• [deleted]

  • Post #102

Hi dear Peter ,

You know ,I must admit I ask me why this limit of c .Indeed it is a real problem for the checking of the space between cosmological spheres and thus their interactions between mass system and their creations like lifes and conscious .

It is a little bizare indeed .Perhaps it is possible in fact .Perhaps we are too young still to know this speed .I don't know .A sure thing ,is it important at this moment ? I think step by step is essential to understand the potential of our laws .We are catalyzers in fact and we have tools around us ,how can we check these systems with rationality and pragmatism .

Even for the communication in our Universe ,it is a problem for the synergies ,but I think strongly the evolution is important in this analyze about the rule like catalyzers of the truth .

The superluminal information can be a reality ,perhaps indeed but our limits are there to check that .

If Newton ,gallilei or Bohr were there ,probably they shall help us .The best solution thus is to study their laws and improve them .

Regards

Steve

Superluminal information is a slightly different matter Steve.

Group velocity and phase velocity of waves are different to the signal velocity that contains the information. In other words we can observe but we can't touch!

But see; http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0609/0609235.pdf (Wang et al) An experiment showing that if a fibre optic gyro 'wave guide' is straightened the Sagnac effect still applies and the wave moves at the same speed with respect to the guide itself, not wrt the lab frame. This is again not entirely consistent with the SR that uses 'normal assumtions', but is with the DFM.

Peter

  • [deleted]

  • Post #104

Hi dear Peter ,

I am going to learm more about this subject .The superluminal information is interesting .

it is well said your words ,In other words we can observe but we can't touch!

Thanks and regards

Steve

Steve

Thanks for your interest.

I don't beleive Eckard has studied and considered this as closely as you now have, and seen the solution. It's a shame as it's the key to open the door he's struggling with. I do hope he reads the posts above.

But it does only unlock the door Steve. You now need to look at the DFM again to see what's on the other side.

If you accept that light may NOT be able to go through a cloud of oscillating particles (or even perhaps billions of 'spinning' spheres if you prefer) at more than 'c', then you're 90% of the way there and just need to consider the implications.

Best wishes

Peter

  • [deleted]

  • Post #106

Hi dear Peter ,

You are welcome.

The problem is the physical perception and its constants.If a velocity more important exists,linear thus we can't perceive it in the logic of the relativity.But with some geometries implying superimposings, that can give some perceptions like this one about this light velocity.

Could you please tell me more about DFM ?

Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #107

Peter

Have checked the result. A travesty. But I see it's proved your postulate perfectly.

And no, Steve didn't really upset me, he was only showing his own lack of understanding. What I am impressed about is that he's now understood and taken on board your points!

That seems quite rare in a world where most are only intested in their own opinion!

I really do belive the DFM is a bit of genius, and I will push it where I can. Best of luck.

Jude

  • [deleted]

  • Post #108

Hi jude,

My aim wasn't to upset you.Sorry for my arrogance ,I am young but I evolve.

Like I said before to Ray in private too ,my past here in Belgium was very difficult due to some people.I have lost all due to my kindness.You can understand thus my paranoia comportment and my lack of quiet.But be sure I am nice,too nice even .You know I have nothing ,I have just my theory and the center.And I must be strong to evitate to make errors still .It is difficult to find universalists.I have a big problem of adaptation to the system you know.

Dear Jude I take never the boat of others but I improve mine.If a theory or a model seems to me corect ,thus I agree and admit the datas.I have already say my point of vue about the work of Mr Jackson and I respect his researchs.Now of course like you say the system is the system and it exists a sad parameter ,this individualism, and many rest in their line of reasoning .

But when a work is foundamental ,the synchronizations appear and thus the correlations too because the universal constants are a reality.If Peter is right thus we shall discovery it with the foundamental synergies.The optic analyze is a tool ,now if the realism is correlated in this optic tools thus perhaps a proof will appear .I wish you all the best.

Regards

Steve

Thanks Jude

I actually really wished I was wrong of course!

I did have greater hopes of this site, but it seems peoples own agendas always rule, which blinkers them and we really don't have any Einsteins around at present.

It seems it's not just the peer review journals holding us back.

But the handful of people like you, who've bothered to read it, and are bright enough to perceive it, give me hope for humankind!

Best wishes.

Peter

Hi Steve

Glad of your interest;

"Could you please tell me more about DFM ?"

I think you'll find it's the "Holy Grail", solving the paradoxes and anomolies of physics and bringing Unification, with a real physical process uniting Locality and Reality, Classic and Quantum. Actually I nicked that bit back from a very good basic analysis of DFM from one of the few who seem to have understood it, that's just gone on Wikipedia. I have some edits planned when I get time but it'll give you a good basis.

It includes the references to my papers, which contain far more evidence, so look them up, read them over, ask any questions and please let me know what you think, or if you percieve any weaknesses.

The great scientists all took on board the work of others and did not dogmatically stick with their own ideas. Pauli did once made that mistake, putting off the guy who derived Electron spin, so he never got the credit. He learned from the misatke - most don't!

Speak soon

peter

  • [deleted]

  • Post #111

Hi dear Peter,

You are welcome.

You know, my line of studying is simple, I study the good works which seem to me importants.A good book or a good arxiv article is always in syncronization.

For exemple in my theory, I have many unknews and hypothesis like all but a thing very important for me is the gauge in the physicality.

When I say I take my boat, it is not a vanity expression but about the gauge .....here the quantum spheres...cosmological spheres and the universal sphere where all turns around.Now of course I alm ready to improve, to optimize, to harmonize my theory with datas inside this finite evolutive sphere.

I make errors like all and I evolve like all, but about my gauge it is an other story.

About your work, I am going to learn more about it.

Thanking you and regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #112

Dear Peter,

Could you resume thus the system, please ....

Let's consider our interplanetary system and its center with a rotating system where ions+ - interacts ....voyager 1 voyager2 pineer...our supersonics and the transition subsonics of winds more the wave of the wall choc more the ions interstellars.Let's imagine too the collisions of atoms and the emission of rays of light thus in its pure fractal.

Personally this system is well architectured like a shield and a sorting, the evolution still takes all its sense.

All is rule in fact and the gravity continues to build with the light. For that a specific system is necessary to create the mass. The Universe and its stars produce particles, these cosmic rays are in a dance, the coded gravity sings and synchronizes. If a particle goes above this limit, thus the perceptibility disappears.

On the other side, with a kind of fractal of this velocity, the synchronization takes all its sense. The rest of these ions, are recycled with these BH probably, thus the sense of rotations and the velocities have a main rule about these synchronizations.

I like Einstein when I see the Eistein effects for the mass and the radius...hv...mc²...hv-GmM/r....and the wavelenghts of the rays have an effect correlated with the gravity thus this mass thus these rotating spheres and the universal quantic and cosmological link.

Are you sure about the gravitational effects and the limit of c ...R0/R=photon rec/photon em, thus the photon has a spectral effect ....

Dear Peter what do you think about the Cosmic microwave background please, just curious,hihi

Best Regards

Steve

Steve

The system simply maintains 'c'. When EM waves arrive at the border of our heliosphere, (as it rushes through the galaxy at around 45,000kph) they have to pass through its dense particle 'bow shock' (or just the termination shock if they're coming up from behind - where they're red shifted. The Voyagers are taking years to get through these areas.

Approaching from ahead, though the bow shock, the waves are compressed, by FM, by the 1013 oscillating particles per cubic mm to give the blue shift we see. And this simple process is what explains Equivalence, and provides Grand Unification!! - the Holy Grail of physics!! But it seems there are few on this planet clever enough to see such a clear simple answer! As they say in the world of spying; "the best way to hide things is in plain sight".

The CMB you say. It could well be the signature of all those almost infinate billions of oscillating dark matter particles surrounding all mass, from accelerated protons to galaxies, and 'regions of space', as they move through the background field, the background field the model allows, which explains everything.

Or perhaps we're all doomed as we've left the wrong people (or no-one!) at the helm of science and they can't be bothered to glance at the chart!

As I've just won the Solent series (Google 'SolentIRC' champagne out!) do you think I should go and wrest the helm from the fools and put us back on track?

Peter

  • [deleted]

  • Post #114

Hello dear Peter,

I am thanking you for this answer.

It is very interesting.

The system is fascinating during these effects.

I see that like a fractal of the electromagnetism and where probably the dark matter has a rule in these fields and spherical architectures.

The division and the activation seems imply an increase of mass near the main spherical centers like planets for exemple.

The modulations take all its sense, dear Peter, I think the planet Earth and its intrinsic code in the center is very important for the modulations and thus for the synchronizations, the spinals rotations are essentials for those synchronizations and evolution of the mass.

Best Regards

Steve

  • [deleted]

  • Post #115

Dear Peter,

I see you work in engeniering and energy/renewables, you now I have invented several systems in ecology and energy.

For exemple I improve the equations for my sphere of composting, but I am not an engineer, this system is very revolutionary.I add the technics inside a finite volume like a kind of membran ,there I insert the vegetal multiplication and the bacterias....its is very interesting, I have others models too with turbins, pulleyrs,...the add of systems is the key.I need to test and optimize this sphere of composting.

The system needs matters and thus the biomass is essential and the quantity of plants, that's why this system must have an ecosystem around, optimized, improved in its diversity.The cycle is exponential.

If you can help, you are welcome.

Regards

Steve

Hi Steve

Yes, to fund my research I was a consultant for the largest windfarm so far in the UK, but I deal with renewable sources and energy conservation not organic matters. I also do fluid dynamics and waves, but not Brussels Sprouts.

If it's any help I believe you need to consider matter more as focussed oscillating energy than rotating spheres. Frequency is critical. The term 'spin' misguides people.

I hope you get a breakthrough in your composting, or accelerated entropy, but remember, genius is 1% inspiration and 99% sitting in a shower of the compost everyone insists on throwing at you!

Peter

    • [deleted]

    • Post #117

    Hi Peter,

    You don't understand me.

    I said simply what when this sciences center will be created you are welcome, I don't search monney but skills for the future.You know with or without FQXi or with or without systems ,I will create it.I just must create a good and humanistic base where the people are universalists and real humanists, the rest is not important.

    My inventions are numerous, and I am not here to sell them but to improve them for the future applications on ground in difficult localities.It is the aim of this center, to invent, to optimize, to put into practice harmonious models correlated with our balances.

    Here is some exemples of my humble inventions which are not to sell !!!!!!!

    Powders for soil

    natural system of purification of water,

    sphere of composting, methan and compost

    natural energetic system

    models of ecosystems against malaria, fight naturally

    optimization of soils

    add of energetic systems

    Solar system and mirror

    pulleys, incompressibility, turbins...

    ...

    I will give these systems for the center and for our fellow men who wait in some parts of this sad planet,it is only simple like that, there I want to unify the scientists, the humanists and the universalists to work above the frontiers, the differences, the monney, the problems...the solutions with our ecosystems are so simple.

    I have several models for the big towns too , we must increase the vegetal mass and the micro and macro fauna and flora will continue naturally if some technics are put into practice.

    I think the responsability of skills is essential in a global point of vue, universal.

    Thus I repeat, if you want and if youare an universalist, you are welcome to optimize what we can optimize, you know I am 34 years old and I must create it ,many friends wait me, they are supers these people everywhere (I knew them by some platforms like Xing or Ecademy , xing is like linkdn, When this center will be created, the synergies with may friends can be quickly made.

    This center will produce and will invent what it lacks in fact for NGOs or others, a center of coordination and production is essential.

    The fact to increase the mass of the ecosystems with the add of some technics is really a very interesting exponential after x times.

    The soil is the key do you know the argilo humic complex, very interesting for the interactions in the soil.

    Sincerely

    Steve

    • [deleted]

    • Post #118

    Hi Peter,

    Do you know the project NIF about the fusion, that seems very interesting.

    There too the rotation of spheres is the key, the secret for the synchronization.

    ps for the 1 per cent and 99 per cent, you know I said that to Florin too, it is the first words at the first page of my method of piano, Hanon method, the best method for the piano furthermore, in fact it is the same, when you study well the bases after you create in harmony with the good notes.But without the studying of the pages and the work to repeat the motions , your fingers don't resist. That is the fact to untie your fingers with just this correct definition 1 and 99 and after it is 100 per cent rational creation...

    To be serious a little,are you ok for the center in the future hiihihi let's go dear Peter, let's invent for our fellow men.

    Best Regards

    Steve

    Sign me up Steve.

    I've seemed to spend much of my life on community and youth work so no reason to stop now just because I'm into my 50's! I suppose if I had more time and a commercial interest in advertising the DFM discovery our new physics would have taken off some time ago.

    Perhaps the human race is now too deep in a rut to find the way ahead. I hope not. Perhaps I'll pass the task on to your centre when I go!

    Did you ever read the papers?

    Peter

      • [deleted]

      • Post #120

      Hello dear Peter,

      Thank you very much, you are super, it is nice.

      For the pappers, no could you tell me the link

      Best Regards

      Steve

      They were somewhere above Steve, but here again.

      A Doctor of something has put up a wiki page intro to it, and I was astonished how good it was. There are also interesting links on it, including one to NPL Head David Whiffen (dec.) whose work was seminal. Just one dim troglodyte suggested it was nonsense and should be deleted! but if you take a look it would be nice if you could hit the 'discussion' tab at the top of the page and add a nice supporting comment for me.

      1st Paper. (needs updating!!). http://vixra.org/abs/0909.0047 Doppler Assisted Quantum Unification Allowing Relativistic Invariance. Sept 09. Peter A Jackson

      2nd Paper. http://vixra.org/abs/0912.0041 Lensing and Galactic Mass Anomaly Solution From DFM Shock Model. Peter A Jackson 19 Dec '09.

      3rd Paper; http://vixra.org/abs/1001.0010 Relativistic GPS Evidence and Quantum Gravity Architecture of the Discrete Field Model. Peter Jackson. Dec. 09.

      The PR Journals won't even read papers on the subject, but if NASA's Gazari's excelent Lunal Ranging papers are rejected what chance do mine stand!!? I hope you find them interesting reading.

      Peter