Essay Abstract

On considering the essentiality to resolve the paradoxes in physics, a top-to-bottom approach with bottom-up integration to cluster the Heterogeneous-matters of Universe is attempted that emerges with a non-inflationary Cluster-matter-universe. In this model the Universe is assumed as a single cluster-matter of cosmic-matrix in fluidity, trifurcated into coherently embedded cluster-matters and further cluster-matters up to infinity and has spontaneous dynamics intrinsically. Hence there is a comparative analysis is been worked out to compare this Cluster-matter-universe with the Universe described by Lambda-CDM model of cosmology that is expressed as Matter-universe. This implies an outcome of phenomenological probabilities that can be integrated with the New-physics that is on emerging with Particle-physics and Cosmology. The prime expectations are the phenomenological variations in Neutrino-physics. There are expectations from symmetry breaking paradigm of the Proton-neutron mass-difference in Gauge model by Pions and their mass in the Higgs system; and also from the phenomenological developments on Mesons and Baryons, that indicates the possibility of the bottom-up integration for this model. Thereby this Cluster-matter-universe model concludes the necessity to investigate for re-structuring the atomic analogy by analyzing the elastic scattering on Parton distribution, while considering the Hierarchy problem and Fine tuning problem in Renormalization for the Unification of fundamental forces of Nature and this may be the ultimate possibility in Physics. Hence the expectations from Beyond Standard Model for Particle-physics are much significant to proceed on these objectives for this Cluster-matter-universe model.

Author Bio

Completed medical graduation on 1977 from Tirunelveli Medical College. From 1979 to 1995 engaged in private medical practice and Healthcare software designing. From 1995 onwards occupied in a research on Mater Physics and waiting for the grant of patent on, 'Triplet clustering and computing the Heterogeneous-matters of Universe'. Member in Indian Society for Technical Education. Member in Technology Transfer Centre. Member in Consultancy Development Centre. Member in World Academy of Young Scientists. Participated training programs in Mathematica. Teaching faculty in Medical Radiological Physics.

Download Essay PDF File

24 days later

Dear Readers,

There is an error in Author Bio: 'Mater Physics' to be 'Matter Physics' (Physics of Matters)

Regretting for this oversight,

Jayakar

You have an original view of 'matter', apart from mainstream ideas. I like that.

you told me that the mass of matter has two sets of dimensions by the quantities of cluster-mass and elementary-mass. But what is conjugation-mass?

You als say in your essay that in Cluster-matter-universe the force carrier is the net centrifugal force by the spin of elementary matters that is not particles, whereas in Matter-universe they are bosons. But if it is not particles, what is it? Can you explain what you mean?

You use a lot of new terms. I will rephrase it as follows, so correct me if I didn't understand what you ment:

- ICM and CCM form a CnCM

- there exists two forms of CnCM: MCnCM and DCnCM

- in a MCnCM: ICM and CCM have the same mass

- in a DCnCM: ICM and CCM have different mass

- ECM is a cluster of 3 EM's

- CnCM exists of 3 subcluster matter

What is the difference between ECM and CnCM?

Peter

Dear Peter van Gaalen,

Thank you very much for your interest on this article.

Conjugation-mass is the convolution of cluster-mass and elementary-mass, that is in analogy with the 'Mass' expressed in mainstream physics.

Force carrier is the space flux of a quantum space that is tensor field of matter. Though it is not assumed as specifically defined particle, it is in analogy with the 'boson' formulated in QM.

CCM, ICM is MCnCM.

CCM, ICM, ECM is DCnCM.

In a MCnCM: ICM and CCM have equal cluster-mass.

In a DCnCM: ICM and CCM have equal cluster-mass along with elementary-mass of ECM

CnCM does not exist of sub-cluster-mattes, but the ICM and CCM of CnCM may have, if they are not terminal-cluster-mattes.

ECM does not have sub-cluster-mattes as they emerge from terminal-cluster-mattes as EM and are conjugate in DCnCM.

Yours jayakar

21 days later

  • [deleted]

  • Post #5

Hello dear Mr Jayakar Johnson Joseph,

Nice to know you .

I liked a lot your point of vue of universal unification.

We search the nature of things,this matter ,this mass ,this energy .

The quest of our truths and truth like a rainbow of our hopes .All is around us ,in us ,above us .In this chief orchestra ,this light.

All is light ,it becomes mass in time ,the light creates the matters ,the lifes ,the intelligence ,the consciousness .It synchronizes the velocities and become gravity ,in an ultim code of building ,it exists ,without any doubt ,an ultim physical aim ,the harmony between matters ,mass ,intelligences .

We are catalyzers of this light ,a result of this light which in the time line has built in a spece ,evolving .

We evolves towards a perfect harmony between mass and light .The physicality evolves ....the light becomes mass .

Best Regards

Steve

5 days later

Dear Steve,

Thanking you and happy to be known by you.

In this Coherent-cyclic cluster-matter model of universe, as all matters of the universe are in cyclic dynamics; the energy is an integral part of the mass of matters and even there won't be gravitation if matters are not in dynamics.

With best regards,

jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #7

Dear Jayakar ,

You are welcome,Thanks too to your nice response .

I agree with you about the mass link .

I see that as linked with the rotations of the quantum and cosmological spheres .

The energy ,the mass ,the gravity are due to a movement ,the rotation of spheres I think .I don't see an other universal link.The mv of spheres is sure an universal constant where the evolutive increasing of mass must be considered.

You know I am persuaded what the number is the same ,it's the same number for our cosmological spheres and our quantum entanglement .This number implies a number of rotations thus fields ,thus steps of energy too ,an important point I think is the evolution where the mass increases ,thus the gravity .It's there that the time activates the rotations ,and the light ,space becomes mass towards an uiltim aim ,an ultim mass.There we can insert the specific thermodynamic .

It exists without any doubt a specific polarity ,a specific code of becoming ,a specific dynamic of building .

This universal equation is fascinating .I see our Universe like a beautiful sphere in evolution with its spheres built by quantum spheres .They turn and always turn our spheres towards the harmony between mass and its lifes ,intelligences and consciousness.

Just a thought

Sincerely

Steve

Dear Steve,

There is cyclic dynamic link between the cluster-matters of universe, in that the micro and macro cosmological domains are connected, may be in simultaneity with the spin of composite particles and elementary particles, that is described in quantum mechanics; except bosons that are representational as space in this model.

The gravitation emerges by the force carrier of elementary-cluster-matter, that is boson and it is the prime force for all other fundamental forces of nature that are representational variations of it only. Collective gravitation is proportional to the conjugation-mass of an object and that is the gravity we observe. Multiverse is not explainable in this model as it describes the universe as a single cluster-matter with embedded sub-cluster-matters and further sub-cluster-matters trifurcated up to infinity. There is no cosmological constant as this model does not describe any inflationary universe.

As quantum numbers including quantum spin numbers are the numeric representations of conserved quantities in a quantum system, it is applicable for this model also by redefining the quantum systems that may be for discrete applicability. Time emerges with chronological events. As cosmic-matrix is in fluidity 'space' is only expressional and not have mass of matters.

The quantitative difference within symmetry emerges with polarity.

Altogether, universe does not have any shape and it is coherently dynamic; but the beginning of origin of dynamics in the universe may not be predictable.

Your interest on this article provides me opportunity to self analyse things that evolves; thanking you ..

Yours jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #9

Dear Jayakar,

I can understand your point of vue .

That said I don't agree about the form .Our Universe is unique and in evolution .All has a cause and an effect .The referential must be rational ,physically speaking.

When I speak about spheres ,you are going to understand me .

All is correlated with this simple universal link ,the spherisation .

In resume ,quantum entangled spheres and their rotation implying mass and rule of complemenatrity and evolution which build spheres (cosmological spheres,same number than quantum spheres !!important about the quantization and the steps of fields ,interactions ,forces ,energies ..toward the planck scale and its limits .)And all that in a pure thermodynamical link inside an universal sphere in improvement ,optimisation ,harmonization of complexification .The rotating spheres link all .It's fundamental it seems to me .

The numbers of interactions is the same than the numbers of rotating spheres ,thus of course we must class with pragfmatism these interactions .

Thus you can't use a referential without limits in a geometrical point of vue ,the form is essential thus like the mass ,the gravity .... .But of course it's just my opinion .

In all case happy to share different point of vue .And good luck for the contest.

Best Regards

Steve

Dear Steve,

Much happy to have your encouragement and wish.

Existence of the universe is eternal, in that evolutions are in locality rather than in entirety. Referential is rational when observed within the system, in that universe has single entity. Referential is a positive integer for Conjugated cluster-matter (CnCM) that is the conjugation of coherent cluster-matter (CCM) with incoherent cluster-matter (ICM) when observed from exterior of the system; that is in analogy with matter antimatter correlations.

Quantum entanglement implies rotating spheres/domains that have quantum non-local connections. Cause of rotation effects energy-mass transfer and vice versa; that is thermodynamics. As these spheres not have symmetry I would like to term as domains in that the cluster-matter orbits and imply that the universe not has shape.

Complementarity is interpreted as multi-field interactions by cluster-mass and elementary-mass in duality and at this point it's not definitive on the applicability of wave function as it may entail derivational expressions for the multi-field interactions of travelling wave. Quantum numbers are levels in quantum and have discrete applicability on this.

Energy-mass transfer from one sphere of rotation to another sphere of rotation is proportional to the angular momentum and duration of interaction between both spheres of rotations, in that geometry is applied.

As everything described is in indeterminate form of algebraic expression, beginning of the origin of dynamics in the universe is not deterministic; thanking you ..

Yours jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #11

Dear Jayakar ,

You are welcome .

Thanks for your answer .

I am going to explain my point of vue en correlation with my theory of spherisation ,a GUT of rotating spheres .

It's the mass which is proportional with the rot of entangled spheres .

About the waves ,it's the same ,the duality is linked with the space .Teus the contact of rot and the spherical fields too are considered.

The numbers of spheres and their specific rotations imply the mass ,the fiedls are proportional towards the ultim energy in all .Thus it's not really a transfert but a stable system where we take the enrgy with the steps of the entanglement towards the wall ,the planck scale.

The intrication is false I think ,many confound informations with intrications .The copehagen Interpretation is more logic .The imaginaries don't satisfy the fundamentals .

The gravitation appears in its locality and not with exterior causes tyransfert .It's important about the main central sphere and its codes in time and space evolution .

There the electromagnetism is considered like a parameter of evolution too where the synchronization with gravity permits mass .

The evolution is determinist and all is linked in a specific equation of building .

The number is specific like all with limits .The eternality is not our physicality ,behind yes but not here .Perhaps at this physical sphere harmonized ,there the eternity begins between mass systems (spheres,lifes ,intelligences,interaction and that in a micro ,meso or macro point of vue .)

The ultim equation needs limits and causes and effects ,rationally speaking of course .

In all case ,happy to discuss about physics.

Best Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #12

Dear Jayakar ,

I disagree about the infinity too ,here is why ,

our Universe is finite ,only our mind extrapolations are unlimited in fact .

To have a correct thermodynamical universal link ,the limit is essential .

If not it's false .The mass ,the gravity ,the evolution continues their road towards harmony in a specific dynamic .

The math are very good tools,of course if the balance is made between the imaginaries and reals.

Let's take the zero ,or the infinity ,I think really it is important to insert in the physicality the correct serie ou extrapolations .

If you begin your referential with a not limited domains thus that becomes difficult after to correlate the quantum and cosmological dimensions which are both finites in their specifities.

What do you think about ?

Best Regards

Steve

Dear Steve,

In a top-to-bottom approach, infinity at the bottom is a nonzero positive number. As per Feynman, 'There is plenty of room at the bottom'. Strata of universe are temporal data points, not in extrapolation. The bottom-up integral data points from quantum physics are in interpolation with the temporal data points of the top-to-bottom hierarchy. The domains have limits but not the universe.

Referential within a domain can be external to its sub-domain. Thanking you ..

Yours jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #14

Dear Jayakar,

Thanks for your answer .

Indeed we have all our perception of our Universe .

Personally I prefer a universe finite and spaces infinites due to our human extrapolations .

There if you use your main referential like that ,thus I understand your infinity in our physicality .

Personally I use only the infinity in the complexification of numbers by primes number ,thus even the primes probably are finites ,thus infinites in the products or adds of primes giving naturals ,reals....The physical base is finite .

Regards

Steve

Dear Steve,

Yes, Nature is numeric with positive integers; 'Nothing is always Something'. You are right; complex numbers appears between finites and may lead to infinity. Thanking you ..

Yours jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #16

Dear Jayakar ,

I think the same ,the positive integers like a result in time of add or multiplication of primes in a specific oscillation ,periodic and harmonious .The negative ,the zero or the infinity are just for some extrapolations but the physicality is specific in its serie ,I thinks they don't exist really ,- 0 and infinity are like our brains ,two sides ,like complexs and imaginaries or the pragmatism of this physical universe and its laws .There the prime numbers are physical s for me like the number of spheres or a serie towards these numbers with some variables ,superimposings or tris.

An finite universe is important in my model about the thermodynamic in all centers of interest ,micro meso or macro .

Without that I can't link with P,V,T,density,mass ,energy ,fields ,rotating spheres ,numbers,forces,gravity ,light ,the 4 interactions .

I need a physical model with limits and a specific dynamic inside ,like the evolution and the increase of mass .If not I think it's impossible .

The imaginaries and complexs must be adapted of course inside this sphere.The 3D more this constant of evolution seems to me essential .

Happy to discuss .

Yours

Steve

Dear Steve,

Yes, there is no negative time. Time between events is finite, that is nonzero and time flows in infinity and no beginning of the origin of dynamics in universe, but have multiple origins by events.

Prime numbers evolve gauge groups; SU(2), SU(3) from U(1) and so on . Mesons are good candidature at the bottom; in that quark and antiquark are numerals with point in between, as positive integers.

Matter universe to Cluster-matter-universe, that is homogeneity to heterogeneity; is increase of mass in locality, in that there is coherent, incoherent and eigen state of dynamics in a domain that is coherently dynamic with its super-domain and sub-domains; that may me descriptive in thermodynamics.

With this you are right; space-time with mass is a rotating sphere, the geometric representation in 3D that evolves in reality; thanking you ..

Yours jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #18

Dear Jayakar ,

You know I know that I am right .My conclusion is not arrived like that in reading some nets .No it's a long work of researchs in all centers of interest .Already when I am 12 yeards old I wrote poems and I searched some answers .At 16 ,I began to class all ,animals ,vegetals ,minerals .....Just that to say waht I know my works .Now Of course I evolve like all and I love learn ,it's my reason of life ,learn and always learn ..

In your last post ,I disagree about the origin of the mass ,it's the rotating quantum spheres which imply the mass ,really ,it's logic in fact when you see in the whole .

Now if some people want invent now the multispheres ,it's their choice ,not mine ,I love the uniqueness .

You are on the good road to find some truths with good referentials of course .Don't stop thus dear Jayakar .

Best Regards

Steve

Dear Steve,

At this juncture, I fully agree Stephen Hawkin's, spontaneous origin of mass in locality that is universality; and the path integral over all matrices and fields, between initial and present time surfaces, with no boundary condition.

Multi-spheres emerges from multi-field interactions by cluster-mass and elementary-mass.

Really, really it's a good discussion that emerges things, thanking you ..

Yours jayakar

  • [deleted]

  • Post #20

Dera Jayakar ,

Thanks for your answer .I didn't know the works of Hawkin .

You know My real problem with these multi is the lack of uniqueness and the universal laws .If we imagine differen,t laws between these universes ,thus all our thermodynamic is different and about the ultim entropy too that becomes bizare ,it's a confusion for me .

The problem of limits too is a confusion .

Could you tell me more about these multi worlds and their dynamics ,I suppose that the intrications are a reality like bizare particles of mass .

Indeed the discussions permit to see more clear .

Best Regards

Steve