The Relation of Particle Numbers to Atomic Numbers by Jeff Yee, Yingbo Zhu, and Guofu Zhou

Jeff

Thank you for good words about my paper.

I have also read your brilliant paper. I found it very interesting and have given it high points. I will read it several times since I do not know so much about the standard model.

Good luck.

Regards _____________________________ John-Erik

The same to me. Thank you Jeff, our essay is being post on this wonderful forum. I look forward to seeing more comments...

Dear Yee, Zhu and Zhou,

Approach is very interesting and promising further progress. It is very interesting to use K^4. This is common known for temperatures. I also get ^4 in other processes. How did you get K^4?

Have you an explanation for the gap between particle numbers 72 and 106 at figure 2.

Think of this. K=1 could be some hypothetical particle, not necessary neutrino. Then for neutrino K=2. Maybe it gives better results. My essay also is governed by mathematics.

Regards,

Branko

Dear Jeff Yee,

Thank you for your encouraging post on my essay. I am reproducing my reply here for your immediate perusal ...............

Thank you for your interest on my essay and good question...

Main problem was the length of the paper. I have to delete many related paragraphs to adjust for the acceptable length.

In this essay, the property of intent of the biological world and the property of reproduction are shown to be present as properties of the universe. These properties were deducted from UGF- the Universal gravitational force acting on any mass, and the fact that Galaxies originate and quench at different times and at different distances irrespective of Bigbang. The Universe behaves as though it is having its own mind.

.... Intent.....

'..... 1.1 About Dynamic Universe Model: In our Dynamic Universe every mass is moving in a direction and goal determined universal gravitational force (UGF) as the indomitable resultant vector of gravitational forces acted by all the other bodies in the Universe. This UGF is not constant force acting in only one direction. This resultant UGF vector force is varying according to ever varying dynamic movements and positions of all the masses in the Universe from time to time. In Dynamic Universe Model, this UGF is the fundamental concept; this model calculates this force "UGF" from moment to moment using its mathematical laws on each and every mass in the SITA simulations. In this way many present-day unsolved physics problems were solved. This method is different from conventional two body problem solution.[10]......'

This UGF sets the goals for every Galaxy or for every mass..

...... Reproduction......

Galaxies take birth in different times and quench (die) in different times in different directions. But the positioning of Galaxies is not random, they will come to a stable 'Dynamic Equilibrium' positions due to UGF is the main theme.

Universe is having Galaxies, which take birth and death is happening. In the Cosmos the biological world is also a part in which is reproduction is taking place. The same thing is happening in the Galaxies. In this essay this reproduction ability is emphasized.

Computer simulations were shown to support the paper.

Here Goals were created by the Mathematics of Dynamic Universe Model in the form of Universal Gravitational Force (UGF). This UGF is the total resultant force on any mass ( here in this case the individual Galaxy) which decides the path to be followed in the next instance. That is how the time is pulling every Galaxy..

Many papers and books were published on Dynamic universe Model by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe

Additionally you please have a look at the CONCLUSION of the essay and please see above... my reply to the question by...

Al Schneider wrote on Jan. 27, 2017 @ 07:59 GMT

and my reply to...

Harry Hamlin Ricker III wrote on Jan. 31, 2017 @ 14:49 GMT

I hope it will clarify your question, if not we can discuss again

Best regards

=snp.gupta

I just gave my reply below as a new post, Sorry I did not post them here

best

=snp.gupta

Dear Jeff Yee

I have study your work (Particle energy .... in vixra.org).

I am very impressed with your huge work and I find very right things there, concerning to a wave-field common essence of everything. Particularly, You correctly have explained the double slit interference of particles (by the way it is much coincide with the mine!) and many useful things also are there.

However, I am forced to say some my regrets also. The standing wave concept of particles is really are very right and this will become much more productive for you if you will start from VORTEX NATURE of field and waves (with your phenomenal ability to working!) I just friendly recommend you carefully to study my works (not now, of course). I think your level will allow you to catch some very necessary trifles from there in short time. Then you can to develop your nice ideas more successfully!

Good wishes!

Dear Mr. Yee and Professors Yingbo and Guofu Zhou,

Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate."

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Jeff, Your Table 1 shows the "missing mass problem". The total energy at the beginning of an atomic transition does not equal the end of transition energy from one element to another. The energy is described as "binding energy", and has never been properly described. The energy is "lost" meaning at the quantum field level in TPICT my essay connections are lost in the geometry of reconnection in the magnetic field. any CODATA values are misrepresented as to the influence of gravity at the quantum level.

I hope this is helpful,I believe we are getting closer to the basic unit of operation Sincerely Francis

Hello Mr Yee,

Congratulations for your essay.I see a relevant extrapolation towards this quantum weakest force this gravity,we see a relevant general method to find this force.But if I can and with humility Mr Yee, I beleive strongly that we must consider this quantum gravitation in an other way than our electromagnetic model,our standard model.This quantum gravity tending to infinity gas a problme.And I beleive that we must consider it not baryonic nor relativistic.This force so cannot be an emergent electromagnetic force.If the cosm and quant 3D sphères turns, it is not due to themro and heat it seems to me.Now imagine the dark matter the supermassive BHs in the cold and that these BHs produce these particles of gravitation and that these particles are cold and speeder than c.See that in this reasoning, the aether is gravitation from the central cosm singularity, the central biggest BH creating the speeder spherons,I named them like that.That is why I have invented this equation about matter energy.E=mc²+ml² we have a road towards the entire infinite gravitational entropy Mr Yee in fact.This cold seems essential.We have not a problem of equivalence when we consider the number of BHs and the number of spherons,because spherons are speeder and more numerous than photons simply.This gravitational aerthe from this cosm singularity is connected with our quantum cnetral singularities,that is why I have inserted quantum BHs with forces stronger than nuclear gluonic forces and spherons encoded them weaker than photns of our electromagnetism.So we can see this standard model encircled by this ngravitation.I loved your work permitting to rank better our standard model.It is very relevant and thanks for sharing your works and researchs.That improves our datas,you complete the postulates and laws.I am wishing you all the best Mr Yee in this contest ,good luck from belgium.

Sorry for my errors in English,I would say the quantum gravity tending to infinity has a problem of equivalence.

all my reasoning implies that photons are not the main primordial informations, but spherons yes when we consider that a photon is a spheron coded with its intrinsic comportments of equilibriums of this heat by this cold.What I find relevant is thefact to consider the spherons like a serie of spherical volumes from the central biggest spherical volume.A primordial serie appears in logic, this serie is p^robably the same than our cosmological serie in its pure finite serie, its pure serie of uniquenss,between 1 and x.See that in this logic ,the gravitation is the real chief orchestra because this gravity encodes gravity and that ourn standard model is, just like a fuel,a system of electromagntic photonic dynamics simply.

All the best

You are welcome Mr Yee,

If you want,I will be happy,with pleasure,I search answers :) and I like study news ideas and works about this weakest quant force.The paradox is that this force is in the same time the strongest when we consider that this standard model is encircled by this cold gravitation if I can say.In fact I consider even that a photon is a spheron coded ,like if this thermo was coded by this gravity implying electromagnetic and thermodynamical properties.I search a kind of primordial serie of spherical volumes.This quantum serie in its uniqueness like a spheron is the same number than our cosmological serie ,from 1 the central singularity sothe serie is between 1 and x in logic .I have superimposed to our standard model particles encoded like photons but with l the spherons with force weaker than photons and electromagnetims.I have also inserted a seri of quantum BHs with a central sphere for the singularity,gravitational, and so these forces them are stronger than our quarks gluons nuclear forces.l is proportional witht the spherical volumes where they are produced.So we have a superimposing of gravitational aethers Inside the gravitational aether.the luminiferous aeter is Inside and is jus a photonic sphere.My second equation mlosV=constant must be improved but we have the 3 motions of 3D sphères s spinal velocity,o orbital velocity, l linear velocity,V volume and m mass.I don't know if the o and s must be considered.

l is the the linear velocity of particles of gravitation,the dark matter,cold, the spherons.l is not constant and these particles and correlated wacves are speeder than c.l is simply their linear velocity like c but at the difference that l is proportional with the supermassive BHs for exmaple in sphericzal volume.That is why l tends to infinity like this gravity and that aethjer is gravitational from the central cosm singularity,the biggest spherical volumes,the biggest BHs.So more a BH is important in volumes, speeder is the particles produced.Hope that helps :)

all the best,

Jeff,

This finding is very interesting and may well hold some clues to the underlying structure of the particles in terms of WSM (Wave Structure of Matter).

It would have been better, though, if you had explained how this work fits into the topic of the essay "Wandering Towards a Goal" and how goal oriented structures emerge. As I pointed out in my essay the formation of particles is the most important reason that allows goal oriented structures to emerge in the Universe, so you should discuss this too, to show how your work fits into the essay topic.

Regards,

Declan Traill

Yes, fair point about the essay topic of "Wandering Towards a Goal". Since the essay is already submitted, it will be addressed here in the comments section.

We took the topic literally to establish a goal of understanding the basic particles which constitute the atoms and molecules of complex systems. Today, it seems that we've lost sight of a goal that simplifies the structure of particles. Instead, we spend billions of dollars to find new particles, and award Nobel prizes, without recognition that nature may not be as complex as we make it seem to be.

"Wandering towards a goal" takes us off the path of complexity to search for simplicity. Our analogy that we raised was the time period in the 1800s when atoms where simplified to a nuclear structure based on proton count. In our belief, we need a similar goal now to simplify particles. As the essay topic suggests, mathematical laws give rise to these intentions, and we have used simple math to take the first step that particles may indeed be simpler than current literature has us believe today.

study binding energy/ Where is it assigned? The before event or the later event,