• [deleted]

Tetryonics has many layers of detail not obvious to the first time viewer of the theory [particular the 9 page introduction submitted here].

As you point out many simplistic terms (and units) can be further resolved to reveal increasing levels of detail and complexity but a trade off has to be made.

You may view it as being similar to Einstein's use of a rubber sheet to depict curved Space-Time [while useful to help grasp the concept of Reimannian curvature it is completely incorrect as a physical model and does not represent the quantised nature of Gravitation in any way suitable for the formulation or development of a quantum theory of gravity].

In seeking a consistent methodology to present Tetryonic geometries I chose to highlight the generalised geometry of CHARGED Energy [ie Pos & Neg EM fields] as it is the interactions of charged geometries [through their E&M fields] that creates 3D Matter.

Hence the term Tetryonics - The CHARGED geometry of EM mass-ENERGY-Matter.

For example the 2pi geometries of radiant Energy [Light] can be further resolved to 8pi geometries of the same [4pi longitudinal Electric fields with a transverse 4pi Magnetic moment see QED on my YouTube channel]

In short in order to in order to convey the beauty of the theory in 2D illustrations [major details of the theory can only be understood by building 3D physical models of what I represent as 2D illustrations and physically manipulating them - and this I encourage].

See attached.Attachment #1: Figure_90.11__n6_Charged_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_02.03__Tetryonics_and_Pi_radians_800x600.jpg

Interesting Abraham,

interesting the tetryonics of 2012. Interesting but you can make better still. perhaps in your second book :)

Regards and good luck.

  • [deleted]

Agree Steve,

What I have found is that every time I revisit earlier work it can either be better explained (or improved) with reference to my more recent work.

For example QED improved QM, QC improved QED & QM, QG improved QM, QED & QC and most recently my work on geometric Math and quantum computing has driven improvements to all the previously mentioned sub-topics.

Checkout my YouTube channel [tetryonics] and you'll see I have already produced over 1200 illustrations explaining many of Science's current mysteries (but it is always improving - that's the Nature of Scientific discovery) 1% inspiration - 99% perspiration.

But somewhere I had to stop and release this theory to the World - if I can do all of this as one person imagine what thousands of keen PhD students can achieve [and that is the whole driving philosophy behind my work - to improve the Human condition]

Thanks for viewing.

Me also,I am born to imrpove this global society. It is my reason of being.

The improvement optimization spherization is the key !

ps eureka :)

I was inclined to approach the problem as a sphere inscribed, tangent to face of tetrahedron..where surface-to-volume of both are equivalent! Repeating this structure within and without carries on to cosmos and microscopic size.

  • [deleted]

Kelvin,

"In seeking a consistent methodology to present Tetryonic geometries I chose to highlight the generalised geometry of CHARGED Energy [ie Pos & Neg EM fields] as it is the interactions of charged geometries [through their E&M fields] that creates 3D Matter."

I agree, specialized forms of EM fields represent what we call 3D matter. One of my mentors, since deceased, a Prof Emeritus of Elec. Engr., stated that we are a "specialized form of energy." This agrees with the discredited theory of "energetics", which was supported by Max Planck, everything is a form of energy.

Consider the billions being spent in an effort to break apart particles, when in reality they are attempting to separate different EM field structures (EM geometries) from each other, very inefficiently.

I just looked at one of your Utube videos on EM waves, QED-28. Longitudinal EM waves are not like sound waves. Examine Laguerre-Gaussian beams with longitudinal components.

Have you examined Bob Palais' Pi page?

Pi

He published an article in the Mathematical Intelligencer, "Pi is Wrong!"

Your 2Pi and 4Pi descriptions match material I have in a couple of papers. My IEEE paper uses the 2Pi description, but I avoid using the 4Pi term in my other papers, not because it is not correct, I describe the characteristic in a different manner.

  • [deleted]

Max Planck's theory of 'Energetics'was on the right track - but it became complicated with things like Maxwellian waves, Transverse mass & Longitudinal waves, quantised energy and probabilistic wavefunctions etc as you point out).

Lacking a formally defined and visual model for their Mathematical solutions to the same,the situation then became even more confused as numerous answers [sqr Neg one, probabilities etc] became accepted scientific answers to quantum math.

Maxwell [had he lived ] would have been one of the first to point out that you must be able to build a physical model of any quantum system in order to justify the theory's accuracy and completeness.

I too agree with the comments concerning pi [C/D] vs Pi radians - it is a fine example in science of using 1 name for 2 distinct properties and as pointed out in Tetryonics we have been mistaking EQUILATERAL Pi radians for spherical Pi ratios in QM for over a century now.

This situation became very more complex in tetryonics where Pi [normally the property of a circle/sphere] becomes a property of Equilateral geometries. However in ET 1/2 pi really is 1/2 of the triangle and 2 ETs have internal angles adding up to 360 degrees so you win some - you lose some.

Fortunately TIME (having a spherical geometry) is usually measured by us as the time is takes light to travel 299,792,458 metres so it units are usually s. s^2 or c^2, c^4. [even though they are drawn as spheres.

I was tempted (early in my work) to use 'Tau' in lieu of Pi for my unified equation but dropped it as I thought it would create confusion in understanding my theory. [ie 4Pi & 36Pi quickly create the impression of geometry in most minds whereas 4T & 36T etc don't] and who am I to re-write mathematical descriptors - I am doing so much now correcting subtle but important misconceptions that arise from using Math without physical Models..

Sometimes you have to go with the accepted terms in order to have a new theory viewed seriously and to be understood by minds used to those particularly quirky

inconstancy...perhaps when the theory develops we can change these poor definitions .... after all seriously QUARKS, UP, DOWN, STRANGE, CHARMED, TOP, BOTTOM, GLUONS??

Perhaps when the theory grows in acceptance we can hold a international council to review some of the sillier names of fields & particles in Physics...I have gone far enough naming the tetrahedral quantum of Matter [the Tetryon]Attachment #1: 1_Figure_02.03__Tetryonics_and_Pi_radians_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: 1_Figure_01.03__Spatial_geometries_800x600.jpg

  • [deleted]

Understand the model you are portraying....

But I would say why would Nature have two identical 'particles' based on different geometry.

Tetrahedral geometries have 4 fascias of interaction for each Matter quanta.

Tetryonics creates everything out of ONE shape [a Equilateral Triangle] and it is only in the micro/macroscopic world that we can't see the triangulated fascia.

{just like a video game or movie CG etc.)

And as my models works for QM, QED, Chemistry and QG I feel it is the better approach to Q-geometry....but I always remain open to new ideas, it is funny where inspiration for QM solutions comes from

  • [deleted]

Kelvin,

"Fortunately TIME (having a spherical geometry) is usually measured by us as the time is takes light to travel 299,792,458 metres .... "

You need to reexamine how you have defined TIME. TIME is a manifestation of the existence of energy. You do not need TIME unless you have energy. I don't know if you looked at the IEEE paper I cite in my essay, topic 1294, but TIME is the result of the relationship between an EM wavelength and its duration, otherwise it seems TIME has no requirement to exist. This is a mathematical argument for the existence of TIME.

Before the concepts in the IEEE paper were identified, time was never expressed in relationship to energy, it was tied to the 1/86400th division of the rotation of the planet Earth, the second. The second duration is okay for domestic use but it has no validity as a scientific unit of measure.

    • [deleted]

    Kelvin,

    You did not respond to the statement I made in my Aug. 15, 2012 @ 17:54 GMT post, "I just looked at one of your Utube videos on EM waves, QED-28. Longitudinal EM waves are not like sound waves. Examine Laguerre-Gaussian beams with longitudinal components."

    For an EM wave with a field component aligned with the axis of propagation, you now get a variation in the intensity in the direction of the axis during the wave cycle, but the frequency of the wave stays constant.

      • [deleted]

      I agree Time is simple the measurement of Energy's motion in empty space.

      If you take the equilateral geometry of Energy/second you have Planck's constant [kg.m^2/s] - ignoring the mass (which is Energy per second [c^2] you will find you have m^2 left over. I introduce the reality of this unit as the area of an Equilateral triangle. so Plancks' constant is really reflecting EQ.Energy/sec

      ie Quantised Angular Momentum = m^2/s

      mass = Energy /second = Energy/c^2 = kg

      put the two together you have Planck's Constant [kg.m^2/s]

      TIME is thus revealed as a measurement of the measure of the QAM

      equilateral geometries] of Energy in any region of Space

      QAM/c^2 = [m^2/s]*[s^2/m^2] = seconds

      As you rightly point out no Energy means no QAM geometry per region of Space

      this no TIME.

      And no changes to Energy means no changes to its QAM quanta [h] - without changes to the Energy content of a region of Space there can be no measurement of what we perceive and measure to be TIME, and from that we can clearly identify the 2 'directions of Time' as being what causes the 2 forms of Electric CHARGE to arise.

      'Travel forward in Time' - Positive Charge

      'Travel Backward in Time' - Negative charge

      To illustrate that point I drew rotational vectors onto the geometries of equilateral Energy geometries. You can then view them as the Energy flow in idealised quantum inductive loops. [remember inductors are the electrical equivalent of inertial mass]

      It is important to remember here that Angular Momentum [as viewed currently by Physicists] is a measure of the rotational velocity component of a system - in Tetryonics it it a reflection of the EQUILATERAL GEOMETRY only - there is no rotational component only changes to the Energy quanta per unit of Time.

      Additionally, you may find a lot more information of what I am explaining here in my QED video on You Tube particularly the Spectral line calculations and the work on Photons wavelengths and frequency.

      CH29 illustration 17 shows clearly how frequency, wavelength and wave numbers are all directly related through mass to QAM geometry.

      see attached

      CH60 may be of help in understanding how QAM is the source of the Fine Structure, various coupling constants and Charge itself

      I'll look over your paper and get back to you.Attachment #1: Figure_01.07__Quantised_Angular_Momentum_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_61.08__Time_800x600.jpg

      • [deleted]

      Frank,

      Apologies if the response was delayed somewhere but I did reply - perhaps my being in a AUS time zone [GMT+10] had something to do with that.

      Re Longitudinal wave correct they are directional EM waves with their E fields aligned with their direction of propagation[DOP] and are produced by spark gaps as utilised by Tesla at the turn of the century.

      Whereas Hertzian/Maxwellian waves are Transverse EM waves produced by accelerating/oscillating electrons and have their E fields orthogonal to their DOP.

      Tesla attempted to persuade Hertz of this when he first announced his discovery but when the photoelectric effect was discovered transmission technology switched to accelerating electrons instead of spark gaps and the debate died down.

      Transverse waves are like sound waves in that they create a pressure gradient in any region of space, while Longitudinal waves have their momenta aligned to their DOP [consider one a slap to the face the other a karate jab to the eye].

      Additionally, (and this is hard to explain here] the Energy intensity of a Transverse wave is a function of its instantaneous Frequency [E=hf] while a Longitudinal wave's energy is more appropriately described by [E=p^2] because it is the momenta aligned to the DOP that does the work [hence the above analogy]..

      It is Longitudinal waves with their aligned momenta that can produce real damage as well being able to produce 'instantaneous action-at-a-distance'.

      You can produce EM waves with identical EM Energies (which only differ in the polarization of their constituent Energy momenta) but it is the Longitudinal wave that will kill you [ask Tesla' assistants or anyone struck by lightning].

      Reading up on Gaussian beans etc will also take me some time so I trust this helps.Attachment #1: Figure_28.07__Hertz_vs_Tesla_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_28.08__EM_waves_800x600.jpg

      Abraham,

      Thank you for your earlier replies. I have a question for you which will hopefully tell whether we have a hypopthesis overlap or not: "How do you explain the well known Flyby anomaly?"

        • [deleted]

        In the simplest terms:

        The SUN (and all Planets etc) emits radiant energies throughout the heliosphere in addition to the convergent gravitational energy produced by their Matter.

        These divergent energies have already been included in the Newtonian model of Gravitation (as well as GR) because both are based on observations not first principles [and so have not been noticed].

        Neither theory differentiates between EM mass and Matter [in fact GR - based on SR - must accommodate it in its formulation but simply lumps Energy in all its forms into the Stress-Energy tensor - EM mass is completely distinct from Matter]

        I propose the term Gravito-Electro-Magnetism [GEM] to reflect the three distinct forces produced by all Matter (particularly Matter in motion]

        The radiant energies produce a net DIVERGENT interactive component to gravitation that that diminishes under the inverse square law and as all Matter is comprised of charged energy fascia interacts with it BUT because our current models of gravitation do not include a quantum model of its source of mechanics (only the observations of the motion it creates) we cannot model the true interactions of the GEM fields of Matter in motion with the GEM fields produced by Planets as they move in their orbits and rotate on their axis.

        The divergent [radiant] components of GEM field [specifically the E field] accelerate charged particles, and as Matter is comprised of charged fascia [even neutral Matter] it creates a force on all Matter moving past another.

        These charge interactions are also responsible for other puzzling aspects of Cosmology namely Dark Matter and Dark Energy and is similar to the Pioneer anomaly [see attached]

        Much more detail will soon be released by me in my next release Tetryonics [4] -Quantum Cosmology [including the true mechanical dynamics of Gravity both at a quantum scale as well as the Cosmological].

        I trust this helps.Attachment #1: Figure_74.06__Pioneer_anomaly_800x600.jpg

        • [deleted]

        Kelvin,

        'Travel forward in Time' - Positive Charge

        'Travel Backward in Time' - Negative charge

        Only in "physics fiction" can time travel backwards. This would imply that an event can have a less than zero duration.

        I would like to know of a reference dating from the period of Tesla's spark gap oscillation process where someone measured the presence of longitudinal EM waves.

        It is not difficult to build an antenna that can efficiently detect longitudinal EM waves, but the same structure will detect transverse wave equally. I am unaware of receiver-signal processors of the Tesla era that could provide discrimination between longitudinal and transverse EM waves.

        • [deleted]

        Kelvin,

        "Much more detail will soon be released by me in my next release Tetryonics [4] -Quantum Cosmology [including the true mechanical dynamics of Gravity both at a quantum scale as well as the Cosmological]."

        Your Hertz vs Tesla diagram, Figure 28.07 (post Aug. 16, 2012 @ 04:16 GMT) does not explain how a longitudinal wave produces instantaneous action-at-a-distance. The notation below the Teslian wave, "The E fields are co-linear with the axis of propagation" would result in a negation of the field and action-at-a-distance because the positive and negative phases cancel in a collinear beam.

        I have a paper that explains how a longitudinal EM field produces action-at-a-distance. The paper is an iteration of six different papers, produced over several years with slightly different titles, that were submitted to five different publications, three being IEEE publications, two to the Gravity Research Foundation (GRF) contest (two different years), and one an ARRL publication. The GRF does not provide peer review rejection comments. Only one IEEE publication, of the two that went to peer review, provided me with the actual peer review comments, except the comments were truncated from one reviewer. The ARRL provided a simple rejection statement.

        The paper provides a simple EM explanation for the force of gravity. The paper contains a statement why a longitudinal EM field, if it is collinear, cannot produce a net force in the direction of propagation (DOP). I didn't use the term collinear, as I illustrated the vector condition with a simple Cartesian figure with the E field aligned with the DOP. The accompanying statement, "Even if a way was found to generate one of the fields to be aligned with the axis of propagation, such as EZ in Fig. 1b, the positive and negative EZ field vectors would be aligned and there would be no net force measurable in the axis of propagation."

        Helical Electromagnetic Gravity Field

        Except for the GRF entries, the other papers provided specific application processes that were topical to the IEEE and ARRL publications, the core helical electromagnetic (HEM) material was essentially the same.

        • [deleted]

        Kelvin,

        I didn't mean to post the above, Anonymous replied on Aug. 16, 2012 @ 19:44 GMT , as anonymous.

        Frank

        • [deleted]

        Frank,

        It would appear that but you and ARRL have overlooked a very important point.

        While light is comprised on super-positioned EM wave of various wavelength the longitudinal waves produced by spark gaps etc. are not of the same nature.

        Each photon comprising the EM wave they form lines up one behind the other.

        Note that even Planar 2D waves have a some minuscule Z component [else you couldn't have Pos charge on one side with Neg on the other to satisfy Lorentz co-ordinate changes]

        As the photons don't super-position they they line up like quantum railway motor-carriages and create a 'rod' of co-linear momentum.

        Once this 'rigid rod' of Energy momenta is established any momenta added at one end of it will 'instantaneously' cause the momenta at the other to respond - just like pushing the end of a stick.

        ACTION can be transferred in either direction along this wave as the momenta are lined up bidirectionally [like little carriages or rods] but any additional EM information added to the wave (apart from the co-linear momenta noted) is forced to propagate at c along its length

        LWs form the basis of Newtons 'action-at-a-distance' and the reason why Tesla's spark gap waves stung his face [but were revealed NOT to be electrons]

        Of course longitudinal waves can be super-positioned but that doesn't enhance the effect (just allows it to operate over a larger surface of action at each end]

        Why has this been overlooked by the Science community for so long? - the wave equations for both are identical, only their sources and E-field polarisations are different [another sad case of doing Maths without physical Models].

        When the photo-electric effect was discovered they moved from Spark gaps to oscillating charged particles to produce EM waves, then Einstein's SR explanation of Electrodynamics drove the scientific community down a blind alley [again because his model of mass-ENERGY-Matter was wrong]

        Longitudinal waves form the basis for electrostatic CHARGE in our Universe, and it is the separation of Charges that gives us the electromotive force for Electricity in our World.

        see attached.Attachment #1: Figure_21.05__Volts_and_EMF_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: Figure_28.17__Longitudinal_Action_at_a_Distance_800x600.jpg

        • [deleted]

        Kelvin,

        The ARRL Editor-in-Chief, and the two different IEEE Editors-in-Chief understood exactly what my papers were presenting, they could not get a consensus from their associate editors, their technical staff and/or those that participated in the peer review. If a paper tries to describe gravity as an EM phenomena versus the Einstein manifestation, it will be very difficult to get a consensus, and this is what editors-in-chiefs try to achieve before they publish an article. My papers have passed through a lot of hands, and I almost expect to see my material published with another person's name on it.

        Your Fig_27.17, "Action at a Distance" is representing exactly the same field configuration alignment as my Fig. 4, "Cut and flattened cylindrical surface depicting two complete cycles of an electric field having longitudinal polarization" when another Fig.4 field of the same type is at 180 degrees. Make a copy of Fig. 4, cut it out and turn it 180 degrees to the original Fig. 4. The plus and minus fields from a source must be displaced laterally, just as they are in the transverse configuration. I show the plus and minus fields being displaced laterally around a cylinder.

        An EM wave will consist of both plus and minus E-fields. Your Fig_27.17 is showing a single plus field at the top and a single minus field at the bottom, and the center show them coupling. Your figure will be equivalent to my Fig. 4 when you have both a plus and minus field set at the top, from one source, and then a minus and plus field set at the bottom from another source. Then you will need two field coupling lines in the center, one with plus at the left side and minus at the right side, with the second line have a minus at the left side and a plus at the right side. We are then presenting precisely the same coupling concept; you using a flat surface and mine using a cylindrical surface.

        Also, in my paper, I state the instantaneous influence-at-a-distance is required for solar system distances. The influence action is fast, but it is not infinite, which is why we have spiral galaxies. The EM fields propagate at the nominal speed of light, but once the field has propagated the influence is not limited to that velocity. The coupled longitudinal fields from two sources provides a perfect match to explain Newtonian instantaneous influence-at-a-distance and providing an attractant only force.

        I had used the railway carriage coupling analogy in some of my earlier papers, but decided it was too "provincial" for my formal paper submissions.

        "Why has this been overlooked by the Science community for so long? - the wave equations for both are identical, only their sources and E-field polarisations are different [another sad case of doing Maths without physical Models]."

        Because everyone has been taught that EM fields are propagated as transverse waves. In the second section of my paper, "Transverse Only", first sentence, I stated, "At the time Einstein formulated his gravity theory, the only EM field configuration known was where both the electric and magnetic fields were transverse to the axis of propagation."

        When I first realized a helical EM field configuration would produce an attractant field to another field of the same configuration at 180 degrees, I built a helical model so I could have a three dimensional depiction of the EM fields.

        I have a few other technical issues I need to discuss with you. I have read a few articles about Tesla, and I built a Tesla coil with a vacuum tube oscillator when I was in high school, in the late 1940s. I started building transmitters shortly thereafter, when I acquired my General Class Amateur Radio license in 1948.

        "Once this 'rigid rod' of Energy momenta is established any momenta added at one end of it will 'instantaneously' cause the momenta at the other to respond - just like pushing the end of a stick." That statement is not quite true, it is not rigid laterally. See reference [6] in my paper. I suspect the EM gravity wave field is not rigid angularly either, and I note this in my paper.

        • [deleted]

        Oh YES, YES, YES, YES, YES

        Nice to see someone else gets this as well

        Understand about the editors not being able to get a consensus on this idea - that's why I did all my work on QM, QED, Chemistry and Gravitation first - so I was VERY confident about what I am saying and the illustrations were as refined as they could be given the scope of corrections I am forcing on Physics and Maths. [Tetryonics covers all the Science fields using 1 quantum of equilateral energy - hence the 60 YouTube chapters released so far]

        I agree about the carriages statement I am loathe to use it myself but look at how scientists describe Lorentz contractions and it is everywhere.

        Agree also about the Transverse only teachings of science these days [but even Tesla couldn't get the idea across to the scientific community] although he did manage to put Hertz into a depression and almost forced him to withdraw his thesis paper.

        Your comments about Solar radiation are spot on [and as A result I'll let you know directly once I am ready to reveal my full Quantum gravitation theory to the public] Drop me you email address [mine is answers@tetryonix.com] and I'll send you a pre-publication release.

        Re: Rigidity - you are correct for a single co-linear wave-train BUT if the EM field Voltage is increased in the same unit of Time [second] then there will be additional lateral wave-trains 90 degrees out of phase with each other] Voltage is just Joules [Planck quanta] per Coulomb [Charge] as measured per unit of Time. [That's why Tesla experimented with high voltage spark gaps]

        Co-coincidently this phase relationship is geometrically identical to Euler's formula and it provides ta physical basis for the square root of Negative One.

        Neg One is simply a nett negative charge field geometry and the square root is the linear momenta it produces. see attached

        As you also suspected in your paper and noted here it is really only a matter of E field polarisation to produce Longitudinal waves[along with having a source capable of producing these waves on a continuous basis] in order for us to start utilising these waves.

        That source will be revealed in my QG paper as [using Tetryonics] I now have a sound working model of how the SUN really produces its energy.

        I look forward with you further on these matters.Attachment #1: Figure_26.05__Eulers_Formula_800x600.jpgAttachment #2: 1_Figure_28.08__EM_waves_800x600.jpg