The technological environmentalism seems a key also. The potential of our ecosystems well utilised and harmonised can help the globality a lot. It is a foundamental, these ecosystems can permit to reach many points of equilibrium and all systems can converge. The industrialisation of our solar system also with these wheels need these balanced ecosystems. I have explained the importance of this composting at big global scale and the vegetal multiplication more the harmonisation of interactions between animals, and vegetals. It seems not possible to reach these points of equilibrium without these parameters. The composting I repeat possesses in a small part an incredible diversity of animals and vegetals and it is the begining of the food chain, I have tested thje majority of families , the resulsts are very relevant, the natural resistance is correlated and the quality of growths are optimised when we add argils and mineral salts and oligo elements. The technologies correlated with our ecology are still not so developped, we have many things to discover and utilise , the complementarity seems an universal foundamentals. This method in the time can solve also the climate problems more adaptations studied. The UN must take into account this at my humble opinion.

7 days later

It is in uniting the good persons, systems, institutes,...and in detailing concrete global solutions where all wins that we shall change this planet for a better. Alone we are nothing in fact and it is in this united logic and in teams with determinism, rationalism, universalism, altruism that we can improve what can be improved.

10 days later

I try my best to unite for this project, I speak about this global collaboration on linkedin , the aim being to create synergies and a team and create this book mannifest of adapted global solutions, if it is well detailed and made and concrete , they shall see that all wins and that we must change globally for the well of all. The most difficult is to unite I have remarked , the communication seems essential , I am not unfortunally good for the communication but I do my best. The most important is to be rational and logic considering this global system , I am not an authority , so it is not easy.

10 days later

Program suggestion.

Aim: to create a group of say 100 people that have good opinions about how to unify Mother Earth so it will be a better place to live in.

Not by pointing at failures, errors but to problems and their solutions. We don't want to create a feeling of doing wrong so we get an attitude of rejection and protection.

We want to attract good people only,not so many needed at this stage. it can be scientists or common people. The ideas are the important, not education.

We want solutions that benefit all, a win-win solution if possible.

This group has to be interdishiplinary in a broad sense.

- different worldviews, cultures, religions, politics, we point out that these are fundamental human rights, which we don't want to change.

- we want solutions to global problems like ecology, economy, social systems, etc. a bit like the UN-program 30.

- future employments with AI robotics, and the problems it give the human community.

- industrialisation of space,maybe suitable for robots.

- employment for common people. as some kind of obligation to create jobs,model from industry and waste program, AI-kindergarten etc, new kind of jobs.

- enjoy the freedom is maybe not a good alternative. Here is a catastrophy lurking.

- a basic salary for all citizens of Earth. Today the lowest salary is 2 eur. so this is a problem,maybe 500-1000 eur would be a goal. You are free to work more.

- human population grow. One or two child politics was not good. Matbe some kind of 'rights' demanded to be a parent? These are always hard questions.

- ecology. A big city like NewYork can be ex., change and show us the way to a sustainable life.

- a certain amount of trees per area

- green roofs, walls, architecture

- light must reach the floor

. communications to -fro the centers etc.

- composting in a global scale

- biological or organic production of food, incl. fish

- energy production sustainable, following EU directives?

- energypolitics is conservative, with difficulties to see new solutions.Now we live in an intermediate situation, where nukes are replaced with other sources. Fusion is still under development, wind, sun, water, hydrogen etc, has their own weaknesses, but are maybe a solution in this intermediate state. Wood, pellets etc biomass production could be linked to climate change prevention. Peat is not sustainable, because it takes too long to replace it. Whynot take benefit of the climate change and grow green energy? This intermediate situation will maybe last for 20 years?

- our seas, mostly oxygenation and eutrofication.

- garbage in the waters.

I linked to several actual projects on your FB wall,tr y to put it here? It could give a good understanding of what you talk of. Ulla.

Hi Ulla, thanks for sharing these ideas, it is general and very important. We have discussed about these ideas together , a new global revolutionary industrialisation is essential also to stabilise the global econony where all wins, the ecolgy and the technology on earth and in space being foundamentals. This AI arrives and is going to replace many manual jobs, the UN must be aware of new rules and global laws for this AI at my humble opinion, the fact to give jobs to majority seems foundamental , that will catalyse all systems and all wins.

A thing important is that new york also can show the road of a new era , the ecosystems can be improved , the vegetal studied walls and the composting is essential for the balance between animals, vegetals and minerals. The jobs correlated also are important. If a town like New york can do it, the others also , the water, the soils, the air , the recycling are so important to reach the points of equilibrium.

I explained also this industrialisation of the solar system with wheels in orbit mimating our gravitation on earth with the rotation, it is important also and the ecosystems inside also, mars can be utilised but at short term , we d have at long term for the lifes a problem of adaptation due to a different gravitation. The 197 governements must take their responsabilities with the help of this UN and world bank , it is an obliged step of evolution for our earth and all wins I repeat. It could be well also to check this nuclear fusion quickly , the advantages are numerous.

Thanks still Ulla for sharing these relevant ideas. I will answer and develop these ideas soon.

Regards

Dear FQXi members , you are the smartest persons on this earth and in logic your consciousness is very developped also , I d be honored to have your ideas to convice the UN, it is important to optimise this planet , if we are a good concrete team with concrete well detailed solutions, they shall listen us this UN. I am persuaded that you have relevant ideas of global harmonisation, persons like you Professor Penrose and the others can make a difference , alone I cannot convice this UN. I ask you with humility to help me , I don t want to be the leader of this project you know, I just sincerely want to make a difference for this sphere earth. We can do it , together in complementarity. Friendly

the thing wich worries me the most is the normality of the system, we follow all a system like if it is logic and normal, the biggest error is there, all the spheres of activity evolves and the majority of humans follow it and believe it is like this. The people works and try to adapt themselves and survive. We cannot blame this , but the problem is very important for the earth and its lifes and the future generations, we don t really change the globality , we don t really innovate for a better this global system, so the effects shall be simply soon a near future a chaotical system due to the human psychology and the numbers. What do this UN ? are they conscious that we cannot reach the points of equilibrium where all lifes animal and vegetal can find their places??? It is more than surprising , we have evolved in consciousness , so how is it possible and the conflicts of interest or the capitalism are not the problem, the solutions exist, so how is it possible simply ?

    This is an enormous problem this reality of normality. And furthermore the vanity , and ego don t arrange the problem , the individualism or the small groups of thoughts continue to nourrish this system due to this lack of universal altruism and foundamental global complementarity. The people ignore in fact this truth, it is totally odd and I repeat it is like normal, but no it is not logic and foundamental to think like this. We are youngs us the humans considering the evolution and we have created a system , we can improve it respecting these foundamentals that this universe shows us. But I ask me if the humans are ready and are able to fight this normality and this vanity and individualism. Hope we can change , the solutions are in our hands, are we able to create a better earth and a better future for the next generations or are we all endoctrinated by this normality, all is there in fact.

    An idea that I worked about is the geothermal sources. Their potential are relevant. We can create for example greenhouses and adapted mechanisms, if we add the composting , we can also utilise the CH4 methan, all is a question of engineerings simply and adapted mechanisms. The pressure and the temperature can be utilised even in the coldest places like here in the north. We can even add other energetical systems like the wind and the sun. The relevance is that with the argilo humic complex, the quality biological of plants is very relevant. I have thought a lot about this technic , it is just a question of good engineering.

      When it is too warm, we utilise the energetical systems disponible to decrease the temperature in adding the systems, the ventilators , the freezing systems and others.

      it is not a problem with a good computer and the good added engineered mechanisms, it is the add of systems the most important for points of equilibrium permitting the optimisation.

      We need also for this project authorities and celebrities and the televisions, I d be honored to have Mr Neil De grasse Tyson in this project, his celebrity can help for the different synergies, I know that he liked also my theory on linkedin, I hope he read this forum and that he can help us, it will be an incredible conscious revolution in being a good team skilling , conscious and multidisciplinary . I repeat but it is wonderful indeed to try to explain this consciousness but it is also very important to utilise for the optimisations....

      8 days later

      Dear all

      I have written article on beyond time and space and it's physical approach

      I will upload that when completed!

      Thanks,

      Prasad Divate

      6 days later

      the real challenge is not in fact I have remarked to create all the challenges and solutions for a better planet , the real challenge is to unite and unify the people in a pure universal altruism.

      The enteprises alone and systems shall not change the world, they improve it a little bit and permit to give jobs or others , but it is in uniting the real general thinkers and systems having concrete solutions that we shall make a difference, the UN can listen if they have a concrete book detailed of solutions.

      I try to have Richard Branson in this project on linkedin , hope they could help.

      5 days later

      The industrialisation of the solar system is for me really a key , we need an industrial revolution where all wins.

      Several soscieties, enteprises work already about this like the nasa, richard branson, elon musk and other billionairies, but they need help and the governments also. We need also to harmonise the interactions between all these systems and the UN is the key.

      The fact to industrialise correctly this solar system is so important, we can utilise the planets and their ressources , create wheels in orbit mimating the earth gravity, we can develop ecosystems balanced between animals and vegetals, .....

      The economy will be boosted on earth and in space simply and the fact also to harmonise this earth ecologically speaking is essential . We can with this global solution give jobs, hope, water, food, energy to majority. We must not forget that this AI arriving is going to replace many manual jobs and so we must create a global ethic also for the manual jobs.

      If the UN does not take its responsabilities, it will not be sufficient at my humble opinion, the potential is incredible for this space and we have the skillings to reach the points of equilibrium.

      For me this industrialisation of the solar system is the main key with the ecology to harmonise the global economy more the consciousness also in the learderships.

      a month later

      The energetical problem is just a part , the fusion I hope will be soon checked and that will permit better distributions, in fact it is the add of energetical systems the key with points of equilibrium. An important point is the harmonisation of ecosystems also and the 197 governments must take their responsabilities in changing their rules. The composting atn big global scale for the soils and the vegetal multiplication are essential, more the harmonisation so interactions between animals and vegetals, a town like New York must have balanced ecosystems everywhere and even vegetalised walls on Buildings.

      The consciousness in the leaderships seem foundamental also, all governments and enterprises must be aware of this universalism , we pollute too much and we don t recycle correctly, that is why the governements can create adapted jobs also about all this, it is really the UN the key , like this they shall oblige the governments to act correctly.

      3 months later

      I know that I am not known and a celebrity and so I cannot utilise the medias and like this planet is like this, so I must be credible. But this project is possible to success. In creating a concrete book of solutions adaptable to our global system and where all wins, we can do it. Alone I cannot , that is why the aim is really to unite and to develop these ideas, solutions. The fact that FQXi is at new york and the world banks and the UN also can permit to success. It is not an utopy this book of concrete adapted solutions for this planet, it is even a priority , a necessary step of evolution. I have not created this group to create political , economomial, religious, or ideologist problems, no , it is just to create concrete solutions, they exist and nobody looses, on the other side, all wins, the richest like the poorest, all governments, all humans, all lifes even on this sphere earth. The aim is to not to imply problems to the leaders or to take their power, no , it is just a win win at all levels. Hope the vanity can be forgotten, hope the thinkers and rational universal thinkers, systems, institutes ....can follow me, Me I don t want to be a leader, I just want sincerely to solve what is possible to solve with sciences and cosnciousness, there is nothing of odd, I am just aware that we can do it .

      We need a system of communication, it is not my strenght the communication. The aim is to unite the good persons of all countries having concrete adapted global solutions, they exist these universalists , conscious and seeing the generality.

      Even in the members of FQXi, I know that they exist also, Penrose probably is a real universal generalist and it could be well if he supports this project. Imagine the revolution in being a good team with celebrities and if we utilise the systems of communication like the net, the televisions, the newspapers and others ? imagine the results in focusing after analysis on global solutions where all wins, Imagine the the possibilities. The UN can listen to us if the solutions are well made. This project is not to make politics or to imply problems for the conflicts of interest, nor to stop tjimngs not possible to stop.

      The project is really to create solutions of optimisation improvement at all levels of this global society. In fact all governments, enteprises, institutes, lifes on earth must win and for this we must revolutionate the global system in inserting logic parameters of adaptation. It is this alos the evolution, it is the adaptation. New York has a responsability for me and can reasure the planet and all humans, they can solve the major problems, it is not an utopy, it is even a necessity for all.

      It can be in all humility the biggest revolution of all times of this earth , a new era , a new step, a new global universal model. If they didn t exist these solutions, I will not insist, but they exist and I repeat all lifes win if the universal deterministic laws are taken into account. The UN must wake up and be rational and universal. I repeat but a new revolutionary industrialisation is a main part of the success, and the solar system with the UN and the world bank taking their responsabilities can boost the governments and all enteprises .

      The AI arrives, don t forget this and the manual jobs and others are essential to reach points of equilibrium, only a new economical gloabl revolutionary industrialisation can permit this. We can success , it is not an utopy, we can.

      If the president Biden understands this, he can be part of this project and I d be honored and he will part of the biggest revolution of all times of this Earth. Be the force of the universe with us.

        Dear Steve

        Why do we need something new? We have this forum at FQXI. You have a Facebook group. You wanted to get together 100 wise and influential people. You are not going to succeed. Either it will be a small group of good friends who agree with one another and will have no influence in the world, or it will be a big group which does have influence, hence people will join it and use it because it has power.

        Look at the UN. It kind of works. People talk to one another. People use it to play power games. Politicians use it to keep hold of their power at home. Democracy can work at a local level, say, at a village level. Humans are able to interact socially with one or two hundred people but not with more. The more people you interact with the less is the quality of the interactions.

        Richard