How to Learn to Ask Good Questions in Physics by Johan Noldus

I am sorry also for my friends of flandres,in fact we are belgians dear Johan, and I d say we are humans.The rest is vain. Your essay is well , a little too much of misunderstood mixings but it's well.

Dear Johan,

Ahahahah Let's go , that 's going to begin.Wallonia 10 flanders 0

Don't forget I am going to show you the real road of our foundamentals, it's essnential for youat my humble opinion, and still one thing you are a pseudo comic scientist , vanitious and without real innovation, a comic I repeat.Your work is a history of sciences, that 'all , you don't understand the real sciences and the real entropy.Rest in your pseudo work for computing.

TOT ZIENS ahahah in live .your essay is weak and frankly study the generality please, you shall see it's good for you.

Steve

Ohhhh daer I am touched ahahh I am sad ohhh, you are strong wwawwww I am going to stop my works hahah I am already dead my friend,Indeed I stop my universitie(geology at FNDP) due to a coma at the age of 20, It was difficult but after some treatments of epilepsy, I am better now,don't be a jaleaous hater if I am going to be still franker now,thus of course I continued my work small thinker ,as what your PhD AS MANY HERE HAS ANY MEANING FOR ME,because I see your reasoning and the lack of generality,as what restudy your foundamentals.In fact you have a job, it is that, in fact you are the last trying it's that, you are a comic, who tries to make sciences with a kind of vanity, but in fact you make a kind of resume on history of physics but where are your innovations, anywhere, mine evrywhere, don't be still I repeat a hater vanitious jaleous,it's not serious you know if you aren't really globally skilling.My Theory is rational, you are who in fact,me I know comicus pseudo scientus.hahah Lorentz covariances and dirac and pauli and who after Newton, Kaluza Klein,WHO .....Your work is weak comparing with the otehrs essays, you are even not at the middle.I am suggesting you to learn more and perhaps you shall understand my theory of spherization, but really I doubt seeing your conclusions.But the hope makes life.

Ok my friend, I will come with better translation of my french.soon hihih I love this platform.

(a) your education in physics is high school level, mine is a PhD,ahahaha

(b) you do not understand anything of what I write which is exemplified by your comments,ahahaha

(c) your ''ideas'' do neither fit quantum mechanics nor general relativity, two theories which you do not even comprehend,ahahahah

(d) you advocate everywhere to professionals that you have the secret to the universe in your hand while you do not even have proper ideas/equations,mvV (c²o²s² )m =E ahahah comicus read all my posts on FQXI since 2 years poor thinker

(e) you use words which you do not even comprehend ahahah say me these words and I am going to show you the road of rationality.

small thinker small work small essay

Tot ziens

ps waloonia 40 flandres I am cool I give you 2 points

to you belgian or perhaps you prefer an other word as walloonian hhahahah

as if I must attach importance to the pseudo websites and the pseudo hater scientists and their pseudo index, have you seen strings, extradimensions, multiverses, reversibility of time, or others stupidities on this index, if no it'snot a real index, the rest is vain and is a lost of time for me, as here in fact with you pseudo thinker, like if I must attach importance to these jaleous of my discovery, frankly.Similarities and copies,I saw them all days on the net, it's not important, I can understand the potential of my discovery, rational, logic, pragmatic and universal.Yes my friend, the universe is a sphere with a central sphere and our particules are entangled spheers with a finite number for the ultim entanglement.

To you if it's possible. 45-2 .......but de Lukaku ahaha

Steve

ahahah it's you the crackpot, 50-2 ahaha and still I am nice.let'(s continue with politness, don't stress, be cool, I am still cool int he sciences details you know, we begin only you know.

Let's Speak about sciences , first I repeat you confound the relativity , and the pure deterministic realism.You interpret very weakly the globality.Your essay I repeat is weak.But let's try to see if you can improve it, but I doubt, fisrt your are too much vanitious, as many young scientists.ahahah

But perhaps you prefer points for elemantary particles or perhaps strings as you are computer, ahaha perhaps in fact you see only the infinity with a binar matrix and a diagonal of Cantor, if it's that your local realism, wawww you confound the finite groups and the infinity and its different kinds, ...thus your pure newtonian fractal has no sense for me respecting the evolution and the encoding of informations, just because you don't respect the limits.The understanding of infinity and finite systems is more than your small analyze, simply and rationally.But let's see the details, weaks I repeat of your work.

Ps you are a big guy no, thus why you ask for fqxi, Fqxi IS A WONDERFUL PLATFORM TRANSPARENT AND VERY INNOVANT AND YOUNG They know what they must do, when a peo^ple is not polite or others, they delete, but why here my friend, we discuss about sciences, simply.

tot ziens

Steve

I repeat FQXi is transparent and delete the not politness words or the real stupidities as you say.I doubt they are going to delete these ones.Fqxi have no preferences or others, FQXi is well organised and well managered.We know all that the scientists and thinkers are vanitious, it's as that.Thus let's discuss without hate if it's possible, just with arrogant and rational critics.....60-5 I give you still 3 points I am cool no? hihi

Steve

for all readers, Lukaku is a soccer player aged of 17(Lukaku is a young african from RDC borned in Belgium and we like it because the belgium is a country of welcome) and we are the first with anderlecht(french club lol) hihihi goalllll laugh is good for health no?

ps have you seen , even the favorite sports of humans are with spheres ahahah but perhaps your spherical eyes do not see that simply.

75-5 hihihi

still one thing, the essays of this year are numerous, and it's a real pleasure to see scientists and thinkers from all over the world. This platform is young and is transparent, it's the most important.It doesn't exist preferences or others, or this or that. Respect that .

Steve

I reread your essay, frankly it's a mix of a kind of pseudo understanding of infinities, infinity and finites groups.It's probably due to your lack of generality and too much of computing and creations of forms in 2D hihihi. You must study all centers of interest, if not you shall continue to mix without a real understanding of the whole. I suggest you must try to think by yourself.

Steve

I gave you 6 but I hesitated to put 5 really, because I think it's just the correct score,and of course I am just, and transparent.A weak work you can make better. Have you read the others essays, there are very relevant ones,rational and general.

Steve

you haven't answered to my questions posted about your interpretation of the pure infinity and the pure physicality. do you consider for example the entanglement, as finite or do you consider the universe as infinite, or do you consider the consciousness as infinite, or do you consider the numbers of cosmological spheres as finite or infinite, how do you interpret the number of particules in our universe, I have many asks .Do you consider for example a limit(s) separating the universe and the unknown, do you consider the walls in all.Or do you think that the entropy is maximum in al.....answer simply.Keep it simple and stupid hahaha

to you

Steve

that's all, you have nothing to say of more?

You fear of the transparence or what? HAHHA ironic,aswer to my asks, simple and concrete if it's possible.

to you

Steve

First it's easy to understand and we know already some ideas of Lorentz or Dirac or Pauli, thjat is not the question, and second still you lack of realism and objectivity. In fact you try to be global and general, but no,sorry. Hidden variables, not but frankly, it is what for you a real hidden variable(a magic field, or what a magic tensor, or perhaps a tachyonic acceleration for travel in the strings,...) be simple and short and concrete. Say me one recognized by the international language for example, Utrecht you say , I see,. But I am cool , I am cool.I rest quiet you see dear FQXi I evolve no? hihiih dear Doc Foster, I know you are a rational in fact, you can help him for some roads at my humble opinion hihihi

Steve

let's analyze -E²+p²c²=0.....see that the mass and the 3D are essential. there is a problem about the motion of photons and the interpretation of mass.They turn and has no mass, pardoxal and realist is the main sense is diffrent than the main sense of gravitational stability, of course for a real understanding of this dynamic, relativistic, the number of the entanglement must be understood in its pure finite serie. This simple evidence permits to better understand the realitivity and the fact that the mass and light are in fact the same as the space also ,in their pure entanglement and their rotations spinals and orbitals. Now for a real understanding of the mass and the difference between light and space, ....the rotations spinals and orbitals explain the difference. Now the volumes of the serie if we consider the uniqueness is specific and probably evolves but doesn't change, but the density yes, that implies a logic of fusion mass light in the arrow of time.Proportional relativistically speaking with the entropy and its evolution.You shall understand that only a different sense of rotation explains the equation paradoxal cited above.Now the space is without rotation.

I say me how is a BEC if the number is finite hihihhi The lorentz invariances are important and are rational also respecting the realtivity of rotations , and spheres and their evolution all in 3D.

Steve

for me it doesn't exist hidden variables, just some steps far of us, proportional relativistically speaking.It's that the relativity. If you want correctly calculate the series, respect the foundamentals. The QM is rational and respect the newtonian fractalization of mass towards our planck scales.Now the determinisn is of course the better road. In accepting our step of evolution at the universal scale,it is simple and logic.But if now the EPR /COPENAGHEN is interpreted as that, that becomes ironic even. Do you see the works of Christian(even if I bother him hihiiI like the realism) and Zeilinger about the violations of Bells.The determinism exists fortunally and the theories of hidden variables are a pure joke for rationalists.

Steve

Oh lalala keep cool don't be angry ,we just begin to have a discussion, a little beer from Belgium hihihi, Doc is skilling,yes it is his name, I am persuaded he can help you for the real understanding of our realism.It doesn't exist hidden variables simply.But I doubt you can change your perception of things,...ahaahah evil details, and what after ...hidden evils and a turing evil machine ahaha waww impressing,

90-5 still 5 points due to my kindness.

To you but apparently you don't understand my asks?

You know I don't see many people who critics your work,perhaps it's just due to the fact you insert hidden variables.But of course that it's just a suggestion.I think you must buy better books, really. Banned you say, really and why because you want it, let's me laugh, I am arrogant, direct and frank, always polite, thus why,just for you and some others, this platform is transparent and your works I repeat are weaks comparating with many others....

You are laughing, really.

Steve