It is a good idea, you could generalise all this with the geometrodynamics and points and the geometrical algebras in considering several E8 and in considering the fields for the partitions, more the padics analysis ,this planck scale is relevant indeed to consider, we must find the real main codes and why we have this emergent spacetime , I don t consider personally that all comes from fields but from coded particles, the space does not really exist in my model.
The Nature of Time
The Planck scale is where you would find the paranormal. Gravitons emit from the Planck scale, expand into our 3D+1 spacetime, by creating our spacetime.
Dear Jason, I don t beleive in paranormal, I beleive that all is deterministic, of course we have many secrets to add and discover but all probably respect this determinism and rationalism, all seems normal, it is like a kind of God, I consider that this thing utilises a pure deterministic universe , and at this planck scale, considering the main codes, we have also normal and deterministic codes, informations, respecting the rational auniversal axioms, equations and laws. I repeat , of course we have many wonderful things to discover and that will permit to create incredible technologies but the paranormal does not seem logic for me, maybe I don t understand well what you tell by paranormal.
Hi Steve,
By describing the expanding graviton, I claim to be able to describe everything that exists physically with the standard model plus the expanding graviton. The big bang began as a single point from the Planck scale; so it looks to me like spacetime of our universe is an extension of the Planck scale; kind of like adding a room onto a house. The Planck scale is where everything is coming from. I know you are not a religious man or a believer, but I would tell a believer that the kingdom of God exists at the Planck scale.
As for determinism, which I guess from what you're saying is equivalent to a non existence of the paranormal, I don't believe that such cynicism is necessary. I infer your opinion that when we die, we cease to exist. You can infer my opinion that when we die, a part of us still exists as a spirit. I would attribute that to the existence of a spirit, a soul, to fields and form that exists at the Planck scale.
Time is one of my favorite axioms and along with matter, you can make a universe. However, the notion of an infinitely divisible path of time turns out to be problematic. Time simply does not make sense at a singularity like a Black Hole.
There has been mention of the two time dimensions...one reversible as quantum gates and the other time dimension irreversible. The universe continuously changes and those changes are irreversible and form a very slow decay time. However, atoms change very fast and form atomic time as the cesium atom resonance at 9,192,631,770 Hz. Universe decay time is much slower at 0.26 ppb/yr, which is the ratio of gravity to charge forces times the speed of light across hydrogen atom.
Once you accept that there are two time dimensions, the whole universe then makes sense...
I would argue that every graviton is a clock unto itself. As a clock, it performs all of the functions of time upon all of the quantum states within its sphere (literally within its sphere).
Hi Steve,
I don't think it makes sense to convert my idea into a mathematical language that neither of us understands. I mean, ideally, it would be great if you said, "Hey Jason! Putting quantum entangled photons through a redshft/blue shift centrifuge as a way to store gravitational energy in the form of linearized momentum states is a great idea!!!" I admit you might have to centrifuge the entangled photons a couple of million times, but you could end up with a very nice gravity field generator. If humans could build one, then maybe they would consider that UFO's use a same or similar kind of technology.
Hi Jason, I am nor a religious indeed, but I beleive in god, like I told you, I have read all the sacred books and philosophies also , I consider me like a rational deterministic christian universalist thinking in a god of spinoza , the bible or the other books for me have been created by humans very smart to check their comportments in utilising the love, the fear, the mystical things and others, I respect the religious, they are free but for me these books are not the real truth, they are just writen by humans , not by god. I don t considere the planck scale like a point but like spheres , for me god has chosen this shape like primoridal essence, and for the BB it is an assumption even if we have several interesting datas with the cosmic microwaves background. About the souls, I beleive that we continue a road indeed and that our uniqueness exists and is transformed, for me when we die , we are in the instant in the central cosm sphere and in the instant resynchronised on an other planet in a small baby ölike all turns, with a correlated evolutive brain, so we continue to nourrish our souls in encodings other informations in other environments and for the paradise, I consider tha we create it, so we are tools of optimisation simply, and we must utilise this consciousness with determinism and love and altruism simply, God exists for me but with determinism instead of religious thoughts , but I am tolerant . all are free to think like they want , take care dear brother human, jedi of the sphere :)
There are no superstrings. There are only 26 dimensional souls that are squeezed into a 3 dimensional human body.
We can have all our philosophies and thoughts but a sure thing, nobody knows this planck scale and what are the souls if they exists, we cannot affirm, we can just imagine and be humble, the dimensions furthermore for me are everywhere in 3D , it is the choice for me of this universe, God if you prefer, the 3D, the spheres 3D and the rotations and oscillations, the complexity appears with the infinite combinations of series that I have explained, the ime the fourth dimension is just a tool like for the quaternions considering these rotations in time, but it is not a real dimension, and so the strings begining in 1D and after towards 11D are false for me
I do like the concept of gravitons as the exchange particle of gravity force, but time emerges from matter action, not just exchange force. A single photon is the exchange particle of charge and has atom sized wavelengths and resonances and so each atom is its own clock in those resonances.
A graviton is just a biphoton that has universe size wavelengths and is the exchange particle of gravity relativity that holds neutral matter together. All atoms today are part of a biphoton graviton since their CMB light still exists and correlates with the exchange photon of their charge bonds.
The two-dimensional time suggested in the first post is an incomplete insight into the true nature of physical reality and therefore of time...but it is a good start...
Not an exchange photon. Why not try to explain the whole of spacetime itself as being made of gravitons that expand from a point, a Planck scale point, to a sphere if radium r = ct? The overlap of all these spheres is what creates spacetime itself. Why an expanding sphere? Because that's what the big bang did. So spacetime itself is made out of gravitons of t > 10 minutes e.g.
"Not an exchange GRAVITON"
Sphere of radius r = ct.
Aspling's quantum gates are simply atoms with quantum phase and so quantum gate time is equivalent to atomic time and is reversible. His irreversible time comes from wave function collapse, which is equivalent to universe time, which has no quantum phase.
Actually, the universe does have quantum phase, but on the scale of the universe. We are therefore in the collapsing wavefunction that we call the universe and so of course, universe wavefunction decay points the arrow of irreversible time...
I honestly don't know if wave function collapse can be proven experimentally. But if it can, then it's because wave functions are actually trapped gravitons. A trapped graviton can escape its captivity (within a particle system) and continue to expand at the speed of light, with its quantum states having been changed a little bit by its quantum encounter with particles.
You seem to have a very strange definition of a graviton, which of course is also a wavefunction just like a photon or an atom. A wavefunction is simply a generic term for amplitude versus mass (or equivalent frequency). You should use a different word if your graviton is not a normal graviton...
Hi Steve,
Right out of my Modern Physics and Quantum mechanics book by Anderson, the definition of a wave amplitude is "such that its modulus squared is proportional to the probability of finding the electron (or particle) at position x at time t. We can write a wave function in the form,
[math]\psi (x,t) = \psi_0 e^{i(kx-\omega t)}[/math]
Although this complex wave function is not directly observable (that is, measurable) it's physical significance rests on the assumption that the quantity,
[math]|\psi(x_1,t_1)|^2=\psi^*(x_1,t_1) \psi(x_1,t_1)[/math]
The whole point I'm trying to make is that I think the wave function is a real phenomena that makes physics work. In your own words "A wavefunction is simply a generic term for amplitude versus mass (or equivalent frequency).", you think the wave function is nothing special. Your not alone. A lot of physicists refuse to acknowledge the existence of the wave function. That's why we can't get to the cool physics! In my opinion, I think that the quantum wave states, using the operator,
[math]p_x = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/math]
can be used to define the momentum quantum states. Generally, momentum wave states are measured in a random way. That is, other than knowing what all of the eigenstates are, you can't predict which momentum state will be measured first, second, third, etc.
But I think there is a way to put those quantum states in a linear order. If that could be verified with an experiment, which I can describe, you could have a frequency term of the form,
[math]\omega(x) = \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x}x \omega_0[/math]
You would have a frequency term that is linear with distance, that is, it increases with distance. What does this show? Well, take the equation for a wave function,
[math]\psi(x,t) = Ae^{i(k_x x - \omega(x)t)}[/math]
Watch this! Let's use the momentum operator to calculate the momentum expectation value . We get,
[math] = =-i^2(k_x - \frac{\partial \omega (x)}{\partial x})[/math]
The momentum is,
[math]p_x = k_x - \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x}t[/math]
Then something interesting happens. The equation for a force is,
[math]\vec F = \frac{\partial \vec p}{\partial t}[/math]
What is the force?
[math]\vec F = \frac{\partial \vec p}{\partial t} = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}(h k_x - h \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x}t)[/math]
The force caused by a linear distribution of frequency quantum states is,
[math]\vec F = h \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta x}[/math]
My idea is that a graviton has quantum momentum states already built into it. When they are captured by quantum systems, they behave like wave functions. When they are allowed to expand at the speed of light for many seconds, they overlap and become spacetime. Spacetime is made of quantum position/momentum states.
Hi to both of you, the problem is that these gravitons if we consider the fields and photons only have a problem of renormalization considering the QFT , yang mills and the feynman diagrams, the problem is really to consider only photons like main essence of this universe and so this GR is not renormalizable if I can say, there are several foundamental problems proving that we must think differently, the emission and absorbtion of these particles of gravitation must be considered in a different logic , that is why this planck scale in this reasoning becomes problematic ,that implies this non renormalization and the fact that we cannot quantize it, but in considering a gravitational aether not relativistic made of particles of gravitation non photonic and in respecting the newtonian mechanics, all seems possible, like I told you, I have reached it in changing the distances and in considering particles encoded absorbed and emited in the cold , this cold DM becomes the key. The problem is this GR and these photons and we must consider and superimpose a different logic that these photons I repeat, you can try all what you want with the strings or photons only , that does not solve the problem, so that implies that the vibrations oscillations even in the Mtheory are not sufficient , because the fields are not the solution but the coded different particles yes.It is not that they are massless but with a different mass permiting the balance universal betweem cold and heat ,in fact that implies that this gravitation is the main chief orchestra and that this electromagntism is just emergent but the main codes are gravitational in a gravitatioonal aether and space , this GR has created a problem. The problem also is to try to unify this GR and this quantum gravitation, in fact Einstein has just interpreted this gravitation for observations at high velocities, implying a curvature of this spacetime, but Newton is correct at all scales and at all velocities between the mass, that is why we cannot confound the observations with the real quantizations.That implies that the gravitational waves have nothing to do with this quantum gravitation , it is just a photonic effect , that is why the MONDs are not relevant for the problem of rotation of galaxies, but the cold dark matter solve this problem and the problem of renormalisation of this quantum gravitation. This cold dark matter solves many things at all scales and permit this universal balance between negentropy entropy, +, cold heat, electrons positrons, particles antiparticles, and others , this GR and these photons really have created a prison for the thinkers, Regards
An aether made of gravitons expanding at the speed of light can (1) provide the wave functions and all their quantum states for momentum/position and (2) expand and overlap to create spacetime. Spacetime itself is made of quantum states for position/momentum.