PlatinumWildcat Hi, The reality can be seen like fractals yes but the philosophy of origin of our reality is still limited .
The Standard Model and General Relativity (GR) are correct and extremely efficient within the scales we observe, yet they remain epistemically and ontologically incomplete. They describe the dynamics of phenomena but not the deeper causes or the true nature of the substrate of reality.
In my own work, which I call the theory of spherisation, I explore an evolutionary geometry of the universe built upon quantum and cosmological spherical volumes. Using the spherical topological geometric algebras that I’ve developed able to handle scalars, vectors, tensors, commutativity, non-commutativity, and group structures, I try to model reality as a hierarchy of dynamic spherical systems rather than static particles.
At the foundation of this framework lies what I consider a 0D infinite and eternal consciousness, a kind of absolute potential without space or time. This 0D consciousness is not a field or particle but the ultimate substrate of existence , pure awareness or potentiality. From this zero-dimensional ground, physical structures emerge first, and only then come mathematical equations and logical relationships describing their dynamics, oscillations, and interactions.
This view contrasts with Max Tegmark’s Mathematical Universe Hypothesis, which asserts that reality is a mathematical structure. While I deeply respect his approach, I think it reverses the order of causality: for me, consciousness and physical structures are primary, and mathematics is secondary , a language of description, not the substance of being.
In this sense, I see mathematics and logic as tools that represent the motions and transformations of the underlying physical–conscious substrate, rather than as the origin of it. Tegmark’s framework, though elegant, seems to exclude the very foundation of consciousness and the tangible presence of physical reality.
Your interpretation that reality is pure energy structured geometrically and purely correlated with the GR like primary essence .The wave and particle are complementary perspectives.
Reality is fundamentally dynamic, fractal, and conscious, and any “unified theory” must eventually integrate these deeper parameters: dark energy, dark matter, life and consciousness itself. Extending beyond General Relativity does not mean breaking its laws but rather completing them in introducing nonlinear, nonlocal, and ontological variables that may finally unify physics, life, and mind. It is the aim for a road towards the theory of everything.
So, even if the wave–particle duality truly exists as a measurable feature of quantum systems, we must stay aware that this is only a partial projection of a deeper, multidimensional process. The current physical models are subsets of a larger, more fundamental framework, where geometry, energy, and consciousness are inseparably linked probably. That is why I always insist on the fqact that this GR like primary essence has created a philosophical prison. We need to transcend the limitations of our current models without denying their validity to build bridges between mathematics, physics, and consciousness. It is probably the key , regards
