Dear Mr. Hoang cao Hai,

Thank you for your nice question.

Well, the existence of Time is linked to the existence of Space and gravity (Please see also chapter three of my Essay and the comment to Mr. Maguire above.)

That means before the gravitational force split off from the primal force at an Energy level of 10 high15GeV (according to G.U.T.) was no time in our space bubble. Because the gravity was formend at this level of energy. You see, there are two Important moments in Theory of Big Bang according to G.U.T. The first, the Big Bang started at a level of energy around 10 high 19GeV and the space was formed, as the first prereqisite exists. The second, is the split off the gravity. In this moment the second prereqisite of time exists. Finally the time came in our cosmic Space bubble at this moment (Energy Level: 10 high 15GeV). That means the time did not started at big bang. The time starts totgehet with the existence of gravity.

The space had the opportunity for an extremly rush expansion, the so called cosmic Inflation. Because velocity is the quotient of distance and time. But there is no Time, there is also no velocity. That means every point can be achived instantaneously.

The Concept of "thermodynamic time arrow" supports also my Concept of Time. Our Space bubble is closed system and therefore the Second Low of Thermodynamic is valid. The Big Bang started with a very High entropy (Fluctuation of quantas due to a High mess, or better entropy. During the cosmic inflation the energy inside our cosmic bubble will be equal spread over the Volume of our Space bubble. That means in the moment of inflation Stops and the time Starts, in this Moment the entropy is very low. By the next steps of development our cosmic Space bubble the entropy is increasing according to the second low of thermodynamic and also the time Runs from history into the future.

What do you think? Some silly ideas?

Best regards

Kai

5 days later

Dear

Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon.

So you can produce material from your thinking. . . .

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

Best

=snp

snp.gupta@gmail.com

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Pdf download:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

Part of abstract:

- -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

A

Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

. . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

B.

Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

C

Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

"Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

D

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

It from bit - where are bit come from?

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

E

Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

.....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

    Kai: I'm a bit confused. At present, the speed of the universe's expansion is increasing. So, how is it right to say that cosmic inflation has "stopped at the right moment"?

    Der Marcus,

    Sorry that I have confused you. Indeed the Inflation is only the Short period of hughe and rapid Expansion of our cosmic bubble shortly After the Big Bang. After this Periode the Expansion Gose much slower. Therefore it is allowed to Speak from the stop of cosmic Inflation. That means the Moment of change from Explosive (Rapid) to Slow Expansion of Space.

    Best regards from

    Kai

    Der Mr. Gupta,

    Nice idea, but I think that is Not possible to cremte matter by only thinking. In my opinion matter is Energy, but thinking is Not Energy.

    Best regards

    Kai

    Hello, Kai!

    Thank you for a very interesting essay question focuses on the problem of the "beginning" and "inflation." I speak in the contest a second time not as a physicist but as a lyricist. Lyricists on the planet Earth most of them also do not care of what is the Universe. Of the universe (the Greek Cosmos - «order») people interested in the history of its formation as homo sapiens sapiens. The problem is not only in the "inflation" (from her, we were tired in the economy), but also that, when the "laws of nature"?. I have a question: «What is more logical reasoning and in line with our intuition, experience and thousands of years of tradition:" In the Beginning was the Logos ... "or "In the Beginning was the Big Bang?" I also invite you to read my essay ...Regards, Vladimir

      Kai,

      If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, "It's good to be the king," is serious about our subject.

      Jim

      10 days later

      Dear Prof. Dr. Kai-Olaf Henkel,

      After your clarification in response to Mr. Hoang cao Hai question that, "The time starts together with the existence of gravity." I realized that you had reached relatively the same conclusions that I have. The empirical evidence (not opinion) obtained in the recently concluded 12 year experiment I have conducted substantiates your position stated.

      You are not alone in your assessment!

      Best wishes,

      Manuel Morales

      msm@physicsofdestiny.com

        6 days later

        Dear Kai,

        Nice work and original. I've never bought the classical view of inflation, so welcome anything that questions it. Very interesting. Do you think this suggests It or Bit as more fundamental? I think you're initial point that it is far more likely that classical inflation stops at an unfavourable point rather than when it seems to have is good!

        If given the time, please take a look at my essay.

        Best wishes for the contest,

        Antony

          7 days later

          • [deleted]

          • Post #19

          Dear Kai,

          A new way of looking at cosmology. Well done!

          You can check my essay and rate if you like it.

          Best regards,

          Akinbo

            Dear Vladimir,

            The Universe, that we can observe is the Space bubble, that was created by the Big Bang. That means, the final question is the nature and the begining of the Thing in this our Space bubble expans. Maybe this is a Logos. Today only some spekulatives are possible.

            Der Kai

            Dear Mr.Hoang cao Hai,

            Well, today nobody knows what gravity is. I think it is a Special Interaction of quantas in the Space. For Example, it is possible that two quantas are conected in shape of a fourangle. The area inside this fourangle describes the gravity.

            I am Not sure.

            Kai

            Dear Manuel,

            Thank you for your comment. I am happy, that I stand Not alone.

            Thank you again,

            Kai

            Dear Akinbo,

            Thank you for your comment.

            Best regards

            Kai

            Dear Antony,

            I think the stop of the cosmic Inflation is determined by the Energy Level of seperating gravity. That means the occurence of time in our Space bubble. Therefore the Inflation has to stop at the right Moment. Finally, maybe it is possible to say the it (Level of Energy) createds the Bit. Because for realising the Message of a Bit the existence of Time is nessecary.

            Best regards.

            Kai

            6 days later

            Dear Kai,

            Thanks for the reply. Nice approach that time becomes necessary. Great way to answer the question!

            Best wishes,

            Antony

            I've lost a lot of comments and replies on my thread and many other threads I have commented on over the last few days. This has been a lot of work and I feel like it has been a waste of time and energy. Seems to have happened to others too - if not all.

            I WILL ATTEMPT to revisit all threads to check and re-post something. Your thread was one affected by this.

            I can't remember the full extent of what I said, but I have notes so know that I rated it very highly.

            Hopefully the posts will be able to be retrieved by FQXi.

            Best wishes,

            Antony

            Dear Dr.Kai,

            I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

            Regards and good luck in the contest,

            Sreenath BN.

            http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

              Dear Dr. Kai-Olaf,

              You have clearly explained why 'cosmic inflation theory' is to be accepted rather than the 'inflaton field theory'. The hypothetical particles called 'inflatons' produced as a result of inflation is summarily rejected by you and giving good reasons for that. The problem of the existence of space and time is solved in your model and it is this which is responsible for the stop of inflation approximately shortly after the big bang at the energy level of about 10^15 GeV. Your conclusion then is "Time begins with the end of cosmic inflation and not just after the big bang". Your derivation of the cause for inflation from the second law of thermodynamics is imaginative and hence is based on solid ground. I appreciate the effort you have put behind in writing this essay in spite of the fact that you are busy in practicing your profession. For this great effort of yours, I will give maximum rating to your well thought out essay.

              Please go through my essay also (http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827) and express your comments on it in my thread before the dead line of 7th Aug.

              All the best,

              Sreenath

              Kai,

              You asked me above to post my essay to you to read. In case you haven't read and scored it, it's here;

              http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1775

              Do ignore the dense Abstract that some have said first put them off, the blog comments include; "groundbreaking", "clearly significant", "astonishing", "fantastic job", "wonderful", "remarkable!", "deeply impressed", etc.

              I hope you can get to it before the deadline. I'm sure you will like it.

              I'm pleased to confirm I was able to score yours well. Very well done.

              Very best wishes

              Peter