Thanks Jaime

You were right, it was nice to read the NASA ranging papers and see the results confirmed exactly as the DFM prediction. No surprise of course, but it will be a surprise if the 'Troglodytes' as you call them don't completely ignore or dismiss them!!

This site is supposed to be for free thinking fundamental physics. We'll see if the adjudicators match up to that or not!!

It doesn't look like many have noticed the NASA papers yet, or maybe as it disproves legend they're simply in denial. All part of normal human failing.

Thanks for your very kind words anyway. And if you're not too scared of being called a crackpot by the uninformed and the simply slow please do spread the word. It'll be interesting to see how many insist NASA are talking rubbish!

I've mailed NASA to congratulate them and am adding a citing and Epilogue to my current paper on GPS evidence. Look out for it on the viXra. Thanks

Peter

Hi Jude (or Hey!).

Thanks for your support and enthusiasm.

It really is nice to have it confirmed that there are other intellegent beings out there.

I'm honoured to be compared with Max Planck, though, despite it perhaps not looking so, my real hero has always been Einstien. He did say; "The general theory of relativity is as yet incomplete insofar as it has been able to apply the general principle of relativity satisfactorily only to gravitational fields, but not to the total field." and "one should not desist from pursuing to the end the path of the relativistic field theory." (1952).

No-one seems to have taken much notice of him, but I have and I'm really glad you agree I seem to have succeeded.

Whether or not the rest of physics notices is an entirely different question! I feel your reference to a Nobel is embarrasingly premature, and it's mankind I'm concerned about not prizes (my trophy cabinet really is stuffed full allready! - Google; SolentIRC), but thanks for the thought. I'll add you to my (small) fan club.

Very best wishes

Peter

5 days later

  • [deleted]

  • Post #84

Dear Jude ,

AHAHAHAH FIRST YOUR NAME ,

second ,like say a friend ,take your med

3 I invite you to see understand my theory ,The theory of Spherisation ,A GUT of Rotating Spheres ,all is said my friend .quantum spheres ...cosmological spheres ...universal sphere.

  • [deleted]

  • Post #85

Thus Jude you can imagine the importance of your message for me .

Dear Peter what do you think about my theory of the spherization ,I am curious .

Thanks

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #86

I insist still we have no proofs about Dark energy

I think you are more a business ùman than a real scientist ,just a suggestion .

I invite you to study the real foundamentals .

Good luck

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #87

Like the expansion ,just false too .No but I DREAM or what ,an eternal expansion where all goes everywhere in a infinite universe ahahahah oh My God

Your lack of pragmatism is ironic in fact .

I think many don't understand well the real physical 3D system and IS SPHERES in rotation around the universal center .You want speak about light and you don't understand its real universal aim with the gravity .The evolution and the realtivity are for you a confusion thus I can understand your posts .

I repeat what do you think about My theory of Spherisation ,a GUT of rotating spheres .If you can of course .Jude you can too .Let's critic in total transparence .

Reghards

STEVE

  • [deleted]

  • Post #88

In conclusion too ,

I invite you to re read the Posts of Eckard about the light .You shall unerstand better what is a sphere of light ,quantum too and its linearity ,contant.

Superluminal

Dark energy

infinite expansion

...FALSE FORTUNALY FURTHERMORE

Steve

Steve

SD; "Dear Peter what do you think about my theory of the spherization ,I am curious."

I can't find it anywhere Steve, Please explain or give me a link and I'll comment.

SD; "I insist still we have no proofs about Dark energy"

I certainly agree there's little proof of exactly what is is. There is however plenty of evidence of a number of its characteristics. To start with, if something is at 2.7degrees it must be 'something', and has energy! The WMAP data also seems quite conclusive, and is the best we have. The whole point of models is to test postulates when there is no final proof yet.

SD"I think you are more a business ùman than a real scientist ,just a suggestion."

What is a 'real scientist' Steve? I'm certainly not a businessman! I agreed with Eckards and Lewis Carolls view of the 'fantasy' direction maths was taking and decided to take a more scientific route, taking Einsteins and Feynmanns advice to 'find a new way of thinking'. The best way I could find was to train as an Architect - learning how to assimilate great amounts of complex fact and theory into visualisation. AE also said; "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand."

I started as a mathematician, but went back to more inductive methods and now consider myself more of a proper scientist!

Peter

Steve et al.

Following the quite conclusive NASA evidence and analysis in Daniel Gezari's arXiv papers on Lunar Ranging I added a postscript and citations to my own 3rd paper, under consideration at the time, focussing on GPS evidence. It is now published. I'm sure you'll enjoy reading it;

http://vixra.org/abs/1001.0010

Relativistic GPS Evidence and Quantum Gravity Architecture of the Discrete Field Model.

Peter

Steve

SD; "I invite you to re read the Posts of Eckard about the light .You shall unerstand better what is a sphere of light ,quantum too and its linearity ,contant."

I agreed with almost everthing in Eckards paper, told him so, and marked him highly. I'm not a specialist in sound, but this particularly relates to the more fundamental questions of; The need for ultimate Realism, that 'theory has to obey reality', and the damage Cantor, his set theory and approach to infinity has done to the progress of physics.

I've seen nothing in Eckards posts contradicting accepted Scrodinger sphere science. We only appeared to disagree on Nimtz because he claimed information transfer at over 'c', which was indeed wrong, 3rd frame observation is not the same.

The DFM is the first model ever to return to total reality but including it with locality, to unify SR and QFT, and to match all observation. (and using the postulates of SR). I have as of yet seen or heard no actual criticism or probem identified in the model itself.

It also exactly predicted the unexpected NASA lunar ranging results!!

I hope you may respect that by actually reading it and deriving sensible scientific questions and observations.

Thanks. Peter

  • [deleted]

  • Post #92

Hihihii thanks dear Peter ,

Like that I know you in fact hihihi .I am arrogant but I am a real nice .

About My Theory ,I am young you know 34 years old and I am a very very veryyyyyyyy bad administrator thus you can encircle my economic situation ,catastrophic hahaha but I evolve .It is the reason why I haven't website or publications,even my certificates I have stop before the certificate .(Medecine,geology,agronomy in Belgium(UMH,FNDP).Is it important ?No evidently and fortunaly for the sciences .I just continue my works ,quietly and pragmatically with an analyze in all centers of interest,you can see the spherisation everywhere even in a flower ,my two passions horticulture and playing music(piano,guitar,djumbe),let's look around you ,you shall see the sphericality of creations .Even with your eyes and brains ,these spheroids ,all appears in this ultim reality ,the sphere.A fruit ,a flower ,a seed,an egg,the wheel for the rotation ,pulleys ,rotors,motors....the favorite human sports with spheres,the glands,the elementary particles ,the stars ,the planets ,the moons,the spherical waves,the form of a tree ,all is balanced in this sphericlity and its laws.

It is like that in fact ,our universe is a sphere in evolution towards a perfect balance between mass systems and their complexifications .

About the light ,do you know the photosynthesis,you shall find interestings extrapolations in this biological ,complex system .

Don't hesistate to ask me details about my theory I will answer you with pleasure.

Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #93

the rela sense of the light takes all its sense with the biological lifes and the evolution where the gravity builds in fact in this line time constant .

  • [deleted]

  • Post #94

Ps of course I respect you ,arrogant but nice and sincerely in the respect .

Could you tell me more about your predictions please ?

Sincerely

Steve

Hi Steve

Are you Belgian?

SD; "the rela sense of the light takes all its sense with the biological lifes and the evolution where the gravity builds in fact in this line time constant."

I assume not Walloon, I've read it a few times, but it still sounds more like Double Dutch! (an english expression for incomprehensible). But I'm trying.

Can I guess and interpolate about your spheres concept; There are spheres of all sizes which surround all objects and indeed all mass, from the tiniest sub atomic particle to the Universe. So we have an infinite number of spheres within spheres.

If the Galaxy is encapsulated by a sphere, lets say with it's halo at the boundary, and it's rushing through deep space (through which light propagates at 'c'), would the light change speed o maintain 'c' when it enters the sphere?

If so might this perhaps be by Frequency Modulation? (FM), which would give the Doppler shifts we see? If so then your theory is very close to the reality of the Discrete Field Model!!

See my latest post in Eckards dept.

Peter

Steve

Our posts crossed!

SD; "Could you tell me more about your predictions please?"

There are heaps of predictions, mostly in the papers. Another was proved true yesterday, that the galaxy has a dense dark matter (oscilating particle) 'sheath' like the heliosheath. See the American Conference reports.

The DFM predicted and solves; the Lunar Ranging results, Flyby anomaly, Voyager anomaly, Shapiro delay/Lensing anomaly (3 year light delays!!) etc. apparent Superluminal motion (look up Wiki), and that the polarity change 'wave' from the sun would change it's frequency outside the heliosphere's termination shock. (just proved true). It also predicts & complies with the Fizeau/Sagnac/ Wang etc. results, and a few less provable things (to date), like that Black Holes may have Lagrangian Points (of equilibrium) at their centres not infinities!! Oh yes, ..and it removes all the paradoxes we currently have.

Unfortunately it seems almost no-one on our little planet can be bothered to even read it, so it will remain effectively undiscoved and we'll stay up the dead end we've been stuck in for decades. Jude did, but it just got her insulted by someone who hadn't bothered! I hope you didn't upset her too much. Perhaps you should read it yourself, and comment after acquiring the knowledge, rather than the other way around?

Peter

PS. I'm really not at all arrogant, but I am in awe of Einstein for saying; "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

  • [deleted]

  • Post #97

Hi peter ,

Yes indeed I am belgian ,walloon,in the french part thus .We are 4 millions in the south of the little country .My region is the Hainaut ,one of the 9 regions of Belgium .Sorry for my literal english .When I will can ,I will study a little the grammary for an optimisation .

Yes indeed if we extrapolate the number of spheres ,we can insert this kind of infinity inside the closed system ,this universal sphere with all these quantum spheres which build the cosmological spheres and their creations .I consider the serie like finite in the whole of the referential .

The number of cosmological spheres is finite and the number for 1 quantic system is the same ,of course with an add of multiplication of these quantum spheres ,we can imagine a kind of infinity .

In this logic ,the quantum system is like a code of becoming for the Universe with its specific architecture.

Dear Peter could you develop a little please about the FM ,the superimposing of the waves are very relevant about the synchronization of frequences .

What I find interesting about the Doppler Fizeau effect is the datas about our sun .We can see continual motions of photospheric gas .The modes with nthe radial velocity thus....It is a pure thermodynamical system where the lines appears whith rationality .Thus the superimposings correlated with the rotations and the motions of particles implies a specific add of lines which give us the final line of interpretation.Maxwell ,Statistic ,Dopller,thermodynamic PV nRT....I insist on this point because I consider an increase of mass due to the evolution and its polarisations between gravity and electroagnetism.The quation of Saha can be inserted for the numbers of atoms ,the volumes more the rotations of spheres can be superimposed with rationality and proportionality ,evolutive .Thus of course the past perception must be adapted in the constants ,irreversiilities and coherences in my opinion .

Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #98

Dear Peter ,

the Universe is finite for me ,the stupidity like imaginaries are infinites ,thus without real sense about ther rationality .

You know if you convice me about the superluminal ,I will agree but it is not possible I think ,it is just an optical interpretation with some math tools .

Now of course if like (a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²...the superluminal is correct thus I will agree .

Even if it is correct ,let's assume that ,even the checking of the light speed is not possible ,thus why these extrapolations above our walls ? Have we a spaceship which can do that ,no evidently thus why these not sure things if even the things we know ,we can't interpret them or check them .

Regards

Steve

Steve

The Sagnac effect (and laser Fibre optic gyros's) prove conclusively that if you take a fibre optic ring and spin it, the light moving through the ring does NOT slow down with respect to the ring! i.e. a 3rd party observer in the lab will see it as a pure case of v1+v2=v3.

Wang et al proved this was also the case with a straight fibre optic cable.

If you put a fibre optic cable on the side of concord it will NOT suddenly contract and detach itself when you pass a light pulse through it!

Any light waves reaching the observer are of course still always measured at c, and no 'information' carried by the wave within the cable can be imparted to the observer. He just receives different information (i.e. pulse timings, colour etc) at c.

The laser lunar ranging experiment, and the gas jets of M87 etc prove exactly the same. To claim this is impossible, or that the SR postulates say it is, is completely wrong and only demonstrates lack of understanding.

So; Everything does 'c' WITH RESPECT TO THE FIELD IT'S IN. Forget Lorentz's theoretical mathematical constructs. In reality 1 plus 1 = 2. How's that for beleivable maths!

Peter

  • [deleted]

  • Post #100

Hi Peter ,

Thanks for this explaination ,you know I love astronomy and I know this radio galaxy M87,I suppose it is M87_VIRGO and its double structure,their gas and blue condensations with millions of parsec of velocity for matters. YES INTERESTING .We see in the visible an speed of 220000 km/s.NLRG DATAS .The IR and the stellar formations are relevant for the real topology of Our Universe.

I search the real sense about those gas jets ,please could you elaborate please,it is interesting .

Regards

Steve

Steve

You'll also be aware there are dozens of others, at up to around 7c from our frame I beleive.

There's a complex confused attempt at a relativistic explanation on wikipedia (Google 'Superluminal motion'), that stands as a monument to man's capacity for denial and inability to accept simple logic and geometry! There's also the sensible, real, explanation derived from the DFM, which is also consistent with the SR postulates.

If you find the video of M87 you can actually make out some of the 'layers' surrounding the superluminal particles, meaning no part of it is actually doing over 'c' locally with respect to what it's moving through. Also remember, the jet has been going for centuries, and most of the particles aren't currently active enough to see.

In theoretical physics terms the model performs the almost magical 'holy grail' function of combining Locality with Reality, which fully unifies QFT and SR.

Our two 'equivalent' astronauts passing each other in space CAN be doing different velocities through a background feild (3rd Frame) AND will always measure light reaching them as travelling at 'c'. The model provides the FM (oscillating particle) doppler shift mechanism which acheives this, although we've all already been given a sample, in our FM radio's!!

Cloud density = velocity difference = oscillation rate = Doppler shift = cloud size/density. It's actually really beatutiful and simple, exactly like Einstein and Feynman predicted.

Unfortunately we don't seem to have anyone in physics with Einstein & Feynmans interest and intellectual capacity to recognise it at present!!

How's you brain doing?

Peter