The Relation of Particle Numbers to Atomic Numbers by Jeff Yee, Yingbo Zhu, and Guofu Zhou

Hello also Dr Zhu,tell hello also to Dr Zhou,you ahev pondered a general relevant papper.

Indeed this forum is wonderful the first innovant transparent Platform of theoretical physics, revolutionary for the global sciences community.China nd USA speaking together I like :) because universalism and altruism are the torchs of truth after all.China and USA even have the keys in hands to harmonise this planet.They can together reasure this sphere earth.Tell it to government :) we liberate the funds for this industrialisation of our solar system, and all wins without exception.Hope that USA CHINA G20 ONU WORLD BANK are conbscient in the high sphères of power that it is time to do it before the adds of several chaotical expoentials.....It is now in fact that it must be made.

Best

Dear Jeff, I'm sorry for the delay!

I shortly read you essay. The main question is: why one needs the linear function of the mass vs particle number? The last one looks like artificial value since as far as we know that the dynamical nature of the inertial mass is unknown. I try to find the mass of electron but the work is not finished. Are you really hope to find something in a tricky way without deep understanding?

Best regards,

Peter

Your comment about my essay Proton Three Plane Immersion Connection Theory concerning "1/4" non conservation. My email fdmooredds@cox.net

Send your gravity paper as soon as possible. Gratefully yours Francis Duane Moore

Hi Jeff, Have you studied the "mass defect" in binding energy for values above Z72 Thanks Francis Duane Moore

You are welcome,I hope of all my heart.That will reasure this planet.

All the best :)

Dear Jeff et.all

I have to say, based on our long lasting cooperation, therefore having a first hand knowledge of your discoveries yous is the best. It introduces the readers to groundbreaking and sweepings discovery. Thanks.

Respectfully Dr.Karoly Kehrer

Hi Jeff and associates,

Your paper demonstrated how mathematical thinking has some power to it. I like your idea of making a periodic chart of particles. You point to the neutrino as being the "proton" of the periodic table of particles.

My work also points to the neutrino as being the fundamental building block of particles (and photons). Some of what I have done may give you a boost in your work. Check out my website www.digitalwavetheory.com

Congratulations on your creative push to the future!

Don Limuti

Dear Jeff,

I appreciate your work, and your aspirations for the particle table are close to me.

I want to give you a link to my essay, which deals with neutrino and the fractal structure of matter, which is confirmed experimentally. In my opinion, there are many levels of matter that differ in the constants of properties. All the elements of each level are neutrinos for the remaining levels, because they differ, first of all, by the angular momentum. By analogy of Maxwell, "the Maxwell gears are distinguished by the tooth module".

Therefore, I think that we should consider not one, but several tables of elementary particles, similar to the table of chemical elements, which differ in energy by 13.9 times.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Dear Jeff,

I am very glad that you interested in my work.

In the "The limiting elements of matter" section of my essay essay in the second paragraph (before the quark table) on page 7, the ratios of all the basic parameters of the limit elements are given.

Formulas for calculating the basic parameters of the limit elements (33) - (40) are placed in my first version of a large still unedited work by reference [20] «Deterministic gravitational waves» in Section 5. «Fractal structure of the matter», на стр. 77 - 79.

Your question

«But if it is 137 quarks, how would it explain that the electron's mass is much smaller than the proton's mass, which has 3 quarks?»...

I apologize for my English and for the fact that I could not explain clearly in the essay, many questions, including this one.

I did not accidentally draw attention in an essay on the effect of Josephson. In it clearly is shown that the de Broglie wave of an electron can have any energy, but it is always less than the energy of an electron. Before becoming a photon, the de Broglie wave of an electron exists as a particle, which is a pair of toroidal gravitational waves. The electron itself is the limiting particle of the electron level of matter, which can form a multitude of particles of the electronic level of matter. For example, an atom, not empty, but contains a medium of physical vacuum from a multitude of particles of the electronic level of matter, which form the spectral lines of the atom.

Similarly to an electron, at the quark level of matter there is a limiting element d-quark, whose energy is 13.9 times larger than the electron. The d-quark can form a multitude of particles in the form of its "de Broglie waves", which are now called gluons.

The electron consists of 137 quarks, which are strictly synchronized de Broglie waves of the d-quark.

The main question of the essay contest, I associate with the clarification of the cause of self-organization of matter, first into particles.

Therefore, your work at the peak of this issue is very important.

In my opinion, it is important to understand that in the fractal structure of matter, all particle formation processes are menaged by parametric resonance and solitons that form the potential wells of stability of all elements of matter.

Each fundamental particle is a high-Q resonator having a plurality of resonant frequencies. Interactions between particles are possible only at their common resonant frequencies. At resonant frequencies of parametric resonance, de Broglie waves form. The interaction between particles, atoms and bodies is realized at the resonant frequencies of their de Broglie waves (particles from micro to macro scale).

All the limiting elements of fractal matter are interconnected by common grid of resonance frequencies, which is related with the stable speed of the propagation of the interaction. Therefore, we see and explore our strictly repeating world from the same set: particles, atoms, molecules and cosmic bodies. For example, of the eight planets of the solar system, there are two, practically identical in size pairs, Venus and Earth, Uranus and Neptune. The pairs are in the same quantum states and are not accidentally neighbors.

For you, the important question is how the particles from their entire zoo are arranged.

This is a very difficult question, because most of the particles under investigation are not fundamental, but are planetary systems and can consist of a set of planetary systems of different levels of matter. The example of such particle is the neutron.

The complexity of particles is comparable to the structure of complex molecules, but particle accelerators are just a miserable similarity of instrument for studying the structure of molecules.

It's like judging the laws of formation of music during dropping of the pianos with big high. For me in the first approximation only pions and muons are understandable so far.

As for the tables, then, obviously, this is also a difficult question. For example, probably the analogue of a neutron and a proton, in the next deeper level of matter, are stable hyperons whose energy is at least 13.9 times larger than a proton and a neutron. However, it is possible that the measured hyperon energies do not correspond to their true energy and can include neutrino elements of a deeper level of matter that can reduce the interaction energy.

Particles, in the energy range from a neutron to a stable hyperon, perhaps many of them are atomic nuclei, or parts of the atomic nuclei, and therefore form some part of your table, similar to the table of chemical elements. Such atomic nuclei can be charged or neutral, without a complex planetary system of electrons, such as a neutron, which can turn into a proton and a Hydrogen atom.

The structure of the nuclei of complex atoms has recently been established. I assume that the nuclei of complex atoms from elementary particles are analogues of molecules from atoms. The simple principles for constructing the fundamental elements of matter I have proposed are only a tool for in-depth research.

Most likely, in order to investigate the fractal structure of particles, we must direct our gaze into cosmos and into the structure of molecules, and also look for analogies. Therefore, in my great work, I began to study all possible limiting elements from the macro-scale to the honeycomb structure of the universe.

Then I understood the structure of the elements of the medium of the physical vacuum with 6 observed Planck spectra of its radiation starting from 3 MHz.

I wish you every success in your interesting and necessary work.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Jeff and co-authors,

Such an effort is overdue. This is quite an important endeavor in organizing and ordering, contributing to better understanding and no doubt opening up avenues toward new discoveries, lie your reference to the equivalence of the proton.

Certainly discovery is part of seeking goals utilizing mathematical laws that have come before, just as this effort will spawn new laws.

I seek such a discover effort in the galactic field in terms of dark matter in my essay. Hope you get a chance to read it.

Jim Hoover

Jeff and co-authors,

As the contest draws to a close, I recheck those I've read to see if I've rated them. Bad accounting system and short memory. I see that I rated your important mission description on 4/3.

Hope you have enjoyed the interchange of ideas as much as I have.

Regards,

Jim Hoover