Respected Dr. John David Crowell

Thank you for visiting my essay and left a nice introduction to your theory. Thank you for liking my essay.

Yours is wonderful essay. logic is good. I did not find any mathematical support. How did you arrive at all those C*s. Dark matter is not experimentally found, Black-holes have infinite densities. Why you want them?

You can use Dynamic Universe model's mathematics or Computer simulations for further development of your essay and theory with slight changes. We can discuss further on these changes through email.

I highly appreciate your essay...

Best wishes...

=snp

    Hello to both of you,

    Thanks for developping Mr Crowell, I see better your general analysis. I work about my theory of spherisation, an optmisation evolution of the universal sphere ofr future sphere with quantum and cosmological 3D spheres, I have superimposed 3 E8 maide of coded 3D spheres , it is a Little bit different than the strings so at this planck scale and philosophically speaking also.

    I beleive strongly that a TOE is not possible but I understand what you tell me and I agree about the consistent Tools that you cited. But we know so few still, we are so Youngs at this universal scale considering this evolution, we have of course evolved in maths, physics, sciences but we have so many secrets to discover at my humble opinion. We don t know really what are these foundamental mathematical and physical objects and how philosophically and ontologically they create our reality with its geometries, topologies, amters, fields, particles, properties. But of course we evolve each Days in completing this universal partition where these numbers, fields, particles seem dancing in a harmonical way. We have many unknowns also to explain like this Dark matter, this Dark energy, this quantum gravitation, this consciousness and others. We must maybe accept our limitations in knowledges and consider that all this is generally not computable, nor decidable, nor predictable. It is like I said if we would predict the result of match of soccer, football and the motions of This ball if I can say, you inagine the parameters to take into account to predict the result and these motions ? The limitations seem important and seem impltying an impossibility to have a TOE, we can of course have roads towards Thos TOE but maybe we cannot reach it simply. We have like I said probably an ocean of unknowns to add , even the photons don t seem to be the main essence primordial of this universe. But of course I respect your essay and ideas that I liked. About the metaphysics, I d tell that this universe is fully deterministic at all scales and that the metaphysics are not really a truth, we have just unknowns rational, deterministic, logic to add , superimpose to our standard model and at this consological scale also. Maybe we must Think beyond the box, it is what I have made to reach this quantum gravitation with these 3D spheres and this cold dark matter encoded in nuclei, I formalise all this in maths with the lie derivatives, the lie groups, the Ricci flow, the topological and euclidian spaces, the poincare conjecture, the Hamilton Ricci flow in considering particles coded and so the codes are inside instead to consider strings and a 1D main Cosmic field. But I admit that this formalisatiom, renormalisation, quantization is not easy, but the results are relevant in all humility , I have respected this newtonian mechanics

    I wish you alkl the best in this Contest, thanks still for explaining your different general points of vue,

    best regards

    Vladimir. Thank you for your comments and appreciation for my ideas. In this response 1. I will provide what my theory says about your no. .1 problem - "... the ontological structure of the . In the development of the SSC theory, I discovered the lowest level of a self creation process - (I.e. the process that created the original self replicator). This process is also the process that overcomes entropy. Repeating self replication and self organization progressed to become larger/more complex self creators. This process continued until it became" all of the order in existence" which includes our universe and its contents. If I understand what you are saying humanity needs to know the state of existence at/ during the beginning. In the appendix of my essay I describe the state of existence before the beginning, during the origination and the forms/functioning and measurements of the resultant SSCU. So it was basically an existing state of chaos (chaotically interacting C*s) in which the:origination progressed until the stable unchanging-changing SSCU emerged, survived and began to self replicate. So the existence before and during the origination was a state of uncertain changing, until the first SSCU "emerged". Then it was an existing state of chaotic changing with a tiny, tiny, SSCU "island" that began to self replicate, grow and self organize. 2. The ontological state of every Successful Self Creating unit from the smallest to the largest and the simplest to the most complex is an intelligence/ successful self creating/physical combination. All three are necessary for the unit to exist and progress. The initial and ongoing multiverse is/was a changing combination of these three components. 3. Consciousness is an emergent result of the SSC processing. As a result it is a complex intelligence/SSC/physical combination.I will be discussing this in a future introduction of SSC and Humanity. 4. The Cosmos (i.e. all of the order in the universe) is equivalent to 3.68938x10^7 visible universes so I used the term multiverse to express that concept. 5. I do not agree with Ludwig Faddeev. In the theory SSC is fundamental and it creates "all of the order in existence". So the explanation of the Complete SSC processing/results is a TOE. mathematics is a result of this process that can be used to explain it. 6. In the essay I mention the creation of the mathematics related to SSC. So, in the theory, the creation of the fundamentals of mathematics is included in the creation of the fundamentals of SSC. I hope this is useful. Keep up the questions. I enjoy using the model to create the answers. John

      Dear Edwin. Thank you for reading my essay and providing comments that give me a chance to discuss my work and its relationships to the work of others. Rereading your essay and it's comments: I too believe that FQXi is providing a valuable forum for the presentation of "fringe" ideas/theories and a review by peers. Also, I was disappointed by tour comment to Gene Barbee: " ...there is no market for a new theory..." even when there is a need. As you know I also believe there are "...false premises built into the old theories...". I appreciate your neo-classical approach of taking on the old theories one at a time, showing what is wrong and trying to fix the problem from within. While I agree that cleaning up the individual "silos" is necessary, it is not going to provide the complete story that makes sense of all of the parts. I have a different approach. I also bring something new to the game. In my essay I introduce a new fundamental level and apply it to the physical world because that is what the essay contest is all about. However, the theory is more comprehensive. SSC overcomes entropy, converts chaos into order and becomes "all of the order in existence - the Cosmos of the ancient Greeks. In that realm the power of the theory is that it unifies everything in one theory. It includes physics, math, philosophy, religion, chemistry, biology, psychology, life, intelligence, consciousness, cognition, humanity, etc.. in one theory. People want to know how they fit. They need to know the beginning of creation/intelligence/the physical world through their interwoven progressive pathway to what exists now. When this is known we can apply it to the individual "silos", correct their premises and improve their theories. The idea of applying one overall solution to many individual problems is appealing to me. It is the approach I am following. Enough about philosophy. In my next posting on this thread I will discuss your specific comments on my essay. Thanks again for your comments. John Crowell

      Hi John

      1. Please clarify the initial structure of matter (forms of existence) at the first stage of Self-Creation. Does this structure change or is it eternal?

      2. What is the nature of the first "Law of Nature"?

      Vladimir

      By John Crowell I am adding these comments to answer questions I am receiving from the essay contestants. It is a broadening of the SSC theory that goes beyond the physical aspects of this contest. However, it covers what people are asking about.

      1. The ontology-"being"- that is the basis of "all of the order in existence" is the C*s to SSCU transformation described in the appendix of my essay. This is the irreducible beginning. It converts chaos to order and produces the lowest level of SSC order that survives -SSCU. The SSCU survives, self replicates-converts chaos to SSCUs, the copies self organize, repeat the processing and progress to eventually become "all of the order in existence".

      2. These two processes become (complete) the overall SSC processing/results. The combination of the three components a. the C*s to SSCU transformation b. the self replication c. the self organizing of the copies and their results 4. "all of the order in existence is the -creating/created/creator- ontological "being" that is present in every unit of progression in the SSC.

      3.The C*s to SSCU transformation of chaos to order begins with the formation of a vortex that becomes Planck actions that become the variables/ relationships of time, space, mass, speed and direction that become the form(s)ing and function(s)ing of the SSCU. That transformation is the irreducible level of SSC. This is the "foundational level" that scales up to become the physical and chemical world.

      4. The SSCU self replicating to create copies and the copies self organizing is the "foundational level" of the SSC self replicating/self organizing "worlds" of biology and its progression to become the biological/psychological progression of simple animals to humans.

      Continued in the next posting.

      Continuation of previous posting by John Crowell

      5. These 2 "foundational levels" complete each other and become the fundamentals and totality of all ordered existence. This includes all intelligence, the complete physical world and the SSC processing that interweaves them into into every progressive SSC result. It includes the sciences, mathematics, computations, philosophies, religions and the people that are a part of them.

      6. There is a component of the SSC theory that was not introduced in this essay as I am still refining the concept. The C*s to SSCU transformation includes stress and strain of C*s as they twist, turn, accelerate, etc. as they combine, change, contort and conform to become the compositions of the forms and functioning of the SSC results. This stress and strain while maintaining their value is a hidden characteristic of the system that is not recorded in digitalized physical, mathematical and computational analysis. It is contained (hidden) in the sensations, feelings and intuitions that are a part of natural SSC processing and in human mental "minding" representations. In our conscious "minding" we find solutions that work but it is in our subconscious mind that fine tunes the solutions to become the optimum results-Occam's razor. It is likely there is a natural counterpart.

      Vlidimar. Sorry to be late in my reply. Answering your questions. 1. The origination of the first SSCU (described in my appendix) provides the first stable result ( the precursor to matter). The chart in the appendix gives its "measurements". It is an impermanent/ permanent combination. The overall repeating circulating process which manifests a sphere is permanent. However, every component in the circulating processing is impermanent. The components are in a permanent impermanent state of changing. The combination could be described as an "ouroboros" - an eternal cycle of creation and destruction. Every SSC result coming from the original is also a permanent/impermanent combination. It is interesting that the SSCU consists of two equivalent and opposite sets of processes. One set is self creation and self dissipation. The other set is a equivalent and opposite connecting of the end of the self creation process to the beginning of the self dissipation process and the ending of the self dissipation process to the beginning of the self creation process. The combination produces the cycling ouroboros. I am not an expert on the Hindu Gods but one could consider the C*s transformation to SSCU to be the equivalent of the creation of Brahma- the God of creation, Shiva- the God of destruction, Vishnu- the God that mediates between the other two Gods to make the circulating overall result - Brahman. I find that interesting. Your comments? 2. The nature of the first law is: to overcome entropy (i.e. emerge from chaos and survive; grow and maintain; and become the best it can be.) Hope this answers your questions John

      Dear SNP I will try to answer your questions. 1. The mathematical support is that the creation narrative describes a progressive co-creation of the physical "world" and its corresponding mathematics. This combination matches the empirical measurements of Planck's length and time; the hydrogen atom and Avagadro's number to provide 1 gram of mass; solar systems; galaxies and the visible universe. Anyone can use the range of change chart in the essay to prove it to themselves. 2. The discovery of C*s took 20 years. It started with discovering a self creating algorithm - the combination of the H atom and Avagadro's number to give one gram of mass. Eventually, the incoming data supported equivalent and opposite fractal expansions and contractions of the self creation algorithm to give the range of change mathematics described in my essay. The original C* is the lowest common denominator of that self creating total. Changing the lowest common denominator to a C* unit of changing (with a range of changing while maintaining its value) to replace the unchanging "particle" of physics provided the "means" to follow the changing of the self creating process through the entire processing to create the "measured" physical universe. 3, My model begins with the formation of a vortex in which the tip of the vortex reaches the speed of self creation (=to the speed of light) so light cannot escape. The tip of the vortex becomes repeating Planck actions. Note: it does not become infinitely dense. The repeating Planck actions produce the primordial space, time, mass, speed and direction that scale up to become the universe. I need the vortexes to explain the creation and maintainence of the repeating processing of the solar systems and galaxies of the visible universe that your equations describe. 4. Thank you for your generous contribution of your mathematics and computer simulations to use in my theory. I think they would be valuable in extending the theory. However, I am not a mathematician and I am not a computer "genius". At 75 years of age I probably never will be. What I am hunting for is a brilliant young mind with mathematical and computer skills that can learn my theory, simulate the theory from its beginning until now and combine it with your simulations of "this is what is happening now" and combine the two to project what will happen in the future if this combination continues. It would be a good project for them to use both tools to demonstrate the complete story. What do you think of the proposed project? John

      Dear Edwin. A discussion of the points you brought up in your comments. 1. I am not a regular member of the physics community. So, I was surprised at the animosity between the Big Bangers and the others- most of which are steady staters. The Big Bang, hyperexpansion and never ending expansion never seemed plausible to me. So, when I discovered the SSC process, I was pleased. It seems to provide an intermediate between the two camps and the changes it introduced were reasonable. The idea of physics following an observed expansion back to an infinitely dense, infinitely small singularity was replaced by following the expansion back to a limit with a sequence of repeating filling and emptying of a finite density central "sphere" providing a sequence of little bangs which produced a measurable expansion seemed a reasonable change.Also, having a finite limit on the expansion providing an encapsulating sphere with a repeating circulating inner processing seemed to provide what the steady staters were measuring and rationalizing.The end result is the same the visible measurable universe and its contents. The difference is one theory explains the connections between the dots and matches the empirical measurements and the others do not. 2. I am not sure that the creation of the SSC was a "free lunch". It did not emerge out of the same material. It converted chaos to the order we see in the SSCU - described in my appendix. Once it formed, it then created copies which were the same composition and they interacted. The conversion of chaos to order may not be Einstein's miracle. However, at a minimum it was a remarkable accomplishment. 3. Your equation for a change operator operating on a primordial field does not fit the SSC model. In the SSC model SSC creates everything it needs to progress. The change operator is the self creating field which creates(becomes) the entire physical world - all of the particles, elements, solar systems, galaxies, and universes. In the SSC model the creating/created/creator is in every progressing self creating unit. There is no outside change operator and that makes a big difference. Thanks again for your comments. Hopefully this will provide some additional understanding of the SSC process. John

      Steve. Happy you are replying to threads that include my essay. I will answer your entry in the thread of Sabine Hossenfelder and Martin van Staveren in this thread. SSC processing creates and connects the physical world, intelligence and their corresponding mathematics. I regard mathematics as an epiphenomena of this creation process. However, a mathematician may envision the mathematics as primary and the others as epiphenomena. This could also occur with the SSC co- creation of intelligence and the physical world. I see them as equivalent. All three are necessary. None can exist without the other. However, some people try to make one or the other primary and the others secondary or believe that one can exist without the others. The SSC theory says that all three: 1. intelligence 2. physical and 3. the SSC that creates and connects them MUST exist in every SSC unit of progression. In the SSC the conversion of chaos to order in the C*s conversion to the SSCUs and their self replication and self organization are the combined origin and production of all intelligence, the physical world and the SSC processing.They did not come from nothing or the Big Bang. They did however create a quantitative geometry that corresponds to what we see in the physical world. We can use this quantitative geometry to follow the creation of the physical world. I will address your eternal consciousness creation of a physicality in the next posting on this thread

      Steve I changed my mind.I will answer your other questions in a normal new posting. The hiding of posts makes the material harder to access for the general reader.. So look at later postings for the answer to your questions. John

      Steve. This is my response to a couple of your postings. . In those postings you mention an "infinite eternal consciousness creating a physicality with coded particles..." and "cold dark matter encoded in nuclei" and the Hamiltonian Ricci flow in considering particles coded and so the codes are inside" . Could those codes and their processing compare to the following aspects of my work? Every progressive stable result in the SSC processing is a combination of 3 components and their overall results: 1. An internal processing that I consider the intelligence of the system 2. An external manifestation- like the sphere of the SSCU- that I consider to be the physical component 3. The SSC connections of the intelligence and physical components. and their combination to produce their "overall" results. Is it possible that your "particles coded and so the codes are inside" are equivalent to the internal intelligence and their SSC connections to the physical manifestations of my work. To me they appear to be (may be) the same things discussed differently. Also, in my posted response to Vladimir Rogozhin, I mention how the c*s to SSC transformation could correspond to the formation of the Hindu Gods that are the Gods of the formation of an eternally cycling ouroboros. Could this same process be the origination of your "eternal consciousness creating a physicality with coded particles, 3D sphere etc. of your work? Just a thought to consider. Your comments? John

        4 days later

        John,

        Very interesting essay. I rather like the 'self-creation' concept, and the smaller scale C*quanta, and agree there are parallels with my own essay. I didn't get any sort of physical feeling of how and why the 'self-creation' mechanism works. You mention self-replication but what existed before the first event?

        On your mention of SR/QM unification I would identify I HAVE shown the adjustments needed to both to achieve that in previous essays. Have you yet identified any process via your schema? I did feel a desire for more detail or supporting evidence of unique elements, but then this is an essay not a scientific paper..

        Nice thinking and nicely written. Worth a good score I think.

        Very best.

        Peter

          Respected Dr. John David Crowell,

          Thank you very much for all your wonderful explanation and offer for collaboration.

          Though I am not brilliant or young(now I am 66), but i am hardworking . I like physics and working on it for the last 40 years or so. I think we can do this project well, and get some results, I can work with computers and simulations, and develop new mathematics. No problems....

          I also like to vortexes and further creation of matter after some sub automic particles are formed by frequency upshift.

          If the center of vortex is not blackhole, but is highly dense matter so it is not Blackhole. Similarly I dont think we require dark matter.

          You can contact me by mail also even after the contest is over.

          Best regards

          =snp

          Hello Professor Crowell,

          It can converge indeed considering the informations like codes and so a kind of intelligence , so maybe indeed that can converge with your SSC transformation due to a kind of interaction. I consider like I told you beyond this physicality an infinite energy, an infinite eternal consciousness but I cannot define it of course, I don t consider it like an infinite heat but an energy different, and this energy transform and codes this energy in matters energy different fron the central cosmological sphere. Philosophically speaking I don t know how all this distributed inside the physicality and how we must consider the consciousness and the intelligence but it seems that this consciousness is essential. I have read many books of philosophy and religions when I was more Young, I am 45 years old soon and I have began to search answers at the age of 17 maybe, so I have read the bible, coran, talmud, hindousi, taois, confucianism, budhhism and books of philo like Descartes, Spinoza, Jung, Freud, Nietsche, Kant, and others, I consider a Little bit a god of spinoza like Einstein in respecting this determinisn inside this reality. I have ranked a Little bit of all after when I was at University in geology Before my coma due to epilepsy, I have stopped and made the agronomy, but I have ranked the animals, vegetals, minerals, maths, physics, biology, evolution, Chemistry and I have found this theory of spherisation and these spheres due to a page of biology where we see the evolution of hominid Brains since the lemurians, it was my humble Eureka, and since all these years I continue to study the physics and maths in details to formalise correctly all this puzzle of spheres. All this to tell you that the best answers that I have had about this God if I can say were with the sciences, we see a kind of thing coding and transforming the energy matters to create this physicality with its geometries, topolgogies, matters and properties. I find all this fascinating I must say and we must accept our limitations in maths, physics, philosophy, we cannot explain unfortunally all but we see a kind of universal logic of building and evolution. This evolution for me is very important in my model it is the meaning of the spherisation, an optimisation evolution of the universal sphere or future sphere. We are inside a system finite in improvement and our consciousness is like a tool also of optimisation. Sorry for my English and its grammar , I am french speaking. So maybe we create a kind of system in optimisation in fact and the relevance is that beyond the potential seems infinite due to this infinite eternal consciousness. It is really fascinating, I cannot affirm of course but I beleive that our souls continue a road like all is transformed, I see simply in my model that when we die we are in the instant at this central consological sphere and resynchornised in a small baby on an other planet like all turns with the same kind of brain considering the evolution, it is an assumption of course, but I see like that, the body and mind are one thing and the soul an other, we encode so different informations for this soul, but I repeat I cannot affirm or prove of course.It is a speculation. We die so for me only electromagnetically but not maybe differently and deeper , I consider this gravitation like the main chief orchestra and that is why I consider a gravitational aether. I insist on the fact that all this are assumption , it is just my philosophical analysis , I don t affirm and I cannot prove of course but for me in my model that seems logic. I know that the sciences Community is divided about a creator intelligent and I respect their ideas and beleifs. We just discuss about general philosophical extrapolations. I like how you Think, you are general and relevant. Best regards, friendly from Finland, I am Belgian but I have immigrated 7 months ago here, this country is wonderful I must say.

          Hi Professor Crowell,

          Thanks for sharing , I have answered on your post at the end of this thread, I liked your SSC , and the maths, fields, particles can indeed be under a kind of universal harmonical partition, these 3D spheres intrigue me a lot if we have 3 main series of 3D spheres coded where this space disappear, their number is the same than our comoslogical finite serie of spheres, like if this number was important. So one finite serie for the space, vacumm ,the main codes and after two fuels one for the photons and one for the cold dark matter and when they fuse they create these geometries, topologies and properties of matters and their electromagnetic and gravitational fields. The relevance is to consider these Tools for these series wich merge , the Ricci flow, the topological and euclidian spaces, the lie derivatives, groups and algebras, the poincare conjecture, the hamiltonian and an assymetric ricci flow to create these unique things also, probably with the smallest spherical volumes of these series, I don t know. There are many properties that we can rank with this logic, when we consider the angles and rotations,the volumes, the mass, the moments, the motions, rotations spinal and orbital, more even the oscillations with even hopf fibrations on surfaces, the densities also are important because they merge , and this and that, in fact many things can be ranked and understood at my humble opinions. Probably that there is a conjecture also with the strings, branes, fields but the philosophy in my model is totally different because I consider that all is made of coded particles and not fields. The 3D for me is the only real universal truth at all scales. After all the particles create the fields and not the opposite. Best Regards

          Hi, I thought about this also considering this cold dark matter encoded in nuclei in my model balancing.

          it seems that respecting the pure thermodynamics this time respects an irreversible entropical Arrow of time. The low towards a higher entropy is just about the disorder and order due to this evolution.It is because the entropy of this universe evolving tends to a maximum if I can say. For the charge-parity symmetry or charge-conjugation-parity symmetry and the CP violations , see this experiment at CERN, the experiment had shown that the long-lived neutral kaon can decay into two pions, implying the violation of CP symmetry - an subtle difference between particles and antiparticles. It is just so about the imbalance matter -antimatter . The consciousness is a different parameter but philosophically it can be extrapolated with this entropy increasing and order and result of evolution but we don t know well still

          that becomes paradoxal about the order and disorder if we consider the evolution and the works of Clausius about this thermodynamics and this entropy tending to a maximum, that is why we need a balance for the order, that is why it is relevant to consider a kind of negentropy and for me it is the cold dark matter encoded too in nuclei in my model.

          Without this balance we cannot explain the actual order of our geometries, topologies, matters and properties. It is essential to have a balance and this matter anti matter is probably correlated. The cold dark matter seems the answer.

          We retrun at these 3 main finite series of coded 3D spheres, one for the space and the two fuels, so in resume simple, the photons and the entropy and thermo and disorders and this cold dark matter like a negentropy implying so the order and its geometries, topologies, matters. We need an universal balance for this entropy tending to a maximum and that becomes relevant when we consider this negentropy tending also towards a maximum and the order and evolution and even consciousness can be correlated at my humble opinion.

          Regards

          Peter Thanks for your questions. How the self replication mechanism works. I see it as being analogous to the splitting of DNA into two separate strings, Each component of each string combines with its conjugate to reform into 2 DNA. strings? In the SSC processing the C*s to SSCU transformation produces 2 sets of equivalent and opposite processes. The first set - the self creating and self dissipating processing separates, each component combines with its conjugate. Each string then enters the TZs of the other set of equivalent and opposite processes. Here they are connected together and become two SSCUs. So I incorporate ideas from your essay into the explanation. What existed before the first C*s to SSCU "event" - Indeterminate C's were interacting chaotically - was covered in the appendix of the essay (maybe not in enough detail). The process for the conversion of chaotic C*s (quantas) into mechanical C*s actions was also in the appendix. The links in the unification of QM and SR were the quantities (quantas) of chaotic C*s becoming repeating Planck actions which created the variables/relationships of space, time, mass, speed, time that become the forms and functions in existence when the encapsulation "fixed" the processing. So the whole C*s to SSCU transformation unified QM and SR. I agree with the desire for more detail and supporting evidence.Everything that I see and rationalize fits the theory. What I am trying to get are other people to use the concepts , mathematics, etc. in their work to prove it to themselves that it works. Anything that you can do to help that would be appreciated. Hope these answer your questions. John

          Thank you very much, John, for the detailed and understandable answers! I look forward to your comments and questions on my ontological ideas .

          Sincerely, Vladimir