Thank you Antony,

Your essay is very pertinent and relevant.

Bits of Wheeler are eDuality that we observe in everything.

I am writing a book about eDuality that explains all things, even our reasoning.

You said :

« By definition, the first two numbers in the Fibonacci sequence are 0 and 1, and each subsequent number is the sum of the previous two. »

and

« Both the Fibonacci sequence and Wheeler's foundational question rely upon 0 and 1. »

I analysed Fibonnacci serie before and find the number « two », and eDuality is at the basis of it, sits at the core of this eReality.

You are in the right way, continue to developpe the idea of Fibonacci sequence in relation with eDuality.

Two, couples, pairs, opposites, ... are the bits « 0 » and « 1 » of our eReality.

The two dimensionalities are everywhere.

eDuality provides the basis upon which all the Universe is built.

From the First and Primary Principle (eDuality) we can say significantly : Thing never, absolutely never existed without its opposite.

eReality is a virtuality, and virtuality is our eReality.

For me : John Wheeler's dream is eReality.

« It » from « bit », or « bit » from « It », « It » is a « bit », and « bit » is « It », all have emerged from the same fundamental eReality.

I also rated highly your essay.

Having read so many insightful essays, I am probably not the only one to find that my views have crystallized, and that I can now move forward with growing confidence. I cannot exactly say who in the course of the competition was most inspiring - probably it was the continuous back and forth between so many of us. In this case, we should all be grateful to each other.

If I may, I'd like to express some of my newer conclusions - by themselves, so to speak, and independently of the logic that justifies them; the logic is, of course, outlined in my essay.

I now see the Cosmos as founded upon positive-negative charges: It is a binary structure and process that acquires its most elemental dimensional definition with the appearance of Hydrogen - one proton, one electron.

There is no other interaction so fundamental and all-pervasive as this binary phenomenon: Its continuance produces our elements - which are the array of all possible inorganic variants.

Once there exists a great enough correlation between protons and electrons - that is, once there are a great many Hydrogen atoms, and a great many other types of atoms as well - the continuing Cosmic binary process arranges them all into a new platform: Life.

This phenomenon is quite simply inherent to a Cosmos that has reached a certain volume of particles; and like the Cosmos from which it evolves, life behaves as a binary process.

Life therefore evolves not only by the chance events of natural selection, but also by the chance interactions of its underlying binary elements.

This means that ultimately, DNA behaves as does the atom - each is a particle defined by, and interacting within, its distinct Vortex - or 'platform'.

However, as the cosmic system expands, simple sensory activity is transformed into a third platform, one that is correlated with the Organic and Inorganic phenomena already in existence: This is the Sensory-Cognitive platform.

Most significantly, the development of Sensory-Cognition into a distinct platform, or Vortex, is the event that is responsible for creating (on Earth) the Human Species - in whom the mind has acquired the dexterity to focus upon itself.

Humans affect, and are affected by, the binary field of Sensory-Cognition: We can ask specific questions and enunciate specific answers - and we can also step back and contextualize our conclusions: That is to say, we can move beyond the specific, and create what might be termed 'Unified Binary Fields' - in the same way that the forces acting upon the Cosmos, and holding the whole structure together, simultaneously act upon its individual particles, giving them their motion and structure.

The mind mimics the Cosmos - or more exactly, it is correlated with it.

Thus, it transpires that the role of chance decreases with evolution, because this dual activity (by which we 'particularize' binary elements, while also unifying them into fields) clearly increases our control over the foundational binary process itself.

This in turn signifies that we are evolving, as life in general has always done, towards a new interaction with the Cosmos.

Clearly, the Cosmos is participatory to a far greater degree than Wheeler imagined - with the evolution of the observer continuously re-defining the system.

You might recall the logic by which these conclusions were originally reached in my essay, and the more detailed structure that I also outline there. These elements still hold; the details stated here simply put the paradigm into a sharper focus, I believe.

With many thanks and best wishes,

John

jselye@gmail.com

    Dear Amazigh,

    I would like to rate your essay with maximum score but so far I haven't received any information from you regarding comments on my essay. For further details, contact me at, bnsreenath@yahoo.co.in, soon.

    best,

    sreenath

      Dear Amazigh,

      Thanks for your rating and I have too rated your essay.

      Best,

      Sreenath

      Dear All participants.

      We are at the end of this essay contest.

      In conclusion, at the question to know if Information is more fundamental than Matter, there is a good reason to answer that Matter is made of an amazing mixture of eInfo and eEnergy, at the same time.

      Matter is thus eInfo made with eEnergy rather than answer it is made with eEnergy and eInfo ; because eInfo is eEnergy, and the one does not go without the other one.

      eEnergy and eInfo are the two basic Principles of the eUniverse. Nothing can exist if it is not eEnergy, and any object is eInfo, and therefore eEnergy.

      And consequently our eReality is eInfo made with eEnergy. And the final verdict is : eReality is virtual, and virtuality is our fundamental eReality.

      Good luck to the winners,

      And see you soon, with good news on this topic, and the Theory of Everything.

      Hey Amazigh,

      What does the lower case little e stand for in all of your words (e)Energy?

      Also, in your essay you propose a duality of info (in binary digits) and energy-matter, or is it something else that you are saying? Saying that there is a duality makes sense, but stressing that it is one with matter-energy is would be more clear if they were shown to be the same thing.

      Otherwise a nice read.

      Amos.

        Amazigh

        Yes, most cultures have embraced duality. Zen considers it an illusion. True, Zen is in a minority. But is truth nothing but a vulgar democracy?

        Yes, the acknowledgement of duality goes back millenia. However, already the ancient Greeks questioned whether the Law of the Excluded Middle must be accepted, and suggested that there could be more values than true or false. Since then, the studies of multivaled logics have flourished. Duality in it strict form is not longer evident.

        You mentioned Bohr's Yin/Yang. But whereas Yin/Yang is a kind of duality, it is also not the same one as the clear-cut one which your other classifications suggest. That is the meaning of the two smaller circles in the Yin/Yang symbol.

        Good luck in your further quests.

        David

          • [deleted]

          Dear Amazigh,

          In particle scenario, information that is the transfer of energy, is duality; whereas in string-matter continuum, transfer of matter with energy is the information, in that duality is with singularity. Thus information is continuum in nature.

          With best wishes,

          Jayakar

            Dear William Amos Carine, David M Reid, Jayakar Johnson Joseph,

            Yes, (e) is a mystery.

            (e) for eEnergy, for a new science in coming : a binary Science, dual Science, fundamental Science.

            I have discovered the functionning of eUniverse : eDuality is in all things, like motion.

            And all things arising, by couple, pair.

            « simple, complex », « wave, particle », « space, time », « matter, antimatter », « electicity, magnetism », « Weak force , Strong force », « gravity, expansion of space », and so on...

            Duality is in all cultures (Egyptians, Greecs, Indians, Chineses, ...) and in each one of us, but never explained and equaled like in China.

            The « Yin, Yang » duality is full of truth, but this must be completed and reinterpreted, like our Science.

            eDuality is present in physics, mathematics, philosophy, economics, biology, chemistry, religion, our thinking, in computers and mechanical machinery, linguistics, and so on...

            Each one of us speaks with eDuality.

            eDuality is the same everywhere.

            There is one kind of eDuality when this concept is clear known.

            eUniverse is very simple at the begining, very complex after.

            This eDuality, these opposites, these contraries, are the 0 and 1 of information.

            It takes a book to explain all these concepts : eEnergy, eInfo, eReality, eDuality, and so on...

            Good luck,

            Amazigh H.

            Dear Amazigh,

            I look forward to reading your book! Let me know as soon as it's published! I'd be very interested to read it!

            Best wishes,

            Antony

            Amazigh,

            Thank you for reading my essay and rating it so. I did the same for yours. At first it seemed more philosophical and out of my knowledge area, but after re-reading it again the beauty of what you are expounding jumped out at me as it directly relates also to my essay. You state "The first principle that governs the universe is Duality". This statement is insightful and powerful to me, in more ways than you know. Within my essay, I introduced Area Calculus which ALSO relies on dual functions. It is my hope in the future to expand my research on these dual functions to help explain how a wave can have the characteristics we associate with a particle, how an attraction can also be viewed as a reduced repulsion, and how a mirror image of General Relativity can be mathematically constructed. Duality indeed! Highest marks for a short but insightful essay!

            Kindest Regards,

            Jeff Baugher

              Dear Amazigh,

              In your essay, you have underscored an important point that is fundamental to understanding the universe - the duality of existence. Everything that 'is' exists against the backdrop of that which it 'is not.' Additionally, there is a 'balancing opposite' to all things, which is also referred to as duality.

              I also took the time to read your post, "Very Important . . ." and I agree with you that the universe must be considered as a WHOLE in order to understand it.

              Thank you for your contribution. I rated you kindly, and wish you the very best in the future.

              Sincerely,

              Ralph

                Dear Amazigh,

                Thanks for commenting and rating on my thread.

                I already read your very precise text on "eReality".

                I would also rate you.

                I can only say regarding your "eInfo" and "eEnergy".

                I think both are same and are create a 'digital' or

                "eInfo" limitation in our basic perception about the

                fundamental nature.

                I hope all my best wishes for your essay in this contest.

                Regards

                Dipak

                http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1855

                  Dear Amazigh,

                  I am very thankful for your attention to my work and for support to me. I have read your essay and I want mark that we have put some different tasks. However your judgements and definitions looks to me very interesting (maybe somewhat disputable also!) and as deserved to attention/examination. I can say definitely that you have presented one nice essay in the contest, therefore I have rated your essay properly.

                  Good wishes,

                  George

                    Dear Amazigh,

                    Interesting, very reasonable and relevant essay.

                    Do you think that Mao Zedong did well in his thought and action?

                    No opinion from my side, just a question.

                    I just found an excerpt on Internet.

                    "

                    (Bingshen August 21), September 25, 1956, Mao Zedong on the wrong duality.

                    1956, 25, 2009, Mao Zedong with some Latin American representative of the party's conversation, recalling some of the historical experience of the Communist Party of China. He pointed out: "The Communists do not be afraid to make mistakes. Errors duality. The error on the one hand damage the party, harm the people; on the other hand is a good teacher, a good education to the party, and education of the people, good revolution. Failure is the mother of success. Failure if no good, why is the mother of success? Errors committed too much, we must turn. This is Marxism. 'Extremes meet' errors pile up, the light will come. "

                    Best wishes,

                    Michel

                      Dear Amazigh,

                      You concluded:

                      "The first principle that governs the universe is Duality. The principle of conservation has come after. Give the same interest to duality that to motion, and things will better.

                      -We know matter is dual as well as the light is. So if duality is everywhere, how to recognize this fact, as we did for the motion ?

                      -The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe.

                      -Science today has an urgent need for a revolutionary theory, logical and qualitative, on the Functioning of the Univers and affects all aspects: mathematics, physics, philosophical, cosmological, sociological, economic, political, etc. "

                      Thanks for inviting me to your blog, I agree in general and if I may promote my theory based on this duality in answering your call for a new theory: KQID please comment my essay Child of Qbit in time and hope you give me a raise in ranking if you approve it. If I may introduce KQID with a long summary.

                      In summary, quoting my answer to Michel Planat and please forgive me for being respectfully and humbly boastful to counter the doubtful: First, KQID Qbit is (00,1,-1) which is singularity Qbit Multiverse in zeroth dimension at absolute zero temperature that computes and projects Einstein complex coordinates (Pythagoras complex triangles or Fu Xi's gua or Fibonacci numbers) onto the 2D Minkowski Null geodesics and then instantaneously into the 3D in Lm, our Multiverse timeline to allows Existence to move around 360 degree and its arrows of time or ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm). New informations are created and distributed per ≤10^-1000 seconds. No information is ever deleted. KQID is the only theory out there that can calculate the dark energy of our Multiverse ≤10^-153Pm/Pv and the minimum bits as the lower bound ≥ 10^153 bits in our Multiverse. KQID is the only theory that I know here that proves bit = it; KQID calculates Sun lights into Sun bits; calculates electron, proton and neutron in terms of bits; set up equivalent principle of bits with energy and matter. Therefore, Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it. Please correct me if I am wrong. And, KQID is the only theory in this universe has the mechanism on how Holographic Principle works. Also answer the mother of all questions, the why, how and what Existence.

                      KQID's Origin of Mass:

                      Furthermore, KQID is the only theory that can explain the origin of mass as A+S=E=ψI(CTE) that Wilczek said admittedly in 2012 after the discovery of Higgs boson mH ≈ 125 GeV in his tour the force article Origins of Mass arXiv:1206.7114v2 that human beings do not yet know the origins of mass and it is not even in sight. He concluded on page 32/35 and lamented like Einstein 51 years before: "We've passed some milestones, but the end of the road is not in sight." Einstein, after his landmark article 107 years ago on m=E/c^2 showing mass in terms of energy in 1905, "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend on Its Energy Content?" But this equation required us to know what is energy before we can define the origin of mass. Einstein truly like Socrates before him as the wisest man in Athens according to the Oracle simply because Socrates claims that he does not know anything, Einstein the wise similarly stated his own ignorance of energy in 1951: "All these fifty years of pondering have not brought me closer to answering the question, what is light quanta?"

                      KQID's origin of mass is simply A + S = E = ψI(CTE) that is Dao's Wuwei (the least action moves) maximizing the flow of A, anti-entropic time-future bits-waves function moving from future to time-present bits-waves function E in optimizing the E flow and minimizing the flow of S, entropic time-past bits-waves function moving from time-past to time-present in terms of both bits and joules SI. That also leads to Pauli's exclusion principle and the lowest amount of energy arrangement required in an atomic system. See KQID Ouroboros Equations of Existence.

                      Michel asked the heart of KQID: "Where is the FAPAMA concept coming from in your frame? I mean who is the influencial thinker?"

                      First from Fu Xi's gua(trigrams) Ξ ☷ as DIRECT representations of nature, from Pythagoras's all things are numbers, from Jesus's Trinity of Father, Son and Holy Ghost, from Hindu's Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, from Planck's intelligent mind as the matrix of all matter and from Maxwell's infinite being with infinite storage capacity who computes in bits/qbits to create and distributes energy that does works, and from Landauer who teaches us that information is physical and nature can freely create and distribute bits/qbits but to erase/deletes the created bits/qbits must incur entropy cost somewhere else in Multiverse. That is why our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit does not and can not erase any information. The computation of Holographic Principle must be within the one and only Qbit(00,1,-1) showing that Existence origin is from Non-existence and the calculations of Einstein complex coordinates can only be done at absolute zero temperature in which Bose-Einstein superconductivity perfectly happens without resistance or entropy. From Susskind and Hooft, who got the idea from Beckenstein-Hawking black hole entropy, proposed/discovered Holographic Principle and Hooft's quantum entanglements must be from the beginning. Thus FAPAMA Qbit must be there from the beginning (Hooft) and splits freely without cost (Landauer and Guth) to itself and Multiverse infinitely every absolute digital time T≤ 10^-1000 seconds. Moreover, every T-moment, our FAPAMA Qbit escapes extinction from its forever chasing companion Non-existence to be reunited only just barely by rebooting, resynchronizing, refreshing, renewing and reborn itself, so that it is forever just newly born evolved immortal baby. This gives us the arrow of time. Ξ00☷ = < S | E | A > = ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) ⊆ T. Time reemerges every digital T-moment. Every T-moment Qbit resynchronizes all Minkowski events in time-present. This is the KEY in re-entangling everything and keeping things in order and not crashing down. Complementarily, KQID also supports block Multiverse within T-moment in which all time-past-present-futures are forged into the NOW that in turn enabling resynchronization above! Time disappears. Yes, Einstein-KQID relativity rules (8πG/c^4)Tμν - Kqid(ΑΘ-ΘS)gμν = Τμν block Multiverse. Yes, Existence is the founder of creativity, it must invent new ways to escape from the grip of its Non-existence complementarity-companion. Dear Akinbo, KQID answers your immortal question if our founder is it or bit. The Founder Qbit is both bit and it simultaneously. Existence-Non-existence is one Qbit. This Qbit is It as Existence. FAPAMA: FA in Chinese means law like law of gravity that gives Existence order in time, PA from the concept of papa or the Holy Ghost or Brahma or Fu XI heaven Ξ that connects everything with everything else as one meaningful whole that manifests in quantum mechanics as Hooft's physical quantum entanglement. Yes, quantum entanglement phenomena must be instantaneous with infinite speed because it is within that one Qbit, there is no gap, no space, no time, no dimension, no locality but it is everywhere locally in physical forms that are derivative from MA as mama trigram earth ☷ that gives birth to mass and structure of Existence in ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) relativistic Multiverse in which time contracts, thus length contracts and mass/energy increases. So you see KQID gives picture of Existence as fantastically magical Disney's world, a holographic but physically relativistic fiction but real Multiverse. We are active game changers in our Wheeler's participatory magical kingdom, the Leibniz's happiest Multiverse possible. Because we are limited, we have choices to make including mistakes that lead to man/nature made miseries; so that we have free will to enjoy this wonderful make-believe holographic world. Let us sing and praise Xuan Yuan's Da Tong song and dance.

                      Amazigh, we do have similar idea not only as co-passenger on timeship earth but also co-mind sharing adventurers.

                      Best wishes,

                      LeoKoGuan

                        Hi Amazigh,

                        I have read your elegant Essay, as I promised you in my Essay page. Here are my comments/questions.

                        1) I find that your Essay is quite poetical, and, in turn, very particular.

                        2) I like that you emphasize the importance of duality and your statement that "The first principle that governs the universe is Duality" is intriguing and could be really correct.

                        3) What do you think on my statement concerning the duality between it and bit, i.e. "Information tells physics how to work. Physics tells information how to flow"?

                        In any case, your Essay is very peculiar, beautiful and enjoyable, thus, I will give you a high rate.

                        Cheers,

                        Ch.

                          Dear Amazigh: In his essay makes an interesting collection of the emergence of the principle of duality as you define it.

                          Do you make this definition: "-The Duality is the common language by excellence, the integral link between all the elements of nature, the machine code of the universe."

                          I totally agree with the importance of the principle of duality. But we need a description of the same physical and mathematical.

                          In principle one could start with a definition of duality at the level of mathematical functions. For example, a mathematical function and / or algorithm has duality, with a sense applicable to the physical world, if you meet certain conditions or axioms.

                          1) must be multivalued. 2) adopts the dual and complementary values ​​0 and 1. Ie represent truth values ​​of logical functions.

                          One of these functions, within the core of the quantum theory is: EXP (i2Pin) = 1 = cos (2Pin) ix sin (2Pin) (= 0)

                          This function is implicit main duality of all: truth function 1, 0. 1.0 etc probability. I Rate your essay days ago with a high punctuation. Thank you for your comments on my essay. And I wish you the best of luck. Angel Garces Doz

                            Dear Amazigh H.,

                            Thank you for posting in my essay where I characterize "information" as the substance of fields, and consequently as a substantial element of nature.

                            I read your essay and APPRECIATE your interesting ideas and the way you express them.

                            Antoine.