Quantum Graphenity by Tobias Fritz

As if that are going to change my life hihihihi, I suspect a lack of generality and a lack of study in all centers of interest.You are a good computer, it's well.Indeed we are not on the same wave lenght.You confound a little the simulations and our realism , objective and rational.

ps a BH is a sphere and it turns, it has a volume, it has a mass, a density and it has a rule with a pure gravitation,and the general and special relativity..you know the thermodynamic and its cooling since the BB I suppose......and this sphere turns also around others centers (more important volumes) and around the biggest volume our universal central sphere and all that inside a closed evolutive sphere.Indeed you don't understand the whole.Thus I suggest you must rethought your lines of reasoning.or perhaps buy better books, they exist you know.But if you interpret as that the unconventional as you says...oh my god, return at universities and take a Occham Razor for your teachers please.

Learn our foundamentals and not only computing.You shall see that will help you, be sure.

On that good luck.

Steve

seee what is a real BH .....please before pondering these stupidities.Never they exist these micro BH no but we dream in live there.If you simulate that ...wawww I am impressed.A BH is a cosmological sphere.The LHC must be rational and stop the researchs of stupidities as higgs or extradimensions or this and that...business VS rationality .....

Regards

Steve

you can say steve,you know dear vanitious and pseudos rationalists.

ahahah let's laugh in live, you are touched oh I just say my opinion and with politness, be direct and frank if it's possible or don't anwer simply,it's not necessary you know Narsep, Or ih or Ionannis, I don't know ....ps ioanis your ideas aren't general.The same treatment hihihi that is that of course, we aren't here to take gloves.if it's that the sciences community ??? well you can't answer because you haven't answer simply.And you don't see the genrality thus why you try ....that is the question.The critics are essential and must be transparent for all readers, FQXi makes well that, he deletes rarelly the posts and it's well I thank you for that.Fortunally this transparence exists.The sciences must foundamentals.

You are interestings as persons but your ideas lack of generality and the generality is essnetial for the real understandfing of our uniqueness and its entropic evolution.I am obliged to show you the road of generality and ITS UNIVERSAL PROPORTIONALITIES? RATIONAL AND LOgIC AND PRAGMATIC.

PSstill one thing, it is not because I have discussions with people that I am going to rate it differently and without logic.Your work merits a simple 5 and tobias a 6....for your illumination, I give a 8 to Dr Ray Munroe and 8 to Dr Klingman and 9 fro Dr Layzer .Eckard merits a good one also....well and you want what after .Be rational thanks.

Regards

Steve

Please see fig. attached.

narsep (ioannis)Attachment #1: sound.jpg

Hi Tobias,

Yes exactly, I came down to visit Barcelona with a girlfriend around Xmas and since we were staying in a hotel in Castelldelfels we drove by ICFO to check it out. As I say it looked like a nice place.

What sort of work is your group doing there ? I'm working at the BIPM in Sevres, near Paris, on a superconducting Watt Balance machine for measuring Planck's constant h and also for the planned redefinition of the SI kilogram standard in 2015. I am particularly interested in applying quanutm information ideas in precision measurement applications-- hence my interest in graphene also.

-Cheers,

Mike Bradley

Dr. Michael P. Bradley, Ph.D., P.Eng.

Chercheur Associé/Research Fellow

Electricity Department/Watt Balance

Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM)

Pavillon de Breteuil

F-92312 Sèvres CEDEX

France

Tél: +33 1 45 07 62 92

email: mbradley@bipm.org

AND

Associate Professor

Dept. of Physics and Engineering Physics

University of Saskatchewan

116 Science Place

Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2 Canada

http://physics.usask.ca/~bradley/index.html

michael.bradley@usask.ca

Hello Tobias,

Congrats on a good essay. I only wanted to correct one thing. Zitter was experimentally observed. Check out Hestenes' winning essay on the nature of time.

Dear Tobias,

I enjoyed your essay and couldn't help becoming more curious as it progressed. It does seem very attractive to test quantum theory in a controlled environment as you describe. Massless fermions seem especially interesting for study, especially if graphene allows a certain degree of control of the parameters. From your research, is the test something that can be set up in an average lab?

Kind regards, Russell Jurgensen

Dear Florin,

that's very interesting! Thanks for the pointer, it would indeed have been worth mentioning in the essay.

On the other hand, from what I gather from skimming Hestenes' essay and his paper, his zitter model is a theory of a classical point particle, and therefore clearly cannot be realistic. For example, how would it reproduce the spectrum of the hydrogen atom? Certainly one needs some sort of quantization somewhere.

Evaluating the merits of the experiment seems much more difficult. So I don't dare saying anything about whether this could be an experimental detection of zitterbewegung or not, but only notice that it's not well-known and has not been published in an 'important' journal, which makes me a bit skeptical.

Hola Tobias

I enjoyed your concept of analyzing graphene as a basis of simulating aspects of physics. In my current fqxi paper and my earlier 2005 Beautiful Universe theory on which it is based I have proposed an entire universe made up solely of one type of node - much as your 2-D graphene 'universe' is made up of one type of node: a carbon atom. In my proposed Face-Centered Cubic (FCC) lattice the nodes are magnetic dipoles whose axes can be aligned in any direction in 3D. (N-S) attraction and (N-N) or (S-S) repulsion play an important role in the interactions of the lattice. I wonder if carbon has such polarity, and whether induction plays a role in the unusual binding strength of graphene's chemical bonds.

A related question that arose in my theory and other discussions here is that in 3D (for example in buckminster fullerine molecules Carbon 60) Brouwer's theorem states that a vector field on a sphere will always have one vortex. This implies a 'weak' spot on a C60 molecule - if that is, magnetic polarity plays a role there. Such phenomena highlight the limitations of 2D simulations in a 3D world, and I hope you can extend your fascinating analysis into 3D lattices, particularly FCC. Good luck to you.

Vladimir

Dear Tobias,

Thank you for the extra detail. It makes it clear it is an involved test. Very interesting.

Kind regards, Russell Jurgensen

Dear Tobias,

Hestenes' idea is only a speculation, but the resonance was experimentally observed and the root cause of zitterbewegung and Klein paradox is the SU(2)xU(1) gauge symmetry of Dirac's equation (combined with the a spin current conservation to be 100% rigurous). This generates a departure from the simple Berry phase of standard nonrelativistic QM and uncovers new physics unavailable from the simpler U(1) symmetry. By the way, in quantum Hall effect experiments, spin current is not conserved and the full SU(2)xU(1) symmetry is experimentally observed and is explained as spin-orbit coupling.

Hello to both of you,

What about the magneton of Borh and the nuclear and atomic magnetic momemts.....it's always proportional in factn with the spinning and orbiting spheres.......partition fuction of a sub systems of entangled spheres ...the number is specific and presice for all gravitational stabilities.The entropy is correlated.

The particles inside the system have a spins thus a magnetism nuclear.We can take several quatum numbers which differenciate the different spins and orbitals.If the volumes are inserted also with the biggest volume for th cneter.....we can also differenciate the velocities of these rotations correlated with mass with the magneton of Borh as system of gauge eh/4pimc....we can subtitute the mass of different volumes. You can use the parallelization of Christian also in a deterministic road showing the rationalities of the magnetic momment, all has a momment,only the space hasn't rotations thus mass thus no momment also.It's relevant if the real serie is inserted for the different quantum numbers......the conservation of the parity seems essential as our proprtionalities.

Regards

Steve

Hello Tobias

I am glad my comments made some sense to you. There is so much in physics and mathematics I do not know - for example Euclidean Quantum Field Theory or what is ternary rotational symmetry and why it is important in fermion structure. In my (BU) theory the FCC arrangement was suggested almost ad-hoc and because other researchers such as Norman Cook (Models of the Atomic Nucleus (Springer)) was able to simulate nucleon structure using it. The magnetic lattice nodes I proposed self-assemble into some sort of configuration. I wonder if this process can easily be simulated and with what software.- it is outside my proficiency (all I know is the old BASIC !).

Hello Steve I hope you fine. Good luck to us all.

Vladimir

Hi Vladimir,

That goes thanks it's nice.Hope you also. Yes indeed ,you are right.good luck to all, this year, the essays are numerous ,it's well for the 3ème year.And furthermore there are many many relevances in several essays.

Best Regards

Steve

Dear Tobias and others,

have you a look to my essay (concerning 3+1 D)? This model is based on C(sp3 hybridization.

Ioannis Hadjidakis