No-one interested in a common sense idea which fits like a glove? Birth of the moon ejecta from the formation of the Himalayas? Continental drift a fallacy that has persisted to this day? Explanation for Antarctica's young mountains? Earth not 4.5 billion years old but more like 300 million plus? Oh dear, what a miss.

If you look at a map of the Earth, or better still a globe, you can use your imagination to picture the Pacific Ocean as the impact site. The dark matter comet would have approached from close under the sun and slammed up and to the right, creating the orogeny of rocks along the west coast of the Americas and Bering Stait as well as the Himalayas themselves.

Plate tectonics and continental drift doesn't exist!Attachment #1: World_geologic_provinces.jpg

The Millennial Cycle is due to the Moon and it's embedded dm comets reacting with the creation dm comet buried near the Earth's core. When it passes exactly over the supermagnetic attraction zone, located as near the centre of the island groups east of Australia, then it gets an impulse which changes it's orbit and distance. It moves further away when the orbit favours a path over the repulsive side, estimated to be just west of Africa.

A sudden change in the Moon's orbit is therefore predicted. It should be possible with sophisticated analysis to estimate when this will occur imo.

  • [deleted]

  • Post #191

We now have a new hypothesis for the resolution of the question raised by Caudal: Are Venus and Earth in a long-distance relationship? as well as a mechanism for geomagnetic fields and pole shifts. The supermagnetism of the moon creation dm comet would be more than enough to churn the mantle with one side attracting and the other side repelling, having the long axis of the comet lying near the horizontal of the Earth's orbital plane.

    The receding of the moon indicates a loss of tidal warm waters into the higher latitudes. This has implications for the global warming debate and the reduction in natural CO2 release from the ocean bottoms. Here's a quote from the Introduction to Physical Oceanography: Chapter 13 - Deep Circulation in the Ocean

    [quote]*The Oceans as a Reservoir of Carbon Dioxide*

    The oceans are the primary reservoir of readily available CO2, an important greenhouse gas. The oceans contain 40,000 GtC of dissolved, particulate, and living forms of carbon. The land contains 2,200 GtC, and the atmosphere contains only 750 GtC. Thus the oceans hold 50 times more carbon than the air. Furthermore, the amount of new carbon put into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution, 150 GtC, is less than the amount of carbon cycled through the marine ecosystem in five years. (1 GtC = 1 gigaton of carbon = 1012 kilograms of carbon.) Carbonate rocks such as limestone, the shells of marine animals, and coral are other, much larger, reservoirs. But this carbon is locked up. It cannot be easily exchanged with carbon in other reservoirs.

    More CO2 dissolves in cold water than in warm water. Just imagine shaking and opening a hot can of CokeTM. The CO2 from a hot can will spew out far faster than from a cold can. Thus the cold deep water in the ocean is the major reservoir of dissolved CO2 in the ocean.

    New CO2 is released into the atmosphere when fossil fuels and trees are burned. Very quickly, 48% of the CO2 released into the atmosphere dissolves in the cold waters of the ocean, much of which ends up deep in the ocean.

    Forecasts of future climate change depend strongly on how much CO2 is stored in the ocean and for how long. If little is stored, or if it is stored and later released into the atmosphere, the concentration in the atmosphere will change, modulating Earth's long-wave radiation balance. How much and how long CO2 is stored in the ocean depends on the deep circulation and the net flux of carbon deposited on the seafloor. The amount that dissolves depends on the temperature of the deep water, the storage time in the deep ocean depends on the rate at which deep water is replenished, and the deposition depends on whether the dead plants and animals that drop to the sea floor are oxidized. Increased ventilation of deep layers, and warming of the deep layers could release large quantities of the gas to the atmosphere.

    The storage of carbon in the ocean also depends on the dynamics of marine ecosystems, upwelling, and the amount of dead plants and animals stored in sediments. But we won't consider these processes." [end quote]

    This means that anthropogenic CO2 contributions might be being masked by the loss from tidal effects for example.Attachment #1: CO2_pump.png

    • [deleted]

    • Post #193

    Here's my first sketch showing the moon creation dm comet inside the Earth which will both magnetise the adjacent solid iron core to create the Earth's magnetic field *and* churn the inner mantle to create the electric field.Attachment #1: Internal_Comet_Earth.jpg

    We now have a model for the millennial cycle which fits the shape of the curve in Rahmstorf's Timing Of Abrupt Climate Changes. With this new mental image of the moon creation dark matter comet, Figure 1 shows a perfect fit at D-O events 7,6 and 5 especially. As the moon's orbit moves towards the ecliptic, as seen from the northern hemisphere, it will experience a repulsive impulse from the dm comet. This will dramatically increase the tide raising forces on Earth, despite the moon moving further away in it's orbit. When the moon's orbit passes the repulsive zone it will momentarily experience normal gravitational attraction before passing through the attractive impulse phase below the Earth's equator. This will similarly dramatically increase tide raising forces, but at the same time bring the moon closer to the Earth, for a prolonged period of higher tides. This double peak can be seen before the spike of D-O 7,6 and 5. There's similarly a double peak on the slightly gentler cooling side of the warming events.

    The moon is currently moving away from the Earth, which fits with a northern hemisphere lunar orbit. The moon would have risen through the repulsive impulse phase and moved further way from the Earth. When it returns on it's cycle it will move further way still before reaching the attraction zone of the southern hemisphere.

    My apologies for not explaining this more clearly, but I wanted to get something done in writing straight away.Attachment #1: Millennial_Cycles.jpgAttachment #2: Lunar_Millennial_Cycle.jpg

    The 1,800-year oceanic tidal cycle: A possible cause of rapid climate change can now be seen to fit the 1,470 year cycle given above, if dark matter comet impulses are considered. Here's a quote from that paper:

    [*quote*]A cause for such greater regularity in tidal forcing might be resonances of other bodies of the solar system, especially the outer planets. We are struck by the close correspondence of the average period of the 180-year tidal cycle of 179.5 years (1/10 of that of the 1,800-year cycle) and the period of the sun's rotation about the center of mass of the solar system of 179.2 years, the latter a manifestation of planetary resonances (13).[*end quote*]

    This 360 year movement of the sun relative to the earth is another important change in the dark matter impulses of the buried moon creation comet. It's the source of the 'little ice age' imo and is probably the biggest influence on our human civilisation w.r.t dramatic climate change.

    Both these cycles need careful analysis and consideration with immediate effect.

      Not the sun's position in the 360 yr cycle but that of the planets, especially Jupiter. It links with the aforementioned ice age cycle as well as the so called split peak problem.

      14 days later

      I have a solution for the twice size spider monkey finds. The Lachamps geomagnetic excursion of 40kya was caused by a dark matter comet impact on the south coast of Australia, creating the Nullarbor plain. The energy of the dark matter impact was enough to disrupt the mantle flow and therefore the Earth's magnetic field. This collapse of the geomagnetic field, evidenced by a spike in beryllium-10 in ice core data, would have let cosmic radiation erode the ozone layer. This would then have led to Earth's surface being awash with intense solar radiation.

      The comet impact also had the energy to lift the entire lithosphere, creating a landbridge stretching from S.E. Asia, arcing across the Pacific and reaching Mexico. This allowed species to cross from one continent to another and would explain the 40,000 year old human footprints discovered by Professor Gonzalez.Attachment #1: Lachamps_DM_Comet_Impact_40kya.jpg

        • [deleted]

        • Post #199

        This new comet would have joined with the moon creation comet in a magnet-like fashion, creating an eventual increase in mantle convection. A stronger magnetic field than *before* the 40kya event. A high peak of solar radiation followed by a decline which stopped lower than before it started. This is the kick start of our civilisation and the peripheral megafauna left behind.

        • [deleted]

        • Post #200

        Here's some dialogue I'm currently having about the latest developments:

        This isn't an ordinary comet impact though! It's a Tunguska-like impact which leaves little or no crater. Imagine a high velocity rifle bullet travelling through a water melon without making it explode. That's the kind of thing that can happen with dark matter travelling through the crust. The magnetic field is effected, initially collapsing to let in cosmic radiation which eliminates the ozone layer. More sunshine means more grass and fruit. Later though the magnetic field returns even stronger than before, so the big guys are hardest hit and are stressed enough to go extinct or evolve a clever survival strategy. Some of the megafauna of Australia was wiped out in the initial phase, such as the hippo-sized Diprotodon, the largest marsupial of all time, which went extinct 40,000 years ago.

        • [deleted]

        • Post #201

        More dialogue:

        The mantle flow creates the magnetic field. Modern science doesn't have an explanation. Dark matter comets *are* the solution. Why are you talking about an "exit wound" you dummy. The supermagnet joins up with the moon creation comet and churns the mantle even more than before when things settle down to an equilibrium. This increases the magnetic field and stops more 'harmful' cosmic radiation. We have a thicker ozone layer than before 40kya imo. Less sunshine equals less grass amd fruit sizes. The megafauna therefore goes extinct or learns to adapt. We invented farming. The cryptids invented something else. It's that simple Farmerboy

        Descartes was right all along with his -Vortices- idea!

        "Does it not make more sense that the 1 million year old limestone was smothered with the ocean mud from a comet impact nearer the present day? This would account for the flatness and lack of any river valleys. Does anyone agree with this middle ground argument?"

        (unanswered)

        [Tunguska:] "Yes, I think it went straight through, unlike a regular comet. If it was an airburst event, many comet fragments would have been found. This isn't the case as far as I'm aware and *none* were found!"

        • [deleted]

        • Post #205

        I predict the evolution of power technology with the invention of the supermagnet motor in the very near future. See here for a present overview with just baryonic magnets imagined. A Few Magnet Motors (June 21, 2011):

        [*Quote*]Although originally suggested by Nikola Tesla in 1905,

        only a few permanent magnet motors-generators have been designed, that is, magnet motors where the power comes from the magnets, not an external, exaustable supply of electricity.

        Engineers of Hitachi Magnetics Corp. of California have stated that a motor-generator run solely by magnets is feasible and logical but the politics of the matter make it impossible for them to pursue developing a magnet motor or any device that would compete with the energy cartels.[*End Quote*]

        "You're right! The watermellon example was a mistake, because that's all in the realms of everyday baryonic matter. The dark matter comet is a supermaterial, a supermagnetic hyper-dense form of exotic matter. It's a totally different interaction than we're taught at school and colleges. This goes through the crust like a rock through candy floss."

        7 days later

        The 20 million year ice age cycle is most likely the up and down undulations of the solar system as it orbits the galactic centre. The ice sheet on Antarctica began to grow some 20 million years ago.

          A discussion on the Wikipedia page of Megafauna has sections where I make the connection between Tunguska-like comet impact events and *both* the creation and extinction of different megafauna species.