Thanks Paul Butler.

I do research on consciousness, and your thinking is good. I use physics (some call it metaphysics, because we cannot use reductionism alone) and math to show on almost the same scenario.

Steve has also many good thoughts about it.

If there comes a new essay contest we can take part. I must admit I have lectures Zeeya Meralis on this alit. I am not a member here.

I have written two essays earlier.

Now I am thinking of the three worlds of Penrose and if they can be unified with a theological view about deduction, foundationalism and correspondence, where we can find immaterial aspects we can link to the mental, platonic and physical matter as Penrose have it. Maybe we can do a linking here?

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Ulla.

We need to complement game theory? All is not about competition, we can also collaborate?

Dear Ulla,

I looked at the theory of three worlds by Penrose and found that some concepts in it are lacking.

1. Mathematics is elevated beyond its actual use. Mathematics is just a part of man's language structure. It is composed of word structures that are linked together to show relationships between the basic words. Anything that can be expressed in a mathematical form can also be presented in man's normal word form. As an example, I can say "E=IR or I can say the force that pushes electrons in a circuit is equal to the number of electrons moving or flowing past a point in the circuit in a specific time period times the resistance to that flow. In the formula, E is a word form that represents the force (Electromotive force). The = word represents equals. The I word represents the number of electrons that flow past a point in the circuit in a time period (current). The R word represents the amount of resistance that the electrons experience to their flow in the circuit. Note that the normal descriptive language gives much more detailed information about the relationship described than is included in the mathematical formula form. The main advantage of the formula form is that it is much shorter to work with and shows the basic relationship more concisely. It lacks the structural details of what is being presented, however. Math is very useful to those who already understand the basic entities that are included in the formula to present and talk about concepts of relationships to others who also have this level of understanding. Math is not usually the best way to present concepts to those who have no background in the area. This is greatly due to the fact that in order to be very concise, a concept is usually represented in the form of a single character or other figure, which is very abstract in form. Only those who work in a field where the formula applies and are well versed in that area are likely to really understand in detail what the formula truly means. Those who do not have such an understanding may use the formula incorrectly and greatly error in their work. Instead of talking about math as though it causes the relationships that are represented in its formulas, it is better to talk about how the existing relationships between existing entities appear to be fine-tuned to work together to produce the observed effects. It is the multilevel connected relationships between entities that exist in reality that are truly interesting, not the math representations of them. The E=IR formula is showing the relationships between existent entities (the electrons) and two forces, which are the electromotive force that is generated by a field that is applied to the circuit to cause the electrons to flow in the circuit and the molecular field forces, etc. that exist in the circuit materials that resist the flow of the electrons through the circuit. My guess is that many who actually work in electronics do not understand this even to the level of detail that I just gave. Much of the confusion in science today is caused by this lack of detailed understanding even of basic concepts.

2. The Physical world is what actually exists. Ideas in the Platonic world can be in agreement with what really exists or they can be based on imaginations that have no relationship to what actually exists. In science only those ideas that conform to what actually exists are of any importance. Today there are too many theories that don't have any real basis in agreement with observed reality. The mental world is more complex than most people presently understand. It is possible for a man to believe anything and then to formulate mathematical laws to represent that belief. This would not prove that such beliefs are true to reality. All of our evidence about what reality actually is, comes from our senses in one way or another. Since true science is applied to gaining the true and complete understanding of what actually exists, any ideas that don't conform to observed reality have no place in science. There are currently many concepts such as multiverses, zero-point energy, vacuum energy, etc. that have no real basis in observed reality. Such concepts should not be considered to be valid scientific concepts unless or until supporting observations are made. Focusing too much on such concepts has led to ignoring easily seen observations that give much needed new understandings of such things in the world as the basic material that fields, energy photons, and matter particles are composed of and how that material is structured in each of them to cause them to display the output resalts that are observed from their interactions with each other in the physical world. Since the Creator made the physical world, many things are presented in the scriptures that give information about it and about the Creator also, because he has made images of himself in the structure of the creation. Many people are familiar with man having been made in the image of the Creator and that is true. The Creator is made of three parts, which are his Spirit that generates all of his intents of what he is going to do, his Word that is part spirit and part body and translates the intents of his Spirit into thoughts that can be understood and acted upon by his Body and vice versa, and his Body that acts in the world in accordance with the thoughts it receives from the Word. Man is also made of three parts, which are his spirit that generates his intents of what he plans to do, his soul, which translates the intents of his spirit into thoughts that his body can understand and act on, and his body, which carries out the intents of his spirit in accordance to the thoughts that it has received from his soul. I find it interesting that in current science the spirit has been left out of consideration. I believe this is because the spirit is the highest part of man that controls everything that the man does and is an image of the Creator's Spirit, which controls everything that he does. Those who don't want to believe in the existence of the Creator would rather that man not get information especially about the highest part of the Creator. I have recently come across an image of the Creator in the most basic structure of the creation in the fields, energy photons, and matter particles. The fields are an image of the Creator's Spirit, the energy photons are an image of the Word and the matter particles are an image of the Body of the Creator. Again, it is the fields that science at least appears to know little about. People tend to think that the scriptures do not contain scientific information, but I have found that it contains scientific information that goes well beyond the current understanding of man on this planet. Since the Creator made or founded the creation, he is by definition the foundation of it. He has made many images of himself in the creation, all of which correspond to each other and to him. The Creator made the creation in a hierarchical form in a similar way to the way a man would make a car. It starts with a single material and is built up in stages of increasing complexity from there. This type of structuring allows one to use deduction to get an understanding of things that cannot currently be directly observed by looking at a level that can be observed.

I have looked at your papers and it appears that you believe that the first living cell could somehow have been produced by nature and that then evolution provided all of the diversity of living creatures that we now observe plus all that did exist in the past, but have died off. When I was young and the state of scientific advancement was that it was believed that living creatures are composed of cells that contained protoplasm, cytoplasm and some unknown life force it seemed to be reasonable to believe that these creatures could have come about naturally and that evolution could have worked to produce all living creatures. As scientific knowledge has increased over time and it has been seen that living creatures are exceedingly complex hierarchical structures, it has become more and more evident that it is not possible for that to have been the case and that intelligent decisions had to have been made in order to build things like the protein machines that enable and control the internal operation of living cells and the production of the programed structure of DNA molecules, etc. It has been estimated that the simplest possible living cell that can do all things that a cell must do to live and reproduce would have to contain at least 200 protein machines. In real living cells these protein machines are chains of amino acids that contain between 66 and over 1400 amino acids. There are over 100 different amino acids. About 80 of them have been found in meteors. There are only 20 amino acids in living creatures, but any random generation of amino acids to build protein machines would likely generate at least the 80 or so amino acids found in nature. Each position in a protein's chain must contain the right amino acid to make the protein machine that will work properly for the purpose it is designed to fulfill in the living cell. This means that if we look at a relatively small protein machine with 100 positions for amino acids each one of which could contain any one of 80 amino acids, there would be about 1x10^220 possible amino acid combinations, but only one of those combinations would build the protein machine needed in the cell. It is estimated that there are only about 1x10^80 matter particles in the universe, so if you used all of the matter in the universe to randomly build amino acids you could only build a very small percentage of the possible different protein machines with chains of 100 amino acids. If you look at it from the DNA side you see that to naturally randomly produce a DNA or even a somewhat simpler RNA molecule that contains the sequences of amino acids for all 200 protein machines in the cell would be even much less probable. It should also be mentioned that not only would all 200 protein machines need to be produced, but they would have to all be produced in proximity to each other close enough to come together into one cell and since the natural environment breaks down complex structures like these, they would all have to be produced in a very short time before any were destroyed by the environment. The only way the right protein machines and DNA/RNA molecules could have been produced is by an intelligent being who understood what was needed and had the ability to make them and put them all together in the cell. Man on this planet still cannot do that, so random generation certainly wouldn't be able to do so either. Someone who could build the entire universe could likely do that, however.

Evolution is another problem area that has become more apparent as science has advanced. When I was young it was considered that the universe always existed. It was said that stars would burn out and explode to form a large gas cloud, which would over time condense into a new star, etc. Now it is considered that the universe is only about 14 billion years old. This sounds like a very long time, but if you consider that no new species generation from an already existing species has been recorded in man's written history, you would have to figure that it would take at least 10,000 years to generate a new species. Since the earth is considered to be about 4 billion years old only about 400,000 species could have been produced in that time, but it has been estimated that there are currently about 8.7 million species on earth and that does not include those that have been produced, but have now died out. Even if you believe that life could have started somewhere else and then later transferred to this planet, in 14 billion years you could still only produce 1.4 million species. Of course, creating a new species would require many small changes to a current species before the difference would be great enough to become a completely new species and we don't see those changes happening either in existing species. Another problem is that if it took 10,000 years for the first living creature to generate a new species, it would be expected that as the number of living creatures increased, the rate of creation of new species should increase because the copying errors that would ultimately lead to the creation of a new species would increase along with the increase in the population. That being the case, we should be seeing large numbers of new species being formed in short times now, but we don't. On the other hand, if the first new species took much longer than 10,000 years, so that the current rate that is speeded up because of the increase in population now equals 10,000 years, then the total number of species created would be much less that the 1.4 million mentioned above.

I see that you look at the concept of self-assembly. Most of the self-assembly that actually occurs, such as crystal formation, etc. are not completely internal, but happen due to a change in their environment. This can be a decrease in environmental temperature or addition of a chemical that causes a reaction, etc. These changes do not generate highly advanced intelligent information structures that contain the information to build living creatures. In addition to that the hydrocarbons that the real living creatures are made of do not spontaneously generate such structures either in the environment. If they were created in the environment outside of living creatures, we would see them naturally formed in places without life like on the moon, etc. I had to look at all of these things to make the final decision that there had to be a Creator. Once I made that decision, I began to look at the written information documents that say they are the Creator's words to us. I found many inconsistencies in most of them, but both the Jewish Old Testament and the Christian New Testament, which is a continuation from the Old Testament contain information about the creation and structure of the creation that I found to be more advanced than the current level of knowledge of man on this planet. This told me that those books could not have been created by man here. They have helped me to obtain a better understanding in many areas. An example of this is that most people believe that we are made of two parts, a body and a soul. They believe that both parts are composed of the body's matter. In reality we are composed of a body, a soul, and a spirit. The body is made of matter. The part of the soul that interfaces with our body is made of matter, but the part that interfaces with our spirit is not made out of matter. Our spirit is also not made of matter. People here don't understand these things partly because there are those who don't want man to understand field structuring who have distracted man from seeking knowledge of this area of science through the vagaries of things like quantum mechanics, and exclusion theories, etc., that say it is not possible to understand the structure and internal operations of fields, energy photons, and matter particles. Most people have been programmed to believe only what is told to them to be true by the supposed experts in the field and to get any work to be accepted in the scientific community it must generally conform to those accepted beliefs. This appears to be done to keep man from understanding the Creator because the fields are made in the image of his Spirit (his highest part) and man's spirit is also man's highest part and is made in the image of the Creator's Spirit. This is getting long, so I will stop for now. I hope this information helps you.

Sincerely

Paul

15 days later

Hi Mr Butler,happy to see you on FQXi, sorry for my late answer, thanks for sharing your ideas , friendly

a month later

A civilization is on the verge of collapse when individuals or small groups of individuals have forgotten what universalism is and its very fundamental essence and the systems governing these individuals are weakened or corrupted by the unconsciousness of those who have taken power.

I know that these words can be too much abstract but it is a logic generality because even if we have evolved and that we have more laws and democracy globally with of course differences for each countries, we make the same errors than our ancestors , the romans and egyptians, the humans are divided still and not really reasured . It is mainly due to fact that the persons having taken this power are not generally entire universal alstruists and so that does not help to reasure these humans and to give them a better life. We are all consummers and a minority are millonaires or billonaires and all what they want is to keep this power. If we were governed really by persons universal , the world d be better because new laws and new parameters d be created. The people works, pay the taxes in the most developped countries, buy a house, have a pension and consum the products simply and the most sad is this normality accepted, if they didn t exist these solutions I could understand but they exist and we can live better, even all lifes animal and vegetal can live better if the globality and the governances were more responsible considering these universal laws that this universe show us about the matters and the energy. We don t lack of potential, of space, of matters, of energy, we lack of a global unified universal altruistic consciousness .....

14 days later

One of the problems is the difficulty to unite and convice. The majority now wants to be followed and wants money even or follow celebrities or others. I find this very sad and it can be understood by the human psychology our sad common past of adaptation, We are here on FQXi on the best platform for the theoretical physics and the members are relevant. So like it is at new york like the world bank, the UN, wall street and it is the MIT , yes it is possible but the humans even the smartest and most aware of this universalism prefer this normality or to be themselves the creators of this kind of system, that is why they don t participate, and of course I am not going to develop our vanity.

This project can be a success if the thinkers participate and if we are united and a good team with concrete adapted global solutions to cinvice this UN and the high spheres of power. Maybe it is just this vanity the problem and this normality simply more our psychological defaults and the fact that we are all divided.

Give to the humans some money, some notoriety, some responsabilities and tell them they are special and wonderful and that we need them , there they are going to participate , tell them even that without them we cannot success and are essential pieces , there they are going to do it. We have the same problem for the theoretical physics researchs, all they are individual and want to be special , the china and india maybe are less like this, and the china we don t see them a lot but they evolve and work in team probably , the error of the occident ,the europe and USA is there, they believe they are alone working, It is the same for the sponsors or the institutes giving money, they always give the money to the same institutes and thinkers in specific universities, it is like a sphere of activity for the MBA even, if we don t change, we shall loose the good train you know.

In all case , I find this very sad and I am anxious about our future due to this global psychology and the fact that we are divided a lot . Maybe the humans , this planet is not ready to change , maybe this normality accepted is difficult to change. maybe we are a specie like this us the humans, individual, vanitious,divided, accepting the things like they are .It is sad unfortunally. But I have hope , I know that the real universalists and the real skilling global general thinkers exist. The butterfly effect can be a reality ....

    David Bohm developed a method for comcrete dialogues rather than debates where the vanity and the fact to impose ideas are prefered. The idea is to share and build understanding, rather than be in competition . It seems important this dialogiues and the win win at all levels of the societies, there is no conflict of interest where the universalism is a reality and when all find a place inside this global solciety.

    The world is governed now by the business , they are even more powerfull and decide at this UN to keep their interests. The others , the wise humans them create some foundations or this or that but have not the power really. The dialogues so must take into account that these persons governing don t want to loose this power and the aim of this project is to not to take their power but that this planet and the global system permit to the lifes of this earth to be better.

    13 days later

    The meaning of My theory of spherisation, it is not only the quantum and cosmological 3D spheres or the geonetrical spherical topological algebras . It is the optimisation nimprovement of this universe, an universal sphere or a future sphere.

    We are divided inside the sciences community about a kind of God , but the best past and actual thinkers considered a kind of god of Spinoza. In my model of Soherisation , I consider an infinite eternmal consciousness like creator of this universe, an energy that we cannot define in 0D in fact without time, space, matters.And this thing has decided to create a physicality, a project in evolution, so the consciousness due to evolution is a result of this evolution and project and it is there that my theory of spherisation becomes important for this consciousness evolving, we are tools for this universe. And I find sad that we don t solve the major global problems, we could harmonise this planet simply and we have been created for this, to help the animals and vegetals and environments to be better with this consciousness. We have a sad global past of adaptation, and this normality so due to this past is accepted , the individualism, the competition, this and that are prefered instead of this pure universal altruism . I am worried about the future of this earth to be frank, the solutions I repeat exist, we could give water, food, energy, jobs,hope to the majority and we could improve our environments. We can depollute the soils and ocean, we can improve the global ecology and even create ecological systems in space with the wheels mimating the gravitation g of this earth, we could improve the qualities of lifes and fight correctly the evil due to this unconsciousness. But no we don t do it, we accept a normality and the high spheres of power now are governed not by the most wise humans but by the money and they accept this normality too and want to keep this power.

    Sometimes I tell me wowww what will be the future , if we don t change now in all case it will be a catastrophe. It is more than sad knowing that these solutions exist, we have been created by this infinite eternal consciousness for this , to improve, to optimise, to love the things and we don t take our responsabilities, have we a problem encoded in our DNA due to this sad past and its adaptations, maybe , must we accept this, no I believe because there is still hope.....

    10 days later

    We can do it if the team is professional,relevant and if the ideas are concrete and detailed to convice the high spheres of power.

    The problems are always the same to unite, of course the vanity like I said, but also the normality accepted of this globality, and also the bad habits , we follow now when the money is there or when people have something to win.

    We need celebrities, I invite Oprah Winfrey , she can help and has a power at thelevision, Keenu Reeve too seems relevant and a real universalist. With them it will be easier to give the message to people and after we need multidisciplanry skillings for the detailed solutions. I repeat but these solutions are for a win win for all lifes of this earth and if the secretairies of this UN who are billonaires and the royal famillies and the other richest humans, they can keep their power, we just create solutions adapted for the well of all.

    We just created global adapted solutions , we dont change the system really, we just give to the systems parameters permitting to improve what we can improve.

    The fact that the majority accepts this normality and make their lifes is an enormpus problem. During that we accept , others have taken the power you know and don t tell me it is an utopy to change this planet , they exist these solutions. The humans are too much occupied with their lifes, with their ego and vanity, with this normality , it is a sad reality.

    They exist these solutions indeed for a better world and the UN governed by the royal famillies and the billonaires don t take their responsabilities, it is a circus, it is not the united nations, it is the richest united simply and they want to keep this power and make some philanthorpies to satisfy their ego and pay less taxes and in fact they don t solve the major problems because they simply fear to loose their power and interests, it is the truth. All we know it , they make programs for the food or others and for the ecology, but they have invested in the biggest enteprises polluting, or fishing where the local people cannot even eat, so frankly me I want well, but this planet is a circus , we are romans a little bit more evolved but the general problems don t change.

    And do n t tell me that it is complex with the economy, the conflicts of interet, the ideologies, the psychologies of all spheres of activitties and jobs please , it is not complex, it is very simple to solve the major global problems. The big question is why it is not made, why the humans are divided like this and accept this normality, it is totally odd .

    Why when you have ideas revolutionary , some systems fear , why so they put you in the silence, it is simple, it is a question of conflicts of interest and global economy. They fear to loose simply their power these billonairies and royal famillies, they prefer a world like this than a world inproved with concrete global adapted solutions. And like the majority of humans accept this normality and believe it is logic , lol so nothing changes really, they are sheeps of the system and during this time, the others them increase their wallets . They fear of a revolution, not a revolution with the arms and guns and violence, no a revolution of consciousness where we improve for the well of all the global system. And when you tell these truths, the puppets vanitious of the system accepting this irony, them they are vanitious and ignore because simply they are stupid and vanitious . They shall not change the world these persons you know lol

    13 days later

    Let s try please dear members of FQXi, let s forget our vanity, lets forget this normality accepted, let s believe it is possible to change the plnet with concrete adapted global solutions. We try to explain this consciousness but it could be well to utilise this consciousness.

    We utilise this competition and we are divided , it could be well to utilise the complementarity instead of a darminist competition.

    FQXi is the MIT, the members are relevant, FQXi is at new york, the UN, the WB, wall street too and if we have the medias, televisions, celebrities in this project, we can success in being concrete .

    Why we must accept a global system like this one knowing that we can improve it with determinsim, sciences and consciousness. Why to consider that this kind of project is an utopy, it is not, it is just choices .

    5 days later

    I have a dream , like you know I have conviced FQXi to create the forum global collaboration, the aim is to unite the thinkers,scientists.. and create global concrete solutions and try to convice the UN, the high spheres of power but I have an other dream, it is to convice the best thinkers in maths, physics, philosophy of the planet and the members of FQXi and convice templeton to sponsor to create a team and after we go all on a specific place in a hostel during 3 months working correctly without vanity about the deepest unknowns and we try to solve correctly, the results shall be incredile and more relevant than in working alone or in small team.

    Imagine the resulsts of discussions, works in maths, physics, of course the persons probably want to be paid like the economical system is like it is but imagine dear all the potential of this project. Imagine the works pondered after these 3 months if we centralise the 200 best thinkers of this planet working together with humility, sciences, consciousness, rationalism, determinism to be coherent in the extrapolations.

    The dream team ......and it d be very revolutionary be sure

      I hope I will succes in the time this project on FQXi global collaboration, not easy to convice and unite , I must publish too. Hope I will success all this, maybe I have not a lot of years still on earth, I have had a very very difficult live psychologically speaking due to personal problems, I have problems of epilepsy too and I have had an operation in emergency 1 year ago for the heart, more my health I must stop to smoke lol , so hope I will succes before my death, but if I die, tell to the members to continue this project of global collaboration for a better world it is possible with a good team, take care be the force with you jedis of the sphere. The most important is to try , to unite, to forget this normality accepted, to forget this indivisualism, this vanity, to try simply in being a concrete team with concrete global solutions to convice the high spheres of power, they exist these nsolutions for the well of all lifes of this earth.

      Hi Ulla , We know that the humans have always make wars and have created weapons, arms, guns.I know that we must protect and that unfortunally even if I find these arms, guns, weapons sad creations, they are necessary to protect the countries against the crazy ideologies or others.That said we are arrived at a dangerous time too considering these nuclear weapons, It is a kind of disuasion but if the opposite ideologies one day make a war, it will be the end of the world like we know it. I am worried with the problems in ukrainia, it is odd this situation. The Nato looks at all this and putin seems determinated, I don t know what he has with his partners in the head to be frank. In all case hope that the wisdom will be prefered instead of the crazyness .

      I tried to answer with some facts, but it is now on FB.

      Ulla.

      Here some facts, source world nuclear association.

      Nuclear power for civil purposes I think nobody protest against, but the civil purposes are always linked to military dito.

      Civil nuclear give us about 10 % of the energy today. It is not THAT much. We could remember the requirements that the energy consumption should decrease by 20 % through technical improvement. So, why do we continue to build new nukes = new problems? The low carbon label is not even low any longer if you include the uranium enrichment procedures, esp.if we must start from seawater soon. Uranium from Australia or Namibia may end up in a reactor in the UAE, having been converted in France, enriched in the Netherlands, deconverted in the UK and fabricated in South Korea....

      Then we also have the medical isotopes. About half of the nukes are such research reactors. And over 160 ships, mostly submarines, are propelled by some 200 nuclear reactors.

      Nuclear power plants are operational in 32 countries . Through regional transmission grids, many more countries depend in part on nuclear-generated power indirectly. Worldwide we have about 450 plants today. The peak was already in 1990. 55 new nukes are under construction. USA, China, France are the most important countries, followed by Russia and South Korea. Many of the Russian nukes are in the warzone now in Ukraine. They are conquered, no inspection allowed by IAEA. This we need to discuss. What happens if.... is it only threats. This is like terror. Are we hopeless here or can we do something?

      Ulla.

      Cont. Of the nuclear countries Sweden and Germany has said no thanks, they will take down the nuclear industry. In Bulgaria the new nuke was stopped also.

      Russia has 37 operable nuclear reactors, with a combined net capacity of 27.7 GWe. In 2020, nuclear generated 20.6% of the country's electricity. A government decree in 2016 specified construction of 11 nuclear power reactors by 2030, in addition to those already under construction.

      Russia's nuclear industry is reflected in its dominance of export markets for new reactors, currently involved in new reactor projects in Belarus, China, Hungary, India, Iran and Turkey, and to varying degrees as an investor in Algeria, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Indonesia, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Nigeria, South Africa, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan among others.

      Ukraine has 15 operable nuclear reactors, with a combined net capacity of 13.1 GWe. In 2020, nuclear generated 51.2% of the country's electricity. Many of these are now siezed. There are countries with no nuclear power plants also having warheads. USA and Russia has about the same amount of warheads.

      Soviet also tested the most powerful explosive ever detonated by humans, the tsar bomb, with a theoretical 100 megatons, intentionally reduced to 50 when detonated. After 1991 the Soviet weapons entered officially into the possession of Russia. The Soviet nuclear arsenal contained ca 45,000 warheads at its peak in 1986, Soviet built about 55,000 nuclear warheads since 1949.

      In Finland Russia should build a nuke also, but the war stopped it happily, because it should come from Ukraine. The nuke was planned on a strategic point, and would have destroyed the whole Norden if misused. This is something that was pointed out in the planning, but NOBODY could believe someone could be so crazy, not even Putin.

      Ulla.

      In a statement posted on its website on 27 June, SNRIU said that "due to the military aggression of the Russian Federation, the State Inspectorate for Nuclear Regulation of Ukraine terminates international agreements concerning cooperation between countries in the field of nuclear safety".

      It said the order was signed on 24 June by Acting Chairman Oleg Korikov and terminated an agreement on cooperation between the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Nuclear Safety of Ukraine and the Federal Supervision of Nuclear and Radiation Safety of Russia which was signed in Vienna in September 1996. It also terminates the agreement between the State Nuclear Regulatory Committee of Ukraine and the Federal Nuclear and Radiation Safety Supervision of Russia on the exchange of information and cooperation in the field of safety regulation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, which was signed in Moscow in August 2002.

      The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has warned about the number of key nuclear safety rules which have been broken as a result of the military action in and around nuclear power plants, and the continuining occupation of Zaporizhzhia.

      IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi, who has been trying to organise a mission for its inspectors to Zaporizhzhia, said he was becoming increasingly concerned.

      "The situation at this major nuclear power plant is clearly untenable. We are informed that Ukrainian staff are operating the facility under extremely stressful conditions while the site is under the control of Russian armed forces. The recent reports are very troubling and further deepen my concern about the well-being of personnel there," he said.

      Energoatom, the company which runs the country's nuclear power plants, said they were all operating within the usual safe limits on 27 June.

      World nuclear news.

      In a few days now, from 24.june, the situation has drastically got more tense.

      Russia says the nuke is theirs, Ukraine says nope...

      I don t understand how it is possible that the high spheres of power don t solve the problems knowing that the solutions exist. They wait what in fact , that this planet already sick dies. The earth will recover you know. What is the problem. Is it really this psychology, this normality accepted, this individualism, this vanity which have taken all the ninds or what.

      The UN is governed by the billonaires and the royal famillies , and they make what, some philanthropies, and this and that but nothing of concrete to change the planet , if they didn t exist these solutions I could understand, but we don t lack of potential space, matters, energy And the thinkers,scientists , or memebers even here on FQXi, they speak about the consciousness or about the global problems but make just this on youtube or on the social groups and for what , just to satisfy the vanity , becaiuse if they wantede really change the world, we have here the possibility to do it in unifying the good perons, systems and in creating these solutions and in convi cing the UN with sciences and consciousness, FQXi is at new york like the UN, the WB, Wall street and they shall listen to us if we are concrete and if we take into account their interests. So what do you do, is really a problem this vanity and normality accepted . I don t understand the human nature to be frank, it is sad, we go all in the wall if we dont change now.

      This project Global collaboration here on FQXi is possible, we could name it Let save this planet sphere earth , we could unite the thinkers, the celebrities, the institutes, the foundations really. We could utilise the medias, televisions and others. So please let s forget this vanity and let s try to success, what is the problem, this vanity really , it is sad, if you are conscious and aware of these universal truths, so help me, don t ignore, or don t be vanitious, but put into practice your universal philosophy simply. It is not complicated, they exists I repeat these solutions. Don t belive it is not possible,it is possible, we know what is the energy, the matters, the evolution, the space, and we don t lack of this potential, the sciences and their truths are not the problem, the humans and their psychologies are the problem.

      A kind of strategy is necessary to create all these solutions.FQXi could send to the members and others a mail in explaining this project . And if these members and persons around FQXi have solutions they can write them . They must be catalysed a little bit simply, for this they must know this project . The ideas can be in all topics , the solutions can be multidisciplinary. We must try to success, it is possible to succes in all case you know with a litlle bit of good will. The communication seesm essential and the information , they must know this project simply. I am persuaded thatthere are relevant universalists aware of our global problems. They can explain their thoughts for a better global world .

      a month later

      The members of FQXi are relevant, FQXi is linked with the MIT, it is at New york, the world bank and the UN and wall street also are at New York. It is possible to create these concrete solutions with wisdom in taking into account all the parameters and even in considering the persons , the billonairies, the royal famillies. The problem is not that we lack of solutions, nor that we can create this team and convice these high spheres of power. The problem is this vanity, this normality. The thinkers are occupied with their lifes, some are celebrities and they are satisfied like this, it is sad , I have explained that I didn t want to be a leader, they can be the leaders if it is this which is the most important for them and for their notorieties. I need the help of persons known , they have a power that I have not at this moment, they are known and we can utilise the medias, televisions and unite other systems, celebrities. What they wait, the world needs to be improved and here on FQXi it is the good place, the USA has a responsability , we can do it, don t tell me that it is an utopy, it is false , they exist these solutions, don t tell me that the complexity of the global economical system is like it is , no we can improve it in inserting concrete parameters even in considering this odd global psychology of adaptation. But where are the real universal altruists conscious of global problems , having solutions for a better planet.

      We have evolved and improved several things , the qualities of lifes seem better than in the past, the problem is not there but it is not sufficient. Even if we have improved many things socially, in education,technology,......the globality is in ecology, economy,....can reach limits and disaters if we don t act. Take your responsabilities please and let s try to change what we can change with sciences and consciousness. It is well to try to explain this consciousness but it could be better to utilise it....

      Even the templeton foundation could ^participate, they want advanceme nts in sciences and philosophies, it is the perfect project to support. They shall sponsor a concrete project not for just persons, but for the earth and its lifes, they want the well of the humanity and this earth spiritually spekaing, so they have the cards in hands in sponsoring, suppeorting this project .

      It could be very relevant if FQXi make a kind of essay contest for this project , the aim being to find concrete adapted global solutions , these solutions can be in ecology, economy, education, technology,industrialisation,robotics and AI,......the aim being to detail the problems and to adapt solutions . After this , the templeton foundation can sponsor and support this project to convice the High spheres of power , the UN. We could have the support of some celebrities also of USA like oprah winfrey or keenu reeve who are universalists too. The butterfly effect can be a reality.

      One of the important solution that I propose for the UN is ecological and is essential at my humble opinion to reach points of equilibrium. The 198 governments must probably follow laws of the UN considering the composting at big global scale to improve the qualities of soils and substrates.

      This sciences is known but not sufficiently utilised. The fact to compost and to insert this compost in the soils is important with the harmonisation of ecosystems and the vegetal multiplications. Furthermore this compost added to the soils with argils permit to create colloids , complex argilo humix fixing the mineral salts and oligo elements and permit to utilise less water also. The farms and forests and soils need this compost because it is the basis .

      This UN could create adapted laws obliging the governments to restabilise our ecosystems with these technics. The qualities of productions for the plants, vegetables, trees...are improved furthermore like their natural resistances against the cryptogamic diseases and others.

      That will permit to have better qualities for the food and our ecosystems and that permit to utilise less phytopharmaceutical products and chemical fertilizers. This method global for the global ecology is essential more the fact to wash the oceans and soils also. We must be responsible and apply adapted laws. The composting is a foundamental , the natural food chain begins there with the animals, fungis, vegetals in this compost , all is linked in fact. The big towns too must consider this ecology , a town like New York must consider the composting,the vegetal walls, the vegetal multiplication, the harmonistation of ecosystems , it seems not possible to reach the points of equilibrium for the earth in the future without a correct global universal adapted ecology .

      17 days later

      I have been networking with physicists and professors lately in hopes of getting everyone on the same page and more importantly the correct book in regards to climate change. Currently the consensus is incorrect. There isn't physicists leading the conversation. With EM radiation making up one side of this equation we should really be letting quantum electrodynamics take point on this one.

      https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQhDYeRy7az1TKqFKwY3JNN-OzMpWOR0aNzd9_VgLjQWbOB_Qn7pIdaaKGNNOj-sS6pWL1ypdYF0qGy/pub

      a month later

      A sad reality but al, this is true dear all,

      I have created a project here global collaboration on FQXi to unite and find adapted global solutions and try to convice the UN,, but the humans have a problem in the DNA, and they are not able to follow this kind of system, it is sad because it is possible , FQXi is at new york like the WB and UN , the members are nobel prizes, but the vanity, the normality accepted and the problem in the DNA of primates imply that we cannot change and we shall destroy the humanity. And for this kind of project they are simply to find problems because simply the humans and their minds are sick.

      all what they want is to nourrish their vanity and their small person , it is only simply than this, they are not ready to make a wise revolution, they are not ready to follow, all what they want is to nourrish this vanity and to be followed.

      The primates have simply a problem in the dna and this normality accepted and this vanity shall imply in the future the end probably of the humanity , in all cases an enormous catastrophe because we cannot change , we have created our own destruction.

        Dear Templeton Foundation, of course it is well what you make in giving money , finances to persons and project ,you work in a kind of faith and for the sciencs but if we don t change globally and generally with a kind of real revolution wise and logic, one day the world will be a pure chaos and you shall loose also you capitals simply because the global parameters and the human psychology and the numbers tell us that we shall create our own apocalypse simply. The next 50 or 100 years it is sure it will a pure global chaotical system and all we shall loose you know, the richest like the poorest and all these projects are well but not sufficient to solve our global problems. You want to work for God and for the sciences in respecting the message of Sir Templeton who were a wonderful thinker and human, if he was here he d understand me I am sure and if we don t try this revolution, it is sad simply because these solutions exist and if we are a concrete team with concrete solutions we can success. The evolution, the faith, the wisom it is this also, the fact to be aware of our global problems and aware of this chaotical future if we don t change it , the economical system will fall down in a near future it is sure if we don t act .....

        Hi all, The world must absolutelly find adapted solutions , here is the number of people by country , we have doubled in 42 years , we were 4 billions, we are now 8 billions.

        China, 1,45 billions

        India, 1,10 billions

        USA 335 millions

        Indonesia 280 millions

        Pakistan 230 millions

        Nigeria 218 millions

        Brasil 215 millions

        Bangladesh 169 millions

        Russia 146 millions

        Mexicco 132 millions

        Japon 125 millions

        Ethiopia 120 millions

        Philippine 112 millions

        Égypt 106 millions

        Viêt Nam 98 millions

        RDC CongO 95 millions

        Iran 86 millions

        turky 85 millions

        Germany 83 millions

        Tailand 70 millions

        England 69 millions

        France 66 millions

        Tanzania 63 millions

        S Africa 60 millions

        Italia 60 millions

        Kenya 56 millions

        Birmania 55 millions

        Colombia 51 millions

        South Korea 51 millions

        Ouganda 48 millions

        Spain 46 millions

        Argentina 46 millions

        Sudan 45 millions

        Algeria 45 millions

        Ukrainia 43 millions

        Irak 42 millions

        Afganistan 40 millions

        Canada 38 millions

        Maroc 38 millions

        Poland 37 millions

        Soudia Arabia 35 millions

        Angola 35 millions

        Ouzbekistan 34 millions

        Peru 33 millions

        Malaisia 33 millions

        Mozambic 33 millions

        Gana 32 millions

        Yemen 31 millions

        Nepal 30 millions

        Venezuela 29 millions

        Magagascar 29 millions

        Cameroon 28 millions

        Ivory coast 27 millions

        Niger 26 millions

        Australia 26 millions

        Norsth Korea 26 millions

        Taiwan 24 millions

        Burkina 22 millions

        Sri lanka 21 millions

        Mali 21 millions

        Malawi 20 millions

        Zambia 19 millions

        Syria 19 millions

        Chili 19 millions

        Kazakstan 19 millions

        Romania 18 millions

        Guatemala 18 millions

        Ecuador 18 millions

        Senegal 17 millions

        tchad 17 millions

        Holland 17 millions

        Cambodgia 17 millions

        Somalia 16 millions

        Zimbabwe 15 millions

        Guinea 13 millions

        Rwanda 13 millions

        Benin 12 millions

        Burundi 12 millions

        Tunisia 12 millions

        Bolivia 11 millions

        Haiti 11 millions

        Belgium 11 millions

        S Sudan 11 millions

        Cuba 11 millions

        Rep Dom 11 millions

        Tchekia 10 millions

        Jordania 10 millions

        Greece 10 millions

        Azerbadjan 10 millions

        Portugal 10 millions

        Honduras 10 millions

        Sweden 10 millions

        Emirates 10 millions

        Tadgikistan 10 millions

        Hungary 10 millions

        Bielorussia 9 millions

        papapouisa 9 millions

        Austria 9 millions

        Israel 9 millions

        Switzerl 9 millions

        Togo 8,6 millions

        It was the 100 first countries on the 196 countries, the 96 others decrease in number but are almost 250 millions

        The world , the UN must absolutelly find adapated solutions ........

        If we don t change the global system, we shall add an ocean of chaotical exponentials soon , the number don t lie. The econnomy and the ecology are the 2 main points.

        A revolutionary industrialisation must be made by the UN and this world bank , the solar systems is there, we must create jobs and these wheels in orbit are a solution and the harmonisation of ecosystems, we must absolutelly focus on this , a town like new york also must be more ecological with revolutionary systems on the buildings. We can multiplicate the plants and animals , so it is possible and the fact to industrialise this solar system correctly is a key , we begin with these wheels, that will give space and will decrease also the number on earth of people. The cology and the economy are the 2 basis to reach the points of equilibrium to give, water, food, energy, jobs, hopes to majortity,I don t understand how is it possible that the UN does not understand this, nmaybe they are to much occupied with the conflicts of interest or the competition instead of this collaboration and complementarity, in all cases it is this or we shall pay all the price soon , the richest like the poorest.

        25 days later

        I d like to have the support of Elon Musk in this project, I have listened youtubes from him where he speaks about the global problems, he sees clear and I share many points of vue anout the ecology, the AI, Mars,.....we need to be united and aq concrete teams with concrete adapted solutions, divided we shall not success .

        2 months later

        I have already explained but I d like to insist, the soils are essential , we must absolutelly improve the qualities of our soils and everywhere , the composting at big global scale is a foundamental, without this we cannot reach the points of equilibrium in the future ......the afrgilo humic complex is a key for the ecology and the agriculture and our forest

        16 days later

        Happy New Year to all, Hope that in 2023 we can unite and success this project on FQXi , it is not easy to unite and convice, the humans are occupied with their lifes, the collective consciousness is unfortunatelly not easy to accomplish, theere are also persons doubting or this or that, but I will continue , we can change this planet for a better in uniting the good systems, persons, ....and in creating concrete adapted global solutions, take care ,

        16 days later

        I know that it is not easy to convice and unite, the humans prefer to be followed or follow when there are interests, but I continue because I know that they exist these universalists skilling having concrete adpated global solutions. Imagine what we can do in being a concrete team with concret ideas, it is possible in all cases.

        The aim is not to disturb the politicians or the persons governing or to create problems , the aim is simply this win win at all scales in focusing on concrete solutions , mainly in global ecology, about the fact also to create more jobs with a kind of revolutionary indusatrialisation and the solar system is there I repeat, we are obliged to evolve and improve the system , the fact to create these wheels in orbit mimating the gravitation seem an essential step of evolution for the animals and vegetals of this planet earth . It is not an utopy, the jobs like the ecology seem essential to reach the points of equilibrium.

        If solutions are put ito practice by the high spheres of power, the humans shall be reasured and that implies better psychologies of adaptation, that will decrease naturally the odd comportments.

        We must do it you know , we must try, only a concrete team with concrete solutions can convice the UN and Wall Street ,

          Steve, It's very complicated. So many things are intertwined that we must be careful not to cause harm in trying to do good. I have read about detrimental effects of Covid lockdowns such as more family violence, physical and mental health harms and negative effects on child development. Consequences of trying to do the best Just today I heard that paper straws are more costly for the environment than plastic. I have not looked further into the matter so can't verify it. They did repeat something I had heard already, That most harm to wildlife from plastic is due to commercial fishing waste. Maybe then well intended plastic straw bans may be more detrimental to the environment. When new plastics recycling technologies may be a solution. Just two examples of possibly making things worse by trying to make things better; by not understanding all that needs considering and how the many factors are .involved directly and indirectly. Where to begin to make sense of it all? The science, gaps in our knowledge, human health, biosphere health, social factors , financial factors, natural resources cost and political considerations all the feedbacks and things I've forgotten to mention-climate there's one! Maybe mapping webs of interactions. I can remember Greenpeace protesting about how Shell oil was decommissioning one of its oil rigs. It turned out they were doing it in the most environmentally friendly way. Protesting is easier than doing the right and beat all-round.

          Hi Georgia, yes indeed it is very complicated , thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree , I believe that we can success if the team and the solutions are concrete and adapted in considering the actual global systems, the psychology , the conflicts of interests...... Like I told I don t want to harm or disturb in making a revolution not wise if I can say, I just believe that these solutions exist and mainly the ecology and these wheels in orbit to catalise the global economy, create jobs, reasure these humans. The richest, these billonaires, these royal famillies, the scientists, thinkers understanding this universal altruism have at my humble opinion a responsability . Friendly, regards

          Sorry I have told Georgia instead of Georgina, I write too quickly without rereading lol , you know Georgina, the problem is to convice to participate , the humans follow when they have interests, or when the vanity is satisfied mainly, it is our nature unfortunatelly, but I know that the real universalists exist and FQXi and its members are relevant, the butterfly effect can be a reality, we need just a small catalyser and it will be ok, if the books of concrete adapted global solutions is well made, if the team is relevant, these high spheres of power with the humans following and supporting us , we can success, the aim I repeat is just an improvement of this global system and not to harm, disturb or this or that, we just create solutions rational considering our potential

          It is of course an important point to check this nuclear fusion, the climate change that said it is too late, what we must do is to find the adaptations mainly and the preventions. We must absolutelly improve the global ecology and be more responsible, the vegetal multiplication is essential and harmonisation of ecosystems and also the improvements of soils with the composting at big global scale and we insert this compost in the soils and we create optimised argilo humic complex and also we must wash and improve also the oceans,

          the compost is important for the soils and this vegetal multiplication, the food chains begin with the soils and after the animals and vegetals in respecting the ecology help to have the points of equilibrium

          a thing that I have tested like I am passionated by ecology and horticulture is to test the plants in this compost and argilo humic complex, the results are incredible, they grow better the plants, their qualities are optimised and also their resistance to diseases is better, they are stronger and so that implies that we don t utilise phytoparmaceutical products wich destroy the ecosystems , imply mutations and permit to disease to become more resistant furthermore, it is always a question of generality simply , the monocultures and phytopharmaceutical products are not the solution , even for the humans who eat these products, it is better natural products simply