yusrob Hi Robert,
Like I explained before, I do not agree with your general statements about the theory of Nature. Simply put, we cannot make absolute claims about the unknown. I also see the universe, its laws, and its origin differently. However, as I have already told you, I respect your perspective.
We can never affirm assumptions philosophically, physically, or mathematically without evidence. Your theory seems to me to be primarily a philosophical one. For me, matter is indeed fundamental, just like energy, and the best way to approach these questions is through the study of concrete equations and laws in physics.
There are many well-established axioms, equations, and laws to learn in order to see reality more clearly. I invite you, if you are interested, to study the works of these great thinkers and their equations; this will allow you to better understand matter-energy transformations as well as quantum and cosmological laws.
For example, consider the works of Newton: the second law of motion relating force, mass, and acceleration in classical mechanics, the law of gravitation, and the work-energy theorem. These are important at low velocities, where gravity can be analyzed as a force between masses. You could also look at Hooke’s law, Coulomb’s law, Ohm’s law, and Faraday’s law of induction. Maxwell’s equations are also fundamental.
Moving on to thermodynamics, it is essential to study the works of Clausius and Kelvin. Do you know the ideal gas law? I love this equation. Boyle contributed to its development. Here is the equation:
PV=nRT
Now we come to a key concept: entropy and the arrow of time. This is important because it deals with disorder. From here, we can develop relevant ideas about information, order, and the “codes of stability” that govern negentropy both in a general and a philosophical sense. This is what I am trying to address in my own theory: information, matter-energy transformations, stability, order, and disorder.
Next, relativity: the mass-energy equivalence, special and general relativity, and Einstein’s field equations. These are crucial for understanding quantum field theory and the universe at high velocities and cosmological scales. This is where the difference with Newton becomes clear. In Einstein’s view, gravitation is no longer a force between masses but rather a curvature of spacetime.
You could also study the Lorentz transformations and the works of Schrödinger,his contributions to quantum mechanics are as important as Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. My favorite thinker is Planck; in my opinion, he was the most incredible general genius in physics. You should study his work, including the Planck relation:
E=hν
There are also many other essential works to learn: the wave equation (d’Alembert), de Broglie’s hypothesis, Dirac’s equation in relativistic quantum mechanics, and in cosmology, the work of Friedmann and others.
In my own theory, I try to unify all scales using spheres as fundamental objects. I aim to reach a general universal theory of gravitation and consciousness, and to better understand parameters such as dark energy (DE) and dark matter (DM). If DE and DM exist at cosmological scales, they probably exist at quantum scales as well. I consider DE to be extremely important, perhaps even the main “information” of the universe,and possibly a fifth force encoding photons and DM to create ordinary matter. In my view, DM may play a key role in mass and complete the Higgs mechanism.
Evolution is essential in my theory of “spherisation,” an evolution of the universal sphere or “future sphere” through quantum and cosmological spheres. For this, I have invented a tool called spherical topological geometric algebras, which can describe vectors, tensors, scalars, associativity, commutativity, non commutativity of Connes and the oscillatory motions of quantum series of spheres for photons, DE, DM, and so on.
Ps, In the actual relevant thinkers also to learn, I am in contact with him and he is belgian also, It is Bob Coecke , he sent me his book quantum in pictures, it is excellent and innovative, I invite all people interested to buy his book and learn it . He works also about a quantum guitar and I like also what he makes like the professor Miranda for the links in physics, music, computings, qubits, I play guitar and piano and the oscillations, partitions,resonnances seem essental in physics
Best regards,
