Essay Abstract

Which came first, human conceptualization of a Source Emission, or human conceptualization of a Gravity Collapse? Whether discovered of invented, knowledge has no sustainable integrity without a fundamental unit of structure... i.e. "knowledge cannot prove itself". My essay analysis of "fundamental" is in terms of Knowledge Base (KB) access directory structures, and I explore the concept of a minimum binary bit differential as a minimum Quanta of Fundamental Information (QFI), upon which to give sustainable structure to the human Knowledge Base (KB). With reference to: World Science Festival: "Limits of Understanding", Dr. Mario Livio's assertion that "... we CAN NOT know what is fundamental.", I utilize a Knowledge Base (KB) Directory, derived from a spherical unified quantization emergence model of Space/Energy/Time/Information, to make a case, that one CAN know what is fundamental, and that accepting/promoting an inability to know what is fundamental, sets a dangerously unreliable/unstable course for human Knowledge Base (KB) emergence, and subsequently human evolution.

Author Bio

Independent Research: 2000-2018 UQS Author/Logician ... website content generation and host to over 5K annual (2017) .php logged worldwide virtual visitors to the Unified Quantization of a Singularity (UQS) Project: www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com Knowledge Base: Open Root SOURCE Directory... but as a consequence of undergraduate and graduate studies at the University of Washington; Dept. of Architecture... Seattle, WA, 1972-1979, my analysis tend to be structural/geometry, and I admit a research bias of "form follows function".

Download Essay PDF File

Sue, I liked that your presentation is refreshingly different but after several pages the novelty wore off and I found it increasingly annoying and difficult to follow. I think it might appeal to people who work IT or similar fields who are familiar and comfortable with that kind of structure. I like that there is some humour in there.

Would you be so kind as to describe what you mean by "resolved Spherical Singularity Gate geometry in plain English (sentences if you don't mind). I do not want to go to the linked site.

Kind regards Georgina

    Hi Georgina,

    Thanks for your comments!!

    Alpha and/or numeric semantics and/or equations introduce a interpretive error potential which should if at all possible be avoided in any discussion of Spatial fundamentals... thus I have preference for geometry.

    To accommodate your preference for semantics in a manner least likely to introduce interpretation errors and/or necessitates reiteration ad infinitum:

    Resolved: cognitive Spatial comprehension attained/verified utilizing CAD environment.

    Spherical: equal distribution in all Spatial directions from a single point.

    Singularity: the Spatial volume described by the distribution.

    Gate: the logicon created by Singularity closure.

    Geometry: the CAD environment in which the Spatial relationships... e.g. direction, point, Singularity, volume, distribution... are graphically defined for precise cognitive Spatial comprehension.

    I agree my approach can be "difficult to follow"... i.e. requires tenacious focus, and a familiarity w/ digital processor boot mechanix is almost essential... thus I must rely heavily on illustrations and I therefor REF: UQS Origin Singularity Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQST-TVNH.php

    If a more generic illustration is required for a readers' comprehension I suggest REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

    Thanks again Georgina... all comments are appreciated.

    S. Lingo

    UQS Author/Logician

    www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

    Hi Sue, thank you for the word list. The links seem to go to the same place and show some shapes and ideas about geometry and the mind. I couldn't see any key to meaning of the colouring on the various shapes.

    In your essay you write " In that the concept of Spherical Singularity Gate has been given valid Spatial geometry form, and mathematically constructed in a digital CAD environment." that says to me you have used a computer to draw a shape which represents your concept (also represented by the word list you supplied). Quote " our mathematicians and theoreticians can now digitally "see" and thus virtually "know" a minimum Quanta of Fundamental Information (QFI) as constituent underlying all subsequent. " How is the coloured shape a minimum quanta of information?

    Quote (from the linked web site):"In retrospect I want to emphasize herein that a digital processor... e.g. a human mind... utilizing a Unified Network, has logic functions available to it ... e.g. a minimum unit of Energy (QE) and a minimum unit of Space (QI)..., that can resolve Energy/Space/Time phenomena in a manner not available to a digital processer... e.g. a human mind... that can NOT verify an unbroken kinematic chain from observed phenomena to it's Energy Point Source."S. Lingo retrieved from http://uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQST-TVNH.php Jan 2018. Sounds like 'Does not compute to me'. I have found Venn diagrams useful.

    Kind regards Georgina

    Hi Georgina...

    Thanks for your re-my-reply, and the opportunity to correct link errors.

    My cut&paste apologies... i.e. the "more generic" visual/graphic illustration should have referenced REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

    "I couldn't see any key to meaning of the colouring on the various shapes."~ GW

    As per the accompanying text in the REF: UQS Origin Singularity Geometry , the "coloring of the various shapes" represents the fact that the shapes are, in the case of the UQS model, of unified unit geometry, and in the case of the Nassim Haramein Singularity quantization geometry, are not of unified unit geometry.

    "How is the coloured shape a minimum quanta of information?"~ GW

    If one analyses the initial boot of a simple digital processor, the initial electron stimulus must be directed onto a Physical Spatial geometry configuration... i.e. accessible addresses assigned... to derive differential electron configurations/choreographies required for intelligence.

    "The Quanta of Fundamental Information (QFI) query process, as the Cosmic Consciousness Computer (CCC://) processor boot bit differential, is a fundamental element of any information processor... i.e. one can say that an information processor specific, minimum binary info differentiation, underlies the capabilities of any information processor. "~ sl FQXi Essay

    In that no Physical Energy Information Choreographies existed at initial differentiation of Space by Energy, a unique Spatial logic/information quantization by a unified volume unit... i.e. Einstein's concept of a unified 3D field geometry... is a "Good guess"... REF: TOPIC: A Universe Made of Stories by Philip Gibbs

    ... as is the requirement for initial Emission Distribution "equal in all directions from a single point."~ sl FQXi Essay

    "It is not that something is being created from nothing, it is that undifferentiated potential information is being differentiated as minimum units of Space/Energy/Time/Information" ~ sl FQXi Essay

    With permissions supported/granted by the Unified Quantization of Spherical Singularity (UQS) geometry... I have for over 20 years utilized a conventional computer to quantize a unified field geometry environment... i.e. Unified Quantization of a Singularity (UQS)... and am currently developing/coding a UQS Virtual Quantum Lab/Game that utilizes a UQS CAD Environment to digitally visual animate, Emission Expansion of pulsed minimum unit of Energy (QE)... i.e. sprites... for distribution/propagation analysis.

    "Sounds like 'Does not compute to me'."~ GW

    As per my interpretation of TOPIC: How to Empirically Confirm a Rational Theory of Fundamentals by Jack H. James ... cognitive abilities to resolve a Math model of a logic reduction of "fundamental" are apparently emergent, and one might add, that application of Math semantics to an invalid logic reduction of "fundamental" have often muddied the cognitive waters.

    "Application design, for any logic processor, including the mind, is based on one's understanding of the info processor's underlying computational geometry." ~ sl

    REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

    "I have found Venn diagrams useful." ~ GW

    Feynman diagrams gave impetus to my visual logic/concept approach to Space/Energy/Time/Information.

    As per my interpretation of World Science Festival:Topic: "Limits of Understanding" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfY-DRsE86s, which provided the impetus for my Essay, the 4 media credentialed panelist concurred that the instability w/ current Space/Energy/Time/Info Physics, is as a consequence of the current instability of Mathematics.

    My assessment is that the APPARENT current instability of Math is as a consequence of a geometry coordinate system, in which the fundamental Spatial relationships of the geometry do not support application of minimum units of Energy/Space/Time/Info, to Space/Energy/Time/Info analysis.

    Thanks again Georgina... comments are in part considered an opportunity to refine my presentation of the UQS as a emerging Virtual Reality... i.e. it is not a theory.

    S. Lingo

    UQS Author/Logician

    www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

    Dear Sue Lingo,

    I have concluded from my deep research that Nature must have devised the only permanent real structure of the Universe obtainable for the real Universe existed for millions of years before man and his finite complex informational systems ever appeared on earth. The real physical Universe consists only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

    Joe Fisher, ORCID ID 0000-0003-3988-8687. Unaffiliated

      Hi Joe...

      I can not argue that Nature can devise the only possible "Universe", but in that Nature chose Space as the canvas for it's animated creation, I can model Nature's creation as a Space/Energy/Time/Information geometry model in a CAD environment and can animate the pulsed emission of minimum units of Energy (QE) as digital sprites.

      REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

      Do you have a geometry model of a "one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface"?

      One dimension is a lateral line, i.e. no planar or volumetric... i.e. no surface.

      "Illuminated" as in made knowable as information?

      A "finite non-surface light" as one dimensional rays from a single source?

      My animated model of Nature's creation is an investigation of a minimum unit of Energy (QE) Emission equal in all directions from a single Origin Source.

      REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

      The more clearly one understands the creation, the more appreciative one can be of it.

      Thanks for you comments Joe... all comments are appreciated.

      S. Lingo

      UQS Author/Logician

      www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

      8 days later

      Hi Sue Lingo

      Your OP "Which came first, human conceptualization of a Source Emission, or human conceptualization of a Gravity Collapse?" is very good , here I want to add in Dynamic Universe Model there is no gravity collapse........dear Sue Lingo....

      Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

      In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

      By the way.....................

      Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

      -No Isotropy

      -No Homogeneity

      -No Space-time continuum

      -Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

      -No singularities

      -No collisions between bodies

      -No blackholes

      -No warm holes

      -No Bigbang

      -No repulsion between distant Galaxies

      -Non-empty Universe

      -No imaginary or negative time axis

      -No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

      -No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

      -No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

      -No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

      -No many mini Bigbangs

      -No Missing Mass / Dark matter

      -No Dark energy

      -No Bigbang generated CMB detected

      -No Multi-verses

      Here:

      -Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

      -Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

      -All bodies dynamically moving

      -All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

      -Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

      -Single Universe no baby universes

      -Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

      -Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

      -UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

      -Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

      -Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

      -21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

      -Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

      -Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

      Have a look at

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.h

      tml

      Best Regards

      =snp

        Hi snp...

        Thanks for reading my abstract...

        As per my essay, in that one can resolve Black Holes as Energy Choreography Scale Transformers, in which Mass density disassembles Physical scale entity choreographies of Energy information, manifesting more "fundamental" entity choreographies of Energy information, which gravity, as defined in terms of Mass has no influence upon... i.e. Energy choreography scale/state change... one can make an analogy to heat density vaporizing water, and a gravity collapse is not necessitated.

        Does the Dynamic Universe Model define Gravity in terms of Mass attraction?

        By what mechanism does electromagnetic radiation initially emerge, in the Dynamic Universe Model?

        Does the Dynamic Universe Model Accelerating Expanding universe have a Spatial geometry defined Origin Source?

        Given the plethora of theories being promoted, and limited time, I have a bias for visual/graphic geometry... REF: UQS Origin Singularity Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQST-TVNH.php

        That being the case, I have established a criteria for my review of any one model.

        If the Dynamic Universe Model facilitates a geometry/graphic visualization of an Origin Source and it's Singularity... i.e. the field geometry quantization encapsulating the point Source of Emission, thus defining a minimum quanta of Space (QI), in which to distribute Source pulsed minimum quanta of Energy (QE) equal in all directions ... I will read your essay, and browse http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

        Thank you Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta for your comments, all comments stimulate my cognitive processes.

        S. Lingo

        UQS Author/Logician

        www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

        Dear Fellow Essayists

        This will be my final plea for fair treatment.,

        FQXI is clearly seeking to find out if there is a fundamental REALITY.

        Reliable evidence exists that proves that the surface of the earth was formed millions of years before man and his utterly complex finite informational systems ever appeared on that surface. It logically follows that Nature must have permanently devised the only single physical construct of earth allowable.

        All objects, be they solid, liquid, or vaporous have always had a visible surface. This is because the real Universe must consist only of one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface occurring eternally in one single infinite dimension that am always illuminated mostly by finite non-surface light.

        Only the truth can set you free.

        Joe Fisher, Realist

        • [deleted]

        Hi Joe...

        Maybe there is a semantic issue here?... i.e. I normally associate surface with Spatial concepts.

        What constitutes a "dimension" in your theory?

        By what mechanism does nature create a "one single unified VISIBLE infinite surface"?

        Belief is no substitute for knowing, and theory can be an evasion of a requirement for underlying principle.

        S. Lingo

        UQS Author/Logician

        www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

        Sue,

        Brilliant! You proved Livio false, and I agree Mies, Geometry & Godel are true. Well argued but hard to read = low scores, but I'm not so easily fooled. As a (long) tenacious investigator astronomer also architect (etc) I think your on the right road for your quest, but we're heading in opposite directions. I hope you may look where I've been.

        There's a 3D quantum scale dynamic picture of re-emission (or two) as a classical mechanism (spherically here = QM) and toroidal based 'black hole' (actually AGN) re-ionization of matter at multiple scales (published - or Google HST Crab Nebula core shots). You'll find the cat alive in the Cartesian box (NOT a wire frame!). You may even catch RNA mutations and others of interest coming out of last years essay (with pictures!) As motion is important a first glimpse of the spherical model is in this 100 second video.

        But a question; Nature seems curvy & wavy, (even if it's spherical -as translation makes it helical) may it not be reduction to binary choices that looses truth and logical consistency? I've proposed replacing the problematic 'excluded middle' with Sine curves and a 'Law of the Reducing Middle.' (Send 'hard shoulder' binary codes down a Fibre Optic cable and that's what nature does to them!). So you're not just 'stoned or not stoned' but you may then be hit by 1 or 100. Does Godel not then make sense?

        Of course you're right it's the "..constraints imposed by one's own fears." that prevents admission of advancements in understanding to doctrine (my 2015 essay, scored top, is lost in the ether).

        I'm uplifted. Thank you. I hope to discuss more. Top job and top score.

        Best

        Peter

          Hi Peter...

          Thanks for having the tenacious focus required to wade through what I realize is an essay that does not stand up well to a speedread.

          That we are headed in opposite directions, grants opportunity to verify the UQS field quantization... i.e. one of the criteria of a valid unified field is that "if headed in opposite directions" we meet, the quantization geometry of the field, made from the Origin Singularity, undlies all entity forms you may have acquired.

          REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation Geometry http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

          Although a Cartesian coordinate system is a valid unified quantization of the field, if an initial Source emission mechanism, which satisfies equal distribution in all directions from a single point, is required to provide intelligence emergence for all subsequent mechanism in the field, a Spherical Singularity Quantization is required... i.e. Cartesian does not support a point Source emission equal in all directions.

          Einstein at 72 years, was asking "What is the Mathematical character of the Universe?" REF: Scientific America ISBN 0-312-25453-9 pg. 19

          It is my assessment that if he had consulted a Mathematical geometrist instead of Gödel, who was a Mathematical equationist, the fact that a minimum unit of Spatial differentiation is fundamental to any perception/measurement of motion, may not have been overlooked for 75+ years.

          One of the logic fundamentals derived from binary coding digital processors, is that the variables of the function must be declared before the Define Function statement is called.

          "Truth and logical consistency" are often a matter of scale/resolution... i.e. "middle ground" mechanisms of Nature may disguise underlying binary code, in the same manner that the binary code upon which a digital processor is established, is disguised by the mechanisms of a digital application.

          I have watched the 100 Second Video and I reciprocate with the following 6 sec.video UQS Origin Singularity Emission https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sbzf6NlU8q4

          Digital CAD/SIM models can facilitate highly complex visual verification... i.e. if the coded simulation does not visually emulate the observed form and process, then the Mathematics is not verifiable.

          In regard to Hans Van Leunen's Essay... REF: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2978... "Much of the physical reality is inaccessible to measurement.", and "In that case, deduction remains the only way of approach.", I highly recommend that one verify that the "bench" Origin Singularity geometry form, follows the most fundamental logic reduction of function... i.e. a pulsed minimum unit of Energy (QE) Emission, equal in all directions from a single Origin Source.., before applying the artifice of the equationist to "everything", or anything, else.

          As per my interpretation of World Science Festival: Topic: "Limits of Understanding" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfY-DRsE86s, the professional Science community believes that the instability with current Space/Energy/Time/Info Physics, is as a consequence of the current instability of Mathematics.

          My assessment is that the APPARENT current instability of Math is as a consequence of a geometry coordinate system, in which the fundamental Spatial relationships of the geometry do not support application of minimum units of Energy/Space/Time/Info, for application to Space/Energy/Time/Info analysis.

          Peter, I have also read your current essay, made notes, still have your 2015 essay to read, and will review the compendium at first opportunity.

          In reading the current FQXi essays, I am convinced your input has not been totally "lost in the ether"... i.e. I see the influence that you and other's have had on the Science community with regard to it's "inability to make advancements in understanding"... e.g. James Putnam's Essay Abstract actually acknowledges "Lack of a foundational system of units" REF: https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3117... and I am "uplifted"!!!

          Quoting you "... it famously takes 10 years to change a ruling paradigm - but it all has to start somewhere!"

          Thanks again for your enthusiastic support of my essay!!

          Sue Lingo

          UQS Author/Logician

          uqsmatrixmechanix.com

          Thanks Sue. looking forward to it.

          Did I mention my 'Law of the Reducing Middle'? No more 'binary' exclusion, removes the paradox in logic! It's a Bayesian/Gausian distribution, just like most of nature. We can now be 'stoned' a bit not just not at all or to death!

          By the way, to shock even more I've also falsified Cartesian 'wire frame' co-ordinate maths. If we use 'Cartesian Planes' making boxes which can move within & without each other but with transformations between the spaces (Maxwell's TZ's) I found logic returns. Might that solve the issue you mention?

          And don't get me on Cosmology and redshift without accelerating expansion - the video's half an hour! This one's good though; Map of the Universe The Great Attractor & Laniakea.

          very best.

          Peter

          17 days later

          Sue,

          Hard work to read but excellent and agreeable. Well done.

          Richard

          Dear Sue

          If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please?

          A couple of days in and semblance of my essay taking form, however the house bound inactivity was wearing me. I had just the remedy, so took off for a solo sail across the bay. In the lea of cove, I had underestimated the open water wind strengths. My sail area overpowered. Ordinarily I would have reduced sail, but this day I felt differently. My contemplations were on the forces of nature, and I was ventured seaward increasingly amongst them. As the wind and the waves rose, my boat came under strain, but I was exhilarated. All the while I considered, how might I communicate the role of natural forces in understanding of the world around us. For they are surely it's central theme.

          Beyond my essay's introduction, I place a microscope on the subjects of universal complexity and natural forces. I do so within context that clock operation is driven by Quantum Mechanical forces (atomic and photonic), while clocks also serve measure of General Relativity's effects (spacetime, time dilation). In this respect clocks can be said to possess a split personality, giving them the distinction that they are simultaneously a study in QM, while GR is a study of clocks. The situation stands whereby we have two fundamental theories of the world, but just one world. And we have a singular device which serves study of both those fundamental theories. Two fundamental theories, but one device? Please join me in questioning this circumstance?

          My essay goes on to identify natural forces in their universal roles, how they motivate the building of and maintaining complex universal structures and processes. When we look at how star fusion processes sit within a "narrow range of sensitivity" that stars are neither led to explode nor collapse under gravity. We think how lucky we are that the universe is just so. We can also count our lucky stars that the fusion process that marks the birth of a star, also leads to an eruption of photons from its surface. for if they didn't then nebula gas accumulation wouldn't be halted and the star would again be led to collapse.

          Could a natural organisation principle have been responsible for fine tuning universal systems? Faced with how lucky we appear to have been, shouldn't we consider this possibility?

          For our luck surely didnt run out there, for these photons stream down on earth, liquifying oceans which drive geochemical processes that we "life" are reliant upon. The Earth is made up of elements that possess the chemical potentials that life is entirely dependent upon. Those chemical potentials are not expressed in the absence of water solvency. So again, how amazingly fortunate we are that these chemical potentials exist in the first instance, and additionally within an environment of abundant water solvency such as Earth, able to express these potentials.

          My essay is an attempt at something audacious. It questions the fundamental nature of the interaction between space and matter Guv = Tuv, and hypothesizes the equality between space curvature and atomic forces is due to common process. Space gives up an energy potential in exchange for atomic forces in a conversion process, which drives atomic activity. And furthermore, that Baryons only exist because this energy potential of space exists, and is available for exploitation. Baryon characteristics and behaviours, complexity of structure and process might then be explained in terms of being evolved and optimised for this purpose and existence. Removing need for so many layers of extraordinary luck to eventuate our own existence. It attempts an interpretation of the above mentioned stellar processes within these terms, but also extends much further. It shines a light on molecular structure that binds matter together, as potentially being an evolved agency that enhances rigidity and therefor persistence of universal system. We then turn a questioning mind towards Earths unlikely geochemical processes, (for which we living things owe so much) and look at its central theme and propensity for molecular rock forming processes. The existence of chemical potentials and their diverse range of molecular bond forming activities? The abundance of water solvent on Earth, for which many geochemical rock forming processes could not be expressed without? The question of a watery Earth? is then implicated as being part of an evolved system that arose for purpose and reason, alongside the same reason and purpose that molecular bonds and chemical process arose.

          By identifying process whereby atomic forces draw a potential from space, we have identified means for their perpetual action, and their ability to deliver perpetual work. Forces drive clocks and clock activity is shown by GR to dilate. My essay details the principle of force dilation and applies it to a universal mystery. My essay raises the possibility, that nature in possession of a natural energy potential, will spontaneously generate a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. It did so on Earth, and perhaps it did so within a wider scope. We learnt how biology generates intricate structure and complexity, and now we learn how it might apply for intricate structure and complexity within universal physical systems.

          To steal a phrase from my essay "A world product of evolved optimization".

          Best of luck for the conclusion of the contest

          Kind regards

          Steven Andresen

          Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin

          Hi Richard...

          My time is prioritized by my research, but the Topic: "What is fundamental?", mandated I "give a vote"... and yes... a month reducing 20 years of UQS project "reductionist" insights as to what "fundamental" means, into 25,500 characters, makes for a dense, tough read, and I thank you for your "hard work".

          In that you apparently found it worth the effort, I figured your essay would be worth a read... and it was.

          Will go post my review of your essay, on your essay page.

          Sue Lingo

          UQS Author/Logician

          www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

          Sue,

          So few have read your essay you may jump around a bit! Have a jump up on me. All who've missed it have missed out on some very deep truths.

          Well done and I hope it gets into the final.

          Rich

          Dear Sue,

          Thanks for visiting my Essay page.

          In all honesty, I must confess that it has not been simple for me reading and understanding your Essay. In fact, I had to read it twice. I think that the second time was fruitful because such a second reading was pleasant and I think to have understood something. Being a theorist of gravitation, I found interesting your referring to black holes. Your statement that "It may be that a gravity collapse concept preceded actualization/verification of a Black Hole Physical/entity observation, but that is not always the case" is correct, because black hole formation depends on the initial mass of the collapsing object.

          I have a question. is your statement that "a gravity collapse disassembles Physical scale entity choreographies of Energy information, freeing Metaphysical scale entity choreographies of Energy information, which a gravity collapse apparently has no influence upon" a proposal to resolve the black hole information puzzle?

          In any case, you wrote a nice and entertaining Essay, deserving my high score.

          Good luck in the Contest.

          Cheers, Ch.