PlatinumWildcat
Hi,
The essay is indeed general and interesting. A theory of everything is what we are all searching for as with my own theory of spherisation, an evolutionary model of the universe and its 3D quantum and cosmological spheres.
Through spherical topological geometric algebras, the tool I have invented to handle scalars, vectors, tensors, commutativity, associativity, non-commutativity, groups, and subgroups, I try to remain consistent. But we face deep epistemic, philosophical,pysical and ontological limitations.
The origin of the universe, the fundamental objects, life, consciousness, quantum gravitation ,none of these are unified yet, so a true theory of everything is not yet within reach.
I consider an infinite and eternal consciousness in 0D, a kind of absolute potential. I regard physical structures as essential and primary, and only afterward come mathematical equations and logical relations that describe the movements, oscillations, and rotations of these spherical volumes within these geometric algebras. I also explore various partitions and possibilities by considering parameters, fields, and particles related to dark energy and dark matter.
It seems that we must go beyond General Relativity, not by breaking its physical laws but by completing it with unknown parameters. The problem of measurement is therefore crucial.
But a theory of everything has not yet been found, even though we are all convinced we are on the right path when a theory appears general and universal. We cannot assert our hypotheses, but it is valuable to share and extrapolate them.
General Relativity is a magnificent tool, as are mathematics ,such as Hilbert spaces and others , yet it seems to me that General Relativity has created a kind of philosophical prison, as if light itself ,photons were the primary essence, and only afterward did the mathematical interpretations give rise to various possibilities.
The multiverse, the many-worlds, the Copenhagen interpretation, and others, all of these are ultimately philosophical interpretations, choices that either view reality as a mathematical accident or as the manifestation of a Spinoza God, as Einstein suggested. But no one can claim to know the universal truth.
Whether we speak of strings or points in 1D, at the Planck scale, with the mathematics of geometrodynamics or Lie algebras within General Relativity ,with or without a god ,or, as in my own theory, of 3D spheres and this infinite, eternal, omnipotent 0D consciousness, we still do not know the true universal dynamics.
Yet, by observing nature, certain evidences seem to emerge. So it is always relevant to discuss and extrapolate possibilities, we evolve after all.
Regards
