Jenny Lorraine Nielsen
Dear Jenny,
Try my theory with maths if you can and if you want of course but it seems relevant to try with your skilling in maths, I have never published , I work about all this but the complementarity is always good. You consider Hopf fibrations and the structure of spacetime for higher-dimensional spheres, and in considering the 3D spherical Bloch quantum volumes and the DE as antigravitational and informational, encoding the photons and DM to create the ordinary matter and our SM. All becomes logical, universally speaking. The gauge theory can be completed, and the GR also, with these deeper parameters and the ontological choice of spherisation. The topology of a closed universe with quantum spherical 3D objects and deeper parameters seems relevant.
The fact of having a physical structure for quantum mechanics and a physical informational structure also seems relevant. That gives roads to explore for the logical relationships and quantum states.In the extra dimensions, the degrees of freedom of the DE and DM become interesting. I tell myself that even the sense of rotations of these quantum spherical series of 3 systems is important, as well as the volumes, to explain negentropy if gravity and antigravity are considered and if the 3 systems merge under the informational DE like a chief orchestra. So it is a kind of extension of spacetime and the SM while remaining logical and consistent.
The difficulty is to respect the actual models and try partitions with the mass from the DM completing the Higgs mechanism and the informational antigravitational potential of the DE. I name this the mass energy information equivalence, but how to create the good equation knowing that negentropy is complex regarding diversity and evolution? The informational quantization is not easy, but it can have a logic topologically speaking. We complexify the SM and spacetime. I try with spherical geometric topological algebras, but it is not easy.
The Lorentz groups are relevant also for symmetries and localities. We don’t break the GR and SR, we just add new tensors for this DE and DM. The tensors for the DE can be divided in two ,I am not sure ,but one antigravitational and one informational, and the Lorentz symmetry can be respected. Locally and globally there are roads for the Lorentz transformations locally and diffeomorphisms globally respecting this GR.The Lorentz groups so can interact with the SM with these deeper parameters added. It can imply larger new fundamental symmetries. De Sitter or conformal groups can be analysed also with geometrical algebra partitions like Clifford or Lie.I don’t know, but there are relevant possibilities with the spherical informational volumes and the two other systems merging with it.
These deeper parameters are extensions for space; they don’t break the symmetry. So the GR and QFT are not broken , they become just richer with new possibilities. So the DE and DM added can be considered at all scales if the Lorentz transformations are made properly and if the diffeomorphism invariance is respected also. You seem good for the mathematics, so you could try. The universe is not a competition due to the fact that consciousness and intelligence evolve, so collaboration is better beyond the vanity which is a disaster on Earth.
The special relativity is not a problem even in adding the massenergy information equivalence in the framework.The SR can still be consistent even with the DE and DM added, because it is a kinematic framework with time and space, so there is no problem, I think, for the local coordinates. So even in adding a DE tensor field,a DM one, and an informational one ,or maybe scalar ,there is no problem. The Lorentz symmetry is respected; it is just that the spacetime is improved for the global curvatures.
Photons (energy), dark matter (mass), and dark energy (information/antigravity) merging take a kind of unified universal logic. The Lagrangians seem relevant to extrapolate. For the computations, it becomes intriguing locally if the DE is the hardware and how this SR acts in this. There are roads to analyse about negentropy and stabilities of information; that is why I think the volumes are important and the motions for these 3D quantum spherical volumes of 3 systems. The logical relationships seem to be in the informational physical structure of the DE encoding the two others. But the information can also be ranked, and this light, signals, causalities can be analysed, and roads can be extrapolated to explain life and others. It is how the local level is considered for the information and how the information is ranked and diversified with the hardware, processors, causalities… This DE is seen like a chief orchestra and can even explain the evolution. This antigravitational property is a kind of geometric nature, and the informational property is a kind of logical nature. So two tensors seem natural; DE seems to play two roles in this universe.
It is ontologically different generally from GR and photons as primary essence, that is why I explained that they can be a kind of philosophical prison even if we consider a kind of 0D infinite eternal consciousness, a God of Spinoza like Einstein said, and how this thing beyond our understanding creates this universe.So the mass energy information equivalence is different from the mass energy equivalence ontologically speaking.
I tell myself that if the informational tensor can be better understood, it is relevant for quantum information, decoherence, and spinor components , and that implies bridges to QM, QFT, and also with the DM quantas of mass for the portal of the Higgs mechanism. That gives a logic, it seems to me. Even this 0D intrigues me if it is true, because in this case it is omnipotent and in 0D, and so consciousness doesn’t emerge from brains or others but is a universal truth because all physical structures express a finite part of this infinite eternal consciousness. All is conscious and even living in this logic. I don’t assert of course, but I see it like this.
Regards
