1. Free Will
Quantum "random" outcomes are random or indeterminate from the point of view of an observer [1]: but are they random from the point of view of the observed thing [1]?
I contend that outcomes are not random from the point of view of the observed thing: the outcomes are only random from the point of view of the observer of the thing:
Clearly the observed thing is not 100% subject to the laws-of-nature [2], because not all variable numeric values representing the outcomes are 100% deterministically predictable by law-of-nature equations. But if the observed thing is subject to "random" numeric values, then the outcome will look random to both the observer and the observed.
Only if the observed thing has itself created new information, which changes what we would represent as variable numeric values representing the outcome, will the outcome appear to be not random from the point of view of the observed thing.
2. Consciousness/ Subjective Experience
What is an "observer"?
If the "observer" is one of several fundamental aspects of reality, then all of reality derived from the fundamentals will be understandable in terms of the fundamental aspects, but the "observer" and the other fundamental aspects will not be understandable in terms of its derivative reality.
I contend that the "observer" is one of the fundamental aspects of reality.
1. Multicellular living things including people, single cell living things, molecules, atoms, particles.
2. 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_nature , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_science .