The Modified Special Relativity Theory and the Meaning of Time: The Interpretation of Quantum Tunneling, Quantum Entanglement, OPERA, ICARUS, and SN 1987a by Azzam K AlMosallami

Dear Georgina,

So, since time dilation is verified experimentally, and as I explained to you in my example relative to Sara and Sally. In my example, it is illustrated, as time is slowing down in Sally's frame compared to Sara's frame. Thus for Sally, time is speeding up in Sara's frame compared to Sally, and that is illustrated for Sally when she returned to earth and found Sara's old 24 years, not 22 as her old.

Quantum tunneling and entanglement experiments are performed in a very low temperatures. That causing the vacuum energy of the medium that the experiment done in to be negative compared to our lab vacuum energy. This is leading to the events to be occurred in a faster rate than the same events if done in the medium of our lab. In the quantum computers, they using the quantum entanglement in a very low temperature and because of that they perform the processes faster than our normal computers, and then we get the result in the quantum computers in a less time separation according to our time. according to that we think information are processed in a faster than light speed in vacuum. same as what happened in Opera experiment, and the problem was in the measuring of time as they discovered lately. In my theory in the case of faster than light there is no violation for Lorentz transformation or causality. and according to that I proof in my theory there is not particles named Tachyons. Tachyonic particle is a hypothetical particle that always moves faster than light, and was coined by Gerald Feinberg in a 1967 paper. Feinberg proposed that tachyonic particles could be quanta of a quantum field with negative squared mass. However, it was soon realized that excitations of such imaginary mass fields do not in fact propagate faster than light, but instead represent an instability known as tachyon condensation. Nevertheless, they are still commonly known as "tachyons", and have come to play an important role in modern physics.

Most physicists think that faster-than-light particles cannot exist because they are not consistent with the known laws of physics. If such particles did exist, they could be used to build a tachyonic antitelephone and send signals faster than light, which (according to special relativity) would lead to violations of causality.Potentially consistent theories that allow faster-than-light particles include those that break Lorentz invariance, the symmetry underlying special relativity, so that the speed of light is not a barrier.

Despite theoretical arguments against the existence of faster-than-light particles, experiments have been conducted to search for them. No compelling evidence for their existence had been found. So my theory illustrates what is meaning of faster than light without the proposed particles Tachyons. and the results of my theory agreed with the experimental results of the high energy physics and the elementary particles.

Dear Azzam,

Thanks again for setting out what you think. I am not denying that time dilation appears to happen and has been supported by experiments. It is also expected within the framework I am using, in the observer's fabricated reality.

David Eagleman on Choice

This is an interesting talk about time perception. He talks about the problem of comprehending what is happening within an empire when field reports from different parts of the empire take different lengths of time to arrive. Reports of the same event may appear to be separated in time.

I think it nicely illustrates how the reality that is occurring to the objects, the source of the data, can differ from the reality constructed by a distant observer from the data that is received. The observer's fabricated construct of reality is not controlling what happens to the objects, they are completely independent of it.

I've read, (in Donald Goldsmith "When time slows down"), that the astronauts who spent 84 days in Skylab aged about five thousandths of a second less than the people at home. I am sure the biological ageing due to living under those very unnatural conditions far exceeded any hypothetical life extension due to motion.

Azzam

But whatever is happening is not time dilation, because no such thing exists to affect. It is a rate of change alteration, different physical conditions cause different 'disturbances' in similar matter, which results in one, or more, of their attributes to change at a different rate. Remember, a timing device is just a timing device, it is not timing. It has just been caused to alter (whatever is is) at a different rate. So it records a different 'time' (as in timing, ie the hands move slower, or whatever.

Paul

Paul,

if you review my paper, you will find; I measure the time by the clock motion, and if you record the motion of the clock by the video camera, and after that you review the negative of the tape, you will find the motion of the clock is considered as a collection of pictures of the negative, and each picture is considered as a part of the clock motion. If you display the pictures of the tape on the screen in a normal speed, you will see the clock is in motion normally. Now if you slowing down the displaying the pictures on the screen by slowing down the tape motion, you will see the motion of the clock is slowed down, and thus the time is slowing down. this is my interpretation to slowing of time or time dilation.

Dear Georgina,

I reviewed the video in the link David Eagleman on Choice. in my theory http://vixra.org/pdf/1206.0002v1.pdf if you put your hand on fire, you put it in a present that is carried by the information element that is transferred from the infinity state (state of infinity energy and zero mass) to your thought unit in your median state (state of mass and energy). Then you live this event (putting your hand on fire) in your material world. When you feel the pain of

burning, you feel it in a present that is carried by the information element

transferred from the infinity state to your thought unit in your median state.

Then you live this event (feeling of pain). The information element that expresses putting your hand in the fire is not related to the

information element that expresses your feeling the pain in your material world. They are separated by the space-time length or present. From that, we refute the causality of your feeling the pain because of putting your hand on fire in the material world. Also we refuse the deterministic principle in the material world, because if you put your hand on fire in the present, and

after that you received an information element making you feel cold, thus you will say "this fire is cold!".

Now if you are feeling the pain, and then you put on your hand an analgesic,

naturally, you have caused a loss of pain. But it was caused Comalogically not

by the analgesic. It is the information element that transfers from the infinity

state to your thought unit in your median state that expresses your feeling of

losing the pain.

In summary: the natural laws in the material world do not depend on the principles of determinism, causality, and continuity, but they are a result of the sequence of the information elements that take place, which are unrelated to each other in the material world.

That is in agreement with Quantum theory (Copenhagen School), where

Heisenberg defined the wave function as "it is a mixture of two things, the

first is the reality, and the second is our knowledge of this reality". We

express the reality as the existence of the information element

in the infinity state, and our knowledge of this reality is expressed

comalogically as transmitting the information element from infinity to our

thought unit in the median state.

Dear Georgina,

What is the Infinity State?

If you imagine yourself as a system located at the infinity state, your spacetime length would be equal to zero, and your zeroth length would be equal to infinity, and your mass would be zero. If located at the infinity state, all of your life would be considered as one present, - no past or future. If you are

eating an apple, then your eating the apple should continue to infinity. This

applies to all events which would be synonymous with eating the apple...

You can have an infinite number of events in the infinity state at the same

present without past or future. The whole of your events exist in the infinity

state in the present. Nevertheless, you are a system existing in the median

state, receiving the information elements of your life from the infinity state.

Each information element is carried by the space-time length (present), where

you live one information element at your present in the median state. But if

you were transformed from the median state to the infinity state, you would

find the whole of your life information elements exist in the infinity state at

the same present. You will find yourself as a child, youth, and aged at the

same time, and untill infinity.

Dear Azzam,

I think there is some overlap of our thinking in what you have written about experience of pain. I have separated the output experience from the foundational causal event, into different facets of reality. That is why they are drawn as different levels of reality in my diagram even though the human brain in which the fabrication occurs, in the case we are discussing, is within the Object reality along with all other material substance.

There has to be a reality interface that receives the data and converts it from the foundational reality into the experience or observation. As the transmission and processing does not take place immediately but over a number of arrangements of the Object universe, the events that are happening precede the experienced present and so are, using the conventional differentiation of past, present and future, in the future relative to the experienced present.

I do not use or require a concept of infinity state.It does not make sense to me or explain any problems and I strongly dislike the concept of eternal continuation of objects or events. Consider the pain you have used for example existing forever. I think the universe is merciful in that former events and arrangements are erased from the Object universe, by recycling sooner or later. Then they only persist in records, memory and potential sensory data within the environment.

I am sorry to disagree. It is good that you have given your interesting point of view here as others may find that it works well for them. Even though I disagree with some of the explanations I still think your essay is very thought provoking and it is relevant to the essay topic which is the most important judging criterion.

Azzam

I did review your paper, and commented on it, and, amongst other things, refrred you to (what is now) my post in my blog of 13/7 11.24, which provides an explanation of what SR is. Apart from the fact that my essay shows what time is not.

Paul

Azzam Almosallami

You have very excited theory unifying between quantum and relativity in concepts and principles and laws. I agreed with you more than Relativity theory of Einstein. I hope scientists take your theory into account seriously

Dear All,

This is new test by CERN attacks the existence of dark matter which is agreed with what I proposed in order to unify between quantum and relativity. In my solution to the Pioneer anomaly http://vixra.org/abs/1109.0058 which is depending on the modified GR and MSRT. I found there is no dark matter or dark energy, it is something like refractive index. Hubble's law can be interpreted by my MGRT and MSRT. I hope to discuss relative to this new test which is good proof to the consistency of my theory which is posted here in FQXi

Marhaba=Hi Azzam

I read your paper and enjoyed the warm personal anecdote in the beginning. However I find that to comment intelligently on it I will have to think about SR in more detail, and think about it and your essay more analytically. In general I can say that you emphasize the role of the observer, which is in line with Einstein's SR, but you derive a different SR.

In my Beautiful Universe Theory which is the basis of my fqxi essay Fix Physics! I emphasize a new starting point of an absolute Universe with no time dimension. In other words I envisage a universal State evolving whether we observe it or not. When we do observe it (as opposed to analyze it as a model) the relativity of Lorentz comes into play. But I do not think superluminal speeds of light exist or can be measured, but I will have to study more about what you say about tunneling.

Wishing you the best in your researches,

Vladimir

Dear Vladimir,

Thank you very much for reading my essay. I'm very happy happy for your comment. Relativity to superluminal speed, I agree with you there is no particle or electromagnetic wave can exceed the speed of light in vacuum, but that is locally. But the measuring faster than light can be interpreted as the concept of the action-at-a-distance as you see in my paper. In my paper as you see, in the case of measuring faster than light, there is no violation for Lorentz transformation or causality locally. Lorentz factor is equivalent to "refractive index" and time can be slowing down or speeding up, it is depending on the vacuum energy of the medium of frame comparing to the vacuum energy of the medium that the observer is taking the measurement. The difference between the two vacuum energies represents the Lorentz factor. In the case of the observer located in a higher vacuum energy , and a particle existed in a lower vacuum energy, where the medium of the lower vacuum is defined by the length L locally for the observer located in a higher vacuum energy. In this case, when the particle transformed from the lower vacuum to a higher vacuum by passing the length L, the observer will think this particle passed this distance in a less time separation than it is required, and by measuring the locally measured distance L divided by the measured time, the observer will think the measured velocity is greater than the velocity equivalent to the owned kinetic energy by the particle. If instead of a particle, the light beam passed the length L of lower vacuum energy, the measured speed of light for an observer will be greater than L depending on L/t. and in this case the Lorentz factor according to L/t is less than 1, which is equivalent to refractive index less than 1. But according to my theory is an observer stationary within the range of L of lower vacuum energy, the light beam or the particle will not exceed the speed of light in vacuum locally, and thus there is no violation for the Lorentz transformation or causality. Now in the case of a particle which is located in a slower vacuum energy and moved with speed very approach to the speed of light locally. Now if this particle is passed the length L, and then appeared in a space of higher vacuum energy, in this case the particle will radiate a radiation which is called Cherenkov radiation.

While electrodynamics holds that the speed of light in a vacuum is a universal constant (c), the speed at which light propagates in a material may be significantly less than c. For example, the speed of the propagation of light in water is only 0.75c. Matter can be accelerated beyond this speed (although still to less than c) during nuclear reactions and in particle accelerators. Cherenkov radiation results when a charged particle, most commonly an electron, travels through a dielectric (electrically polarizable) medium with a speed greater than that at which light would otherwise propagate in the same medium. Cohen and Glashow [2] pointed out that these analogs to Cherenkov radiation must appear at superluminal speeds. And from that they refuted the OPERA collaboration claim that muon neutrinos with mean energy of 17.5 GeV travel 730 km from CERN to the Gran Sasso at a speed exceeding that of light by about 7.5 km/s or 25 ppm. http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3763v2

According to the special relativity theory of Einstein, in order the neutrinos to move with speed equals to the speed of light c in vacuum, it is required the neutrinos to be owned kinetic energy equals to infinity. So, what about if these neutrinos moved with speed greater than the speed of light in vacuum. From that the proposed solution by Cohen and Glashow in their paper is based on a wrong concept to the superluminal speeds, and this wrong concept is based on a flaw existed in the special relativity that must be modified. So, what is the flaw that is existed in SRT. According to my MSRT I found the concept of the relative velocity in SR is wrong, and instead it is required to consider the vacuum energy of the medium in which the light moving. I found, when the train is moving with constant speed V, its vacuum energy is increased compared to the vacuum energy of the earth surface. And when the light beam is passing through the vacuum of the train, it is similar to passing through a medium of refractive index greater than 1. In this case I proposed in my MSRT, the time required for the light to pass the length of the moving train for the earth observer is independent of the direction of the velocity of the train compared to the direction of transmitting the light beam.

Dear Azzam

I thank you for your message. You seem confident of your theory and I will have to understand better what you are saying. Unfortunately my brain works very slowly and it is hard for me to change ideas about that I have acquired and built up gradually over the years, so do not blame yourself if I am not understanding exactly how your theory differs from SR. I do understand the concept of vacuum energy playing an important role in the speed of light, but not in how this allows superluminal speeds. Do not worry, it is good to think about these things and communicate with people from around the world - experts, or like me, dreamers.

Best wishes

Vladimir

Dear Vladimir,

Thank you very much for your massage. Today I posted my new paper "The MSRT, The Interpretation of the Lorentz transformation Equations, Faster than Light and The Cherenkov Radiation" http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0018 . In this paper I illustrate how the Lorentz transformation equation can be derived according to my MSRT, and then keeping the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference. I also proof, the Lorentz factor in SR is equivalent to the refractive index in optics. Thus it is solving the problem related to GR if the light beam is bending by gravity or refracted. According to my MGRT according to MSRT I reached to the exact solution of the unsolved problem to the Pioneer anomaly, furthermore it is introducing new interpretation for the Hubble's law which is agreed with quantum field theory regarded to vacuum. In my MSRT in the case of faster than light, there is no violation for the Lorentz transformation or causality as it is confirmed by quantum tunneling or entanglement, or by the concept of wormholes in Schwartzschild Geometry. If you review my MSRT you will find every think regarded to the contradiction between quantum and relativity is solved

My new paper "The MSRT, the Interpretation of the Lorentz Transformation Equations, Faster Than Light and the Cherenkov Radiation"Attachment #1: Cherenkov_radiation.pdf

Dear Edwin Eugene Klingman and Shan Gao,

Edwin is right. Superposition of wave function associated with different objects leads us to observe them. In PicoPhysics this issue is integrated with action at distance and concept of exchange particle as the mode of interaction between objects. PicoPhysics view on the subject (Though discussed at stage 3 - only stage 1 is available at picophysics.org) is as below:

Superposition:

Space is not conserved but uniform and isotropic at micro level. At macro level, it is defined by space density gradient which can be resolved into three components along the three co-ordinates of reference system attached to observer. Similarly, Object as an observer has a reference system attached. Now the density gradient is with respect to this reference.

The axis of the two reference systems can be assumed aligned and a picture drawn with respect to space density gradient. Knergy content in each object reacts with space as per unary law 'Space contains Knergy'.

Conservation of space makes no room for limitation on space density. The superposition of effect of presence of objects in space is absolute.

Space density

That is how, superposition, effect of presence of different objects in space is computable in complex geometrical distribution.

The density gradient itself is result of consumption of space by Knergy and affinity of space to possess Knergy. This consumption signifies non-conserved character of space.

To address the perturbation introduced by presence of Knergy in space, PicoPhysics introduce g-space as geometrical space, and r-space the real space. The space density is seen as ratio of r-space to g-space.

Space density = r-space/g-space.

Kambhar

The qualification of space as real and geometric is not kind to human perceptions about space. To keep the Space-Knergy dynamic with-in bounds the g-space is identified with space of mainstream physics. Real-space is given an alternative interpretation, 'Kambhar - host reality to anti-Konservation'. The ratio of this reality with respect to 3-D occupied space (G-Space) is now the density that defines Space-Knergy kinematics. Knergy is identified with Kambhar motion in space. The drift speed of Knergy in space is requirement of Unary law, independent of distribution of Knergy in g-space and governed by this density.

Wave-function:

When large amount of Knergy forming a large front confronts another similar front, then the conditions an develop in interference zone where it is not possible to satisfy the unary law - the drift speed, as a function of space density, independent of any particular distribution. So a complimentary process of conversion is hypothesised, which toggles Kambhar under such conditions into the complementary state. The interaction between the two states is only through conversion interaction. Knergy distributed in g-space can be hosted by Kambhar in either state. Kambhar in either state is conserved (Konserved but convertible to the other state).

Kd = K1 + iK2

Wave Function is function that describes the change in magnitude composition of Kambhar with position and time in space. Thus wave-function of quantum mechanics is seen as representing the Knergy density in space. It may be noted that PicoPhysics binds the space occupied by unit Knergy into a single unit to the observer. Schrödinger equation now represents the principle of least action, action being the result of non-Konservation of space. The details will be available at picophysics.org.

Thanks and best regards,

Vijay Gupta

Dear Fqxi community,

Please, review this movie http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2mZ8bNEXcY

then you compare how my MSRT is interpreting all questions regarded to faster than light in quantum and wormholes. then review my other paper http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0018

I think what is questioned in the movie is answered in my MSRT. My aim in participating in FQXI contest is not to win the prize, But to understand real physics and real relativity and quantum.

Dear FQXI community,

My interpretation to twins paradox in SRT is different from Einstein, which is depending on the concept of the speed of connections, or the transmitting of the information elements. Also my interpretation of length contraction is different. If you review this interpretation which I used to interpret faster than light, it is the same principle which is adopted by Joao Magueijo relative to the variability of the speed of light and faster than light. According to my paper http://vixra.org/abs/1208.0018 Einstein is right in some cases, also Joao Magueijo is right. I hope you study my paper seriously, I'm sure everything is solved in physics according to my theory.

Azzam

Lorentz factor equivalent to refractive index, simply brilliant, (I know it must be of course as it agrees entirely with the relevant parts of my own essay!).

Excellent Essay, and I hope you will agree mine is too. Be warned it is crammed in very densely, but I think and hope you may also find the answer to some of your questions there, or 'rational completion of some of your concepts'.

Faster than light is implicit, but in a new class of 'apparent' for all observers not using 'Proper Time'. Real and Local gives CSL.

Do please advise if you extract the kinetic ontology, it is clear many have skimmed over and missed it's very important implications.

Best of luck in the competition, but more importantly in the quest for truth.

Peter