No 3 Things by Yuri Benjamin Danoyan

I prefer no.

I beleive that you are a friend of Lubos Motl. You know the strings can converge but frankly the spheres in 3D are more more more foundamental than these simple strings.That said the 2d convergences are relevant. But can we play with numbers like we want. I think that there are limits , like for all !

The probelm with the m theory and the 11 diemnsions is that the system of uniqueness and the quantization are not respected. Like the evolutive point of vue. That said, it is relevant for the computing and the creation of forms.When the coordonates are correctly inserted. The 3D universality, this Universal sphere, it is more than these defromations due to the variables or superimposed dimensions(which are all in 3D , don't forget ). So the cause of mass, is not explained. Now the oscillations can be relevant. But for that, the volumes must be inserted considering I am repeating the serie of uniqueness.tHE ROTATIONS ARE ESSENTIAL ALSO LIKE THE SERIE OF VOLUMES DECREASING.

The correpondances, convergences can be made. Even for the 3D computing also for the pictures. It is even relevant for the ads/cft correspondance.The branes also can be synchronized.If the serie of uniquenss , universal for the two scales, is inserted with determinism about the quantization of mass.It becomes very relevant for correct simulations.

ps to all, who can ecplain me what is the BFSS Model please ?

Regargs

1.Lubos is not my friend.On the contrary, he is my enemy.

http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/07/archives-vixraorg-against-arxivorg.html

2.I haven't idea what mean BFSS Model.

:) an enemy?. but you know the hate is not good for health. Me I have not enemy but perhaps that for them, yes,I don't know, it is not improtant.The most important is to be universal.

The fact to have enemies has no real meaning for me youi know. The forgiveness is an essential parameter you know. I beleive strongly that thr secret is there, the universal love. The rest is vain. An enemy is not an enemy in this line of reasoning. I beleive simply that perhaps the simple probelm between both of you is the vanity. Perhaps that the arrogance of scientists imply a simple play of competition. It explains probably why a lot of scientists do not like to be critized. The syndrom of the searcher probably. I think that the vanity and the arrogance are more important inside the sciences community than inside a schools of young children.Perhaps that in growing we loose our innocence of child.

Make the peace with him :) like a child makes at school. hop in the hands. :)

BFSS model is Banks, Fischler, Shenker and Susskind (BFSS), it is correlation with Matrix theory. in 11 dimensions of supergravity.the steps of high and low energies can be classed. I beleive strongly that the serie of uniqueness must be inserted with the convergences with the rotating spherical volumes.My equations help for the steps of energies. The pure thermodynamics and heat are proportional with the rotations and the volumes of entangled spheres.the groups of uniqueness are finite and precise, implying a specific finite quantum number.This number is the same that our cosmological number in its pure finite serie, the finite universal group.

Regards

Appendix 4 Solution of cosmological constant problem

Theory: Cosmological constant is 10^94 g/sm^3

Practice: Cosmological constant is 10^-28 g/sm^3

Planck constant h=10^-28 g x sm^2/sec in 2D space embedding in 3D space

Only right value is experimental value.

Note.In the 2D space Pauli's principle is not valid.There is no need introduce the concept of "color".

Does God play Dice?

Yes,but when He play, always falls the same 3:1

:) intresting point of vue.

Another interesting point of view.

Despite my assertion of continuity of time, need to admit: Every cycle of the Universe is a discrete unit.

As promised, a few comments:

1) If you try to find hidden relations using numerology, you have to be careful about selection effects. If there are no relations between particle masses, you may still find a few relations by considering at a large enough number of particles.

2) I think that there are no fundamental dimensionful constants. So, I would side with Micheal Duff in that article you cite written by Okun, Veneziano and Duff.

3) About cyclical universes, I would say that the evolution laws of any universe will make it effectively eternal. I.e. even if the universe evolves in away that gives rise to some state only once and would never return to that, you can use the evolution laws to identify any future state with past states. This is yet another reason (not mentioned in my essay) why I reject the concept of a physical universe :) .

Dear Yuri:

You present some interesting points in this essay. Thanks for inviting me to read it! I'm sorry I was unable to take you up on your earlier invitation to join in on the discussion that was taking place on Phil Gibbs' site. By the way, I thought you would be interested to note that a (one) Schwarzschild black hole has three horizon radii only when Lambda is positive.

I personally think positive Lambda is a fundamental dimensional constant. In this case, a very nice scale invariant equation can be recovered from equation (4) in my essay by setting 2M=r_0-(Lambda/3)r_0^3, and then replacing all dimensional parameters (i.e., r, t, r_0, etc.) by a dimensionless one, X-->X'=sqrt(Lambda/3)X.

Best wishes, Daryl

Dear Yuri,

Interesting essay.

We wrote essays about similar ideas. Now to find missing links between all the phenomena you mention, but is worth your opening your intuition to these strange coincidences. Yes, for this reason you raised a remarkable question, I agree with you. Now we need to find the processes that are behind as those correspond to the physical laws that guide the conduct of energy in the universe.

My work : http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1552

Best regards,

My private correspondence concerning my first essay:

"The wording is very poor and even after one tries to sort out what the author intends to say, the ideas appear to be extremely incoherent." Fri 11/28/2008 9:58 PM

Gerardus 't Hooft , ( Nobel prize in Physics, 1999)

"I couldn't spend a lot of time on it, but a quick look did not lead me to anything that would make me want to reconsider the panel's decision. Sorry."

Sun 11/30/2008 6:55 AM

Frank Wilzek, (Nobel prize in Physics, 2004)

Dear Yuri Benjamin Danoyan,

As per Coherently-cyclic cluster-matter paradigm of universe; Gravity is not only a fundamental force, but also the prime force for the emergence of all other fundamental forces of nature.

With best wishes,

Jayakar

Yuri,

You stated:"Jeff

Appendix 4 Solution of cosmological constant problem

Theory: Cosmological constant is 10^94 g/sm^3

Practice: Cosmological constant is 10^-28 g/sm^3

Planck constant h=10^-28 g x sm^2/sec in 2D space embedding in 3D space

Only right value is experimental value.

See my essay http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1413#addPost"

I couldn't find the appendix. To me the obvious answer is that they both are correct (meaning that there is a large value for the cosmological constant but we can only detect the small value since we are interpreting the EFE incorrectly). Can you point out more directly your derivation?

Regards,

Jeff

Jeff

Can you read my essay Part 3 more attentively?

Dear Yuri, thanks for the link to essay 1512. indeed some âralels but paralels do not cross (perhaps in the infinite). I liked very much your essay, especially when you quote Aharonov " Everything you are going to do is already known to GOD, but you still have the choice" This is exactly what I describe when introducing Total Simultaneity, there all probabilities are "present", and every Planck moment you can make a choice between an infinity of possibillities, that need not to become "reality" , (so no multiverse), only one becomes part of your causal life-line 5that is why our universe is fine-tuned), so you could say that Total Simultaneity is GOD. That is why a lot of posts on my thread are going in this direction.

Eternal return is Immortality is another quote that i would like to comment, in our causal universe it is not nececerry that this eternal return is needed, the universe around is is a result of the interaction between our causal consciousness and the non-causal part in TS, in TS every possibillity is eternal, you could imagine that your causal consciousness is repeating the same probability for a certain causal time even infinite, but it stays causal, so with a beginning and an end, the real immortality is in TS, where all possible life-lines are eternal.

Good luck with the contest.

Wilhelmus

All solutions comes from God.

Hi Yury,

Nice Essay. Concerning your vision of the Universe, i.e. Big Bang; Present; Big Crunch; you could be interested to two works of mine:

1)http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.2523, published in Gen.Rel.Grav.40, 2201-2212 (2008).

2)http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4801, published in Astropart.Phys.34, 587-590 (2011).

In the first I discussed an oscillating Universe. In the second, together my collaborator H. J. Mosquera Cuesta we improved the model by showing a way to remove singularities.

I am going to give an high score to your Essay.

Cheers,

Ch.

Indeed ,but our simple human interpretations are so far of the real meaning of God, this infinite light without motions. God is the troch of all things. The spherization is his her project. It is a little if I said that the infinite light is the man, and this finite physicality tending towards the eternal physicality is the woman. It is relevant considering the polarization m/hv of evolution.

The road is the pure optimization spherization. God is more than our simple human interpretations. It is above our understanding. The real secret is this universal love. We optimize, we improve, we create, we harmonize, we catalyze,we love, we accept, we continue, we live ....

Best Regards