Kimmo,
Fascinating essay, original and very 'real'. I also think I may have actually employed something like the Rouvari effect to great effect in my own essay!
I particularly agree; "interaction is stored in form of rotation frequency and rotation axis orientation changes, into the interacting objects."
I certainly also derive and apply the rotational axis, and, adding translation on the axis, also discuss the 'helix' described. This proves important in resolving the EPR paradox. I think your;
"In case of two, same spin, particles meet in appropriate conditions they process that information by precessing until they have reached parallel rotation axis orientation. End state of this process is a stored information in form of new spinning rates and spin axis orientations of particles involved."
Is a very good description. I also extract some implicit subtleties of 'charge density'. Then I was really impressed with your phrase consistent with my 'information channel' from 'detector' to 'processor' (brain);
"when receptors in an eye process photon information with certain energy, it releases a small current into a ones brains. Brains receive the information in form of electric current but how the brains store that information? Only option is to change brains structure and that's really happening when brains store information."
But of course brains also "process", so analyse and derive conclusions. Which is where I suggest it all goes wrong!!
Long live reality! Good bit of ripping down nonsense curtains. I think it deserves to be higher up the list and have you marked down for a much better score. Have you given a definitive concise definition of your 'effect'? I hope I've helped rip down more of the curtain some areas so hope you can read my essay. I'm pretty sure is resolves the EPR paradox! But reality doesn't seem yet entirely in fashion.
Well done and best of luck
Peter