Dear Angel,

I totally agree with you that the idea of symmetry, invariance, and the fundamental constants - are keys to understanding the deep ontological connection mathematics and physics. I believe that Tradition tells us a principle that substantiates the symmetry and asymmetry in nature and directs the search to the single base of fundamental knowledge.

Today in fundamental science there is a deep crisis of understanding, crisis of representation and interpretation. This profound existential crisis of basic science - universal human problems. Mathematics and physics require a deep ontological justification (basification).

I invite you to see my analysis of the philosophical foundations of mathematics and physics, the method of ontological constructing of the primordial generating structure, "La Structure mère" as the ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge, the core of which - the ontological (structural, cosmic) memory and information - polyvalent phenomenon of the ontological (structural) memory of Universum as a whole. I believe that the scientific picture of the world should be the same rich senses of the "LifeWorld"(E.Husserl), as a picture of the world poets and philosophers.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

12 days later

Dear Garcia,

some tricks, some brilliant ideas, some speculation, a lot of courage - the result is 8. I invite you to comment on the idea in my essay.

Regards,

Branko

    Thank you very much for your appreciation. Current physics, urgently needs to introduce the theoretical empirical concept of an acceleration caused by the energy of the vacuum. With this phenomenon can be calculated correctly anomalies in the solar system; as anomaly eccentricity orbit of the Moon; U.A increasing the sun, etc. Will comment on their work. Humbly thank you very much dear Branko.

    Dear Angel,

    I see that you woke up may be busy with other things. There is a small problem with the reply you gave me above: I leave you time to thing about it. Meanwhile I am giving you my vote and encourage you to continue your quest about the fundamental contants of physics.

    All the best,

    Michel

      Dear Michel: I do not understand where the problem is, I gave the answer. The equation is correct. If you can be more concise, I appreciate it. Regards

      Dear Angel,

      OK, with Phi=(Sqrt(5)+1)/2 your equation is fine. A remarkable approximation. Thanks. I am curious to understand what it means, if it is just a trick or a truth.

      Michel

      Dear Michel : The fibonacci spiral is there.

      Galaxies, plants, human body, etc, etc

      The golden ratio is connected to E8 group and more,including inflation factor of the universe and its rotation.

      [math]\left[O(GM)/O(GMB)\right]\cdot\left[\ln(O(GM))-\ln\ln\left(\alpha^{-1}(0)\right)\varphi/5\right]=m_{PK}/m_{e}

      [/math]

      [math]

      \alpha^{-1}(0)=137.035999173[/math]

      137.035999173 = inverse fine structure constant to zero momentum.

      Truth.

      What do you think?

      Dear Angel,

      If you put your two equations together you get the logarithm of the order of the monster in terms of pi and phi (about 124), a strange equation that you would have to explain.

      Michel

        Dear Michel:

        Inflation

        tpk= Planck time

        [math]R_{\gamma}=\sqrt{\alpha^{-1}(0)/4\pi}=adimensioless\:radius\:light

        [/math]

        [math]t_{PK}\cdot\exp\exp(\pi^{2}/2)\cdot R_{\gamma}=H_{0}^{-1}=1/Huble\:constant[/math]

        max. amount of information-entropy of the Universe Order Monster group

        Unification gravity electromagnetism

        +-e = elementary electric chargue

        Gn = Newton constant = 6.67384 x 10^-11 N x m^2/Kg^2

        Tau mass, muon mas, electron mass and proton mass

        [math]m_{pk}/\sqrt{\pm e^{2}/G_{N}}=adimensioless[/math]

        [math]\ln(\exp\exp(\pi^{2}/2))-\ln(m_{pk}/\sqrt{\pm e^{2}/G_{N}})-1+\cdots[/math]

        [math]\cdots+\left[(\varphi^{20}+248-1)/2-\left(m_{\tau}+m_{\mu}+m_{e}/m_{e}\right)-m_{p}/m_{e}\right]^{-1}=\ln\left(O(GM)\right)[/math]

        Best regards

        Thanks Angel,

        I don't understand the tricks of your game. But is sounds exciting.

        Michel

        Write a Reply...