The Topological Unified Field Theory on the Complex Hopf Fibration

Ulla Mattfolk

Jenny Lorraine Nielsen by setting higher dimensions to 0, just like that? Just because you don't think you need them?

Jenny Lorraine Nielsen

Ulla Mattfolk No I actually have higher dimensional Lagrangians and lower D. You can consider the lower dimensions in isolation of higher because the the higher can be cast as stereogeaphic projection (in which case they don't go to zero) or as zero if you neglect for the higher D effects which are in most situations minor. I only actually set them to zero to obtain plain ordinary GR not for the purpose of the standard model which requires higher dimensions. You don't have to consider standard model effects to consider GR as recovered in isolation. So you have to consider what you want in your Lagrangian. The full Lagrangian in 4D contains stereogeaphic projections from higher D to accomodate both GR and the standard model in one dynamic 4D Lagrangian. But the complete model is in 9D with some properties only recovered at higher subshell dimensions. Each shell handles different properties, so the 9D isn't excessive in terms of motions or degrees of freedom. It just accounts for the full range.

Symbolik

Hi Jenny,

Thanks again for taking the questions in the spirit they were intended. Just a thought a clean way to make the 9D→4D reduction dynamical (instead of “set higher-dimensional influences to zero”), one simple addition is a constraint term in the action:

ΔS = (k / 2π) ∫{S⁹} Λ8 ∧ dτ_2

No expectations or assumptions — just offering this as a possible tool that may prove helpful. Thank you again for your work and clarity of presentation.

Best of Luck,
Symbolik

« Previous Page