Perfect Symmetry by Peter A Jackson

Dear Peter, ymail or gmail, are you sure for y hihiihi

Dear Peter,

I read and I see better.

You say

"The fine structure of electrons behaves in a similar way to that of protons when accelerated through

the vacuum[4] and no evidence can be found that other massive particles behaves significantly differently,

whether they are accelerated individually or in groups. It appears that the fine structure constant of 1/137th

may only be a constant at rest in the field and increases with velocity. This may be essential for the law of

conservation of energy, the energy used to accelerate the particle increasing the effective mass and oscillation

rate, to reach infinity as 'c' is approached, with particle density at a "saturation" level[7] of some 1013/m-3."

Could you tell me more about this saturation please ?

I understand better Peter the meaning of "...spaces in motion relatively to each other." thus thanks .That seems a good tool to improve the datas.

You say "'As the speed of light can't vary, time and distance must'.

In the 2 senses dear Peter about the time?

You say

"The model also resolves wave particle duality, explaining how the 'photon' waves from Lena Hau's Harvard

lab accelerate instantly back to 'c' using zero energy.

Could you tell me more please?

Regards

Steve

Peter,

I have now read your essay.It was very readable and enjoyable.

My initial thoughts. I am not in agreement with the premise of the essay that- there is nothing to prevent our survival, progress and ultimately finding the whole truth of the universe, other than ourselves and the limits we impose. That does seem to suggest that the reason we survive is because of our technology and scientific knowledge. However the reason we survive is only because conditions on the earth have permitted that survival.

One huge comet impact, one blast from a supernova, one extreme solar event and all higher life forms could be eradicated from the earth. Evolution is not the only influence but chance or luck plays its part too. Coelacanth fish and crocodiles have survived from prehistoric times not because of their exceptional intelligence or technology. It is perhaps those societies not dependent upon technology but with access to abundant natural resources and with sparse population who are most suited to survive and mankind will be culled, as is natural for any species exceeding the carrying capacity of its environment.

The left side of the brain does have an intense need for logic as you say. It is difficult for that mind to accept that ultimately it is chance that we are here and chance that will decide if we survive, not science or technology or politicians or economists. We are not Gods but little insignificant brainy mammals in a vast chaotic universe, and despite all of our self delusion we are still at the mercy of natural forces beyond our control, IMO.

This is a unique stage of human history where computing has made available huge amounts of information from diverse sources but the human being still has available the same number of hours in the day. It is not possible to access all relevant data, read, comprehend and assimilate it. There is therefore selection of what will be paid attention to. This is unfortunate because there are highly intelligent and thoughtful people, from various backgrounds, with good ideas who may not be detected "on the radar". Also ideas that confirm or are consistent with our existing way of thinking are unconsciously given greater preference and reinforce our existing bias. This is not a deliberate decision to ignore and exclude but a consequence of having to be selective so as not to be overwhelmed. Not just by nonsense but sheer volume of data relevant and irrelevant.

There is work under-way to develop computers with the ability to find patterns and correlations within information sources and therefore help in the selection of data from the vast amount available. Perhaps akin to the right hemisphere of the brain that seeks connections and patterns within the whole.This could help enormously by reducing the time it takes to look through existing data and ideas and select that which is relevant and find the connections.

Finally, I suspect that much of the essay was actually a vehicle to gain attention for your idea that explains red shift and various anomalies. I am actually very interested in this, especially if this provides a method of accounting for those anomalies and makes successful predictions as you say. I am sure that current mainstream explanation can not be correct and that there is a valid alternative explanation. I will need to think carefully about your idea and check on some of the examples you give.I thank you for drawing my attention to your work.For now just put me down as one more person out of 6,802,200,000 who has read it.

Hi Peter,

Thanks for these explainations.Interesting about the Bose Eisntein condensate, like what the thermodynamic is universal.

The temperature like all is in a specific equation where all is relatively proportional.

The rotating spheres and their specific number and specificities(volume, mass, velocity of rot(spin or orbital),frequences , oscillations,synchronizations.

In my line of reasoning, the light is an entangled system with the same number but with an other sense thus implying the linearity.These entangled spheres turn and implies a state for the light and a not mass.Thus when you insert a changement of thermodynamical parameters, you change the velocities of rotation of these entangled spheres.Thus of course it is possible to change their linearity because all like I said before is proportional.

The evolution permits to build and to increase the mass thus the gravity.Thus the gravitational systems imply a kind of code for the polarization and the synchronization with the light.Thus the gravity is a parameter of the changement of the rotations of the light spheres.

It is the gravity the intrinsic secret, the gravity synchronizes the light like a modulator of the frequances, thus their rotations.The pression, the volume, the temperature ....are of course interestings for the modulations.

Let's take a tree for exemple, the biological lifes are pure modulators of evolution, all gravitational systems evolve and continue to polarise the light with a fractal of these rotating spheres in their linearity towards the gravitational system and its intrinsic codes of evolution.

Thus if the human parameters change the frequences of this linearity, the real question is this one, what is the rule of this modulation because there the evolution is not the real understanding.We return to a kind of consciousness at this scale of modulation if I can say.

Thanking youn dear Peter

Steve

Georgina

Thanks for your kind comments, just 6,802,199,990 to go. (the right 6 would do!).

You're spot on of course, but the quicker we progress our learning the more chance we'll have of survival/deflecting the asteroid etc.

You're very perceptive. I had indeed got very frustrated that absolutely no-one wanted to even glance at the discovery, all our eminent(ish) physicists, peer review journals no-one! Actualy not true, you'll see above a handful have, the majority are supportive but not influential. A minority are scared of their reputation as it's a bit too off the ruling paradigm.

I've actually given up, twice. Sitting here sipping the Holy grail, while the human race rushes past on the way to it's own demise. It's only guilt and a sense of responsibility that keeps me going! Plus virtually every time I look at another scientific anomaly I find the simple answer staring at me from the chalice!

I need advice Georgina. From someone fresh to the Discrete Field Model. How can I present it in a way that the right people will notice and understand it?

I've been blogging for ages, and most have their noses firmly in their own agenda and, as you say, have no time to learn how to think differently. It seems the word 'inductive' means nothing these days, proof, and the 'scientific method' have little value. We're all crowded down unprovable dead ends entangled in superstrings.

Feynman was right. I think it was in 'The joy of discovering..' He modified Einsteins comment, saying effectively that not only would the right answer be unbelievably simple, but that it would initially appear so different as to be simply unbelievable. (I like that one, - I'll use it again!).

Please throw everything at me you can about the model. I discovered another 'prediction' today that'll need checking; That much of the spectroscopic profile of the 'cosmological background radiation' will match the frequency pattern from the 'photoelectrons' generated in the LHC, with a particular correlation at similar relative velocities.

And Equivalence; Do two photons floating in the vacuum have an equal right to claim they are at rest and it is the other in motion, when one is doing 0.9c in the LHC and the other is in a vacuum flask on top of the duct?

Only if we delude ourselves enough to ignore the crazy frenetic particle cloud around the first!

What is your own field?

What would be the way to most simply convince you?

What bits were you most skeptical about on first reading?

Do you need any more links (paper 3 below)

http://vixra.org/abs/1001.0010 Relativistic GPS Evidence and Quantum Gravity Architecture of the Discrete Field Model.

Best wishes

Peter

Dear Georgina,

It's interesting but your vision of the evolution is false for me.Here is for why.

First the hazard doesn't exist in a global point of vue and furthermore the Universe is not chaotic.If you consider the lifes, these results like just a hazard due to some causal parameters, that will imply confusions about your universal referential and its pure intrinsic and foundamental laws.

These kinds of point of vue are pessimists about the harmonization of the matters and its complexifications and results like lifes, intelligence and consciousness.

If we take this conscious, thus in your line of reasoning, it is just a hazard too.

It is not possible when you analyze all our datas about the taxonomy and the classment of these mass since the hydrospheroid about 3.5 billions years ago and even before when the particles begin their danse of plarisations after this hypothetic Big Bang.

In my humble opinion,All has a rule of complementarity and had a rule of complementarity.If the Megaso-strodon(these first mammalians)have resisted in these difficult periods millions years ago, do you consider these polarisations likes hazards, they have a mass and a code , they were complexs and were predicted thus No?

All the actuals mammalians are from this animal, and if we go more far, the first fishs and before the first cells and before the first proteins and before the NH3 CH4 H2O HCN ..H...Quantum spheres. The time builds since the begining like an universl equation in optimization, complexification, improvement and thus the intelligence is a catalyzer of this reality.

When you study the evolution, you see this universal link between all.

The mass increases and it is easy to see it.

The only complexs are int the biological lifes in 3D.The most incredible secrets are in the lifes and the consciousness.

To beleive what the chaos is an universal reality implies a chaotic perception of the evolution and thus about the results too.

The time is a constant which permits to build....the gravity is coded and polarises the light, like a modulator of evolution and its codes.

The harmony is foundamental for that.The chaos is just a short moment thus a false perception in the whole.The chaos is like a foto dear Georgina, always the harmony will be in the whole in my opinion.

Best Regards

Steve

Steve,

When I say the universe is chaotic I do not mean that it is in a state of complete disorder but highly complex dynamic change giving very complex patterns of order, over which we have no control and can only begin to understand.

I too am amazed at the complexity of forms and interaction that can be observed. I understand the evidence that all life is interrelated and forms have evolved from ancestor forms. However there is also evidence that former states of highly evolved complexity have been eliminated taking the earth back to a more primitive stage. From which new complexity has arisen once more.

There seem to be cyclic mass extinction events which may have terrestrial or cosmic origin. Super volcanoes and comet impacts being two possibilities. There is no way we could prevent the Yellow Stone national park super volcano exploding if it "chooses" to do so. There is very little likely hood that we could deflect an incoming comet from impact. It is just a slightly reassuring idea that it might be possible. There is no reason to assume the universe requires mankind any more than it required any of the extinct lifeforms. It is just anthropocentric vanity. The so called harmony of the natural world of which you speak is the balance of numerous life forms seeking for survival of themselves and their progeny or relatives by competition with other life forms of their own and other species. It is not entirely benign and happy situation as there are winners and losers, survivors and those that do not survive.Cooperation can be overlaid on this basic struggle as it can give a survival benefit for the cooperating organisms.

However even within cooperating groups there are hierarchies with some organisms obtaining more benefit for themselves and their progeny or relatives (or friends who are more likely to reciprocate than strangers), at the expense of other organisms in the group. There are also cheats who exploit the cooperative structure for their own entirely selfish purposes. So the natural harmony is a beautiful illusion. An illusion but beautiful non the less.

Besides the cosmic and terrestrial natural forces there are other reasons why we can not ultimately posses all knowledge of the universe. The size and structure of our brains is probably a limiting factor. We will only discover that of which we can have awareness of and what we know about it will depend upon how we analyse and interpret the data we have gathered. I am sure plenty of arguments against ultimate omniscience were put forward in the essay contest.

Peter,

I regret to inform you that I am not one of the six influential people that you wish to reach. I am sure I am not taken seriously by the "scientific establishment" if noticed at all. Which is understandable. I can't offer advice to you on how to get noticed in a positive way.

I began visiting this forum because I thought that I had something valuable to share about comprehension of time and gravity and that someone else might be enthusiastic about what I had to say.I have tried my best to explain it every which way I can but ultimately feel it is time wasted. Prior to finding this site I have self published some of my ideas, just because it is my intellectual property and I would like to be able to use my own ideas later on without having to credit someone else with them. I also mistakenly thought that some other people might be interested. As my thoughts and understanding on the subjects have progressed some of my my former ideas and explanations are actually an embarrassment to me. That is the trouble with sharing work in progress. I have always said it is just the beginning.

I am sceptical about everything until I understand it myself. It is not reserved for your ideas. I do not want you to convince me but to be convinced myself by the evidence you have provided. I will try to find the time to read the supporting material. It is interesting to me. I am sorry but that does not help you at all.

Hi Georgina,

Thanks for your answer, I see better your point of vue and your analyzes.

You say"So the natural harmony is a beautiful illusion. An illusion but beautiful non the less."

There still you don't insert the evolution and its optimization, its improvement, its complexification in 3D.

It is not an illusion but our future simply, the chaos is an illusion , a short moment, a perceptible errors and non the less, the harmony is foundamental ,the choas no.

This perception of things implies a chaotic perception of the evolution because the time is bad understood with its evolution, constant furthermore.

You are right when you say about our limited brain, there too I insist about the evolution , that can explained thus a chaotic perception simply due to these limits of evolution.

We can't confound the universal harmony with the humans chaos, the chaos will disappear thus.

Sincerely

Steve

Hello Mr Jackson,

I, for now, just have a simple question ; can you tell me more about, or give a link to some document pertaining to the Triple Helix Morphology you are referring to in some of your papers. Maybe I'm naive not knowing about it, but I don't seem to find anything describing it.

thank you and bes t regards,

QM

P.S about your quote "We'll never understand what we see while it's screened by what we seek", I'd add "...but when the beauty of both mesh together, we have a glimpse of Truth."

Dear Peter,

I'm positive that with an open and receptive mind, coupled to a confident trust in such a process, this will make sense.

This sounds like a meditative method I use in order to receive intuitive information on the most important questions and interests I have about our magnificent Universe, my place in it and some understanding of it all. I put 'gosub routines' in place, each and every one related to a specific area of my quest, containing the continually up to date set of self referencing instructions, all 'returning' to the 'main program', which is my conscious awareness where every packet of new meaningful data is brought in the open area of contemplation were it is validated and fully experienced. It also happens that the entire process is shunted and fused by 'a revelation', something that reveals itself as completely true and in tune , but sometimes unfortunately too powerful to allow integration.

And, indeed, this must remain an ongoing process as what is already before us not only contains/retains its original information but is co-evolving with each and every 'mind' capable of relating with it, human and/or other.

QM

Hello dear Quanticmessenger,

Nice to know you.A real pleasure to see your words.

Happy to see this point of vue about the contemplations.

Our eyes are our eyes and our heart is our heart.

Never a theory is finished, never it is perfect ..........and the real scientists see this truth.

To Learn and still to learn the good works, a sorting is thus neccesary .....it exists a synchronization between the foundamentals equations.

The responsability of scientists, universals is so important at this moment....if we want decrease the sufferings and the problems simply.

It exists concrete inventions and optimizations on ground for some localities where the sufferings are a reality.

The humanity is like a rainbow, a diversity of colors united, unified in the light....and it is difficult to turn off a big fire with one water drop, nevertheless a whole of drops makes Ocean.........to be or not to be in fact ...

Dear Peter, all is linked and of course the philosophy like all is linked too , maths, physics,chemistry, biology,evolution, astronomy, the universality...it is that the sciences in fact.

To understand the locality, it is evident to study the globality.....

We can thus understand our rule like catalyzers of our environment, of course a harmonious catalyzer.

Friendly the messenger and Peter

Steve