And my email reply:

Hi Mensur,

Thanks for the links, most useful. I have a tentative explanation for the mystery movement of the plates. It's an asymmetric inner innermost core around 360 miles in diameter which wobbles, based on the work of Harvard professors Adam Dziewonski and Miaki Ishii http://www.spacedaily.com/news/earth-02z.html combined with Brouwer's Theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brouwer_fixed_point_theorem (see diagrams). It's probably too speculative for your methodology, but worth contemplating on imo.

Best wishes, Alan

...Getting back to the earthquake prediction conundrum w.r.t Dr Omarbashich's non-peer reviewed work, the only way I can see a mechanism for some kind of 'resonator hypothesis' is at LOW TIDAL FORCING. See the diagram re-attached. A low tide will keep the inner innermost core shell oval shaped, whilst a high tide will tend to stretch the shell into a more circular shape. Now imagine that Venus or Mars happens to approach the co-planar configuration with Earth, i.e. a very low inclination angle in combination with a close approach. If this triggers a wobble of an asymmetric inner innnermost core of the Earth, then this could make a 'heavy contact' with the shell at a low tidal configuration. If it occured at a high tide, then the wobble of the enigma core will only make a 'light contact' with the more circular shell. It's all rather speculative, but it's just about a plausible hypothesis in my working model. I intend to do some more rigorous investigation using Mensur's tables.Attachment #1: 2_Enigma_Core_Solar_Resonance.jpg

...Getting back to the essay

The latest findings by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer fit with this new imagery of opposing mega structures -before- the big bang, NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer & Anglo-Australian Telescope Help Confirm Nature of Dark Energy. If the structures emerge and grow at a constant rate, then the graviton-wraparound-darkEnergy arrival rate, before -and- after the BB, will also increase at a constant rate i.e. giving an acceleration of the expansion of the galaxies.

[quote]PASADENA, Calif. -- A five-year survey of 200,000 galaxies, stretching back seven billion years in cosmic time, has led to one of the best independent confirmations that dark energy is driving our universe apart at accelerating speeds. The survey used data from NASA's space-based Galaxy Evolution Explorer and the Anglo-Australian Telescope on Siding Spring Mountain in Australia.

The findings offer new support for the favored theory of how dark energy works -- as a constant force, uniformly affecting the universe and propelling its runaway expansion. They contradict an alternate theory, where gravity, not dark energy, is the force pushing space apart. According to this alternate theory, with which the new survey results are not consistent, Albert Einstein's concept of gravity is wrong, and gravity becomes repulsive instead of attractive when acting at great distances.

"The action of dark energy is as if you threw a ball up in the air, and it kept speeding upward into the sky faster and faster," said Chris Blake of the Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia. Blake is lead author of two papers describing the results that appeared in recent issues of the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. "The results tell us that dark energy is a cosmological constant, as Einstein proposed. If gravity were the culprit, then we wouldn't be seeing these constant effects of dark energy throughout time."[end quote]

My model is a third alternative which is due some major mainstream consideration.

5 days later

  • [deleted]

  • Post #144

I woke up with a revelation this morning.

Cryptic clue: "vertical movement"

11 days later

  • [deleted]

  • Post #145

Here's someone who has similar ideas as I do:

[copied over from Sciforums.com]

As we shall see, the popular term 'Newtonian concept of attraction (a pulling force)', as applied to gravity, was never unconditionally endorsed by Newton. The concept of gravity as 'a pulling force of attraction' remains a speculative though understandably popular term, coined by Newton's beneficiaries. All of this is to say that the conceptualization of gravity as any sort of pulling force of attraction was not Newton's resolute conceptual or by any means exclusive definition of gravity. Allow the derivation of this last statement to be further qualified:

I wish to cite at this time what is to say the least, a most interesting alternative concept concerning the identity of (what Newton was always careful to call 'universal') gravity. An otherwise completely ignored statement which might even be correctly categorized as 'obscure', or 'inconsequential'. Were it not for the fact that this statement is made by Sir Isaac Newton. And, were it not for the fact that this statement is included in the very (3 page, non-mathematical) Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA.

From the beginning of the 1st to the end of the 2nd page of Newton's three page Preface to The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA, Newton is discussing the motions of falling objects and orbiting planets. By way of his applied mathematical descriptions of the effects of the force of gravity. At this time, Newton offers the following statement about what causes the gravitationally induced motions of planets & apples, quote:

"For I am induced by many reasons to suspect that they may all depend on certain forces by which the particles of bodies, by some causes hitherto unknown, are either mutually impelled towards each other, and cohere in regular figures, or are repelled and recede from each other; which forces being unknown, philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of Nature in vain."

That quote and its extraction will henceforth be referred to here, as THE GRAVITATIONAL ALTERNATIVE. Not my gravitational alternative; Newton's Gravitational Alternative to be exact. I repeat the quote (of particles and systems-of-particles: of matter), 'are either mutually impelled towards each other and cohere in regular figures (orbits; juxtapositions), or, are mutually repelled and recede from each other .'

It implies directly and categorically, that gravity may in fact be the opposite of the universally considered impelling or 'pulling force of attraction'; that is to say, Isaac Newton and his formal definitions, directly and resolutely suggest that gravity may in fact be a repelling or pushing force.

It is difficult to over dramatize the very existence of this statement, its author, and especially its contextual implications. It categorically allows that everything Newton mathematically confirms and describes in The PRINCIPIA MATHEMATICA - from orbiting planets, falling apples, aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric tides - all the large and small phenomena of gravity - is caused by one of two kinds of forces: the conventionally considered impelling or pulling force of attraction, or, its exact opposite, a repelling/ pushing force. That is fact #1.

Fact #1 evokes at least one question: Allowing possible advantage in Newton's Gravitational Alternative that gravity may in fact be a repelling (pushing) force rather than an impelling (pulling) force, how might any such advantage be experienced and applied?

That question and its derivation might still be deemed obscure and inconsequential, if its direct unequivocal answer did not exist, most profoundly, at the heart-foundation of the latest and most advanced generalized theory of gravity in the history of Physical Science. That being Albert Einstein's GENERAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY.

In the first quarter of this century, Albert Einstein, in observing the already well known inversely proportional equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass values (which will be explained, shortly), described this equivalence as: 'an astonishing coincidence', and then applied the cause of his astonishment to the monumental task of formulating an unprecedented theoretical generalization concerning the identity of gravity. That, being none other than the General Principle Of Relativity; which principle is quite literally the foundation upon which rests Einstein's entire General Theory of Relativity. The most advanced statement about gravity, to date.

The General Principle is also misnomered as the 'Equivalence Hypothesis', or, more appropriately, 'The Principle Of Equivalence', which states:

'There is no way to distinguish the effects produced by the inertial force of acceleration (a pushing/repelling force) from the effects produced by gravitational force (assumed to be a 'pulling/impelling force: identity unknown')'.

Regards,

Kaiduorkhon

http://forums.delphiforums.com/EinsteinGroupie

13 days later

Great Essay Alan! Your's is one of the best because the way I see it, these here Threads are a continuation of a really good Essay, no? And by that measure, your close attention and participation both strenuous and insightful qualifies you as one the best.

And so, like an Archimedes Screw rotating in a higher-dimensional space that itself is only a projection of the to'ings-and-fro'ings of particles/fields on a two dimension surface shall we compete for membership lol! Do they even want us? Circumstantial evidence says, "no".

Holographic projection, which is exactly what Archimedes was tracing in the sand when that over-zealous Roman soldier ran him thru...

fqxi should we stay or should we go? sa? ?

    10 days later

    Thanks for the appreciation Tommy, much appreciated!

    21 days later

    The puzzle of the ice age megafauna can now be explained. The pre-glacial age 1-2 mya would have been a much wamer and wetter nothern hemisphere due to the extra strong equatorial current which defelcted northward to keep the arctic basin ice free. This would have made much more land available for year round foraging and thus able to sustain these mega species. The South American megafauna also shows that the southern landmasses would also have been blessed with a much warmer and wetter climate.

    Thus it can be deduced that Earth's rise of animal gigantism would have been curtailed from the dramatic climate change due to the closing of the North American/South American ocean channel and only the most intelligent and adaptable would have survived. Mankind is likely to have exploited this climatic opportunity and pushed many mega species to extinction.Attachment #1: PreIceAge.jpg

    Ice Age EPOCHS can now be understood by the 145 my cycle of spiral arm crossing. Supermagnetism inceases would cause the Sun's ring core to 'judder' due to the stellar supermagnetic plane and so the Earth's ring core would similarly judder. This extra energy effect would be transmitted via energetic magma plumes and cause *rapid* continental drift at the surface. The creation of the Himalayas now makes perfect sense btw. The rapid movement of the plates would allow landmasses to cover the polar regions and the possible curtailing of warming ocean currents. The combination of these two effects would lead to build-up of polar ice which is inducive to a runaway glacial age.

    The stellar supermagnetic plane is the ideal explanation for the galaxy rotation curve enigma.

    *Video Experiment Shows Supermagnetic Material Buried In Rock, Greece‏*

    These magnetic and gravity hills are all over the world and can be seen on youtube with varying degrees of scientific endeavour. They probably won't be too convincing just yet but keep in mind the possiblity that within relatively easy reach is a ball of this magic material http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reZLfRARguk

    • [deleted]

    • Post #153

    Dear Alan,

    I enjoyed your interpretation of gravity using Archemedis Screw modelling, infact this could be how intelligence arises from conscience in a spiral form. I also agree with your point that universe emerges out of anolog and manifests in digital form. Please know that

    Absolute Truth

    lies with in us and here is how I realized and conceptualized it works

    n-sphere

    Love,

    Sridattadev.

      Nederland

      Dank u vriendelijk, Wilhelmus. How' s Nederland? Ik zou zo willen bezoeken als u kon helpen? Uw commentaren waren divers en enigszins beknopt bij verscheidene punt. U bent duidelijk hartstochtelijk over u verhandeling. Dank die voor hij inspanning mijn poging eigenlijk om te lezen nemen. Het zou het begin van vrij verreikend iets kunnen zijn. En zal zo van u. Ik verheug me op het lezen van het. En ernstig, ive nooit aan scandanavia? kreeg een kleine ruimte voor een couupleweken. lol? voorzien van een netwerk here.give me tijd en voor u verteren om met contact te onderbreken. NetherLand@QuantumWidgets.com zullen aan me voor bepaald... krijgen thanx opnieuw

        Hi Sridattadev,

        Thank you for your appreciation of my interpretation, I was delighted to see your post. Yes, the human side of nature is to be always remembered and I enjoyed your blogs.

        Best wishes and love to you too,

        Alan

        Hi Tommy,

        Did you post this in the wrong place by any chance?

        New discoveries are being made nearly everyday. Watch this 3 min video Bermuda Triangle: what happened to Flight 19? - BBC and then read this link for a fascinating story of which I have a remarkable solution Flight 19 - The 'Lost Patrol'

        I wish to make a tribute to Ivan Sanderson for his amazing groundbreaking work which makes my life a lot easier, Vile VorticesAttachment #1: MysteryTrainglesExplained.jpgAttachment #2: DinosaurCometSupermagnetism.jpg

        The Nevada triangle of Steve Fosset fame and the Bermuda triangle of Flight 19 can both be directly geographically linked to the anomalies in the Devil's Sea of Japan and those of the South China Sea. They are simply due to the supermagnetic comet core that must be lodged half way into the outer core, deep inside the Earth. This is most likely the dinosaur extinction comet with the Yucatan crater being from that of a smaller fragment. The Earth's flyby anomaly is likely to be directly related to this main event. It all begins to fit like a glove.Attachment #1: Vile_Vortices_Map.png

          • [deleted]

          • Post #160

          Dear Alan,

          Thank you for reading the blog and sharing the love. All we need is love in this game of life to make this brief journey on this planet a memorable one.

          Unfortunately I see that most of us are moving in the opposite direction of love and this is the root cause of all the problems. Its our choice, we can either make this journey a sweet dream or a night mare, I hope that we will all be wise enough to choose love eventually and restore balance.

          As for scientific aspect of understanding things the answer lies in "zero" or "absolutely nothing".

          Love,

          Sridattadev.