Alternative Models of Reality

It may be useful to breakdown the production and processing of received information, to consider what sort of processes are involved in generating personal quasi reality of which we are conscious. Although the processes in vivo may not in fact be clearly separate and stratified.

Basement, Level 1. analysis, Level 2. association, Level 3. synthesis Level 4. Reasoning, Interpretation or conclusions.

Basement, Object reality-foundational level reality-
matter and photons in ubiquitous base existence- production of potential sensory data i.e. potential stimuli
Non relative as observer independent.
Home of whole truth, alluding to the famous tale of the blind men and the elephant. This is where such a whole, material elephant source would exist. Source of all relative viewpoints based on existing truth.

Level 1, Image reality– emergent ‘reality’ - generated product of sensory receipt and processing.
Which signals are received depends upon location and attention of the observer. Transaction of image formed on retina, by received input photons, into electrical signals that are transmitted via nerves to the CNS. Filtering of inputs due to intensity and wavelength. Only a portion of the spectrum of ‘light’ can be absorbed by the photo receptors and photo receptors have individual sensitivity to intensity. Image formed in visual cortex from received electrical impulses.
Finding lines and edges in images for example, pattern recognition. Generation of attributes such as colour allowing discrimination; qualia. Association of learning and memory and shown context allowing later identification, attribution of meaning, in context understanding including names, emotions, names and associations of generated attributes such as colour.
Ability of an organism or device to use the visual product for navigation may result, Rudimentary awareness, such as occurs with blind sight -it’s production can involve automatic unconscious working of a device or sub conscious processes within living organisms.
Numeric Level 1 quantification. Generation of measurement products from input sensory stimuli.

Level 2 Perception (of an external reality or environment) An aspect of wider consciousness. *
Continuation of processing from level 1 - association of learning and memory and shown context allowing identification, attribution of meaning, in context understanding including names, emotions, names and associations of generated attributes such as colour .
*Consciosness can be regarded as how it feels to be an individual, monitoring itself. Awareness of; What, who, where in relation to external local environment, awareness of functioning and regulation of body and mind and self talk.
Consciousness in includes; awareness of the self both as a whole organism and ‘disembodied’ thinking mind, Self talk, awareness of the state of the body (generated from information received from it -experienced as feelings.) Includes awareness, due to processing of internally produced information sent to the CNS, of; breathing, air hunger, change of heart rate, of orientation within environment, and balance, gastro -intestinal issues, nausea, pain, nutrition hunger, thirst, wakefulness, sexual arousal , ( Awareness of emotional state, (Emotions, the feelings experienced due to information received from the body as a result of the effect of hormones on it)

Level 2 Result of processing of input numbers or quantified results.

Application of required mathematical procedures for purpose. Relations among existent particles, objects, parts or materials or that were phenomenal at measurement will be shown as semblance in the processed input. Patterns/ consistencies among the processed can lead to mathematical formulation. Mathematics can be applied to achieve a certain purpose. Perception generated will depend on the mathematical model used (how well it models the relations that existed at measurement) as well as input from Object reality (extracted from absolute truth) or Numerical level 1. (extracted from limited, relative truth)

Level 3 Synthesis Manufacture of ‘personal quasi reality, ‘how the world is ‘as I see it ’, from own perspective. Models of reality and current narratives may come from; friends and acquaintances, family’s teaching, school teaching and further and higher education, own personal experience/ patterns of perception, traditional media, social media, learned religions sources, learned political ideology, other secular models or narratives such as by reading books.
Synthesis of perception into current model of reality and narrative descriptions. (Not actual truth, because of limitation of input and what sub set of input is sent for multiple levels of processing, as well as limitations and fidelity of current model of reality and narratives to partial Object reality. Misleading or false models or narratives used for synthesis of perception will affect the personal quasi reality formed making it have even less likeness to Basement Level Object reality.

Level 3 Delusions and fantasy
Disruption of synthesis due to malfunction because of illness, or structural damage or. Alcohol, or drugs. Eg, delirium, hallucination, psychosis, drunkenness
Fantasy; imagination-synthesis, using self generated input, rather than input from existing external environment. Creation of alternative realities such as fantasy happenings and worlds . May be used as plot for books, films, games. May be useful in re-imagining manufactured quasi reality obtained from synthesis of perceptions based on objective reality derived inputs.

Level 4 Interpretation or conclusions.
Use of level 3 synthesis to reason or explain happenings, make sense of the world, from own perspective.
Passage of Emergent time is produced from the outputs of processing of sequential signal receipt. Different emergent passage of time is generated by different observers according to signals received

Discussion points

1. We should not be surprised that the quasi reality produced by synthesis, usually assumed to be reality, is consistent with the model and narratives used in its production.
2. The formative models and narratives are foundational to the believed quasi reality but not the Basement level foundational Object reality.
3. Quasi reality is individually generated, using the individuals experience and learning including models and narratives.
4. Similarity of personal quasi realities relies upon similarity of experiences and learning, as well as similarity of models and narratives.
5. Similarity of experience can derive from living within a group exposed to the prevailing culture/s of that area, foods, music, customs, Exposure to same films, TV, books.
6. Models and narratives can be scientific dogma, be religious, be other secular models
   including pseudo science and popular conjecture. A cohesive social group is likely to have shared models and narratives whether believed to be true or not by individuals.
7. AI and Social media algorithms endanger social cohesion; by taking up a lot of attention that might be expended otherwise in shared social and cultural pursuits, Lessening their influence, and over individualizing experience. Giving quasi realities that are less similar to each other because of deprivation of shared experience and shared models and narratives. Making it less likely the individuals will agree, as they are not starting from ‘common ground’.
8. Different cultural groups will also have different quasi realities (‘how the world is’, as I see it). Knowledge about the models, narratives, and experiences used in synthesis of their world view can give insight into attitude and behaviour.
9. We can not assume all ‘not mentally ill’ people by virtue of being people, or because there is a belief in one true reality, will have similar quasi realities/world view. This is a problem for globalization. Local conditions and cultures vary and so does quasi reality. ‘One size does not fit all’ though we might wish it was not so.
10. This model may be helpful in addressing; ideological differences or differing moral stances, religious differences, differing scientific views, differing background both social and environmental, different education, lack of ‘common ground’ due to depleted social interaction and technology driven division, in order to enable constructive conversation between the parties, and form suitable responses to fit the circumstances.

Georgina Woodward
The smiley face is an error in posting the writing,not part of it. i don't seemable to delete.or add a space to the intro.

Georgina Woodward
"This includes the products of vision, photographs, and 3D space-time graphical representations of received data.
Limited: eg. made from the incomplete spectrum of photons emitted by the object and transmitted as pre-light, and relativea sub set, pertaining to a particular viewpoint)"
It ought to say.....This includes the products of vision, photographs, and 3D space-time graphical representations of received data. Which is a imited portion of all the data emitted.
Limited: eg. made from the incomplete spectrum of photo ns emitted by the object and transmitted as pre-light, and relative ( representable as a sub set of all the data emmitted by the object, if data was represented as a set ), pertaining to a particular viewpoint)
I

Georgina Woodward
Further changes'
STARTS; According to the explanatory framework used here, space-time is the ‘space’ generated by the observer, device or organism from processing of received sensory inputs, coming from the existing external environment
A LITTLE FURTHER ON;; The product is Limited: eg. made from the incomplete spectrum of photons emitted by the object and transmitted as pre-light, due to the specificity of photoreceptors as to the frequencies absorbed, and relative i.e. pertaining to a particular viewpoint.

Georgina Woodward
The (Not asmiley) emoticon was helpful. Thanks, Today i've started adding sone bachground references .Maybe i can share them and others tomorrow

Georgina Woodward
What do you think of the stratification on the basisof how much processing has happened,? Are there too many levels?

Georgina Woodward
i'm think conclusions/Interpretation or conclusions is Use of current level 3 synthesis to reason or explain happenings, make sense of the world, from own perspective. Conclusions drawn by processing new perceptions using the personal quasi reality synthesized viewpoint. Ongoing updating of what appears to be happening and why in personal opinion. Perceptions incorporated into personal world view quasi reality or there is cognitive dissonance, which may lead to change of the quasi reality to fit the new perception reasoning should not be a separate level but just use of sythesisis level

Georgina Woodward
I have joined up the writing about time which had become separated and misplaced.
'[Georgina Woodward, Uni-Temporalism, the Relation of Human Beings to Time and the ‘future’ of Time in Physics, 2016, viXra.org, viXra:1612.0389]
Passage of Emergent time is produced from the outputs of processing of sequential signal receipt. Different emergent passage of time is generated by different observers according to signals received Foundational passage of time is due to the changing configuration of all existing. It is uni-temporal, i.e. unitary, observation independent and hence the same everywhere in the external environment. "

Georgina Woodward
There is ‘Separation‘ of noumenal object reality from phenomenal, generated realities; Image realities, perceptions, Quasi realities

Georgina Woodward
New title.for the paper
About reailty, a model with an external existing observation independent Object reality and internal observer generated Image realities, perceptions and quasi realities.

Season's greetings wishig you peace, joy and love, Gina

Georgina Woodward wish you Georgina a merry christmass too full of joy, peace and love, universally yours,

Dirac spinor test functions are used to construct a class of U(1)-gauge connections, which are used to construct U(1)-gauge invariant Dirac spinor test functions and U(1)-gauge invariant bivector test functions, resulting in a quantum field formalism of weakly nonlinear functionals of the Dirac spinor test functions, parallel to the informal nonlinear dependence of quantum electrodynamics on Lorentz invariant test function wave-number properties such as Mandelstam variables that determine the renormalization scale
baju

Quasi reality; what is subjectively experienced by organisms and assumed to correspond to material reality external to the individual who is expriencing the quasi reality.
Considering what sort of processes are involved in generating personal generated quasi reality. A paper called, On the perception of probable things, states ‘We have learned that the function of any area of the cerebral cortex, including that of primary visual cortex, is subject to top-down influences of attention, expectation, and perceptual task. Internal representations of the world, acquired by experience, affect our brain’s strategy for analyzing visual scenes.” [6. ] Indicating that perception is not merely objectively based only on limited input received but influenced by such things as expectation.
That is all potentially useful to physics, and in addressing current and impending challenges to human civilization; including modern day impoverishment of shared human interaction, disagreements of different groups and populations, having different worldviews, (due to differences in; faith, secular ideologies, dogma, education, life experience) with the potential to escalate to wars, and for use when carefully integrating AI and social media into human civilization. Basement, Level 1. analysis, Level 2. association, Level 3. synthesis. Utilization of level 3 giving reasoning, interpretation or conclusions. Basement, Object reality consi. It is where production of potential sensory data i.e. potential stimuli occurs. It is non relative as this reality is observer independent. Home of whole truth, as in Object material reality, alluding to the famous tale of the blind men and the elephant.[ 7].
This, basement level reality, (Object reality), is where such a whole, material elephant source would exist. Source of all relative viewpoints based on existing material truth.

Georgina Woodward
It is not useful to see the world in terms of high-level beings (e.g. blind men and elephants), or to see the world in terms of Jesuses/ Gods that are coming to save the believers while the world burns, or to see the world in (e.g. Scott Aaronson’s and David Chalmers’) terms of “whether we are living in a simulation” or not, or to see the world in terms of mathematical multiverses. All are equally nonsensical and unprovable speculations and ideas.

Physics is about taking the real world, as found, seriously. Physics is supposed to be based on: 1) experimental results; and 2) theoretical models that try to symbolically represent experimental results in a way that ties and connects everything together using mathematical symbols and statements. Anything else is sure to lead to a type of madness, unhinged from the real moving, living, as-found world.

The connection/ interface between high-level beings (human beings) and theoretical symbolic models of the world is that human beings create and are conscious of the symbols, human beings analyse the symbols, and human beings move and change the symbols. These very specific aspects of human beings are a necessary part of the symbolic models of the world.