Hi Jonathan.
In reply to my prior posts, you said:
"I just re-read your second post above and it made a bit more sense of something you were saying in the earlier post. Your statement at the end "How space manifests as electromagnetic/gravitational energy is a central and very valuable physical idea." is right on. Perhaps the key, as you say, is to recognize that there is both an attractive and repulsive component at work - which changes the effective action at different levels of scale. This makes unification simpler."
"We end up 1) Balancing/unifying scale and 2) Balancing attraction and repulsion in conjunction with space manifesting both gravitationally and electromagnetically. (Think wave/particle)."
Consider the above when reading/considering my essay, and in keeping with what dreams are/involve as well; as I have definitively demonstrated the unification of gravity and electromagnetism/light in/as dream experience (in and with time as well). Dream experience is sensory experience, and it involves/includes physics (for many other reasons as well). The dream is real. What is ultimately possible in physics (including mathematically) is necessarily tied to the integrated, interactive, and natural extensiveness of being, thought, and [sensory] experience. In fact, reality must be understood (in varying degrees, of course) as pertaining to (or involving) what is the integrated extensiveness of being and experience (including thought).
Dreams include and involve opposites, thereby adding to the integrated extensiveness of being, experience, and thought. Indeed, this is why dream experience is considerably different from waking experience. Importantly (and fundamentally) gravity and electromagnetism are understood as adding to the integrated extensiveness of being and experience (including space and thought).
Consider this:
Visually, the universal experience of the body is one of visual transparency (i.e., invisibility). Accordingly, when our bodies are visually distinguishable (or visible), then each of our visible experiences of the body (and of everything else for that matter) must necessarily be different (or unique); and individuals are then visually distinguishable as well. Since all of our bodies are visually transparent (or invisible), each of our bodies (considered individually) must necessarily be different when visible. Since the experience of the body is both visible and invisible, the visible experience of the body is necessarily changing (or inconstant), unique, and finite. The disintegration of the visual experience when an object is close to the eyes is demonstrative of the relationship between visibility and invisibility. The visible appearance of the body (including that of experience in general) is relatively unique, finite, and limited. (This conclusion is also in keeping with the fact that thought and vision are necessarily different.) The thoughtful understanding of the visible is properly understood as variable and finite in relation to the totality of experience, including that of the body.
Thoughts and emotions are differentiated feelings. Our thoughts, emotions, and feelings are largely (or often) indiscernible to others in keeping with the fact that the body is transparent (or invisible inside the eye). Since the body is visually transparent (that is, the interior of the body and eye are experienced as invisible), what follows is made all the more clear. Since there is a proportionate reduction of both thought and feeling during dreams, the experience of the body is generally (or significantly) lacking; for thought is fundamentally rendered more like sensory experience in general. By involving the mid-range of feeling between thought and sense, dreams make thought more like sensory experience in general. The reduction in the range and extensiveness of feeling during dreams is why there is less memory and thought therein; and it is also significant that the unborn child is carried in the center of the body. Dreams involve a fundamental integration and spreading of being and experience at the mid-range of feeling between thought and sense. If the self did not represent, form, and experience a comprehensive approximation of experience in general, we would be incapable of growth and of becoming other than we are.
This duality (i.e., visible and invisible) of our visual experience lends itself to our concealment, the use of costumes, etc.; and it is an indispensable part of our growth and of our becoming other than we are as well. The experience of the body as being generally present (while waking), while also recollecting the body as being generally or significantly lacking (including visually) during the dream becomes more understandable. The visual experience of the body during dreams is generally variable, inconsistent, and lacking due to (that is, in part, and consistent with) the fact that the totality of the visual experience is closer when dreaming. The transparency of vision is an essential element of the totality of visual experience. Experience is not visually determinable or predictable, because experience is not visual in its essence.
Consider this sentence: "The disintegration of the visual experience when an object is close to the eyes is demonstrative of the relationship between visibility and invisibility." in relation to particle/wave; the interactive nature of thought, being, and experience; and dreams.
Thanks Jonathan.