those discussion are important i must review it carefully later i skipped reading over the comments to follow what each of the participant is saying i've looked more /only on the essay
EmeraldBeetle
living body as a cybernetic servomechanism
what this reminds me of a quote Le Metrie is a french 17 century philosopher that says that the human body is a machine
that i agree with a follow up line of thought is
if humans are robots why bother building robots *
aproaching the movement capabilities of humans in a moment that most human have barely learned to walk
thats an counterargument against building , stories about joining with robots are interesting however premature in a moment when human languages and culture are not prepaired to handle this
and solving ecological problems culturaly
every living thing human plant or animal has potential for a higher consciousness and intelligence, for some there must be more effort invested but still i see the potential being there this is an equalizing bar and brings in for discussion religions like jainims
i have in must reading list can science answer moral questions
however things get tricky with the science of science or the mind science
- on a counter balance , the overperformer trends that where the competitions and over achiever say that the universe is big we got to move fast
my argument here is that social structures comes from preserving a slowing down attitude are in fact technology that is not yet physicalized
this informing about potential advance technologies from the future if people pay close attention to what is happening or to nature
a link can be physical or by air (invisible, ghostly) just because it does not have a body does not mean its not existing ( or could not be cycled over, to have or not to have a physical substrate)
the idea that if the knowledge of it existance is there (centralized or not) - than philosophy is power
- going back to my previous essay -impressions of comp deci calc inexpert ecentric take, or for how could science be better
i cannot say i have strong opinions in lots of area beside mathematics and a bit of ecology
from having an opinion to doing something about it is a huge leap
having other doing something more about your opinion
this reminds me of something else like for example like intergenerational communication - statues or photos that commemorate people
would the living person like to have a statue with itself not sure , churches have saints scientist have heros
with a long term view there is not enough space to comemorate all the figures in the future like we do today
this means there must be some other museum like things that achieve the same thing in a more rarefied manner
with scientists there is a high pressure on the important discoveries on them so there must be a social way to encourage independent rediscovery
