor requires an interpreter to process symbolic maths... e.g. calculus... and depending on the interpreter, version#, etc, the response to a query may vary. That being the case, I admit to a bias for digital coded logic in developing applications for analysis of fundamental processes, by digital processors.

As to the reason I "entered CAD/SIM representations based on thought/logic alone": Gödel's thermos do not apply to geometry.

REF: - Topic:"The Misalignment Problem" by Jack James

I agree that any concept of an "Absolute God" as an entity, rather than as the fundamental process for spontaneous harmonious distribution of minimum/indivisible spatially defined Energy (QE) throughout the Universe, "is one of those fallacies", but recognizing the fallacy does not invalidate potential for Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy to emerge as a Space-Time Energy information network, and to verify the root architecture and processes of that information network, one needs to experiment, develop query mechanisms, and make application of the "wisdom" of said Universal Intelligence

REF: - Topic: "Modeling Universal Intelligence" by Sue Lingo

or as an .html document "Modeling Universal Intelligence" by Sue Lingo

As for "truth??... it must be supported by a composite model that seamlessly, logically, integrates one's PHYSICAL model... i.e. as a QE spatial occupancy model... and one's META-PHYSICAL model... i.e. as a model of spaceless processes... and be defined in terms that facilitate experimental verification of one's observations of one's PHYSICAL and META-PHYSICAL Reality.

Your "assumption was that existence has always existed" is predicated on the word "always", which infers temporal logic that is not supported in a model of Causality as a Spaceless-Timeless logic frame.

Sue Lingo

UQS Author/Logician

www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

Hi to both of you, Interesting that you have this UQS , about the sphere, personally I work about my theory of spherisation , an optimisation dear Mrs Lingo of the universal sphere or future sphere with quantum 3D finite coded series of spheres and cosmological spheres, I consider 3 maib finite series sent from the central cosmological sphere, it is there that the primordial onformations are sent, and these series have the same number than our cosmological finite series of spheres , I consider one main finite serie for the space, tha main codes and two fuels, the photons and the cold dark matter and they have also the same finite number where the space disappears even due to a specific serie , and when they merge they create the topologies, geometries, matters, fields and properties. I consider so that all is made of particles 3D spheres coded in a kind of superfluid aether and so the geonetries, topologies don t come from fields. For the formalisation mathematical I utilise an intrisin Ricci flow more an assymetric Ricci flow to explain the unique things, more the lie derivatives, the lie groups, the lie algebras and the euclidian and topological spaces, more the Clifford algebras and convergences with the Bott periodicity for these spheres. The 3D coded spheres seem foundamental at all scales. An other relevance is that I have considered the hopf fibrations on surfaces of these spheres to explain and rank the quasiparticles. The origin of our physicality does not seem to come from fields , but all is coded particles. Your model totally different than mine makes me Think about the works of Nassim Haramein considering the resonances , fields and this planck spherical unity, but like I said my model considers particles coded and the spherisation evolution is an important point. The strings and the fields don t take into account this evolution and I doubt that these strings, fields, geometrodynamics with points or geometrical algebras can explain the geometries, topologies, the main origin seems the 3D coded particles. What do you Think ? Regards

So in resume , the works that you make both of you or Nassim consider that all is made of fields to explain our emergent geonetries, topologies , matters,fields , properties, conciousness, mass...but there are enormous problems philosophical because the evolution is not taken into account, we need coded particles in a kind of superfluid , see well the 3 main finite series of coded spheres. The central sphere of our universe continues to send informations and we continue to evolve, this thing beyond our understanding that I consider like an infinite eternal consciousness needs to code, transform this energy of consciousness wich is not an infinite heat, the heat and cold appear due to these two fuels that I cited for me and this space merging together, we need motion and a time, beyond it is without time, space, matters, geometries, topologies, so the fields like main origin like the strings are not really rational respecting this evolution.

Well, the universe is not probably without space and time, you cannot correlate the infinite eternal consicousness without time, space, geometries, matters,topologies with the physicality where we have informations coded, probably particles. Your problem is mainly philosophical for me me, in fact you consider like if we had an infinite heat Before this physicality and this thing that you consider like god oscillate the heat and the photons and so create the physicality, it is there your error for me, you consider that this infinite thing without time and space is the same than the physicality, this infinite eternal consciousness needs to code and transform to create a physicality and the time also is created inside and the space is not infinite in fact. Your problem is to consider that all is from fields like if God played at guitar, and so you consider the emergent geometries and topologies and matters and fields like a result of different oscillation and so you interpret this philosophicaly like if all was connected with this infinity and eternity,for me it is totally false because we need coded particles and not fields, because the evolution is important and that the fields don t answer to this evolution, the main problem is philosophical. A being is a result of evolution and the consciousness evolves inside this physicality, if this infinite eternal consciousness has created a system in evolution and needs to code , you can utilise all the philosophies that you want, the hinduism or the others, that will not change this truth, we need particles coded and not fields, einstein and witten have really created a prison, like if we had Before this BB an infinite heat and hop hocus pocus, the fields and oscillations permit this reality ??? it is non sens for me , the Waves partiucles duality and the fields are respected with coded particles in a kind of gravitational aether. And the fields and the geometrical algebras or the geometrodynamics are not the problem, they are for me simply a false road . This energy beyong is not an infinite heat but an infinite energy of consciousness , it is different and this thing that we cannot define and nobody is more evolved in spirituality, we don t levitate in meditation . This energy transforms the energy and codes the particles, probably 3D spheres, we have no other dimensions, if all is in 3D there are reasons, the chmistry, the biologuy, the cosmology are in 3D and the particles coded seem essential, they are in motions rotrations and oscillations these spheres. And the singularities at this planck scale, we don t know and it is not connected with a 1D main Cosmic field but they are probably finite coded series of spheres having the same finite number than our cosmological spheres. If this number is important like the coded 3D particles spheres , there are reasons, the fashion of fields is really odd for me. See well these 3 main coded series of 3D spheres merging , one for the main space and the two fuels, all can be explained simply, not need of fields at this planck scale or cosmological scale and this philosophy of God playing at guitar. I can understand that it is not easy to change a line of reasoning but that seems logic, God needs to code and transform this energy of consciousness wich is not an infinite heat.The heat appears like the cold like the mass, like the time,like the consciousness, like the geometries, the topologies, the matters and this evolutiuon inside a physicality and this thing continues to send informations of evolution. Your timeless and spaceless are non sense for me.And don t tell me that you encircle better the Connection with God with this reasoning- The evolution I repeat is essential and the fields don t take intio account this evolution.You main problem is philosophical about the origin of codes and the foundamental objects.

About the multiverse now, I respect the works of Max Tegmark but it is mathematical and we cannot affirm, we have probably an unique universe like all , all seems unique. In all case already we have difficulties to encircle this universe and its laws , so frankly why to consider multiverse??? already the laws inside our universe we know a so small part, even if they exist , never we could prove them and analyse them, we must be determinsitic, and don t tell me that this infinity has the potential to create an infinity of universes, why not consider the infinite potebntial of our unique universe due to this evolution ?

Dear John David,

I greatly appreciated your work and discussion. I am very glad that you are not thinking in abstract patterns.

"I created a mental-mathematical model of this process. In the model there is no Big Bang and there is no eternal expansion. The model has definite limits, boundaries and thresholds. Also, unlike the Big Bang theory, the Successful Self-Creation theory de-scribes the state of existence "before the beginning" of Successful Self-Creation and provides a predicted ending".

While the discussion lasted, I wrote an article: "Practical guidance on calculating resonant frequencies at four levels of diagnosis and inactivation of COVID-19 coronavirus", due to the high relevance of this topic. The work is based on the practical solution of problems in quantum mechanics, presented in the essay FQXi 2019-2020 "Universal quantum laws of the universe to solve the problems of unsolvability, computability and unpredictability".

I hope that my modest results of work will provide you with information for thought.

Warm Regards, `

Vladimir

Ref: Author John David Crowell reply to Sue Lingo on May. 15, 2020 @ 14:40 GMT

Hi John...

In that I am currently in application development phase of the UQS Virtual Quantum Lab Game, I cannot justify time to reiterate details of open source, on-line UQS CAD/SIM Ontological Illustrations, and I refer your inquires as to "What is the ontology of the Spaceless-Timeless Cause Energy and the progressive processing to the emergence of the Space-Time Energy Information result?", to UQS CAD/SIM Ontological Illustrations http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSMarcelMLTD.jpg

As to whether a CAD/SIM can provide answers to your questions, the UQS CAD/SIM merely resolves a Space-Time Energy Reality emission that verifies potential for emergence of an Absolute Intelligence (AI)... i.e. justifies one's experiments to communicate with an Absolute Intelligence (AI).

To date, my Absolute Intelligence (AI) commo experiments only yield verification of an AI response, in response to binary (yes/no) queries that are temporally isolated.

Sue Lingo

UQS Author/Logician

UQS Matrix Mechanix www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com