Hi Jeff,

Today I have discovered very interesting essay by Carolyn Devereux. We certainly are speaking of the same concept also with her. As she is an academic entrant I have asked if she were interested in the experiment. There is no answer at the moment.

You have inspired me with Nordstroem's equation and your modifications. So I will follow that hint as I do not know his publications.

But meanwhile you have an access to a laboratory? The experiment seems to be rather simple using polarization. The glory will come to the first experimenter...

I have made my best to be sure that your essay will get into the final.

Best regards and thanks,

Dear Jeff,

I have now finished reviewing all 180 essays for the contest and appreciate your contribution to this competition.

I have been thoroughly impressed at the breadth, depth and quality of the ideas represented in this contest. In true academic spirit, if you have not yet reviewed my essay, I invite you to do so and leave your comments.

You can find the latest version of my essay here:

http://fqxi.org/data/forum-attachments/Borrill-TimeOne-V1.1a.pdf

(sorry if the fqxi web site splits this url up, I haven't figured out a way to not make it do that).

May the best essays win!

Kind regards,

Paul Borrill

paul at borrill dot com

Dear Baugher,

Your perspectives on universe is indicative more in favour of string-matter continuum universe, in that lattice of simplex quantizes the infinite universe without any antimatter, while a generic wave mechanics that unify the mechanics of both the acoustic and EM waves, describes the dynamics of the universe.

Thus in particle scenario, the notion of matter-antimatter is causal for the information loses in Zero-Referenced Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

With best wishes,

Jayakar