8 months later

I've just made a discovery when using the 1,800 lunar tidal model of arctic environment of Northern Russia during the last 20,000yrs and the assumption of a millennial peak triggering H1 at 17,000 B.P. See Fig 1. of paper 'Radiocarbon Variability in the Western North Atlantic During the Last Deglaciation' (2005) by Laura F. Robinson et al. which can be matched at 10,000 B.P. with the Fig 3. in paper 'Holocene Treeline History and Climate Change Across Northern Eurasia' (2000) by Glen M. MacDonald et al. I've put the two together by expanding the tree data graph by 152% on the photocopier machine and then scanning.

The Maximum Forest Extension is 2 cycles of 1,800 yrs, showing peaks at 4,400 and 8000 yr B.P. (uncalib) which fits with the lunar tide into the arctic basin cycle and extrapolates to the date of 17,000 yr B.P., the onset of Heinrich 1. The tree data shows dips due to the lunar tidal minimums .

You can see the graph compilation here [url=http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=249553&st=0]1,800yr Lunar Tidal Cycle Fits Glacial Data[/url]

See also:

[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/blogbbctv/posts/Ice-Age-Giants-Filming-animated-creatures-in-the-wild]Ice Age Giants: Filming animated creatures in the wild[url]

14 days later
14 days later

I made some amazing discoveries whilst trying to solve the dreadful 777 SFO accident: I copied the posts over from The Atlantic Wire:

Alan Lowey • 2 days ago

The terrestrial Flyby Anomaly phenomena most likely interfered with the auto-throttle system imv. There's been a string of suspect airliner disasters that have begun with

electrical faults.

This fits with the data recorders and instructor pilot testimony as well as the unspecified "lateral deviation," at 500-200 feet.

Alan Lowey • 16 hours ago

I've just realized that this accident is identical to my notes from National Geographic 'Air Crash Investigation'. My piece of paper says:

Sharm-el-sheik Jan 3rd 2004

FlashAirlines 604 737-300

1. instruments not working

moonless night

Turn over Red Sea

Turning wrong way!

Autopilot doesn't work

Flight recorder

- did head left -> nose lift decrease speed

- then reverse [unreadable -ed]

vertigo?!

Fluid in inner ear!

agree on disorientation of pilot

@Alan Lowey • 2 days ago

a) chances are the the pilots were not using autothottles on a visual approach, although you might be referring to the FADEC that converts information from the thrust levers to power information for the engines

b) what does a phenomena related to spacecraft passing near earth have to do with this accident?

Alan Lowey • 2 days ago

a) I got the information from the CNN article 'San Francisco 777 crash probe brings questions over auto speed controls'. It sounded clear enough to me at the time, although I'm not an airline pilot. Is the article misleading in some way?

b) There's a lot to explain here, but you sound the type of person who would be able to grasp the high brow concepts in question. Here goes..

The CNN weather expert on microbursts insists that thunderstorm clouds are essential for this phenomena which doesn't agree with eyewitness accounts. Microburst events have occurred in PERFECT BLUE SKY WEATHER WITHOUT A CLOUD IN SIGHT. There was just such a localized case in the news that, despite a CLEAR BLUE DAY, ripped the roof off a guy's house and planted it on the roof of his pick-up truck. He didn't even see the event it was over so quickly. His terraced house neighbours were untouched. Here's another typical example: "I saw my first clear air microburst last week as I was flying back from the Apache reservation to Phoenix. We were flying in our six seat twin engine aircraft, and off to the left there was a clear air microburst. The AIR WAS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR, but at ground level there was an inverted mushroom of dust kicked up by the strong microburst. It was like a small localized dust storm was happening. We were at about 1000 feet and a mile away. We experienced significant turbulence as we flew by.

We would not have seen the microburst if it had not occurred over a plowed dusty field which put a lot of dust up in the air."

I analyzed the original cell phone footage of the 777 SFO approach and noticed the nose pitch-up for no apparent reason around 8secs before impact. This then fitted with the NTSB announcement of the increase in thrust 7secs before impact as evidenced by the data recorders. I theorized that the pilots correctly increased power immediately after a clear blue day microburst in order to maintain sufficient speed for a successful landing. If the event at 8secs was due to pilot input of the controls, then this would be evident from the black box data. The next bit is all speculation-sounding to the layperson.

The absence of glidescope assistance and the new pilot on type are just compounding factors imv. Clear blue day microburst events probably happen every day around the equatorial regions of the earth. They get reported as CAT, but the effect is a 1.6g acceleration evidenced by the data recorders and the Flight Crew suffering broken ankles due to high heels etc. Other new weather phenomena are just coming into mainstream science. It's now accepted that anti-matter is created from electric thunderstorms as well as terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs).

[quote]The newer RHESSI satellite has observed TGFs with much higher energies than those recorded by BATSI. In addition, the new observations show that approximately 50 TGFs occur each day, more than previously thought but still only representing a very small fraction of the total lightning on Earth (3-4 million lightning events per day on average). However, the number may be much higher than that due to the possibility of flashes in the form of narrow beams that would be difficult to detect, or the possibility that a large number of TGFs may be generated at altitudes too low for the gamma rays to escape the atmosphere.[end quote]

I propose that this new field of inquiry lends itself to a new type of microburst event explanation.

There's so much we still don't know and are now just finding out about. I've spent 30 years since school trying to find a common sense solution to these kind of mysteries.

I'm someone who's coming at this from a new-science angle initially. I get frustrated because the science community is so fixated with mathematical models that have so many gaping holes in them. I only have limited flying experience myself but do have a technical background from being a former scientific officer at Farnborough. I also get frustrated that when one investigates the many mystery plane crashes, such as the ones portrayed in the National Geographic series 'Air Crash Investigation', there is a running theme of blaming pilots despite the inconclusive series of events envisaged. Things just don't add up. Pilots don't commit suicide and mass murder because they have some financial trouble for example.

When all these mystery accidents are looked at together, there is evidence of a new force at work which can also explain the Flyby Anomaly. I have previously submitted a well received essay to the FQXi physics competition for a left-field solution to the many problems of Milankovitch-only solar-forcing to explain the 100ky ice age cycle.

In short, there is a clever solution which solves the Ice Age conundrum, the Flyby Anomaly, the Galaxy Rotation Curve problem and the 777 SFO mystery all in one go.

P.S. I've come to the astounding conclusion that this force only acts on fluids, which emanates from fluid dark matter around the inner core of the Earth. During a terrestrial Flyby Anomaly Phenomena it can also act on the fluids of the human mind to create temporary confusion..

Alan Lowey @Alan Lowey • 3 minutes ago

The lateral deviation to the left and sudden loss of altitude suggests anti-clockwise spinning left-hand corkscrew particles. It can be further deduced that normal gravity is an even mix of these and right-hand corkscrew particles spinning clockwise.

The number of neutrons and protons are of equal number in a stable baryonic nucleus and are therefore obvious candidates. The neutron is the obvious candidate for anti-clockwise spinning left-hand corkscrew particles due it being known that most of our currently observable universe is right-handed. The neutron-neutron bond is therefore the mirror-image of the proton-proton bond.

It can be deduced that 'dark matter' at the center of the Earth is actually neutron rich material. I propose that the proto-earth was hit dead center by a debris fragment of a neutron star supernova and the moon created from the liquified proto-earth, leaving the neutron-rich matter within the Earth.

22 days later

Ice age & millennial cycle bacterial bioprecipitation due to increased ocean currents bringing nutrients to the surface. The amount of time that water vapour is in the air is reduced which gives short bursts of rainfall with overall less cloud cover and therefore more sunshine. The reason why megabeasts were able to thrive in an ice age.

23 days later
10 days later

[quote]A paper published today in the International Journal of Climatology finds the 18.6 year lunar-tide cycle influences rainfall and climate over adjacent land areas. According to the authors, in years of strong tides, tide-induced ocean mixing decreases sea surface temperatures and lowers air pressures, which in turn affects rainfall variability over the plains east of the subtropical Andes, South America. The opposite pattern is observed in years of weak tides. The paper adds to other peer-reviewed publications finding a lunar influence on ocean and atmospheric oscillations, which in turn have large scale effects upon climate. The IPCC ignores lunar, solar, and other planetary harmonics, which alone can explain climate change of the past century.[end quote]

New paper finds lunar-tidal cycles influence climate (17 Jul 2013)

3 months later

The Enormous alien planet discovered in most distant orbit ever seen gives more credence to the extra gravity on the plane of Jupiter to explain the ice age hypothesis imv.

[quote]But, there are still problems with this scenario. For one, difference between the masses of two stars in a binary system is typically no more than a ratio of 10 to 1.

"In our case, the mass ratio is more than 100-to-1," Bailey said. "This extreme mass ratio is not predicted from binary star formation theories -- just like planet formation theory predicts that we cannot form planets so far from the host star."

Researchers are also keen to study the new planet, because leftover material from when the planet and star formed can still be detected.

"Systems like this one, where we have additional information about the environment in which the planet resides, have the potential to help us disentangle the various formation models," Bailey said. "Future observations of the planet's orbital motion and the primary star's debris disk may help answer that question."

The planet HD 106906 b is only 13 million years old, and is still glowing from the residual heat from its formation," the researchers said. By comparison, Earth formed 4.5 billion years ago, which makes it roughly 350 times older than the newfound exoplanet [end quote]

6 days later

Jupiter's icy moon Europa 'spouts water'

[quote]"It is travelling at 700m a second... All of this gas comes out, and almost all falls back towards the surface - it doesn't escape out into space."

These plumes appear to be transient - they arise for just seven hours at a time.

They peak when Europa is at its farthest from Jupiter (the apocentre of its orbit) and vanish when it comes closest (the pericentre).

This means that tidal acceleration could be driving water spouting - by opening cracks in the surface ice, the researchers propose.[end quote]

    Europa only has a small orbital inclination which makes me think that it might be Io's influence instead.

    Now that I've looked at the Wikipedia entry on the moon's of Jupiter I can see that there *is* a hint at the importance of inclination:

    [quote]The orbits of Jupiter's irregular satellites, and how they cluster into groups: by semi-major axis (the horizontal axis in Gm); by orbital inclination (the vertical axis); and orbital eccentricity (the yellow lines). The relative sizes are indicated by the circles.[end quote]

    11 days later

    I've found a missing piece of the puzzle: What do you get when you melt a neutron star? An unimaginably dense lump of strange matter and a whole new celestial beast.

    Quark stars: How can a supernova explode twice?

    [quote]The implications would be enormous. These stars would take pride of place alongside the other heavenly heavyweights: neutron stars and black holes. They could help solve some puzzling mysteries related to gamma-ray bursts and the formation of the heftiest elements in the universe. Back on Earth, quark stars would help us better understand the fundamental building blocks of matter in ways that even machines like the Large Hadron Collider cannot.

    Astrophysicists can thank string theorist Edward Witten for quark stars. In 1984, he hypothesised that protons and neutrons may not be the most stable forms of matter.

    Both are made of two types of smaller entities, known as quarks: protons are comprised of two "up" quarks and one "down" quark, whereas neutrons are made of two downs and one up. Up and down are the lightest of six distinct "flavours" of quark. Add the third lightest to the mix and you get something called strange quark matter. Witten argued that this kind of matter may have lower net energy and hence be more stable than nuclear matter made of protons and neutrons.

    Quark nova.[end quote]

    [quote]Edward Farhi, an MIT physicist who researched strangelets, thinks the most likely place to find strange matter is in neutron stars. These collapsing stars compress their interiors forcefully. "At the core, you have densities and pressures large enough to form strange matter. If strange matter formed in the core, it would eat its way out and consume the star," says Farhi. Underneath its crust, the star would become a lump of strange matter, or a strange star. If two strange stars collided, they could send strange matter careening toward Earth, says Farhi.

    足How could strange matter be dangerous? Under special circumstances, it "eats" other matter. In order for this to happen, the strange matter has to be more stable than the matter it meets and not repel it. If those conditions are met, the other matter will "want" to convert to strange matter, and contact between the two will get things going. The result would be an ever-growing ball of strange matter, burning through matter like a fireball.

    For such a disaster scenario to occur on Earth, strange matter would have to remain for more than a fraction of a second at earthly pressures, and we don't know if it can do that. It would also have to be negatively charged.

    In fact, potential strange matter would probably be positively charged, says Farhi. And since the matter on our planet (including us) has positively charged atomic nuclei, it would repel strange matter. "If you had a little lump on the table, it would just sit there," says Farhi.[/quote]

    Should I be afraid of strange matter?

    An anisotropic 'graviton' model of quark gravity emission is all that is missing imv.

    Page 22 of this paper shows a diagram which drew my attention because it's exactly the image I have of exotic matter existing at the center of the Earth. It has the magnetized ordering and the rugby ball shape on end from the equatorial perspective as well as the 45 degree polar configuration matching the inner innermost core of the Earth measured anisotropy.

    Bulk viscosities of magnetized quark matter

    and neutron star phenomenology

    ........

    8 days later
    19 days later