George Ellis on EXISTENCE

Georgina Woodward
Georgina,
There were no “topics discussed”, there was only a monologue on your part. I think that every sentence of yours is questionable, leading to another questionable sentence, on and on, sentence after questionable sentence.

I note that you have written 3 books, together with people who have your former surname “Parry”, which make the hubristic claim to provide “a solution that allows Relativity and quantum mechanics to be non contradictory”.

Your 3 books, all published by “CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform” in October/ November 2018, are:

• Time, Reality, the Universe: The Categorization Solution. This work is about time, about reality, about the universe. It is about how the material universe functions and develops, and our relations with it; by which we have experience, and knowledge of the external world. Solutions are provided to long-standing problems in physics. Category error is identified as an issue in both Relativity and 'the mysterious differences between quantum and macroscopic scales'. Category error is identified within Einstein's work on Special Relativity, (and the light clock argument is re-examined), allowing the paradoxes to be dispelled. An explanatory framework that incorporates differentiation and categorization is set out.The nature of time and the arrow(s) of time are addressed, providing a solution that allows Relativity and quantum mechanics to be non contradictory. And more... Authors: Georgina P. Woodward, Grace Parry; editor: Nigel Parry; 396 pages.
• Physics Renovation: 2nd Edition. This abbreviated work provides solutions to numerous problems within physics. The nature of time and 'the arrow(s) of time' are addressed. Allowing Relativity and quantum mechanics to model aspects of reality without contradiction. Inadequate categorization is shown as the cause the supposed differences of quantum and macroscopic scales, and a reason for retiring the Schrodingers cat analogy. Categorization error is identified within Einstein’s work on special Relativity, and light clock argument, allowing the associated paradoxes to be dispelled. As well as proposed solutions to other longstanding 'puzzles of physics'. Improved 2nd edition with clear identification of categorization error in physics. Expanded discussion of this error, especially in comparison of quantum and macroscopic scales, and its providing remedy. Author: Georgina P. Woodward; 153 pages.
• Reality in the Context of Physics Illustrated: The Diagrams in Colour. The Reality in the Context of Physics (RICP) explanatory framework. Presented as a collection of 7 full colour annotated diagrams with associated word list and key to abbreviations. Giving a new understanding of time and helpful for dispelling problems afflicting physics. Starting with a list of points in its favour. Diagrams 1 to 4 have accompanying explanation. There is also brief discussion of two kinds of time and Uni-temporalism. Author: Georgina P. Woodward; 34 pages.

Lorrainne: Definition byIOxford languages DISCUSS; Talk or write about (a topic) in detail, taking into account different issues or ideas.

"

Georgina Woodward
GRACE PARRY artist and design advisor
NIGEL PARRY editor
Neither is co-author. AUTOMATIC SOFTWARE ERROR,IMO

Georgina Woodward
And now, in the above posts, you have twice promoted another close relative, Alex Parry, without mentioning that he is a close relative.

Georgina Woodward
Your monologue didn't "tak[e] into account different issues or ideas".

what about black cat in dark coal cellar, not facing a would be observer but intent on finishing his plate of food. How can that be as it cannot take definite form at a singular place if not observed, according to quantum mechanics?
IF no observation product is formed (too dark) That alone doesnot rule out the possibility of an un-seen material cat. A bit like asking if the moon is there when I don't look. In relativity there are many different possible seen moons depending on the position of the observer. If one shuts his eyes,for himalone the moon ceases to be a part of his vision but it is still seen by the others and still exists as a material object , affecting tides

Georgina,
I don’t agree with your piecemeal way of looking at the world. I think that the world has to be looked at as a whole.

I think that “WHAT EXISTS” is a self-contained, standalone, world, that of necessity knows itself and moves itself, because there is NOTHING OUTSIDE the world doing any of it. Everything else that exists, including an aspect that we would label “time”, only exists as a consequence of the primary existence of the self-contained, standalone, world, that knows itself and moves itself.

A world that is structured:
Physicists have found that the world is structured, or has structured itself, into category, relationship and number aspects, aspects that physicists symbolically represent with equation symbols, and category and number symbols.

A world that knows itself:
While physicists might symbolically represent aspects of the world with equations and number symbols, the actual world underlying these symbols necessarily knows its own relationships between categories (like mass or position) and the numbers that apply to these categories. It would be logically impossible for the world to operate, if the world had NO inkling, no knowledge, of its own specific relationships, specific categories and specific numbers. A basic knowledge aspect of the world is a logical necessity. And clearly, this knowledge aspect has been found to be individual and point-of-view, and not global and God-like.

A world that moves itself:
Nothing moves the world except the world moving itself; the world causes its own movement; the relationships that structure the world are the secondary movers, not the primary movers in the world. Movement is symbolically represented as number change, or number jumps, where these numbers apply to categories like the relative position category. In this way of looking at the world, “time” is not number change, but KNOWLEDGE of number change, where these numbers always apply to categories. So “time” is like a higher-level category, not a structural dimension.

We could say, if moden science is described as ;"looking for a black cat in dark room, that may not be a coal celllar, that doesn't want to be found and may or not even be there, and may not actually be a black cat, while using a small laser pointer with unreliable battery. Mathewmatics might be said to be in that contextt, all of the above written in abstract, obscure language.

The material moon, protons, neutrons and electrons ;forming matter is not thesame as the observation products, which are a partial only likeness generated by thei brains of individual obsevers. they are not the same despite appearance name etc,
At the time of the ERP paper Einstein wanted there to be a definite material.reality,like the singular script behind the different views of the audience using the analogy used ealier. This is despite EInstein's traIns of different lengths that he presened in ' On the electodynamics of moving bodies' There doesn't seem to be a clear undrstanding that the relastavistic physics presented is incomplete. Besso is not still alive somewhere else along a time dimension but theoretically it would be possible to see liknesses of him generated from potential sensory data.

Georgina Woodward
Georgina,
I know you think you are being helpful, but “what quantumc [sic] physics says and how the world is described by Relatrivity [sic]” can’t be reconciled and explained in terms of your homespun sock analogy, or your homespun black cat analogy, or any other of your homespun analogies.

Pausing to correct your spelling, grammar and punctuation would be a good start; and pausing to think before you post your dribs-and-drabs, stream-of-consciousness comments would be a good start. I know you think you are being helpful.

………………

I’m contending that the issues of matter and time, and consciousness/ observers etc. are secondary aspects of the world that should perhaps be seen in the context of the bigger-picture, primary aspect of the world, the bigger-picture, primary aspect of the world being that the world is a genuinely self-contained and standalone system.

I.e., there is nothing outside of the world manipulating the world. Of necessity, the world is a type of thing that created its own relationships, categories and numbers; these are the aspects of the world that physicists represent with special symbols; and the category aspects of the world can be measured by physicists. Of necessity, the world is a type of thing that internally moves itself.

I’m contending that, because the world is a self-contained, standalone internally-moving viable system, these necessary foundational aspects of the world can be implied from what we know about viable systems:

• A point-of-view aspect of the world, which needs to come from small parts of the world, and
• A creative aspect of the world whereby, in order to resolve situations, the small parts of the world need to continually, and on the spot, create new numbers and apply them to the categories, and
• A knowledge aspect of the world whereby the small parts of the world need to know their own relationships, categories and numbers.