Discussion points

  1. We should not be surprised that the quasi reality produced by synthesis, usually assumed to be reality, is consistent with the model and narratives used in its production.
  2. The formative models and narratives are foundational to the believed quasi reality but not the Basement level foundational Object reality.
  3. Quasi reality is individually generated, using the individuals experience and learning including models and narratives.
  4. Similarity of personal quasi realities relies upon similarity of experiences and learning, as well as similarity of models and narratives.
  5. Similarity of experience can derive from living within a group exposed to the prevailing culture/s of that area, foods, music, customs, Exposure to same films, TV, books.
  6. Models and narratives can be scientific dogma, be religious, be other secular models
    including pseudo science and popular conjecture. A cohesive social group is likely to have shared models and narratives whether believed to be true or not by individuals.
  7. AI and Social media algorithms endanger social cohesion; by taking up a lot of attention that might be expended otherwise in shared social and cultural pursuits, Lessening their influence, and over individualizing experience. Giving quasi realities that are less similar to each other because of deprivation of shared experience and shared models and narratives. Making it less likely the individuals will agree, as they are not starting from ‘common ground’.
  8. Different cultural groups will also have different quasi realities (‘how the world is’, as I see it). Knowledge about the models, narratives, and experiences used in synthesis of their world view can give insight into attitude and behaviour.
  9. We can not assume all ‘not mentally ill’ people by virtue of being people, or because there is a belief in one true reality, will have similar quasi realities/world view. This is a problem for globalization. Local conditions and cultures vary and so does quasi reality. ‘One size does not fit all’ though we might wish it was not so.
  10. This model may be helpful in addressing; ideological differences or differing moral stances, religious differences, differing scientific views, differing background both social and environmental, different education, lack of ‘common ground’ due to depleted social interaction and technology driven division, in order to enable constructive conversation between the parties, and form suitable responses to fit the circumstances.

Georgina Woodward
"This includes the products of vision, photographs, and 3D space-time graphical representations of received data.
Limited: eg. made from the incomplete spectrum of photons emitted by the object and transmitted as pre-light, and relative🙁a sub set, pertaining to a particular viewpoint)"
It ought to say.....This includes the products of vision, photographs, and 3D space-time graphical representations of received data. Which is a imited portion of all the data emitted.
Limited: eg. made from the incomplete spectrum of photo ns emitted by the object and transmitted as pre-light, and relative ( representable as a sub set of all the data emmitted by the object, if data was represented as a set ), pertaining to a particular viewpoint)
I

    Georgina Woodward
    Further changes'
    STARTS; According to the explanatory framework used here, space-time is the ‘space’ generated by the observer, device or organism from processing of received sensory inputs, coming from the existing external environment
    A LITTLE FURTHER ON;; The product is Limited: eg. made from the incomplete spectrum of photons emitted by the object and transmitted as pre-light, due to the specificity of photoreceptors as to the frequencies absorbed, and relative i.e. pertaining to a particular viewpoint.

      Georgina Woodward
      i'm think conclusions/Interpretation or conclusions is Use of current level 3 synthesis to reason or explain happenings, make sense of the world, from own perspective. Conclusions drawn by processing new perceptions using the personal quasi reality synthesized viewpoint. Ongoing updating of what appears to be happening and why in personal opinion. Perceptions incorporated into personal world view quasi reality or there is cognitive dissonance, which may lead to change of the quasi reality to fit the new perception reasoning should not be a separate level but just use of sythesisis level

        Georgina Woodward
        I have joined up the writing about time which had become separated and misplaced.
        '[Georgina Woodward, Uni-Temporalism, the Relation of Human Beings to Time and the ‘future’ of Time in Physics, 2016, viXra.org, viXra:1612.0389]
        Passage of Emergent time is produced from the outputs of processing of sequential signal receipt. Different emergent passage of time is generated by different observers according to signals received Foundational passage of time is due to the changing configuration of all existing. It is uni-temporal, i.e. unitary, observation independent and hence the same everywhere in the external environment. "

          Georgina Woodward
          Background and references

          1. [Solutions: Addressing longstanding problems of physics Kindle self published Paperback – 2022, Woodward G, P]
          2. [Making Progress by Thinking About Light Differently, viXra, Woodward, G., P., 2023 https://vixra.org/abs/2311.0087])
          3. [Britannica, Gravitational fields and the theory of general relativity, via https://www.britannica.com/science/gravity-physics/Gravitational-fields-and-the-theory-of-general-relativit ,retrieved 16th Dec. 2923
          4. [ Woodward, G., Uni-Temporalism, the Relation of Human Beings to Time and the ‘future’ of Time in Physics, 2016, viXra.org, viXra:1612.0389]
          5. Sensory processing, Massachusetts general hospital, webpage retrieved Dec. 2023 via https://www.massgeneral.org/children/autism/lurie-center/sensory-processing
          6. 6. [Wikipedia, The blind men and an elephant, via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_men_and_an_elephant# ,retrieved Dec. 2023]
          7. [Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing Gilbert1, C.D. and Mariano Sigman1,2 1The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York.”Neuron 54, June 7, 2007 ª2007 Elsevier Inc. ]

            Georgina Woodward
            Breaking down the production and processing of received information, in order to construct a model of the material reality human’s exist within and further realities generated through sensory input processing; Considering what sort of processes are involved in generating personal quasi reality of which we are conscious. Although the processes in vivo may not in fact be clearly separate and stratified.
            That is potentially useful to physics, and in addressing current and impending challenges to human civilization; including modern day impoverishment of shared human interaction, disagreements of different groups and populations, having different worldviews, (due to differences in; faith, secular ideologies, dogma, education, life experience) with the potential to escalate to wars, and for use when carefully integrating AI and social media into human civilization.

              Georgina Woodward
              New title.for the paper
              About reailty, a model with an external existing observation independent Object reality and internal observer generated Image realities, perceptions and quasi realities.

                Georgina Woodward
                This model is compatible with Bret Weinstein's perception mediated selection, as demonstrated by bower birds and insect mimicing orchids.

                18 days later

                Dirac spinor test functions are used to construct a class of U(1)-gauge connections, which are used to construct U(1)-gauge invariant Dirac spinor test functions and U(1)-gauge invariant bivector test functions, resulting in a quantum field formalism of weakly nonlinear functionals of the Dirac spinor test functions, parallel to the informal nonlinear dependence of quantum electrodynamics on Lorentz invariant test function wave-number properties such as Mandelstam variables that determine the renormalization scale
                baju

                a month later

                Quasi reality; what is subjectively experienced by organisms and assumed to correspond to material reality external to the individual who is expriencing the quasi reality.
                Considering what sort of processes are involved in generating personal generated quasi reality. A paper called, On the perception of probable things, states ‘We have learned that the function of any area of the cerebral cortex, including that of primary visual cortex, is subject to top-down influences of attention, expectation, and perceptual task. Internal representations of the world, acquired by experience, affect our brain’s strategy for analyzing visual scenes.” [6. ] Indicating that perception is not merely objectively based only on limited input received but influenced by such things as expectation.
                That is all potentially useful to physics, and in addressing current and impending challenges to human civilization; including modern day impoverishment of shared human interaction, disagreements of different groups and populations, having different worldviews, (due to differences in; faith, secular ideologies, dogma, education, life experience) with the potential to escalate to wars, and for use when carefully integrating AI and social media into human civilization. Basement, Level 1. analysis, Level 2. association, Level 3. synthesis. Utilization of level 3 giving reasoning, interpretation or conclusions. Basement, Object reality consi. It is where production of potential sensory data i.e. potential stimuli occurs. It is non relative as this reality is observer independent. Home of whole truth, as in Object material reality, alluding to the famous tale of the blind men and the elephant.[ 7].
                This, basement level reality, (Object reality), is where such a whole, material elephant source would exist. Source of all relative viewpoints based on existing material truth.

                  Georgina Woodward
                  It is not useful to see the world in terms of high-level beings (e.g. blind men and elephants), or to see the world in terms of Jesuses/ Gods that are coming to save the believers while the world burns, or to see the world in (e.g. Scott Aaronson’s and David Chalmers’) terms of “whether we are living in a simulation” or not, or to see the world in terms of mathematical multiverses. All are equally nonsensical and unprovable speculations and ideas.

                  Physics is about taking the real world, as found, seriously. Physics is supposed to be based on: 1) experimental results; and 2) theoretical models that try to symbolically represent experimental results in a way that ties and connects everything together using mathematical symbols and statements. Anything else is sure to lead to a type of madness, unhinged from the real moving, living, as-found world.

                  The connection/ interface between high-level beings (human beings) and theoretical symbolic models of the world is that human beings create and are conscious of the symbols, human beings analyse the symbols, and human beings move and change the symbols. These very specific aspects of human beings are a necessary part of the symbolic models of the world.

                    Lorraine Ford
                    this is an extention of the RICP model, beyond thr two levels of reality identified by Kantian philosophy, namely noumenal and phenomenal reality. Taking it from basic Image reality , which can be unconsioous and generated by machines as well as organisms, to perception and then Quasi reality. Level 3 Synthesis
                    Making personal quasi reality, ‘how the world is ‘as I see it’/ What’s happening and prediction based on that, from own perspective. Models of reality and current narratives may come from; friends and acquaintances, family teaching, school teaching and further and higher education, own personal experience/ patterns of perception, traditional media, social media, learned religions sources, learned political ideology, other secular models or narratives such as by reading books. Synthesis of perception into current model of reality and narrative descriptions used. (Not actual truth, because of limitation of input and what sub set of input is sent for multiple levels of processing, as well as limitations and fidelity of current model of reality and narratives to partial Object reality.
                    On the perception of probable things, states ‘We have learned that the function of any area of the cerebral cortex, including that of primary visual cortex, is subject to top-down influences of attention, expectation, and perceptual task. Internal representations of the world, acquired by eption of probable things,2012