I have taken the time steve A to read quietly your matter time aethertime on your blog on internet, It is respectable in the sense that you try to link several foundamental and that yoiu have taken a long time to create this blog, I respect thi. But it is true the entangled photons biphotons are an assumption and you ahve not solved the problem of this QG.
What you tell about the BHs and the cycle , it is an assumption too, nobody knows actually what they are really and if we must go farer than this GR and even if the singularities exist. You affirm so predictions and it is not proved.
You tell for example that The graviton noise of the universe is what makes all wavefunctions collapse and so is what makes reality real. It is still an affirmation not proved.
You speak after about the predictions of the discrete ether pulse , you explain some cosmological things and this and that but they are limited and not proved.
How it is possible to tell that the Single Photon Resonance as Fundamental Action is a truth and you tell the universe is a spectrum of this ether and you utilise thelorentz anmd fourier, frankly it is odd generally about what is our universe philosopjically.And the emmiter and absorbers are not the problem, the proble is our deepest unknowns to superimpose to the photons and this GR.
after you consider the qubit for this universe and you link with the uantum computing , but it seems that we have qutrits generally speaking.Furthermore the qubit and binar codes are a human invenction, the universe is more complex about the codes and informations, so I find this odd too.
You general midea about the qubit and the quantum computingt is an add of several known works where you conclude your own line of reasoning not proved still.
Sfter you speak about the strings, loops and branes for the anglual momentum spin, for your information we don t know the foundamental objects, we don t know is the lopps are correct or the points or the strings or the 3D spheres like in my theory, So it is still an assumption and there too you mix several physics like dirichlet, after the dbranes and the dimensions but all this are assumptions too.You speak about reasonances but in fact we retrurn still about the philosophical origin not known, we don t know is the oscillations and resonances of these photons are the key of this reality, so still you affim things not proved.
In fact you mix the works of Einstein, some maths and phycis and after some ideas about the strings and branes and you concloude your own model siuperimposing all these ideas ,
After you make the same for the BHs and the QG, like I explained here before and you affirm still these assumptions.You have made the same with the antiverse .
I liked that said the double slit diffraction for a btter understand of these photons but that does not imply they are the only one prinmary essence of the universe.
