It from Δ-Logit by Vladimir I. Rogozhin

Interesting read. I added my rating

Dear Vladimir,

Asking question is in logic only.

When an experiment is repeated by any one and it gives the same result, then it becomes science. I mean here our thinking should be based on science and practical experiments.

Just thinking in logic with out practical experimental support can not lead us any where, what do you say?

Best

=snp

Dear Vladimir,

This is a very impressive philosophical essay with several deep thoughts that touch many aspects of my own essay, although the latter was written from a physical point of view. It seems to me that metaphysics is not so much different from physics as I thought before. I am still translating your ideas into my own (physical) language and this will take some more time.

For now, my congratulations to your important essay.

Best regards,

Walter

Vladimir

Your essay was a bit on the philosophical side for my tastes, however, I enjoyed it, especially the notion of ontological memory.

I was wondering: does ontological memory lives in subtime?

You can find the latest version of it here:

http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

Ontological memory may be only indirectly accessible to us. Subtime appears to give it the kind of properties consistent with your description. My description: brief flashes of reality with long periods of darkness in between.

If I am only even a tiny bit right, I'm expect it will open up many philosophical questions.

I hope this leads to some even partial relief from the crisis of representation and interpretation in the fundamental sciences.

Let me know what you think.

Kind regards, Paul

"Information as a phenomenon of Ontological Memory in nature is multivalent in its manifestations at different levels of reality."

That uses all English words, but what on earth does that mean? Seems like a string of buzz words which happen to be in grammatical order. Much of the essay is like that. It's English, but Huh?? When I spend time to read these essays, I hope to learn something, but with sentences like the above, my eyes just glzze over, but this is one of the most highly community rated essays. I don't mean to be negative. Maybe other people are more technical than me, but I think I better represent the general layperson for whom this essay would have little interest or relevancy.

Best of Luck for the Magnificent Eight !

I am throught the 180 essays, all rated. For me 2/3 of them were poor and other 1/6 curious. The rest (1/6) have I rated over 4/10.

You are among the authors of the top essays from my sight - alphabetically :

Corda, D'Ariano, Maguire, Rogozhin, Singleton, Sreenath, Vaid, Vishwakarma,

and I hope one of you will be the winner. Vladimir, thanks for your rating

David

I rated the essay to be 10 not because of the quality of the essay but of my respect to the contribution of Russian scientists as a whole, especially to Gorigory Perelman!

Dear Vladimir Rogozhin: I had to read your essay several times to understand it correctly. Being a well-written essay, the density of ideas stated; joined a very erudite historical hindsight, make this essay an example magnificent mathematical thinking not, but it draws conclusions and axioms, of great importance. I do not like the word philosophy, I prefer: well structured thinking, logic and axiomatic.

One of the important conclusions that you discussed is the concept of unitarity, in the sense that all physical phenomena, including space, time, and energy or mass, are actually manifestations of a single, fundamental entity, which takes into itself all physical characteristics, apparently manifested separately.

Indeed, as you noted repeatedly in his essay, a theory of unification, by pure logic requires: 1) A holistic principle of unitarity. 2) fundamental functional units not "divisible" most fundamental units. That is to say: There must be a minimum as Delta incremental, that is nothing, that there is a minimum length measurement of space-time-mass.

You remember in her essay the great thinkers of history, from ancient Greece, through Galileo, Kant, Boubarky. In this historical analysis mentions the importance of, for example, basic geometric forms: sphere, triangle, etc.. And here, here is where you absolutely right, as for example, the principle of holistic unitarity is manifest in the spins possible. That is: 1) The arithmetic average of the sum of the cosines of all nonzero spins, this arithmetic mean is very roughly squared (renormalization effects), the ratio of the mass of the Higgs boson mass and the value of the vacuum Higgs, that is:

SUM_spins_cos( cos(s))= Delta(s)

cos(s)= s/sqr[ s(s+1)]

Delta(s)= 2.8755503

( Delta(s)/4 )^2 = 0.5167993455

Vacuum Higgs value = 246.221202 Gev=V(H)

V(H) x ( Delta(s)/4 )^2 = 127.246 Gev ~ mh

Another example of principle of holistic unitarity

The tetrahedron: the angle formed by one side with a face.

This angle has the following property with respect to the spins of the graviton, the spin of the leptons, and the fractional electric charges.

cos(th1)= cos(54.73561031 degree) = cos( s= 1/2)

sin(th1) = cos( s= 2)

( cos(th1) )^2 = 1/3

( sin(th1) )^2 = 4/3 maximum value electric charge SU(5) unification

I think, humbly, that these two mathematical-physical examples, would be a small "translation" of the excellent and well-reasoned thoughts embodied in his magnificent essay. I'm sure it will be one of the winners of this contest. Greetings. Angel Garces Doz

Dear Vladimir,

Great reading, i agree with you on the whole. Many nice ideas that actually could shape future view on physics and philosophy.聽

Best wishes

Koorosh

Best of luck in the finals Vladimir.

Have Fun!

Jonathan