Dear amazigh,
I have down loaded your essay and soon post my comments on it. Meanwhile, please, go through my essay and post your comments.
Regards and good luck in the contest,
Sreenath BN.
http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1827
First principle is eDuality ! by Amazigh M. Hannou
Dear Sreenath BN,
In your Introduction : «CI is understood as a collection of bits whereas QI, by contrast, is a continuum.»
Is it a mistake ?
It appears to me to see good ideas. I will immediately read your essay and I come back to you.
Amazigh
Hi Amazigh,
You wrote:
"Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc."
I agree with you and have been working to develop such a concept for several years. In the context of the simulation paradigm, I have developed a theoretical picture that has results consistent with observational cosmology. When I conducted a test to see if the paradigm is true of our reality I found that it was, and discovered a number of biological, cultural and historical aspects. While I was not able to survey all of this within nine pages, you can get a taste of it in my Software Cosmos essay. Perhaps it will answer some of the questions you pose at the beginning of your essay.
Hugh
Dear Amazigh,,
Thanks for your nice essay, well done
I enjoy reading it and rate it accordingly
You wrote:
"Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc."
I agree with you and among all these what is the central idea?
i think is symmetry, my essay may interest you
Bit: from Breaking symmetry of it
Hope you enjoy it
Regards,
Xiong
Dear Joe,
« Information is not reality. Information has nothing to do with reality. Reality is an absolute. It is the ultimate condition. It is the only real condition. One cannot acquire any more of reality than one has already gotten.
The more information one collects, the less one will ever know about reality. »
Things cannot be quite good or quite bad. We cannot generalize like that.
My opinion is that the information is any object, any phenomenon.
And our reality and information are almost One.
Where there is no information, there is nothing to see, nothing to observe.
Good luck.
Amazigh,
We see with our eyes as do all animals and fish. We differ from the animals and the fish in that we stupidly pretend to know what we are looking at. Each animal and fish has sense enough to know that it is an animal or a fish. Each man pretends to know that he knows more or looks better or is stronger or richer or is different than other men. He has to qualify and quantify everything he sees. All the information we use was imparted by men who have been dead for centuries.
Thanks for wishing me good luck.
Joe
Dear Amazigh,
Your question, "CI is understood as a collection of bits whereas QI, by contrast, is a continuum Is it a mistake?".
No it is not a mistake but a scientifically accepted fact.
I will shortly post my comments on your essay; mean while, please, go through my essay and post your comments in my thread.
All the best,
Sreenath
Dear Amazigh,
In your brief essay you have raised too many questions and you have rightly said that to solve the problem of duality in all various fields, "Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the functioning of the Universe and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc." You have rightly given equal importance to both information and reality, and that information pervades all fields in the universe including the whole universe, and reality, on the other hand, is objectively real and that it cannot be touched by information. This is also the conclusion that I have come across in my essay. So, please, go through my essay and post your kind comments on it in my thread. After seeing your comments I am going to rate your essay, written in a highly innovative style, with a very good score.
Best regards,
Sreenath
Dear Amazigh,
Your essay is very interesting. So I will rate high. Try to read my essay too.
You said to Joe above that if there is nothing to see, nothing to observe, there is no information? But if you put your hand in your pocket and find a diamond there, you have got information. But if later in the day, you put your hand in your pocket and no more diamond, have you not obtain an information also?
So what you said that if there is nothing to observe there is no information will not be correct.
Best regards,
Akinbo
Dear Amazigh,
Very bold original essay. I have three questions for you.
First question: Did you try to draw a principle of Cusa "coincidence of opposites", the minimum and maximum?
The second question: Are you trying to make one more small step - from the "Dyad" to the "Trinity" and see in the single principle of the trinity symbol?
The third question: Why the picture of the world of physicists poorer sense than the picture of the world of lyricists??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3ho31QhjsY
I wish you success,
Vladimir
Amazigh sorry, forgot to put a rating - 7
Dear Amazigh,
I invite you to comment my essay on my forum and rate it.
Best regards,
Vladimir
Dear Amazigh,
I enjoyed your concise but original and very pertinent essay. I did question not your statement that 'object is information' which I agree by your definition, but whether your definition is useful as one that discerns and leaves a task for 'reality'. but then I saw what you proposed. And indeed putting 'real' under Religion twice certainly states you position!
Do you not however think we need to distinguish nature from metaphysics? Perhaps you might read my essay then answer that? I show the double helix produced from simple motion, proposing a universe of multiple spaces with no excluded middle. I hope this may found the revolutionary theory you essay rightly identifies as desperately needed.
I also found very valid and interesting your ideas for fundamental corrections to: "Quantum and Wave Mechanics" instead of "Quantum Mechanics" and "Theory of Relativity and Absolute" instead of "Theory of Relativity". Your present score seems ridiculously low so I'm pleased to give you a hike up. I hope the extended deadline allows you to read and score mine.
Well done and Best wishes
Peter
Very important ! Very important ! Very important ! Very important !
The eUniverse is a whole. A theory which does not consider the whole eUniverse would be unspeakable to claim to be the theory of everything. In physics only, it is possible. But not if it concerns the entire eUniverse.
The theory is there to gather a largest number of objects and phenomena, in larger and larger sets, and the dream is that only one set, the largest set that can exist and we call eUniverse, that collect all them and so they share the same language of communication, the same principles and laws.
Can this dream be reached ? My answer is a big YES.
It is a Theory which would include all other theories because it is a binary Theory, on the basis of the information, and information is the basis of eUniverse, its authenticity, its strength and its source.
This big Theory, the mother of all the theories, I found it, it is announced now, but it has been a long time since I work above and since I was convinced of my approach.
And a single concept claims to be able to gather all the fields, all the domains, to apply at every level and all the scales, Its name is eDuality.
From eDuality will emerge a new science, a new philosophy, and mathematics will be consolidated in their abstract role next to concrete of physics.
To work, the world needs its both legs, use its both hands, see with its both eyes, and to think, worry about the two contradictory points of view at its disposal.
Wheeler's dream has come true : "It from bit" ; to me : "It's a bit" ; this Theory such as predicted : A simple Theory to explain a eUniverse so complex.
I summarize the idea of Wheeler : Finally, it is also simple and we did not even think of it.
I apologize if the translation is not good.
Amazigh HANNOU
Hello Amazigh,
Thanks for your comments over on my page. I'll reply moe thoroughly and read your paper by early next week. I like the look of your abstract, asking all the right questions, so look forward to it.
Best wishes,
Antony
Dear Amazigh and all,
Thank you for posting in my essay. Here is some work I am doing to achieve what you are trying to do as well.
Simple mathematical truth of zero=I=infinity, iSphere and iSeries as described below can explain all the aspects of reality mathematically.
I am attaching the iDNASeries.bmp that I have envisioned and how it shows the DNA structure in its sequence.
I give you all a cosmological iSeries which spans the entire numerical spectrum from -infinity through 0 to +infinity and the simple principle underlying it is sum of any two consecutive numbers is the next number in the series. 0 is the base seed and i can be any seed between 0 and infinity.
iSeries always yields two sub semi series, each of which has 0 as a base seed and 2i as the first seed.
One of the sub series is always defined by the equation
Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i
where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i
the second sub series is always defined by the equation
Sn = 3 * Sn-1 -Sn-2
where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2 * i
Division of consecutive numbers in each of these subseries always eventually converges on 2.168 which is the Square of 1.618.
Union of these series always yields another series which is just a new iSeries of a 2i first seed and can be defined by the universal equation
Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2
where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2*i
Division of consecutive numbers in the merged series always eventually converges on 1.618 which happens to be the golden ratio "Phi".
Fibonacci series is just a subset of the iSeries where the first seed or S1 =1.
Examples
starting iSeries governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2
where i = 0.5, S0 = 0 and S1 = 0.5
-27.5 17 -10.5 6.5 -4 2.5 -1.5 1 -.5 .5 0 .5 .5 1 1.5 2.5 4 6.5 10.5 17 27.5
Sub series governed by Sn = 2 * Sn-1 + Sigma (i=2 to n) Sn-i
where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1
0 1 2 5 13 34 ...
Sub series governed by Sn = 3 * Sn-1 - Sn-2
where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1
0 1 3 8 21 55 ...
Merged series governed by Sn = Sn-1 + Sn-2 where S0 = 0 and S1 = 2i = 1
0 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 ...... (Fibonacci series is a subset of iSeries)
The above equations hold true for any value of I.
As per Antony Ryan's suggestion, I searched google to see how Fibonacci type series can be used to explain Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity and found an interesting article.
http://msel-naschie.com/pdf/The-Fibonacci-code-behind-super.pdf
Now that I split the Fibonacci series in to two semi series, seems like each of the sub semi series corresponds to QM and GR and together they explain the Quantum Gravity. Seems like this duality is a commonality in nature once relativity takes effect or a series is kicked off from a basic singularity. The only commonality between the two series is at the base seed 0 (singularity) and first seed 1, which are the bits in our binary system.
Its also interesting to see the singularity is in the base seed of zero and how it is all pervasive all through out the DNA structure in the attached image. I have been telling that I is that nothing which dwells in everything and this DNA structure seems to prove that notion. Singularity is right with in the duality. Absolute is right with in the relativity. This proves that both of these states of singularity and duality are interconnected and are the source of life.
Love,
Sridattadev.
Dear Amazigh
Your short but intensive essay is to be linked to my ideas of reality.
The dualities you gave are indeed only a grasp of all the dualities that exist in our causal universe. Between all dualities there is energy, the essence of our existence, between birth and death there is LIFE. A battery gives no power when it is empty and both poles have no difference.
The e-duality you introduce I perceive as the qubit reality, in the quantum "reality" a qubit can be both ends of duality , the duality itself is displayed in the Bloch sphere.
So in-between these dualities there is the essence just as I am trying to describe in my essay : THE QUEST FOR THE PRIMAL SEQUENCE , which I hope that you can read, comment and rate. I think that you will find there some indications to the answers of the questions you are posing and your comments are welcome.
I hope that you will be able to spare some causal time and give like I did (from 2.8 to 3.1) a rating that is in coherence with your appreciation.
best regards
Wilhelmus
Dear Wilhelmus,
Thank you for appreciating my essay.
If I suppose that the Universe is information. And if I also suppose that the Universe is built from simple to more complex. Which system, to choose, a simple binary, or complex decimal ?
My answer is clear : the binary.
I rated your essay.
Respectfully, and good luck.
Very important ! Very important ! Very important ! Very important !
The eUniverse is a whole. A theory which does not consider the whole eUniverse would be unspeakable to claim to be the theory of everything. In physics only, it is possible. But not if it concerns the entire eUniverse.
The theory is there to gather a largest number of objects and phenomena, in larger and larger sets, and the dream is that only one set, the largest set that can exist and we call eUniverse, that collect all them and so they share the same language of communication, the same principles and laws.
Can this dream be reached ? My answer is a big YES.
It is a Theory which would include all other theories because it is a binary Theory, on the basis of the information, and information is the basis of eUniverse, its authenticity, its strength and its source.
This big Theory, the mother of all the theories, I found it, it is announced now, but it has been a long time since I work above and since I was convinced of my approach.
And a single concept claims to be able to gather all the fields, all the domains, to apply at every level and all the scales, Its name is eDuality.
From eDuality will emerge a new science, a new philosophy, and mathematics will be consolidated in their abstract role next to concrete of physics.
To work, the world needs its both legs, use its both hands, see with its both eyes, and to think, worry about the two contradictory points of view at its disposal.
Wheeler's dream has come true : "It from bit" ; to me : "It's a bit" ; this Theory such as predicted : A simple Theory to explain a eUniverse so complex.
I summarize the idea of Wheeler : Finally, it is also simple and we did not even think of it.
I apologize if the translation is not good.
Amazigh HANNOU