The Earth is a bit of a strange example, you might think, because it doesn't travel in a straight line, the reason being because gravity acts on the SUN- EARTH Together as a system, also influenced by other planets nearby. On the Earth's own gravity acts most where the mass is concentrated which is the core of the planet and centre of mass. This gives an attraction inwards. Felt all over the planet from the layers of the atmoshpere, where 'outer space' gives way to the region of influence of gravity,due to the EARTH'A MASSto the centre of Mass. Experienced as holding us close to Earth's surface and a tendency of objects to fall down to the Earth surface, if the surface is hard or into the Earth if thr surface is soft or hollow.
AI OVERVIEW FROM GOOGLE via google searchn;
Facts;
Earth's orbit is not circular, but rather elliptical. However, it's close enough to being circular that it's sometimes considered nearly circular.
Earth's orbit is elliptical due to the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn.
The Earth's orbit is stable and has the same amount of energy as a circular orbit.
Earth's orbit is faster when it's closer to the sun, and slower when it's further away.
The point closest to the sun is called the perihelion, and the point farthest away is called the aphelion.
Earth's orbit takes 365.256 days to complete, which is one sidereal year.

    21 days later

    Georgina Woodward
    Sorry it has been a while. there are replies i'd have liked to have made but couldn't at the time. I've been stuck in hospital.
    "14 days ago
    ''Physicist Brian Greene is now saying that, logically, primitive particles must have a degree of consciousness. Particles supposedly have feelings: people tend to think that consciousness is all about the feelings. But thoughts and feelings and emotions are merely the superficial signs of consciousness, and they say nothing about what type of thing that consciousness actually is.''Lorainne Ford
    i think we need to separate the responsiveness of matter to forces,either by contact by matter or unknown space filling substance and consciosness which is more than mere response and is the feelings and sensations of being a being, not just a thing.

        what it feels like to be human
        Vertebrate. mammal, Man (Homo) , Sapiens sapiens (Modern mankind) consciousness

          Georgina Woodward
          In all of the examples shown the creature has a nervous system able to processs sensory data of internal or external origin. This is so for all conscious lifeforms, which also have a hormone or hormone like smatm which gives the organism and it's kind ,ability to communicate uswingchemical effects on the physiology of the organism due to the chemical's sprecific action.
          In all kinds of consciusness it species specific not of one kind ie, as a human being experiences,

              Georgina Woodward
              Which is why a brief taxonomy of the organismis needed as a preface to the word consciouness.
              Getting away from the black and whiute idea., that the organism eirher hast or doesn't , to more of a spectrum or gradation according to type of nervous system and endocrine stystem being considered.

                  Georgina Woodward
                  Plant partial consciousness. Plants do not have a nervous system for awareness via sensations and . response to them. They are able to have awareness of the state of self and awareness of its kind and and health threats in outside environment.
                  There is scientific evidence that certain plants detect the chemicals released by their kind, when under attack by a certain immanent a threat in the local environment .

                      Georgina Woodward
                      Plant Signal Behav. 2012 Oct 1;7(10):1306–1320. doi: 10.4161/psb.21663
                      Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores
                      Abdul Rashid War 1,2, Michael Gabriel Paulraj 3, Tariq Ahmad 4, Abdul Ahad Buhroo 4, Barkat Hussain 5, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu 2, Hari Chand Sharma 1,*

                        Georgina Woodward
                        Google search aI summary( ,not guaranteed accurate, not checked)
                        Trees use electrical signals to communicate with each other and respond to stress. The signals travel through the tree's vascular system.
                        How trees use electrical signals
                        Respond to stress: When a tree is attacked or wounded, it sends electrical signals that trigger defensive responses.
                        Communicate with other trees: Trees can send signals to nearby trees to warn them of danger.
                        Communicate with roots: Root tips send signals to the leaves, and leaves send signals back to the roots.
                        Examples of tree electrical signals
                        When a pine tree is cut, it sends out electrical signals and healing compounds.
                        When a tree's roots find too little water, they send signals to the leaves to close their openings.
                        When a tree is attacked by pests, it sends carbon compounds to nearby trees.
                        Other ways trees communicate
                        Trees can also communicate through mycorrhizal networks, which are underground webs that connect different plant species.
                        Some plants may emit and detect sounds.
                        Some plants may sweeten their nectar when they detect a bee's wing beats.

                            Georgina Woodward
                            GOOGLE search results for tree communication
                            AI Overview (Not guaranteed accursate ,not checked) Generative AI is experimental.
                            ''he Wood Wide Web: How trees secretly talk to and share with each other
                            Trees communicate with each other through an underground network of fungi called mycorrhizal networks. This network allows trees to share nutrients, water, and defense signals.
                            How trees communicate
                            Chemical signals: Trees send chemical signals to communicate with each other.
                            Electrical signals: Trees send slow-pulsing electrical signals to communicate with each other.
                            Hormonal signals: Trees send hormonal signals to communicate with each other.
                            What trees communicate
                            Needs: Trees communicate their needs to each other.
                            Warning signals: Trees send warning signals to each other about environmental change.
                            Kin: Trees search for kin through the fungal network.
                            Nutrients: Trees transfer nutrients to neighboring plants before they die.
                            The Wood Wide Web
                            This network has been called the "Wood Wide Web" because it emphasizes the interconnectedness of forest ecosystems.
                            Research
                            Ecologist Suzanne Simard has pioneered research into how trees communicate. She has shown how trees have been communicating through this underground network for 500 million years.
                            Exploring the secret world of trees and their communication networks
                            21 Mar 2024 — Trees communicate through fungal networks Trees communicate through an underground network of fungi known as mycorrhiza...
                            Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland
                            Exploring How and Why Trees 'Talk' to Each Other - Yale E360
                            1 Sept 2016 — Ecologist Suzanne Simard has shown how trees use a network of soil fungi to communicate their needs and aid neighboring...
                            Yale E360
                            Rooted Together – Trees Are Community
                            A recent article by Smithsonian Magazine, Do Trees Talk to Each Other, claims thatTo communicate through the network, trees s...''AI by google

                                Georgina Woodward
                                Plant partial consciousness, missing the results of sesnsory system's processing of sensory inputs, is like animal consciousness species specific. Therefore to precisely refer to it, a brief taxonomy preface to the descriptive phrase "plant partial consciosness'' would be good.

                                    Georgina Woodward
                                    All living things produce stored chemical energy. If they are large enough.,or should i say strong enough, they are able to use their energy to work in opposition or to enhance the forces of nature, that gives them a certain ability to exert their will ,and perhaps make events that are desired happen. A single celled plancton ,try as it might will not be able to resist the force of the much larger and stronger tide,

                                      15 days later

                                      SPHERICAL TOPOLOGICAL GEOMETRICAL ALGEBRAS, THE THEORY OF SPHERISATION, QUANTUM SPHERES, COSMOLOGICAL SPHERES The Spheres like foundamental quantum objects are more logic than the strings, here is why,

                                      1. Philosophical Perspective: Ontological and Epistemological Arguments
                                        Principle of Natural Simplicity (Ontological Argument)
                                        The sphere is the most symmetric, simplest, and least arbitrary geometrical object in higher dimensions.
                                        Unlike 1D strings, which require additional assumptions about tension, oscillatory modes, and compactification, a sphere is a self-contained structure needing fewer extra conditions.
                                        Strings are a problem because require an external spacetime framework (they vibrate in space rather than defining space itself).
                                        Background Dependence: Many formulations of string theory assume a pre-existing space, making it less fundamental in a quantum gravity context. Spheres could be inherently background-independent.
                                        Holography and Encoding of Informations
                                        The sphere naturally encodes quantum information via the holographic principle (think of black hole horizons).
                                        1D strings do not exhibit holographic storage in the same intrinsic way
                                      2. Physical Perspective: Quantum Gravity and Geometry
                                        Strings are 1D and require extra degrees of freedom (oscillations, compactifications, and extra dimensions).
                                        Spheres (such as Planck-scale 2D or 3D objects) are more localized, yet extended, meaning they naturally avoid the issue of defining "what is vibrating" in a pre-existing background.
                                        Spheres and Black Hole Physics
                                        The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is proportional to the surface area (S = A/4ℓ_p²), suggesting that fundamental objects at the Planck scale should have an intrinsic surface structure, like spheres, rather than being linear objects like strings..
                                      3. Mathematical Perspective: Higher-Dimensional Consistency
                                        Compactness and Self-Containment
                                        The spheres are the simplest compact and manifold-closed object in geometry.
                                        Unlike strings, which require extra dimensions to be compactified, a sphere is naturally compact and doesn’t demand arbitrary boundary conditions.
                                        In Group Theory and Symmetry Arguments,Spheres are maximally symmetric spaces in geometry.
                                        Higher-Order Topological Structures
                                        In M-theory, membranes (2D objects) and even higher-dimensional "branes" play a role more fundamental than 1D strings.
                                        Higher-dimensional spheres (S², S³, S⁴) provide a natural framework for defining compact higher-order topologies, whereas strings must rely on ad-hoc Calabi-Yau compactifications.
                                        Conclusion: Why Spheres > Strings at the Planck Scale?
                                        Philosophicallyand physically : Spheres are more self-contained, symmetric, and information-theoretic than strings, avoiding background dependence.
                                        Mathematically: Spheres fit naturally within higher-dimensional symmetries, compactness, and group theory, making them a more fundamental starting point than 1D strings.

                                      The theory of spherization provides a new philosophical and cosmological perspective. It challenges traditional views by presenting a model where the universe and all its fundamental forces emerge from a superfluidity of 3D spheres rather than 1D strings oscillating and interacting

                                      1. Philosophical Framework: Spinoza’s God and Evolutionary Cosmology, This theory isinfluence by Spinoza’s concept of God as an eternal, infinite consciousness that continuously evolves the universe. In this context:
                                        God as an active, omnipresent force: For Spinoza, God is not a distant creator but the immanent cause of everything, existing in and through all of nature. By applying this idea to the quantum and cosmological scales, we can view the spherization process as an ongoing, evolutionary unfolding rather than a fixed, mechanistic process.
                                        Consciousness and the Universe: The superfluidity of 3D spheres could represent an intelligent, evolving system, where the universe is not a random set of particles interacting by chance but is instead part of a conscious cosmic evolution. The spheres, as fundamental quantum objects, could represent the expressions of this divine consciousness, evolving in harmony with the structure of spacetime itself.

                                      Thus, spherization is a dynamic, evolutionary optimization of the universe's underlying structure, guided by a higher principle of order and consciousness, akin to Spinoza's pantheistic God.

                                      1. Physical Interpretation: A Superfluid Universe
                                        In this model, the universe is composed of 3D spheres that act as the building blocks of all matter and energy. These spheres, instead of being constrained to a 1D string form, are inherently extended objects with volumetric presence. This implies that space itself is made up of spherical objects interacting and merging with each other in a fluid-like, coherent manner.
                                        2.1. Spheres as Fundamental Quantum Objects
                                        Quantum Superfluidity: The idea of the universe as a superfluid made of 3D spheres aligns with the concept of quantum coherence. Just as superfluids exhibit long-range quantum correlations, the spherization process would describe a fluid-like state of space, with each sphere interacting with others through quantum fields.

                                      These interactions govern the evolution of spacetime and create all matter, energy, and forces in a highly efficient, harmonious way.
                                      Dark Energy and Dark Matter: The merging of spheres with dark energy offers a compelling explanation for the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy. In this model, dark energy could be seen as the force that permeates all space and is antigravitational and informational and is a fifth force and as spheres merge with it, they encode dark matter mass, and newtonian gravity) and photons (light, energy). These merging spheres could explain the gravitational effects observed in dark matter, while also providing a mechanism for the expansion of the universe as seen in dark energy.
                                      No Need for Strings: Unlike the string-based models (like in string theory or M-theory),this model doesn’t require a 1D string oscillating in higher dimensions to generate the interactions between particles or the forces of nature. Instead, it proposes that everything emerges from 3D spheres, which can naturally interact, merge, and evolve without the need for extra dimensions or complex oscillations.

                                      2.2. Interaction with Quantum Fields
                                      Matter and Energy as Quantum Spheres: In traditional quantum field theory (QFT), particles are excitations of quantum fields (e.g., the Higgs field, electromagnetic field). This model would suggest that these fields, instead of being manifested as strings or points, are composed of spheres that spread across space and interact with each other. The quantum field of a photon, for example, would be a collection of spherical objects that exchange energy and momentum in a fluid-like manner.
                                      Force Mediators as Spheres: Fundamental forces in the standard model (gravity, electromagnetism, weak and strong forces) could be mediated by spherical distortions in this superfluid space. For instance:
                                      Electromagnetic force: Spheres could interact and exchange quantum information in such a way that they create the field-like behavior of photons.
                                      Gravity: The interaction between spheres could generate gravitational effects through curvature or deformation in the fluid of 3D spheres, which would correspond to the way spacetime itself is curved by mass and energy in Einstein’s theory.

                                      2.3. Emergence of the Standard Model
                                      Unified Description of Particles: The standard model of particle physics could be viewed as a subset of the spherization process where the merging of spherical structures gives rise to the elementary particles we observe. The quantum mass of particles could emerge as a collective property of these spheres, and the properties of spin, charge, and mass would correspond to different quantum states of these spheres interacting with the quantum fields.
                                      Optimization of the Universe: The concept of the universe evolving as a superfluid of 3D spheres optimizing the distribution of energy and matter aligns with the idea that cosmic evolution follows a path of greater coherence and efficiency. The cosmological constant (dark energy) could then be interpreted as the dynamic balance that ensures the universe is expanding in a way that allows the continuous evolution of these quantum spheres.

                                      1. Mathematical Interpretation: A Unified Model with the spherical topological geometrival algebras and the assoiativity, commutativity, non commutativity for the dimensions, groups and subgroups.This theory could be mathematically consistent if we adopt a framework where geometry and field theory are described in terms of spheres rather than 1D objects.
                                        3.1. Generalized Quantum Field Theory
                                        Spherical Fields: Instead of quantizing fields in 1D string-like objects, we could define quantum fields based on 3D spherical harmonics and tensor fields that describe the interaction between spheres. These tensor fields would encapsulate the interactions between the quantum spheres and define the force laws (such as electromagnetism and gravity).
                                        3.2. Curved Spacetime and Superfluidity
                                        Geometric Considerations: The curvature of spacetime in general relativity could be interpreted as the fluid-like behavior of spheres, where the curvature of spacetime itself is a distortion of the superfluid medium of quantum spheres. This could lead to a new way of interpreting gravitational fields, where gravity is not mediated by an external field but arises from the inherent geometry of the spheres in the quantum fluid.

                                      3.3. Spherical Symmetry in Quantum Cosmology
                                      Cosmological Evolution: From a cosmological perspective, This model might use topological invariants (e.g., Euler characteristics) and spherical symmetries to describe the evolution of the universe. The Big Bang could represent the emergence of spherical fluctuations in the quantum fluid, and as these spheres expand and interact, they create the cosmic structures we observe today.
                                      Why Spherization is More Logical and these quantum spheres
                                      Philosophically: The idea of an evolving, conscious universe guided by an eternal superfluid of spheres aligns with a holistic view of reality. Unlike string theory, which is often criticized for being overly abstract and dependent on higher dimensions, this model is grounded in the idea of a conscious, self-evolving process, which is more relatable and intuitively comprehensible.

                                      Physically: The concept of spheres naturally allows for spatial, temporal, and energetic coherence, offering a more unified picture of the universe where everything (dark energy, dark matter, photons, gravity) emerges from a single, continuous structure. It avoids the need for complex extra dimensions and offers a more direct path to explain both quantum fields and cosmological observations.
                                      Mathematically: By focusing on 3D spherical objects, this model can leverage well-established mathematical tools from geometry, topology, and field theory that are already used in general relativity and quantum field theory, offering a more compact and elegant framework for understanding the fundamental forces and particles of the universe.

                                      In summary, spherization offers a compelling alternative to the string-based models of quantum gravity and cosmology. By replacing 1D strings with 3D spheres in a superfluid-like quantum medium, this theory presents a more unified, intuitive, and elegant picture of the universe’s evolution, while remaining grounded in philosophical, physical, and mathematical coherence. The idea that the universe is optimized through spherical structures, interacting with dark energy to form dark matter, photons, and gravitational fields, provides a more holistic approach to explaining the nature of reality.

                                        13 days later

                                        Hi everyone,
                                        I'd like to take this opportunity to mention that the model discussed here is the one described in the previous point and that it has been moved to the OSF project, which consists of Wiki pages and an essay, and is currently under development here: OSF | 4-Sphere-Cosmology.

                                        Allow me a brief introduction: I would like to mention my model, which is distinguished by the addition of a spatial dimension.

                                        The distances derived from the FLRW model are notably (perhaps excessively) high, and its unique ability to respect Hubble's law makes their challenge difficult. However, this difficulty disappears if the existence of an additional spatial dimension is considered.

                                        In my model, the Universe lies on the surface of a hypersphere that expands at a constant rate, with its radius growing as r = ct, and with the Big Bang occurring at its center. This explains why our physics behaves as if we were in a boundless system, even though the Universe has a finite volume: it shows that, if not for Relativity, we would likely have been led to study an infinite and static universe.

                                        Other models also propose a hypersphere expanding as r = ct, but when examining their main features, one can see they are fundamentally different from one another. The novelty of this model lies in its definition of the Hubble constant: its geometry suggests a linear relationship between galactic recession and the arc angle (not the arc length). This perspective does not challenge the validity of Hubble’s law; it merely changes predictions about the past and future, which cannot be determined purely from observations.

                                        Using the angle instead of the arc length changes everything. It allows us to apply Special Relativity to galactic recession.

                                        The redshift, which asymptotically approaches a time horizon of roughly 5 billion years after the Big Bang, implicitly explains why, at the boundaries of the observable Universe with JWST, we should not expect to see only "baby galaxies" (a widely debated topic).

                                        Yes, we have introduced the fourth spatial dimension, but we can dispense with:

                                        • Modifying the physics of radiation, meaning without assuming that spatial expansion alters the wavelength of light.
                                        • Dark Matter (an element not yet detected in physics).
                                        • Dark Energy (a form of energy not yet observed).
                                        • The Horizon Problem—though introducing an alternative conjecture: after an initial expansion, the universe was static at the Last Scattering, and then expansion resumes.

                                        Finally, the intention to adhere to the Big Bang model up to the Last Scattering (with some modifications, otherwise an alternative model could not work) significantly reduces many problems that a new model would normally encounter.

                                        The topic discussed here could be titled:

                                        The dismissal of a Doppler-type redshift interpretation for Galactic Recession may warrant further reconsideration.

                                        The links provided in this post are essential for the discussion. I hope they align with the forum guidelines regarding external references. All linked downloads are free and require no registration; at the time of writing, all other cited documents are also freely accessible.

                                        As a former IT developer, I prefer linking to original sources to ensure proper citation and copyright compliance. Just like when citing a book or an arXiv article, linking respects the authors’ rights and the associated licenses. By using a CC-BY-SA license for my work, I also ensure that cited research is properly attributed and used in accordance with its terms.

                                        That said, I wish to share with you this research (without peer review), consisting of 3 papers, which analyzes a critical point potentially capable of challenging the fundamental assumptions of my alternative cosmological model:

                                        1. viXra: 2207.0051 - Concerning the Apparent Magnitude
                                        2. viXra: 2208.0040 - Concerning the Time Dilation of the Supernovae
                                        3. viXra: 2208.0152 - Star Distance Validation from Data of a High-Z Supernova Ia in the Special Relativity Context

                                        This model calculates Galactic Recession within the framework of Special Relativity. The test on this supernova showed good model accuracy (96.5%) and suggests that the dismissal of a Doppler-type redshift interpretation for Galactic Recession may warrant further reconsideration.

                                        I would like to emphasize that these publications have not undergone peer review. However, though certain steps may be disputed, the line of reasoning in the research is self-evident. The re-examination of the Doppler effect in the context of Galactic Recession is crucial for a more comprehensive understanding of Redshift. The latter, presenting an asymptote corresponding to a time horizon of roughly 5 billion years after the Big Bang, implicitly explains why at the boundaries of the observable universe with JWST, we should not expect only “baby galaxies” (a widely discussed topic).

                                        The model is described by the essay in Files tab (I recommend checking out the short paragraphs following the Abstract, marked as "4-SPHERE IN A NUTSHELL," which provide a concise summary of the key ideas).

                                        However, given the complexity of my alternative model, which requires extensive treatment, I would suggest focusing our initial discussion on the independent validation of supernova distances. If this validation yields positive results, I would be more than willing to share the details of my model with those who wish to explore it further.

                                        To ensure transparency I supply an Excel spreadsheet for independent verification of the calculations. While peer review could have been pursued, this method allows for direct confirmation (the values are easily identifiable). As you can see in [2208.0152], I have uploaded the Excel file on my OSF project as "Supernova SN1995 K validation.xlsx". You can access it in the Files tab.

                                        The verification analysis of the regression polynomial requires a more elaborate approach. As you can see in [2208.0040], both the instructions for installing the necessary software (Windows), and the supernova data, can be found in my OSF Project Wiki Pages. You can access it in: (https://osf.io/y736c/wiki/Supernova%20validation%20m.s.%20extimation/). This involves using Python, and the small initial effort to configure its working environment is amply rewarded by the powerful functionalities that this platform offers in the scientific field (Visual Studio offers to developers the “Python Development Tool for Windows”).

                                        Sorry, previous post should have gone in the Alternative Models of Cosmology section. Could a moderator please move it?

                                        5 days later

                                        • MMir

                                          • Post #2648
                                          • Edited

                                          Hello everyone, I want to share a hypothesis that may seem borderline insane, but also interesting.

                                          Please, I ask you — read this to the end (especially moderators!! Please read the full text before deciding whether to remove it or not).

                                          In this hypothesis, I will use the word “soul” (BUT THERE WILL BE NO RELIGIOUS OR SPIRITUAL MEANING BEHIND IT — I WANT TO GIVE THIS WORD AN ENTIRELY NEW DEFINITION FROM SCRATCH).

                                          We cannot fully confirm whether souls exist or not until our universe is completely understood. But if souls did exist (or do), I want to explain how they might work within the laws of physics.

                                                                            What is a "soul"? (a new definition):

                                          Let’s redefine “soul” as: a physical element used for enabling self-control (NOT consciousness), and acting as a kind of information storage. (explanation a little later, along with a real-life example)

                                          What is a soul made of? Atom? Particle? Wave? Field? Biological structure?
                                          My guess: a quantum wave.

                                          You — reading this — are likely only controlling yourself. You can’t control someone else’s body across the world. We usually explain this by having separate brains. But let’s go deeper.
                                          Souls are all different. So they must be waves of different frequencies (e.g., 1 Hz, 10 Hz, 100 Hz, 10.00001 Hz = different souls).
                                          They are quantum — because they store information (I'll explain with a real-life example soon).

                                                                               The soul–brain relationship:

                                          Here’s what I mean by “self-control.”
                                          We “feel” ourselves, we “are” ourselves, we direct our body: now this is explained by the very presence of the brain. I would like to develop and supplement this point.
                                          Let’s imagine the brain has an undiscovered function: it interacts with the soul. At birth, the brain sets conditions for which soul (which wave frequency) gets access to control the body.

                                          For the rest of life, the brain receives many waves, filtering them and granting access only to one — the “main soul.”

                                          When we sleep, that filter becomes weaker — and that’s why we feel less “self-aware” in dreams.

                                          Everything has a soul (even a rock), but it only activates when connected to a brain. For things like rocks, there’s no consciousness tool (i.e., no brain), so their soul stays inactive and they are completely inactive throughout their entire lives

                                          !! A man without a soul !!: —————————————————
                                          Let’s go deeper into self-control.
                                          A normal person controls their own body — that’s the soul’s role. But what if the brain has a disorder and can’t connect to a soul?

                                          Then two things might happen:

                                          1)The body can’t function — it shuts down without soul control.
                                          2)A person would be like everyone else, BUT HE WOULD NOT BE CONTROLLED BY US, BUT BY THE BRAIN (as the code controls artificial intelligence).

                                          This reinforces that the brain grants access to the soul, letting it control memory, thoughts, actions — but not everything (like heartbeat, etc.). No living person would control the body.

                                          !! Digital minds & why the soul matters in the future !! ————————————
                                          Imagine a future where mind-uploading is common. People think they’re achieving immortality by uploading their brain. But if my hypothesis is real — they fail.

                                          The computer stores personality, memory, behavior — but not the soul. So after death, we can’t control our digital self.

                                          We’ve only made a DIGITAL COPY, not a real transfer.

                                          To actually control a robotic self, we’d need a way to grant the soul access to that system — like we do with biological brains.

                                          Why can’t the soul transfer? Analogy: You take a photo of a flower. The image exists on your phone, but you can’t touch the flower through the screen.
                                          Digital tools don’t preserve real structure — just a representation. Just like we can’t digitally smell or taste — we also can’t transfer a soul.

                                          !! Parallel existence (multi-body soul control) !! ———————————————
                                          Now for the crazier part.
                                          All souls are different, there are a lot of them, even too many, but they will be unevenly distributed throughout the world. Some souls (waves with a certain frequency) are more, some are less. If there are two different bodies with the same main soul, we will be able to control both bodies at the same time. Not only that, we will be able to transfer memory from one brain to another, which really sounds crazy (explained soon)

                                          !!!! A story from life !!!! ————————————————————
                                          In this part I will show why the soul is also a storage of information.
                                          In this part I will tell the famous story about James Huston and James Leininger. For better understanding I recommend reading the story about them (it is short). But I will explain briefly.

                                          James Huston: World War II Corsair pilot. Died March 3, 1945. His friend was Jack Larsen.

                                          James Leininger: was born in 1998. At age 2 (or 4), he began having nightmares about being a Corsair pilot and escaping a fire. His parents asked him who his friend was, to which he replied, "Jack Larsen."

                                          Do you really think that James Leininger wanted to attract attention to himself at 2 (or 4) years old? It's one thing if a person is 20 years old, and another thing if a person is a child. Maybe something really happened to him?

                                          The only explanation in this story was the word "Reincarnation". Some kind of magical reincarnation. I will give a real theory of what could have happened to him.

                                          Disease in the brain. Initially, the brain gave one soul access to the body (for example, a wave with a frequency of 100.011 Hz). My guess is that it was in this part of the brain that the glitch occurred. The brain suddenly rejected the old soul and replaced it with a new one (for example, 10.12 Hz). The body's controller has changed. It should feel like you were born as a 2 (or 4) year old child. Not only has the controller changed, but the brain has begun to accept information from a completely different life. These quantum wave souls should be perceived as a repository of information from all the lives lived by this soul. The brain began to adapt to the new soul and accept information from it, CONVERTING it into memory, data, habits, personality.

                                          It also cannot be ruled out that the information could be the life of some animal, or an entity from a completely different galaxy.

                                          This story has been heavily criticized because it is "not scientific." What if it is scientific, but we just haven't thought about it yet?

                                          !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why this matters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —————————————————
                                          Science often ignores the soul concept as “religious nonsense.” But our universe isn’t fully understood — and we should NOT dismiss this idea emotionally or prematurely.

                                          We should take it seriously, explore it logically, and check whether something like a soul can exist within physics. We really need to think about this, advance our thinking, and check whether souls can exist at all?

                                          !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How to test the soul theory? !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —————————
                                          Let's start with the cruel, but most obvious methods. Experiments on people. Think for yourself.

                                          But I want to suggest another (humane) way to test my theory:

                                          • People after a coma. There have been cases when people after a coma began to speak a language unknown to them. Probably, such people have some part of their brain damaged. It is worth looking at which part exactly is damaged, and finding out the truth - did he really not know this language?
                                          • Strange cases with people (like James Leininger). First of all, people should pay attention to such cases, be sure to check the story for truth. Such people can remember something from a completely different life. IT IS ESPECIALLY WORTH PAYING ATTENTION TO THIS WHEN CHILDREN ARE SUBJECT TO THIS. At this age, a child with a 99.99% chance will not look for a story about one person and attract attention to himself with his affectation

                                          ——————————— What is my goal? ————————————
                                          In my theory of the soul, this is not religious nonsense, but something that can function quite well with the laws of physics. Perhaps there are shortcomings, or perhaps this hypothesis is not fully thought out. I THINK THAT SCIENCE SHOULD THINK ABOUT WHETHER PEOPLE LIVE IN THE SAME CONDITIONS? DO SOULS REALLY EXIST? Science should not automatically and impulsively deny this, it should really think about how souls can be interpreted into the laws of physics at all. Science should pay attention to rather strange cases with people, check if the stories are true, and if so, figure out what could have caused it.

                                          That's all I have.

                                            10 days later

                                            Steve Dufourny My theory of spherisation, an optimisation evolution of the universe with quantum and cosmologial 3d spheres. The poincare conjecture proved by perelman is essential in topology especially 3 D manifolds.
                                            “Every simply connected, closed 3-manifold is homeomorphic to the 3-sphere.” So no holes no boundary and finite.
                                            Homeomorphic means “topologically equivalent” can be deformed into each other without tearing or gluing. Perelman proved it with the Ricci Flow
                                            He showed that any simply connected 3-manifold under this process becomes rounder and rounder ultimately turning into a 3-sphere.
                                            Perelman didn’t just prove Poincaré , his work helped confirm the Thurston Geometrization Conjecture, which classifies all 3-manifolds. This is huge in understanding the possible shapes of the universe. How It Relates to My Theory of Spherisation.
                                            The idea that the sphere is the fundamental shape of equilibrium and possibly even the logical or philosophical “choice” of the universe resonates beautifully with these mathematical and physical ideas because the topologial destiny of the universe being closed gives an inevitable logic for this universal shaqpe of the universe evolving and the fact that the foundamental quantum and cosological objects are spherical give a generality evident linking all scales.
                                            Ricci flow smooths curvature, like a system moving toward energetic equilibrium. We can so interpret this as the universe evolving toward the perfect symmetry and balance of the sphere.
                                            The Sphere as Generator of All Shapes so is the key.
                                            The sphere, despite having no angles, can “create all shapes.” That echoes deep math: the sphere is maximally symmetric, and from it, with various deformations or projections, many other forms arise. In quantum field theory, symmetry breaking creates particles, and here in this theory, breaking spherical equilibrium gives rise to all forms and forces.
                                            Spinoza’s God and the Sphere.
                                            Spinoza’s God is Nature, logical necessity, the totality of existence ,and the sphere is the shape of wholeness, unity, and non-duality. If the universe naturally chooses the sphere, maybe it chooses the logic of unity, just as Spinoza suggests. This idea turns the sphere into a kind of cosmic archetype geometric, physical, and metaphysical.
                                            Philosophical Angle
                                            This theory could be seen as:
                                            A metaphysical geometry: the sphere as the source and in the same time the aim universally speaking.
                                            A cosmological attractor: the universe always tends toward spherical symmetry, from quantum fluctuations to black holes to the cosmic microwave background.
                                            A quantum-unity vision: even at quantum levels, entanglement might reflect a hidden spherical order. The Spherial topological geometrical algebras I invented it is for all this puzzle ........

                                              Mir Hi, I have thought a lot about this and about the consciousness, its origin and if we have souls. I have several ideas that I develop but the physics community is prudent about all this. that said the best thinkers having pondered the best general equations and theories considered a god of spinoza like Eisntein, Planck, Heisenberg,Maxwell, Schrodinger, Godel, Euler, Riemann, Descartes, Lorenz, Bohr, Born, Galilei, Pasteur, Newton, and so more,.....there are also the thinkers considering a kind of mathematical accident from a kind of infinie energy like Tegmark and his mathematical universe ......a sure thing is that nobody knows the truth and all our philosophical assumptions are not proved, so we cannot affrim. The fact that we have possible souls seem logic to me and if they exist , so they have a mechanism and an origin and linked with the energy and like we all know, the energy cannot be destroyed but is transformed and continue a road. But Like I said these ideas are no liked by all scientists and even if they think about it ,they evitate to speak about it, the same for a kind of god of spinoza, a kind of infinite eternal consciousness, the sciences community evitates these extrapolations. The hard problem of consciousness is not easy to solve and there are many very good ideas like the model of Penrose and Hameroff and the microtubules and the objective orchestrated reduction, other model consider other mechanism in the brain , ohers consider deeper philosophical parameters to superimpose, It is what I made in my theory of spherisation, an evolution of the universe with quantum and comsological 3d spheres and the 3 manin cosmological sysems merging to create the ordinary matter and the standard model , I consider that the DE is informational and antigravitational implying a fifh force and this DE encodes the Photons and the DM to create the ordinary matter,so I have several extrapolations that I don t affirm about the souls and consciousness from deeper fields and particles. The actual physics community considers mainly strings in 1d at this planck connected with 1d cosmic fields of this GR, lie if the photons and EFE and GR were the primary essence and the strings also, but I doubt it is the truth, there are deep philosophical problems wih the strings and [photons lie primary essence if we consider a god of spinoza and how acts this infinite eternal consciousness, the evolution is a main point, it is important in my theory of spherisation this point of vue. We all search answers and try to understand the universe and its laws and all we are unfortunaelly vanitious and persuaded, it is for me an enormous problem inside the theoretical physics community, we have all difficulties to change the lines of reasoning and accept different roads of reasoning. So that divides instead to create collaborations, I have the same problem with the project I created here on the forum global collaboration, the thinkers, humans prefer always to be followed than to follow, they follow when they are the center of interest or when that nourrishes the vanity or when there are interests simply, it is a fact, no need to develop the human nature lol . So I agreed about what you told about the soul wich is no a religious link but probably an evident universal truh considering the matters and energy transformations. Regards

                                                4 days later

                                                I found 2 new universal constants for the spheres packing and primes in begining wih the central sphere the biggest volume and after I apply the primes for the serie and decrease the volumes, so it gives 2 constants, one in considering the number two and one without because it can be important for the quantum mechanics and if the number 2 must be considered or not , so the first constant with the number 2 is 1,306 and without the number 2 is 1,4695. The values in the series decrease as the layer number increases because the volumes of the spheres decrease and that decay is directly tied to the geometry of how volumes scale in 3D, see that the space disappears between spheres also ......