It’s Fibonacci’s Bit - Seeding the Universe with 0 and 1 by Antony Ryan

Dear Antony,

I just read your essay. You write well, and the idea that fibonacci numbers might play an even more fundamental role in nature than we thought does not seem so implausible. Also, the notion that instead of going from 3 dimensions to 0 dimensions we must go sequentially to lower dimensions by increments of one dimension is at the core of the framework that I work on.

Unfortunately, I was not able to understand your black hole argument. I failed to see how the Fibonacci sequence is related to the dimensionality of a region inside the black hole, and, as a result, I can unfortunately not comment on that aspect of your paper. Perhaps there is more that could be said about the relation between the two. Assuming the Schwarzschild metric correctly also describes the interior of an event horizon (a big assumption, btw) the transition from the horizon to the singularity is smooth. There are no regions where the dimensionality is reduced. Perhaps you meant to refer to some infinitesimal region outside the singularity that is "too small" to be captured in the metric?

Also, the connection between entropy and the n-simplexes seems unmotivated to me. Can you think of a real world example of entropy closer to our immediate experience where your model might help understand entropy more deeply? In fact, I would advise you to focus on such situations over the situations pertaining to black holes because if you arrive at an as yet untested physical prediction that differs from standard physics, there is a fighting chance to do an experiment.

You deserve kudos for some original ideas, hopefully you can develop these further and particularly in empirically testable regimes.

All the best,

Armin

For everybody, and especially for Steven P Sax and the autor of this great essay respect to the fundamental role of fibonacci numbers and number theory

The neutrality of vacuum due to electric chargue implies the true of Riemann hiphotesis

In other words the meutrality of vacuum for virtual chargued particles is equal to:

Sum(n =1,infinity [mpk/sqr({ + e}^2/Gn)]

x n^-s = 0)

s is one zero of Riemann function; s= 0.5 ti

Real part of de imaginary part of the first zero of Riemann function

14.134725141734693... = Zero1

[Zero1/(Pi x e x Phi)]^-2 239 =~ exp( 5 (In2)^2)

e = base of natural logarithms

Phi = (1 sqr(5) )/2

Regards

The entropy of a black hole has a direct connection to the Fibonacci sequence, given by the following equation:

[math]S_{BH}=\pi R^{2}=\frac{A}{4}\Longrightarrow\pi=S_{BH}/R^{2}=4{\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\arctan(\frac{1}{F_{2k+1}})}[/math]

The entropy of a black hole has a direct connection to the Fibonacci sequence, given by the following equation.Looking at this equation, it follows immediately that: 1) Increasing the spacetime curvature, given by 1 / R ², then entropy increases. That is the curvature of a surface, involves the strong holographic principle: the information is stored and computed on surfaces. It's no wonder that the Fibonacci sequence, to generate spirals aureas, can describe the behavior of a black hole.A black hole can not contain any singularity, entering the quantization of the gravitational field.The spiral aurea (Fibonnaci) represents exactly one black hole.

The quantization of space-time, ie: there is a length limit, a mass limit, etc., implies that there is no singularity must occur after a certain length, gravitational repulsion, corresponding to the gravitino of spin 3 / 2

So the mass of gravitinos have to be very high, but less than the Planck mass

The imbalance between repulsive gravitational force, within the horizon, and the attractive force, is what generates the Hawking radiation

RegardsAttachment #1: images.jpeg

Antony,

Awesome; compelling, original, insightful, and wonderfully written.

I'll have a lot more to say on your essay when I get additional bandwidth, but wanted to let you know that I greatly enjoyed it. In my view, certainly one of the most interesting essays I've encountered in this contest so far (and I'll be sure to elaborate on why that is in a future post).

Chris

Dear Anthony. Hello, and apologies if this does not apply to you. I have read and rated your essay and about 50 others. If you have not read, or did not rate my essay, The Cloud of Unknowing please consider doing so. With best wishes.

Vladimir

Hi Anthony -

It's very interesting to see the Cosmos expressed in a system based on numbers. You make this approach intriguing even to non-mathematicians. No small accomplishment.

The 'chicken and egg' relation of It and Bit you describe, echoes my own view of their correlation in a greater energy field.

I hope you'll be kind enough to read and rate my essay which accounts for many of the phenomena you describe, but more structurally - or in physical terms, if you will.

All the best,

John

The Higgs Vacuum, the Higgs boson, the seven extra dimensions and the fibonacci serie,limited to the five fibonacci numbers divisor of 240, Kissing number in 8d, and the 240 non zero roots of group E8.

mh = Higgs boson ; mVH = value of Higgs vacuum ; me = electron mass

1)

[math]

m_{h}=mVH\cdot P(2,l_{7})=126.177\: Gev

[/math]

2)

[math]m_{h}=mVH\cdot\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})\cdot(2/l_{7})[/math]

3)

[math]246.221202\, Gev\cdot\sin^{2}(2\pi/l_{7})\cdot(2/l_{7})=126.177\: Gev[/math]

4)

[math]l_{7}=3.0579009561..=[(2\cdot(2\pi)^{7})/(16\pi^{3}/15)]^{1/9}[/math]

5)

[math]lenght\,7d\, ratio\: to\: l\, Planck=l_{7}[/math]

6)

[math]\frac{m_{h}}{m_{e}}=246924

[/math]

7)

[math]1\cdot2\cdot3\cdot5\cdot8=240\;240\pm1=(239,241)\,(twin\, primes)

[/math]

8)

[math](8^{6}-5^{6}-3^{6}-2^{6}-1^{6})+(8^{3}+5^{3}+3^{3}+2^{3}+1^{3})-\sqrt{8^{6}+5^{6}+3^{6}+2^{6}+1^{6}}-1..

[/math]

9)

[math]..-\cos\theta_{GUT}=\frac{m_{h}}{m_{e}}=246924

[/math]

10)

[math]\theta_{GUT}=angle\: unification\, theories\: SU(5)

[/math]

Regards for everybody

Dear Antony: yes are one very clear and exact conections from leech lattice in 24d and the Higgs vacuum value, mVH ( ratio to electron mass. The particle less massive and with electric chargue.And absolutely stable)

24d= DIM(SU(7))/2= DIM(SU(5))=4d!

Fn= Fibonacci numbers

240= lattice 8d

[math]K(24d)=196560

[/math]

[math]

K(24d)=\exp({4\pi/3 }+8)-\ln({mVH\cdot{}\sqrt[4]{2}\cdot{}\cos({2\pi/20 })/m_e)

[/math]

[math]

20= \sum_{Fn/240}F_n

[/math]

Regards