You are just a crank, that is why you should be banned. Now, let someone of the appropriate level approach me and you will see how the discussion evolves.

I am not laughing, I am thinking about those intelligent people I know in Wallonia and who suffer under your immense stupidity.

Kind regards,

Johan

  • [deleted]

ahaha your credibility is finished due to your hate.....ps you are a comic and I eat you in live poor thinker.

100-5

Banned yes of course you think what that FQXi is as you, no my friend they are universal.And of course they are just.Viva el transparence no, even it that irritates you, the net is revolutionarry as my ideas.Ahahahah

Steve

  • [deleted]

who suffers due to my intelligence it's that, you become crazzy my friend.Wawww beauitiful heart.

Ps I have had a bankupcy due to this left politicians at the age of 27 thus of course I am laughing and more than you, be sure.

Well you haven't answer about what I meant above, thus still you are a pseudo.but you can evolve.

Banned no but frankly you are ironic,

Steve

  • [deleted]

120-5

  • [deleted]

still one thing pseudo scientist...FQXi is not psysics forum and advanced physics forum...there you can be banned when you critic,.......... here no !!! Thus of course we are going lo laugh my belgian friend.

hihihi ironic, ......I love this platform

  • [deleted]

you know FQXi has habit with me, I know the under review, and you know what, after they approve in general,thus of course you confound a little the platforms and the serious of these platforms....please respect FQXi.Or go on physics forum with a false name, here it's the real name ok.

  • [deleted]

no dear, not here and you know why because it's transparent.You are full of hate, and your uniersality is for me as a water drop compated with an ocean.

Some people have so many vanity that I just critic and of course after their only solution is the banned system.....but not here,fortunally.Thus of course let's continue without being deleted.But you repeat now always the same....you haven't nothing to say of more....you can speak about physics....but perhaps you prefer to loose your time for my banned hour.ahahah

Steve

  • [deleted]

ahahahah wawww a charlatan and a crank now and what after I am a people who likes monney, ahahaha erro dear pseudo I dislike several things dedicated to disappear in time space evolution, here is their names, monney, arms and weapons, frontiers and borders, stupidities and differences.......ahahah of course dear pseudo.

You are very bad fall with me you now,.....the love and the compassion are my sisters small thinker.Ahahah still more hate it's that and now you are going to say what after....

140-5 and still I am cool no?

my defaults are parano and a little babby in my characterial comportment, vanitious also but I am obliged in the sciences comunity..that's all, I have had some discussions here since these 2 years, sometimes I am parano with Ray or this and that but I like them , I like people.

You are very very ironic.

To you

Steve

  • [deleted]

Good luck he says me ahahah let's continue thus.

I have to translate the language that is so pretty, French. My work is practical and rational, with or without your approvement. The pursuit of truths and the truth is not a game, but a sincere and humble search to this universality and its increasing entropy. Your essay is for me a proud and poor impulse of inconsistencies. You should definitely restudy more subtly your surrounded rationalities. You can discriminate against me, say this and that about me, vilify on my personality. Know that it will not affect my works. You do not consider certain evidence . If you knew how childish these pseudo things are important to me. The shadows of casualness bog down the steps of the unconscious, such chasms without glow and fervor. It would be pointless to explain the color blue to someone seeing red.

To you

Steve

  • [deleted]

"I challenge you to find someone with a reputation who is of the opinion you are not a crank and is willing to say so here."

Well interesting, perhaps your friends but not everywhere in the world my belgian friend ahahah I challenge you to put a list here if you want.Ahehehe

ps I am persuaded that several rationalists, very intelligent have seen my theory, that's why my theory will be in the books for universities, yes indeed,with or without your approvement.It's as that whern a work is rational and serious and pragmatic , you kniow when I classed animals and vegetals or when I study my game at piano or when I write poems, always I am serious, thus of course frankly ....I am laughing really and even I am sad for you in the same time, because there you are really full of hate, not me.It's that the universality and the compassion of love. I will pray for you hihihi

To you,

Steve

  • [deleted]

ahahaha well I will publish my friend, I will publish. I just begin to create the Intyernational Humanistic Sciences Center and I am a very very bad administrator and management,thus it's difficult.Thus In fact I seach a kind of team,it's important the team and the complementarity. But I am a little parano thus of course I am waiting the good persons. In fact my works of classments and others are numerous as my inventions. Thus of course I must be rational and prudent for my society. Furthemore more my past problems in belgium with this bankrupcy, I have lost vegetals due to bad people.I understand my parano.

At my opinion, you have bad advices around you,....but let's continue

Vixra and arxiv are interestings , but of course a real occham razor is essential, I prefer the good books of thermo, QM,or maths.....the learning is all days , and the books are so important.You are very bad fall you know.

The sciences are universals and rationals. Your works no. Mine yes.the complexity returns to simplicity.

to you

Steve

  • [deleted]

ok well let's go for thermo now ask a question and I answer and after I ask and you answer ok.

Begin now

Simple, give a rigorous definition of a dynamical quantum entropy.

  • [deleted]

the entropy is maximum in all thing,at this Wall separating the unknown and the physicality but for that you must understand the concept of increase of entropy also because the mass polarises the light my firend.

Ps The entropy of a system is a function of the thermo coord ......between thermal states no but frankly

To me what is for you the form of an elementary particles, be short concrete and precise.

Nono, I asked you a rigorous definition, meaning that you introduce symbols,dynamics, statistics and so on. Please you ahead.

Johan

  • [deleted]

Ok you know what , you are a comic, restudy witht he help of Carnot the real meaning of S and its intergrations.The entropy and its increasing is not a play my friend.I haven't a program for maths but let's go for the principle of entropy. The mass the energy and the light are purelly linked with the rotating entangled spheres and their pure finite number and volumes. iT IS THIS FUSION DUE TO EVOLUTION which implies the increase.But I doubt you see this subtitles.don't forget S=const.ln omega.The real equilibrium against the disorders.If you see thye second law my friend ....and the Gibbs function .....THE SPINNING ROTATING SPHERES IN 3D EXPLAIN ALL .You shall see perhaps the fields of energy towards the Planck scale.

To you

Steve

  • [deleted]

the spheres and their pure rotations proportional with mass are purely linked with their volumes with the delta S if you intergrate with temperature and pression and cosnt....you shall see the quantization of mss and its correlated fields. But I doubt, really ....it's a little te same tha for ideal gas and delta S between rotating spheres.S=Cp lnT-nRlnP+So....if you now substituate correctly your differential equations, the serie of decreasing of volumes and incerasing of E correlated with mass, perhaps I shall more interested than at this moment.S=CvlnT+nRlnV+So.....

  • [deleted]

your credibility falls in live my friend with your ironical answers.You do not even understand the principle of entropy, in fact you are now in a bizare position.You haven't answers, thus always since several posts you say the same.

Aswer to mine for now me I HAVE ANSWERED YOU NO...in fact you don't know how are these elementary particles. I am nice I give you 3 choices a point, a string or a sphere.It's easy no and even you can post an other, but even that you haven't answer....

  • [deleted]

200-5 I am still nice, 5 point of bonus

200-10 I am cool no

Clausius and fermi shall laugh.Giibs Dirac also.Carnot, Joule Maxwell also...Lorentz will say you, my young thinker, be more rational, and nernst and Planck shall smile to your hates.As a quiet road relativistic of our Laws.Do you see the constants, irreversibilities and coherences of our foundamentals, I beleive that no unfortunally. Make a BEC with infinities if you want after all, it's not my problem hahaha

Steve

  • [deleted]

ahahah that's all...ahaha 250-10 return at school , a PhD you say , where in fact in a bar or what? Aahhah Well could you develop that ,pi exp 4=piexp4/5=8pi² SUM inf and n=1 1/n²-48SUMinf and n=11/nexp4 what is it ?YOU CAN BE HELPED BY FOURIERS ten second too late ahahah

a real comic about our foundamentals.You do not understand the universality of the entropy and its increasing of mass.You ponder a pseudo work of relativity and hidden variables.A real comedy for rationalists.They exist you know.

to you