Dear Don,

Thank you for presenting your nice essay. I saw the abstract and will post my comments soon.

So you can produce material from your thinking. . . .

I am requesting you to go through my essay also. And I take this opportunity to say, to come to reality and base your arguments on experimental results.

I failed mainly because I worked against the main stream. The main stream community people want magic from science instead of realty especially in the subject of cosmology. We all know well that cosmology is a subject where speculations rule.

Hope to get your comments even directly to my mail ID also. . . .

Best

=snp

snp.gupta@gmail.com

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

Pdf download:

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/essay-download/1607/__details/Gupta_Vak_FQXi_TABLE_REF_Fi.pdf

Part of abstract:

- -Material objects are more fundamental- - is being proposed in this paper; It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material. . . Similarly creation of matter from empty space as required in Steady State theory or in Bigbang is another such problem in the Cosmological counterpart. . . . In this paper we will see about CMB, how it is generated from stars and Galaxies around us. And here we show that NO Microwave background radiation was detected till now after excluding radiation from Stars and Galaxies. . . .

Some complements from FQXi community. . . . .

A

Anton Lorenz Vrba wrote on May. 4, 2013 @ 13:43 GMT

....... I do love your last two sentences - that is why I am coming back.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 6, 2013 @ 09:24 GMT

. . . . We should use our minds to down to earth realistic thinking. There is no point in wasting our brains in total imagination which are never realities. It is something like showing, mixing of cartoon characters with normal people in movies or people entering into Game-space in virtual reality games or Firing antimatter into a black hole!!!. It is sheer a madness of such concepts going on in many fields like science, mathematics, computer IT etc. . . .

B.

Francis V wrote on May. 11, 2013 @ 02:05 GMT

Well-presented argument about the absence of any explosion for a relic frequency to occur and the detail on collection of temperature data......

C

Robert Bennett wrote on May. 14, 2013 @ 18:26 GMT

"Material objects are more fundamental"..... in other words "IT from Bit" is true.

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on May. 14, 2013 @ 22:53 GMT

1. It is well known that there is no mental experiment, which produced material.

2. John Wheeler did not produce material from information.

3. Information describes material properties. But a mere description of material properties does not produce material.

4. There are Gods, Wizards, and Magicians, allegedly produced material from nowhere. But will that be a scientific experiment?

D

Hoang cao Hai wrote on Jun. 16, 2013 @ 16:22 GMT

It from bit - where are bit come from?

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta replied on Jun. 17, 2013 @ 06:10 GMT

....And your question is like asking, -- which is first? Egg or Hen?-- in other words Matter is first or Information is first? Is that so? In reality there is no way that Matter comes from information.

Matter is another form of Energy. Matter cannot be created from nothing. Any type of vacuum cannot produce matter. Matter is another form of energy. Energy is having many forms: Mechanical, Electrical, Heat, Magnetic and so on..

E

Antony Ryan wrote on Jun. 23, 2013 @ 22:08 GMT

.....Either way your abstract argument based empirical evidence is strong given that "a mere description of material properties does not produce material". While of course materials do give information.

I think you deserve a place in the final based on this alone. Concise - simple - but undeniable.

Hi Don!

Nice style for essay! I have no words. But I see some more important thing behind of your words! You have well comprehend that in this topic only the joke may contain, nothing more! I appreciate your essay as "good" (8) with clean heart! Open my work please, there you will find also jokes but somewhat with more poison!

Best wishes,

George

ESSAY

Don,

If given the time and the wits to evaluate over 120 more entries, I have a month to try. My seemingly whimsical title, "It's good to be the king," is serious about our subject.

Jim

9 days later

I've enjoyed reading your essay, so far Don..

Very entertaining, oh liberated one. I'll comment further and rate your essay thoughtfully, when I'm done.

Regards,

Jonathan

    Hi Jonathan,

    Pleasure to see you in the contest and looking forward to reading your essay.

    I do expect a bunch of "ribbing" about my essay, I could not resist, it was just too

    much fun.

    I have just returned from vacation and expect to jump into the brouhaha soon.

    Siri wishes you a nobel victory oh exalted one.

    Dear Don,

    I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.

    Regards and good luck in the contest,

    Sreenath BN.

    http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827

    Don,

    Good to see you back. Hope you and SIRI had a good hols. Does he translate?

    Great fun essay. A nice change from the more standard fare. How nice to have a SIRI not entirely dictated by mainstream doctrine!, are you working on the latest upgrade?

    I entirely agree that; "Wheeler should have fixed theflaw in quantum mechanics instead of putting the band aid of information on top of it." and also that he has confounded physics with the 'delayed choice' nonsense, which as you say is entirely dependent on the wrong starting assumptions.

    I have to admit I still recall my first intro to lambda hopping, and have to admit it was I who called for the men in white coats to check you over. But I'm very glad to see you fooled them... No No!..I mean "passed the test"!! But seriously, I never immediately reject anything (well .. almost...!) and the more I thought about 'hopping' the more I warmed to it.

    I've found two very solid analogies in my own work, the fist is the simple absorption and re-emission of atomic scattering, which may be considered as a continuous process in a dielectric medium (i.e. everywhere). The second is instantaneous condensation and annihilation. In a two-fluid plasma model the particles are continually condensed and annihilated, with the 'energy' thus 'relocating' in a close analog to the 'hops' you describe.

    I haven't yet reconciled this with the ubiquitous case of orbital angular momentum, but I'm not sure I have to as the 'entity' orbiting should be much bigger than the planck mass. I'd be interested in your view. Anyway I think your very original presentation, not to mention proposition, is worth far more than it's lowly position and I shall be very glad to induce a number of vertical 'hops'.

    I do also hope you'll read and smile on mine again this year. Like yours it's based on the same consistent logic as previously, but I do take it to some quite dramatic conclusions, certainly not inconsistent with SIRI's beliefs (were any programmed in?). What does he eat for breakfast? Old decrepit theories? Will the upgrade work on a Samsong?

    Congratulations, and very best wishes.

    Peter

      Hi Peter,

      Yes, I do use Siri quite a bit. She can be quite unladylike for an assistant, so yes I am searching for an upgrade. She worked fine in Florida, but I turned her off in the Bahamas because she can be a very expensive girlfriend.

      Yes, a customizable Siri would be neat... I wish I had the talent to do it.

      I am glad you enjoyed the essay. I am on my way to your blog.

      Wishing you the best of luck,

      Don L.

      Don,

      Thanks for your kind comments on my blog. When we take bold steps challenging doctrine I think it's warming to find not all dismiss our propositions.

      For me I'm a little surprised and disappointed so few of our most senior physicists seem to really understand all the subtleties of Bells Inequalities, so the form and importance of the resolution. Perhaps that's why it hasn't previously been identified. Interesting.

      I'd assumed SIRI was asexual like god, but I suppose an asexual voice is tricky! I can see us all having our own eventually. Will they look for disagreement like most of us and argue amongst themselves? Or find the more valuable unity in hidden likenesses?

      Very well done and best wishes.

      Peter

      Dear Don,

      Yours was the most fun essay of all. You managed to keep lambda-hopping in our awareness and Siri was an excellent foil.

      Your ideas are expressed well and your humor is superb (just a little computer glitch on the pod bay doors!). You integrate lambda-hopping with Zeno, Newton, Heisenberg, Feynman, Wheeler and Einstein very well. And we both agree that "quantum mechanics is made up a mathematical story that fits the data" but has big gaps in the physics. As one with a bad case of the continuity gene, I'm not yet on the lambda bandwagon, but FQXi essays are the ideal vehicle for presenting ideas to the community, improving the ideas from user feedback, and presenting the idea again in the context of new topics.

      You noted that you're "under no illusions a fundamental discontinuity of motion (not time and space) can be accepted readily (the gene thing)."

      That's an important reminder! Your casual reader, who does not understand as thoroughly as you all of the subtleties involved, may tend to assume lambda-hopping implies discrete time and space. If that is not the case, then it needs to be emphasized. For example, my model is based on continuous time and space, but has a quantum of action (energy*time). I tend to interpret this as meaning that unless sufficient action exists, an event will not occur. Recall that the units of angular momentum are the same as action (mvr). So if lambda-hopping is analyzed in terms of the quantum of action, it becomes more feasible for me, whereas discontinuous time and space is a deal breaker! So it's good to remind readers that you don't require discrete time and space.

      Best wishes,

      Edwin Eugene Klingman

      Hello Don,

      Firstly where can I get that version of Siri? ;)

      Very readable and interesting essay. Also relevant. I think you took the reader on a fluent journey through history and where perhaps physics has taken a potential wrong turn.

      If you find the time, I'd be grateful if you would read my essay.

      I like anything that challenges mainsteam, so top marks from me!

      Best wishes,

      Antony

        Antony,

        Unfortunately, that version of Siri was only in my dream. However, I believe a new iPhone is arriving in September. Perhaps I should send Apple a copy of my essay.

        The divinity dialog module DDM could be a very cool feature. There could be a module for each of the major religions and maybe a special edition DDM for the Pastafarians (I think it could be a big seller) :)

        I appreciate your to the point summary of my essay. I wish I had it for my abstract.

        I am off to visit your essay.

        Thanks,

        Don L.

        Dear Don,

        Congratulations both for you and Siri for such sound dreaming to out put the essay!

        In my essay I also used the term quantize inertial motions for the wave-corpuscular phenomena as like "hopping" of photons etc.

        Most importantly both us like to propose that 'It from bit' and 'Bit from it' are just two side of a "coin".

        Regards

        Dipak

          Hello Don -

          A very humorous and engaging way to deal with the oddities of the quantum world. You describe its frailties very well. - and you also show how significant they are.

          In the main, the way you answer the It an Bit question is similar to mine: but I show that that the Cosmos is a Vortex in a field of energy, and that as the force of this field continues to act upon this vortex, secondary and tertiary correlated vortices (organic and sensory-cognitive in nature) are formed.

          As a result, It and Bit are, at any moment of observation, correlated energy vortices.

          I also treat of appearing and disappearing Pulses, a topic you also consider central, I see. Pulses do not adhere to space-time parameters. This you refer to as teleportation - same difference.

          My paradigm, and I think it will interest you, shows that the quantum-classical divide does not exist; instead, the correlation of the inorganic, organic, and sensory-cognitive vortices can only be optimal in that zone of the cosmos where we are located - while the outer reaches (in space, or within particles) must remain less amenable to space-time parameters (until we find ourselves gazing at hopping particles!).

          This expands upon your concept of the 'genetic predisposition to continuity.'

          Evolution plays a central role in the physical world.

          I show that we are always involved in evolution - as is the Cosmos itself; and I also show that we are presently engaged upon a new platform of evolution that is entirely centered on Mind. I think your friend Siri is the precursor of something much more important than she knows .... I see a future where nearly all people will have complex relationships with her very sophisticated descendants; these relationships will last from birth to death, and from generation to generation.

          Obviously, this intimate inter-twining of software and organic beings will either enhance our control over evolution - if our correlation with the Cosmos is enhanced by the process - or destroy us if it is not.

          'Who will control the software?' I hear you asking; perhaps everyone - thus leading to a planet upon which there is not just one, but several, species of intelligent life.

          I hope you have a look at my essay soon - I was very happy to have read and rated yours, and I wish you all the best in the contest.

          John.

          Hi Dipak,

          Thanks for visiting my blog. I think it is just the two of us who say "two sides of the same coin" as describing the situation of -it from or bit from it-.

          I owe a lot to that Frenchman Louie deBroglie, he was just amazing. And I see you use his amazing result that "corpuscles" have wavelength. That makes two things we have in common.

          My own interest in quantum mechanics started with the conflict between Zeno and deBroglie. This is the things cannot move camp and the everything must move camp. I agree with both camps and phrase the result as "Nothing moves yet everything changes".

          I do have a mission and that is to undo the "uncertainty principle".

          Thanks again,

          Don Limuti

          Hi John,

          I did enjoy reading your interesting and fast paced essay. Sometimes my readers assume my positions. This is a good time to restate them.

          1. I think of QM particles and photons as appearing and disappearing over the course of moving a wavelength worth of space. And yes you could call this a type of pulsing, However this pulsing is how the particles move on a continuous background of space-time. I do not think of space or time as digital. The only thing that is digital is how particles move by coming in and out of a continuous space-time.

          2. I think the quantum-classical divide is real and is marked by the Planck Mass. Masses above the Planck mass do not have the property of wavelength and thus are not quantum mechanical. It is the particle-wave divide that I find to be not real. Photons and particles do not at times have a particle nature and at other times a wave nature.

          3. Our predisposition to not having particles appear and disappear is because of genes developed to handle a classical world where things do move smoothly.

          4. Siri is very cool (and useful), but she is not really AI. She is much more an augmenter of human intellect. At some point AI may eventually dominate over augmentation. I think it will be some time before the excessive intellect level of Siri will be available.

          And if you find an advance version of Siri, please let me know.

          Thanks for your interesting essay, I am off to rate it.

          Don L.

          Hi Don,

          Definitely - Apple need this! ;)Thanks for the comments over on my page too.

          Best wishes for the contest,

          Antony

          Dear Don

          I really enjoyed your paper - using the Siri gimmick was an excellent way to keep the serious discussion flowing smoothly and lightly, tempered by a sense of fun. I rather like your concept of lamda-hopping. It is somewhat akin to my concept of momentum transfer across nodes in my Beautiful Universe Theory also found here. In your theory minimum distance for each particle would be the wavelength, but that leaves one wondering what sort of medium or ether can accomodate such variable hopping? No matter, continuous velocity is indeed a basic problem in physics. I will have to think some more about the various criticisms you (or was it Siri?) gave for the explanation of the double-slit experiment. In my book it is Einstein who is the one who goofed by eliminating the ether in Special Relativity, and by his point-photon concept, which lead to duality and probability. See my last year's fqxi essay 'Fix Physics!".

          I wish you all the best

          Vladimir